SUGGESTION: Limit comments by hubbers who have no published hubs?

Jump to Last Post 1-10 of 10 discussions (18 posts)
  1. LauraGT profile image91
    LauraGTposted 6 years ago

    There seem to be many hubbers who have no published hubs and are still allowed to comment on other people's writing. While there are some hubbers who are simply new and asking questions before diving in, it seems that some people open accounts purely for the purposes of making comments, often nasty ones, on people's hubs (since guest users can be more easily disallowed). 

    Should hubpages limit the number of comments one can make if the hubber hasn't published at least one (serious) hub?

    1. Marisa Wright profile image97
      Marisa Wrightposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      If you look on the political and religious forums, you'll see a fairly large contingent who sign up for HubPages just to use the forums, and they are usually people who feel strongly about the topic.  They're bound to spill over to Hub comments, especially if you have posted on those forums and attracted their attention. 

      I do think changing your settings to "approve all comments before they appear" is the best approach.    It means delayed gratification for the reader but it solves this problem, and problems like the recent spam attack. 

      If you leave it the way it is, even if you don't respond to the troll, he/she gets the satisfaction of seeing that the comment has appeared for a while, and imagining how distressed you are when you delete it.  They'll keep coming back to annoy you again.  If it simply never appears, there's less of a thrill for them and they'll give up eventually.  Especially if you report them, which will get them banned.  And IP addresses can be traced, you know.

  2. MickiS profile image79
    MickiSposted 6 years ago

    Interesting suggestion. You can just moderate the comments and not approve them. Is that not sufficient?

    HubPages is also a Community of readers. I understand if they are leaving nasty comments (they are probably likely to be writers who have a second account for commenting) that's one thing. However, shouldn't there be reader-only people in the Community?

    1. LauraGT profile image91
      LauraGTposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Hi MickiS.  I do think readers-only should be allowed, but perhaps they should have to pass a higher threshold, in order to eliminate what you described (people having a second, phony account just to leave nasty comments)?

      I don't want to have to approve all comments before they appear.  In my experience, only guest users and hubbers with no published hubs have posted inappropriate or nasty comments. When I started disallowing guest users to post, I started getting very similar comments from a new hubber with no published hubs (a little too coincidental and similar style). Perhaps this is an outlier, but perhaps there is a way to more closely monitor those hubbers and ensure that they are well-meaning and serious "readers-only."

      1. MickiS profile image79
        MickiSposted 6 years agoin reply to this

        Great feedback, Laura. Let me put some more thought into this one, if that's ok with you.

  3. relache profile image85
    relacheposted 6 years ago

    There are a goodly number of site users who would support this sort of limiting in the forums as well as in comment capsules.  Especially as it would throttle back the sock puppets created just for personal attacks and arguing.

    1. Jean Bakula profile image98
      Jean Bakulaposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      In the past month or so, I've been getting weird and somewhat nasty comments from guest users. Nothing was so obscene or disgusting that I should make an issue of it. But I agree there should be some kind of limiting. I can understand people would come to HP to read, I wish I had more time to read, as I spend more writing. But if the commenter has no hubs, for perhaps a month or two, why not give them the heave-ho?

      1. Cardisa profile image91
        Cardisaposted 6 years agoin reply to this

        I have been asking the same thing for months and finally it seems we are getting staff to listen. I hope something is done to reduce this kind of thing.

  4. psycheskinner profile image84
    psycheskinnerposted 6 years ago

    It seems to me that this would leave a genuine commenter in a lose/lose situation.  Many hubbers allow only registered users to comment.  So, wishing to comment they register--and still can't comment?

    I would rather see a more proactive approach to banning trolls, and banning the IPs of repeat offenders.

  5. profile image0
    DigbyAdamsposted 6 years ago

    I agree with psycheskinner. I would hate to see visitors sent to us by search traffic have to jump through hoops to comment. They are not always trolls or spam and some leave wonderful and insightful comments. It would be a writer's loss to lose these comments, because some Hubbers apparently can't get along.

    1. Pamela N Red profile image86
      Pamela N Redposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      I agree. I've had some great comments by people who aren't registered at all and would not want to deter them from giving input simply because they aren't writers.

      I think the people who have registered and not posted articles probably did so thinking that was the only way they could participate. They are welcome to comment on my articles anytime.

      1. psycheskinner profile image84
        psycheskinnerposted 6 years agoin reply to this

        But as many hubbers allow comments *only* from registered people, their hubs would essentially become closed to comments as soon as this suggested policy change occurred.  People do legitimately register only to comment on these hubs,because it is their only way to do so.

  6. Haunty profile image80
    Hauntyposted 6 years ago

    I agree with the last two posts. Commenting should only be restricted to the extent to which individual Hub authors can do it at this time.

    That said, I have to admit I am not quite impartial. I love rude comments, mostly because the ones I get are just plain silly. Once I wrote a hub about a trickster character in African mythology, called Anansi, and then out of nowhere I got a comment from an 'organic reader' that said exactly this: "Allah will destroy you." I have a feeling that this comment was left in all earnest and the person really wishes me to die, which is just plain amusing, IMHO. big_smile

  7. profile image0
    Arlene V. Pomaposted 6 years ago

    If someone decides to write some rude comment about my writing, maybe I should take pleasure in the fact that I got to them?  Enough that they actually took the time to leave me comments?  I can understand a reader being angry and rude over an article, but as a writer, you can always ignore it, answer to it or delete it.  What I can't stand are the readers who use the Forums for advice to their personal problems.  At the most, these people have three Hubs in.  Maybe zero.  It's like, "Now that I'm here, you can help me with my love life.  I'm not writing anything.  Just answer my questions and give me advice for my relationship problems."   And that's all these people do once they get the attention that they want.  Oh, break out the violin while you're at it!!!  They don't plan to write anything!

  8. MickiS profile image79
    MickiSposted 6 years ago

    Thank you all for the great feedback and discussion.

    I'm inclined to leave the comments the way that they are and allow you as authors to moderate your comments, delete the ones you don't like, and use your comment capsule settings to determine if its worth accepting comments from guest users.

    Laura, thank you for the initial suggestion (and great discussion starter). Do let me know if you are not satisfied.

    1. LauraGT profile image91
      LauraGTposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Thanks MickiS and everyone for the discussion.  I guess I would agree that I don't want to bar legitimate commenters from posting.  Perhaps just a more rigorous approach to identifying and eliminating trolls, as psycheskinner suggests above.  I have some hubs that are more "controversial" in nature (e.g., commentary on Obama's decision to support same-sex marriage), and have actually felt somewhat cyberbullied/attacked - even though there is some level of anonymity, it is still not a comfortable feeling, and I would much rather spend my time writing and responding to interesting/thoughtful comments. Some of the comments left would be considered grounds for criminal prosecution if they were traceable to the source.

  9. rebekahELLE profile image87
    rebekahELLEposted 6 years ago

    I don't get nasty remarks, but I don't think someone should have to have a hub(s) published to comment. It's normal to expect questionable comments on controversial hubs. While it may be a bother to moderate comments, it might be the easiest solution rather than setting more restrictions for those who comment.
    The few times I've found an offensive comment, I've deleted it or ignored it.

  10. SomewayOuttaHere profile image59
    SomewayOuttaHereposted 6 years ago

    some have brought some fun to the forums...haven't seen 'blondepoet 2' in awhile...he/she was fun!...made me smile! i can't remember whether or not they published anything - it didn't matter, i just luved the avatar!

Closed to reply
 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)