"Shood Eenglish speleng be funetik?"
As a reading instructor, I offin wunder. Yoor tern too wa in!
Definitely not. It's bad enough trying to wade through some people's typos. I'm thinking about English as it's spoken in the U.S. There are several dialects spread across the country which means one word can be pronounced several different ways depending on the region where it's being used. If everyone spelled the words based on the way they pronounce it, there would be no set standard. If we take the step to use the phonetic spellings for words, why no go a step further and let our kids always write the way they type in text messages?
You make a good point about different dialects and pronunciations in different areas. Standard spelling is another big issue. Getting bureaucrats to agree on any changes is a steep uphill battle, e.g., changing from standard to metric measurement.
Funny but interesting question, i scribble. I think it would be confusing because we all have different pronunciations and dialects. We've become accustomed to the spelling of words being consistent as we get used to each other saying them differently.
Haha. No! I am a language student and I find phonetics difficult to do that is why it is good to keep on using the spelling as is.
You mean like they use to do in the Domesday Book before someone invented a degree of standardisation into the language ?
Besides if you look more closely at Americanese I think you'll find they more or less 'Spel Lik That !"
I think you're saying we need standardized spelling, and I agree. I just wish it could be more phonetic, one letter for each sound, etc. I'm sure you've noticed some spellings are different in Britain and U.S., like standardise(ze) and colour/color.
Eye dew nut know.
I can tell you this, a spell checker would not look twice at that sentence since they are all words and as far as it is concerned. The sentence is okay since all of the words are spelled correctly.
Ah my mind goes back to Gallagher's old standup routine.
But seriously no I think we do need to get back to the basics of education and teach English the way it was taught rather than accepting what we have today where few can spell or write and fewer still can make themselves understood.
I am somewhat reminded of Chinese history.
Before the written language every region, even different villages, couldn't speak to each other. It was really quite a mess and impossible to govern or even trade widely.
In the 12th century the Emperor got fed up with it all and decreed that everyone in China would learn to read and write his script.
Fortunately for English there aren't 3000 symbols to memorize and we can learn to sound out words with reasonable accuracy.
Yes there are a lot of contradictory and confusing things in the English language but it is probably the best there is and its worth learning correctly.
Great point about the history of written language and the need for commonality in spoken and written word. I've heard that some other languages are more phonetic than English, such as Spanish and French. Don't know what makes a language 'best'.
Sometimes it can already be difficult to figure out what someone means or is really saying when you read what's written down, if things weren't spelled correctly I think I'd get it wrong even more.
For those that are dyslexic I don't know the answer to that one. I guess it depends on the age of the child. Maybe letting the younger child learn phonetically would get them started and then as they get a bit older get them to incorporate more correct spelling into their writings.
I know it's possible for someone to be dyslexic and still succeed in school. I don't see how they can succeed without being able to spell correctly.
Oh, my inner critic just died inside a little reading this lol
No, I would hate to see that. Also, what about different accents where words sound different for example people in my neighboring state of Missouri who already don't know how to pronounce it and say "mizuruh" would that not confuse all of those who don't live there when we spell it phonetically? Although phonetic spelling may help out with those who don't understand that my state is NOT pronounced Illinoise lol
It's a pity we didn't start this centuries ago when the language was young. Alas, you can't teach an old tongue new spelling!
by Baileybear 8 years ago
I raise this question after reading an informative hub on keyword searches. I asked the writer if she uses American spelling if gets more hits, even though from UK and she said yes, as well as using American terms. Will the English language ever be standardised? (swap the s for a...
by Alan 6 years ago
After so many posts in reply to the question of "your" and "you're," I don't have time to look through them all, but it does not seem to me that anyone has put forward the obvious need for having spelling and grammar correct.The English language is very reliant upon context,...
by skeptics r us 8 years ago
Does anyone agree with me that spelling should be required thru 12th grade?I've seen so many spelling errors on web pages lately. That includes 'help wanted' pages!!!!!! It's a scary thought that our future is in the hands of people that are not even aware that there's a problem.
by Duane Hennessy 5 weeks ago
Writing from Australia we use some different words to England and the US we also have a mixture of spellings from both countries.A classic example, in relation to an article I'm currently writing, is the word for sneakers.In England they use the word trainers, in the US they use sneakers and in...
by Venkatachari M 17 months ago
Why are people using more and more confusing and ambiguous words nowadays?I am seeing this trend nowadays very frequently that words get used which can refer to two or more meanings thereby creating confusion among readers.For example, "Tire" instead of Tyre". Tire refers to getting...
by ZSY264 9 years ago
Now, I have recently joined this community and I must say some of the articles I've read were wrought with grammatical errors or a strange juxtaposition of word choices. Now, let me make myself clear: I do not think that those hubs that were laden with valuable information were useless or bad...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|