Scientists find areas of the brain responsible for spirituality

Jump to Last Post 1-15 of 15 discussions (129 posts)

71
aguasilverposted 12 years ago
Comments?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article … brain.html
reply report
1. 60
  janesixposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  That first picture in the article was really, really creapy
  reply report
2. 0
  jomineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  What is new?
  reply report
3. 59
  Disappearingheadposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Careful now John, this may lead to a salvation loophole. If it can be demonstrated that spirituality/belief in God is in some way linked to the construction of our brain, then we might argue that unbelief is not someone's fault, but is a result of a differently arranged brain. Ooh what a hotbed of dispute this could turn into.
  reply report
  71
  aguasilverposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Could indeed DH, which of course is why I posted it?
  
  That and the fact that I can post whilst most of the world is asleep still!
  
  I particularly liked:
  
  "In the most recent study, Johnstone studied 20 people with traumatic brain injuries affecting the right parietal lobe, the area of the brain situated a few inches above the right ear.
  
  He surveyed participants on characteristics of spirituality, such as how close they felt to a higher power and if they felt their lives were part of a divine plan.
  
  He found that the participants with more significant injury to their right parietal lobe showed an increased feeling of closeness to a higher power.
  
  'Neuropsychology researchers consistently have shown that impairment on the right side of the brain decreases one’s focus on the self,' said Johnstone.
  
  'Since our research shows that people with this impairment are more spiritual, this suggests spiritual experiences are associated with a decreased focus on the self."
  
  Which (to me) indicated that some folk can ONLY get closer to God when you inflict a traumatic brain injury to the right side of their noggin, in other words a good clout round the head!
  
  But of particular interest was the aspect that "spiritual experiences are associated with a decreased focus on the self" which is an obvious reason why so many are incapable of being reached by God, they are too focussed on their SELF.
  reply report
  0
  Emile Rposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Interesting article. One thing that occurred to me, after reading it, was the ancient superstition that left handedness was from the devil. (my son is left handed, so anyone reading this...don't read more into it than is written. He's a good egg). It is commonly believed that efthanded people are dominated by their right brain, and vice versa.
  
  Could they have somehow been aware of the functions of the sides of the brain? Knowing that the left lobe was associated with caring for others? And, if so, how?
  reply report
  73
  lone77starposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  My brother Larry is left-handed. His first grade teacher in West Texas tried to beat it out of him, until my Mom found out about it. Perhaps the teacher's ears were ringing until the day of her death. Larry's a gentle, generous soul. The old superstitions have a hard time dying.
  reply report
  0
  Emile Rposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I know a guy whose dad did the same thing to a catholic nun. They pulled him out and sent him to public school shortly thereafter.
  reply report
  59
  Disappearingheadposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Mmm. I'm very left handed, left footed, and left eyed, which if this means I am dominated by my self right side of the brain, might explain why I am rather vain, self centred and selfish. Maybe this also explains why during all my years in church as those around me hollered and hooped about the Holy Spirit being present and "moving in this place", I felt and sensed nothing, zero, didley squat.
  reply report
  71
  aguasilverposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  So you need a clump around the right side of your head with a baseball bat?
  
  I think that could be arranged!
  reply report
  0
  Emile Rposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I know. Your church experience was the same as mine, the few times I've accepted invitations. But most of what goes on in church appears to be theatrics.
  reply report
  61
  mischeviousmeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Like speaking in tongues and shaking on the floor? Absolutely agree...
  reply report
  0
  Emile Rposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I've never been present for any of that. I'm afraid I'd burst out laughing.
  reply report
  0
  Chasukposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I've been an active participant. Not of the shaking n the floor thing, but of the speaking-in-tongues.
  
