Lol, Romney Introduces His Wife as a Heavyweight

Jump to Last Post 1-11 of 11 discussions (90 posts)

68
bgamallposted 12 years ago
This poor man is simply clueless. Totally politically clueless. He lacks a certain subtle intelligence crucial to discussing world affairs with the leaders of the world. Gaffe after Gaffe after Gaffe:

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/power-playe … 15755.html
reply report
1. 0
  JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  1 - Every politician makes gaffes. Obama has had more than his fair share.
  
  2 - This really isn't as bad as you make it. He used a term that refers to the best of all fighters, and clarified his meaning, nor did she take offense at it.
  
  Do you make this much of a deal about Obama's gaffes?
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  57 states 57 states 57 states 57 states.....
  
  Years later, 57 states 57 states 57 states
  reply report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Yes, that's one of them. Why focus on the gaffes of one side and pretend the gaffes on the other side don't matter?
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Ask the Romney supporters...they are the ones making that case.
  
  Romney just made a slip...which is what the dems said about Obama and 57 states.
  
  But the R's here kept pushing and pushing 57 states to make fun of Obama.
  
  Tell them to stop the 57 states thing!
  reply report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  This is always the problem.
  
  Go make the other side stop first.
  
  It's the other sides fault.
  
  They started it.
  
  I'm saying, if someone calls a R gaffe a gaffe and a D gaffe a slip, they aren't being honest. There's no reason to focus on one side only.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Who did that?
  reply report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  You just did.
  
  I pointed out to the OP that it's not good to focus on the gaffes of one side. My position is that it's not good to focus on either side. Then you come in and start pointing at the Rs.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  You asked this question:
  
  "Do you make this much of a deal about Obama's gaffes?"
  
  I pointed out that they did.
  reply report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I asked bgamall if he makes as big of a deal about Obama's gaffes. This is a thread about Romney, I wanted to see if he makes the same big deal about D gaffes.
  
  Your response was not only irrelevant, but it proved my point.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I geuss you missed it when every day there were 40 threads attacking Obama.
  
  Should someone have gone on there and asked them if they did the same with Bush?
  
  Ask any R if they attack R's the same way they attack Dems...what do you think the answer will be? Of course not.
  reply report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  You're still doing it! I don't condone R's or D's doing it.
  
  Nor am I an R.
  
  The point is that nobody should be doing it, but you just keep pointing to the R's.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I didn't see you asking Longhunter that when he made a thread with the title hate mongering liberals attacking the dead.
  
  You see--that's my problem here at hp.
  
  All these people claim to be fair, or indepenent, but they usually favor the right.
  report
  92
  habeeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Favoring one side and NEVER admitting that the other side is wrong are two different critters.
  report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I would say that applies to LH.
  report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I didn't respond to that thread because I wasn't a follower of the people being attacked. I don't usually inject myself into conversations I don't know about.
  
  It's all about justification. You say you see it all the time here, so you do it too?
  report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  It's people speaking their mind...you seem to want everybody to act a certain way.
  
  We are who we are.
  report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Ah, you don't believe humans can change and grow?
  
  Sorry, I do.
  
  I used to be an R, and everything the D's did was evil. Then someone helped me open my eyes. Nobody should be hating on someone because of what side they are on, we all need to try working together.
  report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Well, I geuss when you take a republican to task--I'll believe you more.
  
  You see-I've been down this road before.
  
  Had people lecture me about being one--sided while allowing their republican friends to go on as partisan as ever.
  
  Let's see if you are an equal opportunity questioner.
  report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Pessimistic then. I've done my fair share, I think Newt is one of the scummiest people to ever have lived, and I've criticized him for his personal conduct. I've done my research on Romney, but not on Santorum. I know I don't like Obama ever since he started campaigning, there are some pretty incriminating things about him out there.
  
  I'm going to be voting Romney this time round, cause his economic/government spending/taxation policies are what we need.
  report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  So, that puts us at odds...
  
  and try as you may to get along, there are just certain issues that cannot be resolved in this atmosphere.
  
