If you follow the rich and famous be it footballers or film stars or royalty you will then see that money does buy literally anything that takes your fancy and an attractive spouse! Take Mick Jagger for instance, he always had a beauty on his arm and his looks are nothing to write home about! Making a choice on those principles I would rather be 'Rich'. It's true that money doesn't always buy happiness but it easier to be happy without financial worries..
I know this is not the answer to your question. What I would want MOST out of life is Piece of mind. No matter how good looking you are or how much money you have is irrelevant if you are not happy. Piece of mind is Priceless.
Rich! Attractiveness can only get one so far- there are plenty of attractive people who are not wealthy and plenty of wealthy people who are not attractive. Personally, I'd prefer to have lots of money and a large mansion.
Okay! Im gonna change my answer. I think ill go with looks. Then i can make money FROM my looks. ....cause apparently beauty CANNOT buy you looks. LOOK at the face of Versace, a BILLION DOLLAT EMPIRE :
It Seems That Ugly People Are More Anti-Social and Violent Than Good Looking People. Do You Agree?Whether it be cops or politicians, usually it's the ugly ones who are making the news, killing people, and creating...