Why Men love Women (Erotically)?

1. 0

   PhenomWriterposted 12 years ago

   Except from the erotic-factor, what else is there? Buddha left home, and after he gained Enlightenment, advised everybody to say away from women ... .... was he another blind man establishing his subjective prejudice upon the world?

   replyreport
   1. 89

      CyclingFitnessposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      The flowing nature of their body in contrast with ours and the pure difference within them.
      
      It may be within man's constant need for acceptance.
      
      It's true that a bad woman can lead a good man astray.

      replyreport
      1. 59

         Disturbiaposted 12 years agoin reply to this

         That's a bunch of crap.  No one can lead anyone astray unless they are a willing party to being lead.  A truly good man would not be lead astray.

         replyreport
         1. 89

            CyclingFitnessposted 12 years agoin reply to this

            No- a weak man can be led astray very easily.
            
            And that is irrespective of him being a good man or not!

            replyreport
         2. 0

            Daniella Lopezposted 12 years agoin reply to this

            You can't force the willing... lol/

            replyreport
   2. 57

      Felixedet2000posted 12 years agoin reply to this

      Remember that women were specially design and prepared for the enjoyment of men, yes women do make men to be high just like drugs. But when you want to do away with the addiction that comes via women, you abstain totally from them otherwise you'll be consumed by them.

      replyreport
      1. 59

         couturepopcafeposted 12 years agoin reply to this

         I'm not even going to touch this one.

         replyreport
      2. 0

         PhenomWriterposted 12 years agoin reply to this

         Are you a psychologist or something?

         replyreport
         1. 60

            Chaotic Chicaposted 12 years agoin reply to this

            I think you got the psych part right but it ends at the first o.

            replyreport
            1. 0

               PhenomWriterposted 12 years agoin reply to this

               Is that a joke?

               replyreport
   3. 61

      Dave Mathewsposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      There is a gigantic difference between loving someone and being in love with someone. Being in love should translate to being in "LUST" with someone. It is not until we can get past the lust, that real love comes into the picture.

      replyreport
      1. 0

         PhenomWriterposted 12 years agoin reply to this

         And what is  'that real love' Dave?

         replyreport
         1. 59

            couturepopcafeposted 12 years agoin reply to this

            ISTG you sound like the computer in War Games.

            replyreport
            1. 0

               PhenomWriterposted 12 years agoin reply to this

               And you sound like a virus in the harddisk

               replyreport
               1. 59

                  couturepopcafeposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                  Sorry, I was just referring to the way the computer talked to Dave in War Games.  Nothing personal.

                  replyreport
   4. 59

      cenabcn1posted 12 years agoin reply to this

      lolz

      replyreport
2. 64

   Greek Oneposted 12 years ago

   they smell nice and are soft
   
   some can make a mean casserole... and others know how to raise your children

   replyreport
3. 59

   Disturbiaposted 12 years ago

   I think it's biology and the natural instinct needed for the survival of the species.

   replyreport
   1. 47

      ajayshah2005posted 12 years agoin reply to this

      I agree. It is a natural phenomena and also for the continuity of human existence on the earth.

      replyreport
   2. 0

      PhenomWriterposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      Good reply...scientific...though we still don't know what 'biological life' is. But does your point make Buddha's ideas invalid? That is...what if a man chooses to remain celibate throughout his life - isn't that a good choice?

      replyreport
      1. 59

         couturepopcafeposted 12 years agoin reply to this

         Buddha was very simply denying the flesh so he could concentrate on the higher plane of the spirit.  Nothing weird or mysterious there.  However, as the saying goes, it's easy to be a holy man sitting on top of a mountain.

         replyreport
         1. 0

            PhenomWriterposted 12 years agoin reply to this

            So you are saying that the 'higher plane of the spirit' exists? Who said flesh has anything to do with mountains?

            replyreport
            1. 0

               PhenomWriterposted 12 years agoin reply to this

               "Flesh is only and only important to those dogs who can not control it."

               replyreport
            2. 59

               couturepopcafeposted 12 years agoin reply to this

               Yes, IMO the higher plane of spirit exists.  The reference to the mountain means that Buddha separated himself from others so as to meditate on what is.  It would have been far more difficult to do this had he stayed within the community surrounded by people who might otherwise influence his quest.

               replyreport
4. 77

   stclairjackposted 12 years ago

   because light loves the dark,... silence loves the loud,... sand loves the sea,... because life is ballance,... and woman ballances man.

   replyreport
   1. 79

      skyfireposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      Eh ?

      replyreport
      1. 64

         Greek Oneposted 12 years agoin reply to this

         I.E. our ying loves their yang

         replyreport
         1. 59

            couturepopcafeposted 12 years agoin reply to this

            I think it's the other way around.  Your the one with the ...yang.