  I lived with Romnney as gvr, and I don't like him.
  report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  It's fine, we can disagree without attacks.
  report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  We can try...
  report
  92
  habeeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Pass the beer and pretzels! lol
  report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  What WOULD help is a dart-board with Russsshhhh's face on it!
  report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  How bout a board where each slot is a different politician... both sides can win if they hit the ones they hate the most
  report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I'd take the whole crew of Fox News and be satisfied.
  report
  92
  habeeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I'd take Beck, Olbermann, Schultz, Hannity, Palin, Bachmann, Newt, Santorum, Barney Frank, Pelosi, and Rush. I'm an equal opportunity dart-thrower. lol
  report
  92
  habeeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  That's human nature, LMC, so I partially agree with you. My problem is when some people ALWAYS attack and defend only one side. I've both attacked and defended BOTH sides on the HP forums. If my memory serves, I've seen you disagree with Obama on some points.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I try to be honest about the issue...I don't think I have to be fair!
  
  Because from my x-perience, nothing about politics is fair.
  report
  92
  habeeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Want some new material?
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  G-Dam America G-Dam America G-Dam America ...that was playes so much, it was like background noise!
  reply report
  60
  Cassie Smithposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I liked when Obama admitted that he didn't know the "Austrian term" for wheeling and dealing.
  reply report
2. 92
  habeeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Get a grip, man! Do you not understand what a heavyweight champion is?? Ann is obviously thin, and believe me - she's thinner in person. If she were overweight, I might consider the comment a gaffe. Oh, when you were talking about intelligence, you misspelled "discussing." lol. Sorry - the English teacher in me. Your finger probably just hit the wrong key. I do that, too, especially when my hands are numb from nerve damage.
  reply report
  68
  bgamallposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Come on Habee, add to this the dog on the car roof gaffe, the 700k is middle income gaffe, the horse in every port gaffe, the not employed while I make 42 million gaffe, the not feeling rich while worth over 200 million gaffe, and you can see the Romneys have a problem.
  
  They have a huge problem in that they are simply out of touch and lack thoughtfulness. Plus, Bain broke some companies and caused at least one death due to their greed.
  reply report
  92
  habeeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Do you really want me to list all of Obama's and Michelle's gaffes?? And if I were to try to list all of Biden's gaffes, it would probably take me a week of typing! lol
  reply report
  68
  bgamallposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Biden is Romney light. Biden is VP, Romney wants to be pres. Big difference.
  reply report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  What about Obama's gaffes? You keep avoiding that issue.
  reply report
  92
  habeeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I was going to ask that!
  reply report
  92
  habeeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Biden is VP. Ann R does not hold any office. Big difference.
  reply report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Do you make as big of a deal out of Obama's gaffes?
  
  The 700k 'gaffe' is ridiculous, he said no such thing.
  
  Having a good time with citizens isn't a gaffe either.
  
  You're just fishing for ammo against Romney, why don't you focus on his politics?
  reply report
  68
  bgamallposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Ok, I predict that Romney will increase wars and the pentagon's budget that is bloated now. I predict that Romney will allow more easy money lending as he seeks to repeal the Volcker Rule.
  
  I predict that Romney will do more to harm the middle class since the rich know they can squeeze Americans as long as the policies to do so line up.
  
  Both parties allow speculation and much of it comes from out of America, with Brent Crude Oil, so drilling won't change a thing. Our WTI will be exported as that is the plan.
  
  But the Republicans want more housing bubbles and will end up attacking main street. The Republicans are very much like the IMF. I have documented that here and at Business Insider the desire for the wealthy to securitize and sell bad loans guaranteed by government.
  
  You and Habee should read my articles there. If you hate what the IMF has done to third world developing nations beware of what they could do here and in Europe.
  reply report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Do you make such a big deal about Obama's gaffes? What's that, 4 times you've been asked?
  reply report
  68
  bgamallposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  No, he has already proven to have some sympathy and concern for the 99 percent. If you are not in the 1 percent, you should not trust Romney. i trust you are not in the 1 percent Jaxson. Where do you put yourself that you should support folks predatory toward main street? In my ebook, Dirty Dirty Republicans, I make it clear that both parties have exploited mainstreet, but that the Republicans are planning more speculation in real estate in the future.
  reply report
  92
  habeeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Main street? Don't most small businesses support Romney?
  