  It's not funny when you are doing it. Actually, it never becomes funny, in the "ha-ha" sort of way. I'm glad that I experienced it, if only to understand what it feels like to be in the grips of delusion.
  reply report
  0
  Emile Rposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Wow. Did you, personally, speak in tongues? How did that happen? Did you believe you were possessed by a spirit?
  reply report
  0
  Chasukposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Yes. I was a devout Christian of the "Born Again" variety, attending an evangelical church. I believed, then, that I was filled with the Holy Spirit.
  reply report
  0
  Emile Rposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Well, I'm glad you found perspective.
  reply report
  0
  Chasukposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Thanks, and likewise. :-)
  report
  59
  Disappearingheadposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I can "speak in tongues", though whether it is of God or just my sub conscious mind operating that part of the brain responsible for speech, causing an outpouring of gibberish because I'm not speaking with intelligence, I don't know. I rarely ever do it though as I see absolutely no practical use for it even if it was real. Its actually very easy to do, though i can't explain how. I just open my mouth and speak what sounds like a flowing language of some sort.
  
  I was certainly never inclined to "speak in tongues" in church just to feel part of the crowd or anything and I've never sensed the presence of God in Church or when in tongues.
  reply report
  0
  Emile Rposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  That's pretty wild. If I did that, I think I'd record it and have it analyzed until someone could explain what it was.
  reply report
  0
  Chasukposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Anyone can "speak in tongues," if they try.
  report
  0
  Emile Rposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I think I am the person who would prove you wrong. I could never speak in tongues. I can speak gibberish, but I'd definitely be making it up as I went.
  report
  0
  Chasukposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  From my perspective, everyone who speaks in tongues is making it up as they go along.
  report
  71
  aguasilverposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  From your perspective now, or for all time?
  
  Did you ever believe in tongues?
  report
  0
  Chasukposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  From my perspective, now.
  
  Yes, I believed in tongues, then.
  report
  71
  aguasilverposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  So you could be wrong again, as you admit that you believe you were wrong before?
  report
  0
  Chasukposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I acknowledge that I could be wrong, yes.
  
  I acknowledge this about _literally_ every one of my beliefs, if that belief entails a factual claim.
  report
  71
  aguasilverposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Love it Chasuk, you remind me of Doubting Thomas sooooo much!
  
  But the more I see you write stuff, the more I am happy to know you, if only on-line.
  report
  0
  Chasukposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Thanks. :-)
  report
  0
  Emile Rposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  So, when you spoke in tongues; although you considered yourself to be filled by the Holy Spirit....you were aware of the fact that you were making it up as you went along? I don't see how you could have thought that. Don't Christians believe that those who speak in tongues require another spirit filled believer to interpret?
  report
  71
  aguasilverposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Yes we do.
  report
  0
  Chasukposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I didn't believe that _then_, but I believe it now.
  
  As for the second part of your question, the answer depends on the Christian, whose belief is usually influenced by the congregation that he or she attends.
  
  Paul discusses tongues -- and the rest of the gifts of the Spirit -- here:
  
  http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?se … ersion=NIV
  report
  71
  aguasilverposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  There have been incidents where tongues has been spoken and the speaker had no idea what was said, and unbeknown to them a visitor who spoke little English reported that they had been speaking in their (rare) language.
  
  Having it analysed though would do no good, it's 'encoded' for God alone to hear, though He will provide a translation to another present, IF the tongues are genuine.
  report
  61
  mischeviousmeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I did and I was asked to sit outside until I could compose myself, properly.
  reply report
  0
  jomineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Conversely, you can also State that it is the defect in brain that make people assume the existence of god.
  reply report
  60
  janesixposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Except for the fact it isnt a defect.
  reply report
  67
  aka-djposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  DANG!
  