            replyreport
            1. 64

               Greek Oneposted 12 years agoin reply to this

               ...lost it when i said 'i do'

               replyreport
      2. 77

         stclairjackposted 12 years agoin reply to this

         it was just a bit of prose,... my romatic slipped out for a sec,... i real it back in and put it away.
         
         men love it,.... IT,... they aso like clean socks and cheese burgers.

         replyreport
5. 64

   Greek Oneposted 12 years ago

   ... and don't forget the casserole

   replyreport
6. 79

   skyfireposted 12 years ago

   Thanks. For the first time i missed Confucius type of post.

   replyreport
   1. 77

      stclairjackposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      i am confucious now?,.... cool,.... an upgrade.

      replyreport
7. 79

   skyfireposted 12 years ago

   lol

   replyreport
8. 95

   cat on a soapboxposted 12 years ago

   In addition to sex, food, and offspring,I think men appreciate being needed in ways that balance the attributes of women. A man will often feel emasculated by an extremely strong-willed woman or trapped by a constant nag. Erotically, men love women because we are warm, soft, curvaceous, and mysterious. Women also have complex natural scents/tastes that attract men.

   replyreport
   1. 59

      couturepopcafeposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      The same reasons they love a hot New York pretzel from a street vendor.

      replyreport
9. 60

   Chaotic Chicaposted 12 years ago

   The 'christian' or 'religious' view on this is simply that that is the way God intended it to be; that he made woman for man, to entertain him (so to speak) and be his partner.
   
   The 'physics' view on this has to do with pheremones and hormones and the biology of humans as animals.  When everything boils down to the basics, we may be 'higher thinking' and 'higher functioning' (the credit so often belonging to that all-important opposable thumb) but we are indeed animals.  Men love women for the same reason women love men, it is necessary for species survival.
   
   The question you seem to be asking has less to do with attraction then in attempting to find validity in celibacy.  With a population threatening to overwhelm this Earth and a rampant spreading of so many viruses and STDs there are more pros to remaining sexually innocent than there are cons.  Whether or not that is a 'good choice' is a matter of personal opinion. 
   
   That said there is a reason so many monks, or other celibate societies, tend to establish living compounds in remote locations.  It is due to an effort to distance themselves from the temptations natural within themselves.  In other words, there is nothing wrong celibacy but your body will betray your mind when given the proper circumstances.
   
   *disclaimer~there are plenty of men whom embody the characteristics of a 'siren', leading astray an innocent woman despite herself.

   replyreport
   1. 0

      PhenomWriterposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      "... but we are indeed animals"
      
      Can you tell me what is this thing that you call 'animal'?

      replyreport
      1. 0

         PhenomWriterposted 12 years agoin reply to this

         If you don't know the definition of 'animal', then overthrow that idea.

         replyreport
      2. 60

         Chaotic Chicaposted 12 years agoin reply to this

         An animal by definition is any living organism, excluding plants and bacteria. Specifically, we are mammals whick, by definition, are any of a large class of warm blooded, sometimes hairy,  verebrates whose offspring are fed with milk secreted   by the female mammary glands.
         
         All animals essentialy follow the sam basic perameters when reproductive maturity has been reached, that being the standard goal of find a suitable mate and repopulate the species.  The only difference with humans is that we have the luxury of higher thinking though we do not always use it.
         And in regards to the time delay in geting back to you, it was not due to lack of understanding of what I wrote, as you seem to be insinuating, rather a call to responsiblity as I  had work to do.
         Additionally, an a brutish, debased, or inhuman person is referred to as an animal.

         replyreport
         1. 64

            Greek Oneposted 12 years agoin reply to this

            why does this post turn me on????

            replyreport
            1. 60

               Chaotic Chicaposted 12 years agoin reply to this

               Perhaps you find intelligent thought processes stimulating.  Or perhaps your baser mammalion instincts are homing in on the mammaries...I 'll let you use your higher thinking to figure it out.

               replyreport
               1. 64

                  Greek Oneposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                  yeah.. i would go with the mammaries theory

                  replyreport
                  1. 60

                     Chaotic Chicaposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                     Yeah, I kind of thought so.!

                     replyreport
         2. 60

            Chaotic Chicaposted 12 years agoin reply to this

            Please excuse my grammarical errors, my laptop has  crased and I  am using my son's tablet. I am not yet used to typing this way. 

            replyreport
         3. 0

            PhenomWriterposted 12 years agoin reply to this

            I genuinely appreciate you Chaotic Chica, for this reply. Thank you that you replied.
            