  Your rants aren't coherent. What does Mitt's referring to his wife as his heavyweight champion have to do with the 1%?? I'm confused.
  reply report
  68
  bgamallposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Most small biz is in the 1 percent. Or at least it is in the top 5 percent and wants the same freebees available only to the rich that will get them to the top 1 percent.
  
  http://www.bankrate.com/finance/taxes/t … -earn.aspx
  
  I am starting to think you are a bit naive, Habee.
  reply report
  92
  habeeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  95% of the small business owners I know support Romney. I'm talking real small businesses - the ones that usually file taxes as individuals. These certainly aren't in the top 5%. Why do so many chambers of commerce, including the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, back Mitt?
  
  You didn't answer my other question.
  
  Mitt's tax plan will stimulate the economy:
  
  http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Columns/2 … aspx#page1
  reply report
  66
  Ralph Deedsposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Mitt's tax plan would increase the gap between rich and poor in this country.
  reply report
  92
  habeeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Please do some research and see what leading economists have to say about Romney's plan. And how could the gap get bigger if more people are employed? Employed people earn money. Obama is clueless about most economical issues. Why has he blocked Keystone? Even some democrats don't understand the POTUS's stand on that, including Bill Clinton.
  reply report
  68
  bgamallposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Tax cuts and supply side economics coupled with hot money from the UK caused the housing bubble. Romney has the same economic advisors in place that helped blow the housing bubble in the last decade.
  report
  92
  habeeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  And you hold Frank guiltless? I think there's plenty of blame to go around for the housing mess.
  report
  77
  rlbert00posted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Prove it.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  http://finance.yahoo.com/news/mitt-romn … 10655.html
  report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Mitt's tax plan is to reduce everyone's taxes, and keep the burden the same on each bracket. That's a fair reduction across the board.
  
  Yeah, he's not going to effectively lower the taxes of the bottom 50% by much, because they only pay 1.8% already.
  report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  This is what that analysis said:
  
  "The poor pay a little bit more. The rich pay a lot less".
  report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  That page isn't loading right. What part of Romney's plan will increase tax on the poor?
  
  "Make permanent, across-the-board 20 percent cut in marginal rates"
  
  or
  
  "Eliminate taxes for taxpayers with AGI below $200,000 on interest, dividends, and capital gains"
  report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  "Second, he all but erases Obama's term from the tax bill by repealing both Obamacare's taxes and the stimulus tax credits the president would like to extend."
  
  "Lower taxes for everyone except the lowest-income Americans. Bigger tax breaks for the richest. And $500 billion added to the deficit by 2015 that we would have to borrow or cut."
  report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Yes, he would get rid of obama's tax hikes, and instead of giving the stimulus credits, he would lower the tax rate. It's still a tax cut, don't you think we've had enough stimulus by now?
  report
  92
  habeeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I'm not naive - I know how to research. When you excoriate Romney for so many petty, unimportant things, it's hard for me to take you seriously.
  reply report
  68
  bgamallposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Oh, I spend a lot more time on serious things. You can read me at Business Insider. I have over 90 articles there blasting such things as libertarianism, the ponzi housing scam, McDonald's Pink Slime, the Fed, Ron Paul, Tim Geithner and much more. I write under my real name, Gary Anderson, listed by first name in the author section.
  
  With supporting the Dems it is just a question of the lesser of two evils.
  reply report
  92
  habeeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Then you know that McDonald's is no longer serving up pink slime. Now it's being served in school cafeterias. Yuck!!
  reply report
  68
  bgamallposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  True, so I wonder what filler they are using now. George W Bush deregulated the beef industry and allowed this to happen.
  report
  92
  habeeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Gross! Why did it take this long for folks to discover it? And why is it being allowed in our schools? The mother who sent her kid to school with a turkey sandwich was rebuked, yet the schools are feeding pink slime? Is the amonia compound the same stuff Walmart was blamed for using with their ground beef several years ago?
  report
  66
  Ralph Deedsposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  OK, Habee, but you must admit that Romney is pretty gaffe-prone. I'd list a few, but I'm sure everyone is aware of most of them. However, that's the least of his problems. He's pandered to the Tea Partiers to the point where nobody can be sure what he really believes and what his policies would be if he were lucky enough to win the election.
  reply report
  92
  habeeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  He's more gaffe-prone than Obama? Wanna bet $10,000?
  reply report
3. 61
  Repairguy47posted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Does that certain subtle intelligence begin with a bow and by your leave the way Obama grovels?
  reply report
61
knolyourselfposted 12 years ago
That seems to be the way somebody wants it.
reply report
76
Shanna11posted 12 years ago
Hahaha, oh come on-- political spin anyone?

