Why does the date for Easter change from year to year?
Given that the Christian celebration of Easter is a remembrance of the resurrection of Jesus, should not the holiday be on the same date as the supposed original event, that is, three days after the crucifixion?
Well, I think the actual holiday is symbolic, since nobody knows the exact dates of the events. So, good Friday is always a Friday and Easter is always the following Sunday, which of course is a different date every year.
Which is to suggest the holiday and the event is supposedly honors are both arbitrary and established by clerics after the fact.
Ah, okay. Well, I can see what you mean about the holiday, but the event? What bearing does the particulars about how/when the holiday is celebrated, or even how it was devised, have on the legitimacy of the event?
Probably because it has to be on a Sunday. It doesn't matter for Christmas. But for the Holy Week liturgy to work properly, the commemorations have to correspond to certain days like Good Friday etc.
Easter is always celebrated to keep the observance of Easter in correlation to the Jewish Passover. Because the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ happened after the Passover, they wanted Easter to always be celebrated subsequent to the Passover. And, since the Jewish holiday calendar is based on solar and lunar cycles, each feast day is movable, with dates shifting from year to year.
Interesting since Easter originally was a pagan rite predating both Christianity and Judaism.
Easter by name wasn't a pagan rite. The celebration of the earth is what you must be referring to. It certainly wasn't called Easter.
"The name 'Easter' originated with the names of an ancient Goddess and God. The Venerable Bede, (672-735 CE.) a Christian scholar, first asserted in his book De Ratione Temporum that Easter was named after Eostre (a.k.a. Eastre). She was the Great Mo
In the dark, early days of trying to convert the Angles (different kingdoms at different times), Jutes (first) and Saxons (similar to Angles due to complexity of Saxon kingship) within mainland Britain, some ideas had to be adapted. One of these ideas was the celebration of the Passion of Christ, a phrase that perplexed these northern folk. A compromise was arrived at. The goddess of the earth and its bounties was similar in each of the three cultures: Eostre/Eoster. The rite was a celebration of new life - motherhood - amongst the heathen incomers from across the sea, not the mourning of a man's passing. The two were linked insofar as Jesus was considered to have risen from his tomb on the third day (Easter Monday).
The time-lapse and fixing of the date was based on the old heathen method of fixing the celebration of Eoster, by the phases of the moon (3rd full moon after the Yulefeast, now Christmas), at that time considered January 6th in the Julian calendar. It also happens to be 40 days after Shrove Tuesday, although that was set after the date of Easter - work that one out for yourself.
As clear as Mississippi mud-pie? Or a bit clearer. You'd have had to be there when King Aethelberht of the Jutes in Centland (Kent) bargained for concessions with St Augustine, his big ace being the knowledge that Columba was advancing across Northumbria and if Augustine didn't like it he could get stuffed - which he would have if he'd got too 'shirty' with Aethelberht.
"It's a long way back to North Africa, my man, and it's (quick 'wet-finger' test) that way!'
You can imagine, can't you. Two, tall, bony old men seated on the Isle of Sheppey, on the north coast of Kent, eye-balling one another, the prospect of a better bargain with Columba (who'd only come from across the Irish Sea via Iona and could steer his way down the east coast) if Augustine's mission fell through. Aethelberht was in a win-win situation, and could dictate what his jutish priests of Odin and Celtic druids could think up as stumbling blocks for the Roman missionary.
Who said power didn't taste sweet?
You know, I went to Catholic school and no one ever explained the reasoning behind this moving celebration (ha) to us. I just assumed it had something to do with Spring break not taking place when all the public schools were out. ~ˬ•
I appreciate your very honest answer and impressions, Annie. I think that Alancaster149's explanation is closer to reality than some of the others.
It does vary due to the lunar cycle, similar to the system that dictates when Passover's timing.
Ester is a pagan holiday,and have nothing to do with the Christian faith. Bunny rabbits and hen eggs do not go together. It is all about money,..and not Christian worship.
by alexandriaruthk4 years ago
What are your plans this coming Holy week, are you celebrating it?For most Catholics and some Christian denomination the Holy Week is a big celebration.
by hookedhuntress5 years ago
Many say that the origins of Easter are pagan and therefore Christians should not celebrate it.I am curious as to how others feel about this and what their opinions are.
by X-Con4 years ago
What do Easter eggs and the bunny rabbit have to do with Jesus' resurrection?
by Claire Evans13 months ago
We know it is not possible for someone to still be walking in the wilderness for 40 days so this is evidence that this event didn't really happen. Where did the number of 40 come from?
by HOOWANTSTONO4 years ago
Passover or Easter, which is your choice, and the most important part of it.
by ALL4JESUS6 years ago
Any idea of who created that great graphic? I have seen in bumper sticker but know nothing of its origin.
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.