            I might have asked you what is this thing called  'living organism'; but leave that for another day!

            replyreport
            1. 60

               Chaotic Chicaposted 12 years agoin reply to this

               I would say that a basic definition of living organism would be any living creature or being with an internal structure of organs and parts that work together to maintain it's life, without which it would cease to live.

               replyreport
               1. 0

                  PhenomWriterposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                  "to maintain it's life"   -Can you define this thing that you call here 'life'?

                  replyreport
                  1. 60

                     Chaotic Chicaposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                     Life is the property that distinguishes plants and animals from inrganic manner, specifically the cellular biochemichal activity characterized by the ingestion of nutrients, the storage anduse of energy, the excretion of wastes, growth, repeoduction, etc.
                     And yes, this time I decided to get you the Webster definition 

                     replyreport
                     1. 0

                        PhenomWriterposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                        Does that definition say exactly what is the difference between a stone, and a human being?

                        replyreport
                        1. 60

                           Chaotic Chicaposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                           Well, unless a stone excretes waste and reproduces, I am fairly certain that the above mentioned Webster defintion clarifies the difference. 

                           replyreport
                           1. 0

                              PhenomWriterposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                              Right! ...but what is the difference between a dead body, and a living human being?

                              replyreport
                              1. 64

                                 Greek Oneposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                                 the same between a wife's eagerness in the bedroom after and before marriage

                                 replyreport
                                 1. 0

                                    PhenomWriterposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                                    ...such a serious reply

                                    replyreport
                              2. 0

                                 PhenomWriterposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                                 ...And how are you so sure that something needs to have to 'excretes waste and reproduce', in order to have 'life'? Who knows they don't have life?

                                 replyreport
                     2. 0

                        PhenomWriterposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                        To put it simply - I want to make a dead human being alive. How can I implant life into his body again?

                        replyreport
                        1. 60

                           Chaotic Chicaposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                           See Mary Shelley's Frankenstien.

                           replyreport
                           1. 0

                              PhenomWriterposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                              I love  Prometheus, not  Frankenstien.
                              
                              You may have missed this one...And how are you so sure that something needs to have to 'excretes waste and reproduce', in order to have 'life'? Who knows that stones don't have life?

                              replyreport
                              1. 0

                                 PhenomWriterposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                                 What is 'inorganic', and what is 'organic'?

                                 replyreport
                                 1. 60

                                    Chaotic Chicaposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                                    I have every intention of resuming this amusing repetoire at the earliest convenience however I have an engagement to attend to so I will bid you adieu until then.

                                    replyreport
                                    1. 0

                                       PhenomWriterposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                                       Ah...you left, no one is right here right now... 

                                       report
                                    2. 0

                                       PhenomWriterposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                                       Hey, give me the answer of "What is 'inorganic', and what is 'organic'?" , after you come back?

                                       report
                                    3. 60

                                       Chaotic Chicaposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                                       Organic being  the chemical or carbon makeup of a being of living organisms. Inorganic, according to my english teacher, is the opposite. And we have already discussed the defintion of ohrganism.
                                       In regards to the stone, which is the solid, nonmetalic mineral matter rock is made of, is scientificadlly incapable of spontaniously creating energy. Read SPONTANIOUSLY. It may be organic but it does not meet any of the criteria to be considered live/alive.

                                       report
                                    4. 0

                                       PhenomWriterposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                                       Coal and Petrol and Diesel are all made of carbon - Are they alive?

                                       report
                                    5. 60

                                       Chaotic Chicaposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                                       They absolutely meet the criteria for being organic but not for being living.  They may be used to produce energy but they do not store or create energy sans assistance from any outside source nor do they consume nutrients ergo no waste production either.

                                       report
                                    6. 0

                                       PhenomWriterposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                                       I heard that a dead body also 'consume nutrients' and does 'waste production' - because they are alive.
                                       
                                       Why are they alive? -Because they have 'life'. My spanish teacher told me so.

                                       report
                                    7. 60

                                       Chaotic Chicaposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                                       Well I will have to be honest and say that I have never before heard of a dead body 'consuming nutrients' but in a way they do 'produce waste' via the process of decomposition. However, none of the internal organs or parts are working at all, they are certainly not creating or using energy, nor are they capable of reproduction anymore.  The two defining characteristics that do exist are no more than by-products of decomposition, not proof of life.

                                       report
                                    8. 0

                                       PhenomWriterposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                                       not proof of life.  -what is now 'life'?

                                       report
                                    9. 60

                                       Chaotic Chicaposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                                       The definition of life was already divulged, the existence of the sum of it's parts are required to ascertain that a thing is live thus providing proof.  Accordingly, the absence of the sum of the parts no longer sustains the definition thus the characterisation of  death, not life.  Now that we have come full circle on this topic I believe it is time to lay this thread to rest. 

                                       report
                                 2. 0

                                    PhenomWriterposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                                    Leave that for another day!

                                    replyreport
10. 41

    boby325posted 12 years ago

    I think god has given this feature to the men to keep His world full of human being. If the men had not any erotic feelings to women, no new life would born.

    replyreport
    1. 61

       ikechiawazieposted 12 years agoin reply to this

       Women were created not just to help men but TO BE LOVED BY MEN. Its one mystery that you can only ask God

       replyreport