I think it's amusing. He obviously meant to compliment his wife, and not hurt her, but he just fumbled like any human is prone to do.
reply report
59
logic,commonsenseposted 12 years ago
Just curious, are the OP and LMC brother and sister?
reply report
1. 92
  habeeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Actually, I think LMC usually has more valid points.
  reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 12 years ago
"If you cut tax rates, the rich pay less. If the rich pay less, somebody pays more. If nobody pays more, then the government shrinks. If the government shrinks, the beneficiaries of government lose. Who are the beneficiaries of government spending? Three out of every five dollars goes to old people (e.g. Social Security), sick people (e.g. Medicaid/Medicare), and poor people (e.g. income security programs). If we cut government, the poor, sick, and old will probably lose out."
reply report
1. 0
  JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  A lot of government money goes to inefficiency, or paying interest on debt. It's waste. The government is NOT the ideal of efficiency, so we don't want them being the ones running everything. The post office has a -7% profit margin. We are short $42 TRILLION dollars to pay medicare/medicaid and SS for the next 60 years. Think about that, $42 TRILLION.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Why don't we just get rid of the cap on FICA? It stops at $106,000 now.....even if you raised it, that would solve a lot.
  reply report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  When the government wastes taxpayer money, spends taxpayer money that it wasn't supposed to spend, the answer isn't to raise taxes.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Social security is not a wasteful program. Neither is medicare. It's much more efficient than private insurance, a bulk of whose money goes to perks and bennies of the ceos.
  
  FICA pays them both, as well as disability and other such programs. Lifting the cap or getting rid of it alltogether would fund it forever, and not hurt anyone in the process.
  
  All these GOP policies hurt the ones who can least afford it,and reward those who already have it made.
  reply report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  This is a common lie from the left. CEO salaries are tiny, tiny fractions of total business. For instance, if the CEO of Coca Cola gave all his earnings back into reducing the price of coke, each can would cost $0.000003 less.
  
  Private insurance can be more efficient than governmental, and if you include the future-debt of these programs it is much more efficient.
  
  No, even if there were NO cap on FICA, the funds would still run out in 75 years. But that's always the answer. Government spends money it's not supposed to spend, and we'll tax the rich even more to make up for it, right?
  
  We need to LOWER taxes to encourage investment and growth. We are above almost every developed nation in taxes, higher taxes isn't the answer.
  
  Yeah, an equal tax cut for everyone hurts the poor.
  reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 12 years ago
"Somebody making between $10,000 and $20,000 would pay 1% more in taxes than they would under Obama's current policy. Somebody making between $500,000 and $1 million would pay between 7% less in taxes"

No--I don't like it. It's another tax break for rich people! Same old same old!
reply report
1. 0
  JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  They are not going to pay 1% more. The bottom 50%, which goes up to $35,000 (iirc) only pays 1.85% already, and Romney will lower that by 20%.
  
  Romney said it best. People are rating his tax plan, when the details haven't been released yet. It's just news agencies and 'study groups' trying to get hits by doing 'research'.
  reply report
0
JaxsonRaineposted 12 years ago
This is why we don't need more stimulus. Do you still think Obama will get it right after his last promise?

http://cdn2-b.examiner.com/sites/defaul … hart_0.jpg
reply report
1. 75
  lovemychrisposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  The stimulus needed to be bigger and bolder. We the 99% of the people need it, not we the 1%.
  reply report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Stimulus didn't work. You want a bigger stimulus than the last one? What about Obama's promise that if we could spend $1 trillion on stimulus that unemployment wouldn't go above 8%, do you still trust that stimulus is the answer?
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  He didn't say that. A member of his team did. And she was speculating, not promising. That is a GOP lie that is out there.
  