  You just ruined his argument!
  reply report
  71
  aguasilverposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Don't often resort to 'smileys', but that was a classic!
  reply report
  0
  jomineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  In psychiatry, assuming existence of a non-existing thing is a defect called delusion.
  reply report
  71
  aguasilverposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  And your proof that this is so is.... your statement relies purely upon your own assumption and belief that God is a non-existing thing, so by YOUR own rules PROVE THAT.
  reply report
  0
  jomineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  This is the type of arguments that make me think you are really a stupid person. I told you many times I DO NOT NEED PROOF. You tell me what this "god" thing is clearly and objectively and what this fellow can do(other than guiding your life, of course), then I will show you it does not exist.
  
  Your god equate with a creator, and there is nothing for the creator to create. Where is god then?
  reply report
  71
  aguasilverposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  OK, yes I obviously am stupid, but thank you for correcting me, I need to PROVE God exists, but you don't need to PROVE that He does not.
  
  Perfect sense.
  
  Both of us make a statement, only one of us has to prove they are correct.
  
  Next you will be telling me bacteria does not exist, and offering no PROOF just like your earlier Doctor counterparts did, thereby allowing countless women to die in childbirth, because they refused to wash their hands, after doing the autopsies on their victims, WITHOUT PROOF that doing so saved lives.
  
  But I guess I was just too stupid to see that as logical.
  reply report
  0
  jomineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  What is this wish-wash all about?
  Read it one more and read it the last time.
  I DO NOT WANT YOU TO PROVE GOD. I WANT YOU TO TELL ME WHAT THIS 'GOD' IS, WITHOUT CONTRADICTING YOURSELF OR REALITY(That is don't hook up facts which are facts only in your opinion).
  reply report
  71
  aguasilverposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Ohh, I see, YOU WANT.... yep, that explains it all!
  
  ASK HIM YOURSELF
  
  (sorry, shouted as you are obviously not only colour blind, but deaf)
  
  You see, God does not do side shows for folk, but IF you could but ONCE get a genuine and sincere moment, ask Him to make Himself known to you, and you will get your answers.
  
  Take the blinkers off, get to have an inner peace, and ask sincerely, that's all.
  
  I don't guarantee bolts of lightening, nor that you will be struck down blind for a few days, or that the Holy Spirit will drop on you in a flash, but IF you can put aside your pride and ego, and 'intellectual' mask for a while, you will get the answers.
  
  Matthew 18:3-4
  King James Version (KJV)
  And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.
  
  Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven.
  reply report
  0
  jomineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Really, you can neither think nor comprehend. You were just hooking it up when you said you have an IQ of 142. Your IQ will never go above 42.
  reply report
  0
  Chasukposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  The way that I read this, Jomine is asking for your definition of "God," not for instructions on how to experience him.
  reply report
  71
  aguasilverposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  OK Chasuk, I accept that you may be right...
  
  Hmmm... My definition of "God" lets see what I can do!
  
  I define God as being a spiritual force or entity that has unlimited power and knowledge, and can operate outside of any known laws or rules that we think exist.
  
  I think that entity or power had set confines on our abilities which we declare are absolute, but are relative to 'God'.
  
  I cannot describe God because He does not wish to be described, and in any case as a spiritual force does not have to take form unless He chooses to.
  
  I believe the bible was written to allow us a 'glimpse' at what God is, and how He does things, it was designed to allow mankind to examine what He chose to reveal, and let them determine whether they wanted more or less of Him in their temporal lives, and eventually in their eternal existences.
  
  He could be a more advanced entity from somewhere out there, and not a 'God' at all as we perceived Him to be, but I am content to experience Him within the confines He has allocated to us in His word and in our communications.
  
  I'm sure that if I set my mind to it, I can define Him better, but I am just about to take the family out, so that can wait!
  
  Thanks for clarifying Jomines request.
  report
  0
  jomineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I'll wait and see whether you can do it, the definition you gave lack clarity and has left unanswered a number of questions.
  report
  71
  aguasilverposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Give me the questions and I will try to define it better, time allowing, these topics have already given me two hubs to write!
  report
  0
  jomineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I'll start with the first sentence
  "I define God as being a spiritual force or entity that has unlimited power and knowledge, and can operate outside of any known laws or rules that we think exist"
  What is spirit?
  what is knowledge?
  
