The layout change removed the listing of top hubbers. I always enjoyed reading what the top hubbers published. Maybe a layout modification is in order.
Top, hot, and latest hubs are still available.
I'm not happy with the new layout either. It's not as user friendly as the old one. The notifications area at the top is confusing because when you have new notifications the number in green looks out of place. It also takes more clicks to get where I want to go. Kind of disappointing.
If it's true the "top Hubbers thing" is gone, rather than just temporarily lost in the new set-up, it's probably a good thing. A number of things that aren't/weren't that great can come from having a page like that.
I think the new format looks nicer, but I'd agree that it's a little bit of a pain in the neck to do the extra clicking. I've been in the habit of just scanning the goings-on in a matter of seconds. (Maybe the idea is to discourage people from scanning the goings-on quite so easily and, instead, encourage them to get straight to their own Hubs. )
I like the new layout it looks more like my own website and not just a part of a bigger one. It has a cleaner look to it too. I don't mind the menus either, the contest link on that green thing looks great!
As for the Top hubbers page, I don't mind it being gone and not returning. Too many squabbles have ensued from people scrolling through and seeing who has high scores from who has low scores. That page was unnecessary and cause a lot of problems. I am glad that the hubs and topics pages are still intact.
My only request or suggestion would be that hubbers be able to access the HP home page (I am not talking about the feed) while signed in but I was told by a hubber, rudely so, that my suggestion was redundant so I'll just leave it alone.
Interesting new layout. Kind of weird not seeing the "top" hubbers anymore.
I'm not sure I like that.
Does seem to be pretty user friendly though!
I've always thought that "top Hubbers" thing (at least the first page or two) pretty much made a lot of people on it sitting ducks when it came to anyone wanting to find ideas or one sort or another (and more) to copy, steal, etc. Maybe it wasn't the biggest source of "iffy" stuff, and maybe not having it won't do miracles in that department; but I'd think that at least it might help some. At least now, anyone who's looking for "ideas" (or whatever else anyone/anything could find by just going to a page or two) will have to work just a little harder. There's something to be said for the proverbial "low profile".
Another reason for the change, at least for the list of hubbers that had been there so long, is many of them were hit hard by Google Panda, and they in fact may no longer be top hubbers, as some have already mentioned in the forums.
Maybe Hubpages is waiting till things settle down before making a new list, or it may be nothing more than a decision to drop it altogether.
I agree with Lisa, it is when my score is on 100 that my best hubs get copied and yes, I'd rather not have them copied... sitting ducks indeed!
Personally, I liked that page and miss it. I used to send people to it all the time. They'd ask, "Hey, you like Hubpages, what should I do on there?" I could just send them to that page and say, "Go read, the last ten hubs by the top ten people on there and you'll see what you need to shoot for."
Plus, frankly, it's nice to know who is doing something right. Gives you something to emulate.
I know some people b!tched about that page, but they were people who couldn't get on it (and maybe the three socialist who could, but don't actually get that they aren't really socialists every time they cash their adsense checks). Go figure. I think the same social-weakness that has made it nearly impossible to flunk failing students or to even describe any kind of physical or mental ailment by its actual name rather than some long-winded euphemism that says the same thing is behind the removal of it.
Let's face it. People don't want to know they are average or even worse. If they can't be on the top list, they want the list pulled down. Working to improve is wayyyy too hard. Let's just pretend nobody is doing better than the rest. That way we're all equal.
I miss the hubber page, not as much the top hubbers, but the latest. I like to check out the new arrivals to see if there is anything interesting. Also when I was new quite a few people greeted me and welcomed me in, I wonder if anyone can find the new hubbers now. I settle for viewing new hubs now, which is OK, I sometimes find hubbers that have been around a while that I hadn't noticed before, as well as new hubbers, when they post a new hub.
The same happened to me. I was lucky enough to find some very polite and helpful people when I first signed up. I'm sure the new hubbers feature was a part of that. I suppose we'll all know how it goes with time.
The answer to those looking for the top hubbers list can be found in my latest hub.
by Carolee Samuda 5 years ago
I was hub hopping and had to flag a few hubs for being substandard (word count). One hub had exactly 10 words and 2 photos. There should be a way the system prevents you from publishing a hub like that except if it's in the poetry section.
by SmartAndFun 3 years ago
Thanks to ThatMommyBlogger for finding this site and bringing it up in another thread. I think it deserves its own thread to warn HP writers. It looks like a site called 2uidea-dot-com is taking newly published hubs and putting them up as their own at a rapid pace. It appears they have filled their...
by Ben Martin 3 years ago
I have a few of my hubs copied right now and have the little 'C' by their title telling me that the hub has been copied... but I don't see anything else. I've sent out DMCA notices for these hubs, but till the system crawls them again and realizes they are gone, those little copyright symbols...
by Dr. John Anderson 5 years ago
This issue has been raised many times in the past – but given the 20% drop in traffic it should be rectified urgently (good enough is no longer sufficient (IMO)Links to unrelated pages is something that Panda and Penguin have hit sites for. If an author puts an unrelated link on their page they...
by Mary McShane 3 years ago
If you have noticed your traffic decreasing lately on some of your hubs, this Facebook page is copying content from several hubbers and publishing it on their FB page. The Facebook page is called OHealth atwww .facebook .com /pages ...
by Simone Haruko Smith 5 years ago
In our latest blog post, we've shared James Edmondson's early designs for an updated Hub layout and profile page. Check out the blog post for a more detailed explanation of various aspects of each page. But hey- what are your thoughts on the designs? We'd love to get your...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|