  And the stimulus DID work. It saved or created 3 million jobs. And the GM loan worked too.
  
  And Obamacare is starting to show real signs of progress...in terms of saving money and getting more people insured.
  
  2 years of private sector job growth.
  
  We are just starting to recover from the blow we were leveled by 30 years of theft to the top.
  We can not afford to go back and let them finish the job!
  reply report
  0
  JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  No, it was in his stimulus bill. Obama said if we didn't get the stimulus we would hit double digits. Well, we still did. With the stimulus, the unemployment rate was worse than the projection without it. You can say they were just wrong, but that margin of error is so large it approaches a coin flip.
  
  We still hit double digits. As far as jobs saved, that's been debated ever since Obama took office. Regardless, any jobs created by government spending are temporary jobs, artificial demand, and those jobs are gone now.
  
  And bankrupting our country.
  
  First, imagine how the private sector would grow if we had competitive tax rates.
  
  Secondly, job growth, adjusted for capita, has barely increased. Yes, things are starting to turn around, but any free market will correct itself after a recession. We could be doing so much better than we are.
  reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 12 years ago
We lowered taxes in 03,05 and 10....what growth? What jobs?

More Swiss bank accounts for the Uber Rich.

And weren't people being turned away from private insurance companies if they deemed the risk too high? You want to go back to that?

Romney's plan is not an equal tax cut. He cuts more for $500,000 and up.

And he increases the deficit by 500 bil.

It's another reverse robin hood.
reply report
1. 0
  JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Our corporate tax rates are still way too high. We can lower personal tax rates, but it doesn't help too much if we don't have businesses investing in America to create jobs and stimulate wealth.
  
  He doesn't cut more, he's cutting 20% for every bracket. 20% = 20%.
  reply report
  75
  lovemychrisposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  "The rest we knew, destruction of the middle class, pump and dumps, Wall Street Crimes, all under the guise of “trickle down” and “lowering taxes.” Every phony 3rd string economist they could buy has been discredited."
  
  More of the same.
  reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 12 years ago
"And bankrupting our country"

Good News! Obamacare Will Cost Less than Projected http://mojo.ly/zBJRQR
reply report
1. 0
  JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Yay, 100 billion less than we thought... still over $1 trillion though. oops.
  reply report
53
dragonarmt1posted 12 years ago
Thankyou for all your efforts that you have put in this. very interesting info
reply report
75
lovemychrisposted 12 years ago
Private sector has added 4 million jobs over the last 2 years http://pic.twitter.com/Jwubugok
reply report

Post a Reply

jump to first post

Necessary
HubPages Device ID	This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
Login	This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google Recaptcha	This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
Akismet	This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google Analytics	This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic Pixel	This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web Services	This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
Cloudflare	This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted Libraries	Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)

Features
Google Custom Search	This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google Maps	Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google Charts	This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host API	This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTube	Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Vimeo	Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Paypal	This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Login	You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Maven	This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)

Marketing
Google AdSense	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClick	Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index Exchange	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Sovrn	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Ads	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexus	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Openx	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon Project	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLift	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say Media	We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing Pixels	We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking Pixels	We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.

Statistics
Author Google Analytics	This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
Comscore	ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking Pixel	Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
Clicksco	This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)

Lol, Romney Introduces His Wife as a Heavyweight

Arts and Design

Autos

Books, Literature, and Writing

Business and Employment

Education and Science

Entertainment and Media

Family and Parenting

Fashion and Beauty

Food and Cooking

Games, Toys, and Hobbies

Gender and Relationships

Health

Holidays and Celebrations

Home and Garden

HubPages Tutorials and Community

Personal Finance

Pets and Animals

Politics and Social Issues

Religion and Philosophy

Sports and Recreation

Technology

Travel and Places

About Us

This website uses cookies

Lol, Romney Introduces His Wife as a Heavyweight

Related Discussions

This website uses cookies