  Now about power, power is limited and is a comparison. So what is this unlimited power. Say the classic quote 'can god create a stone that he can't lift' shows it well. So does that mean, god is more powerful than us, or is there any stand to which you compare the power? How do I know the entity that has power as god or not?
  Laws/rules are descriptions of observed phenomenon. So what you mean by 'existing laws'?
  report
  58
  A Troubled Manposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Why bother? First, you post a link to an article that you believed supported your ridiculous beliefs, but instead misunderstood the article to show that your beliefs are all in your head and now you want to try and answer questions? Hilarious. Can I now refer to you as Mr. 142?
  report
  71
  aguasilverposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Only if I can call you Mr 47...
  report
  79
  Aficionadaposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  
  And the religions that I know of, Christianity in particular, say that the root of sin is too much focus on one's self. A lot of people have probably heard the little saying "The heart of S-I-N is 'I.'" That seems to me to fit with this research.
  reply report
4. 0
  Chasukposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I believe that all experience occurs in the brain, so this is unsurprising.
  reply report
  79
  Aficionadaposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  
  Chasuk, I know how precise and exact you like to be in your communications. Do you actually mean that "all experience occurs in the brain," or rather that all experience is processed in the brain? What about my experience of giving birth? How could that actually occur in the brain? Or Hubbers' experiences of communicating here in the forums? Is that occurring in our brains?
  reply report
  0
  Chasukposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  That's a good question, and one that I'm not sure how to answer. Unfortunately, this means that I'll be developing my answer as I'm typing it, so there might be a bit of fumbling.
  
  I believe that there is a world which exists independent of my experience of it. I believe that the apple on the tree actually exists, though not necessarily in a form which corresponds to my perception. My knowledge of the apple's existence -- and of the tree's, and of every other corporeal thing -- is only available to me via my senses.
  
  I believe that I am a consequence of neuroanatomy. I am a process that perceives itself. I guess that I could call myself a meta-process.
  
  This meta-process occurs only in the brain. However, I see now that my use of "occurs" made it seem that I meant, "all experience [happens] in the brain."
  
  Yes, I should have written, ""all experience is processed in the brain."
  
  Thanks :-)
  reply report
5. 58
  A Troubled Manposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  It seems scientists are beginning to confirm what we knew all along, that spirituality, belief in a higher power, etc. are all in the mind.
  reply report
  61
  mischeviousmeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  It's also saying that the most profound spiritual eperiences come from a brain damaged individual. Which would make sense there are so many, insanely devout, whackos out there.
  reply report
  0
  Emile Rposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  So is everything else that makes us unique as a species. What's your point?
  reply report
  58
  A Troubled Manposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Still trying to get me to chase you down one of your emotionally charged rat holes?
  reply report
  0
  Emile Rposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  It appears you would rather continue making bizarrely imaginative accusations than backing your immature barbs with facts.
  
  Please, don't let me rain on your fantasy parade.
  reply report
  58
  A Troubled Manposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  reply report
  0
  Emile Rposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I adore a man with a sense of humor. Especially when he laughs along when I'm laughing at him.
  reply report
  58
  A Troubled Manposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  reply report
  71
  aguasilverposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I would say it is to the contrary, they seem to have established that SOME folk are hard-wired to be able to communicate with God, whilst others are hard-wired to be only concerned with SELF and worldly, and need a clout to the right side of the brain before their spiritual side can be awakened.
  
  I am available if you need a head trauma, but you will need to provide the baseball bat.
  reply report
  0
  jomineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  It appears it is head injury, birth defects, strokes and genetic abnormalities and drugs that make the hard wiring!!
  reply report
  71
  aguasilverposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  No, it appears that all those things can save those who are hard wired for SELF to gain a perspective of selflessness, which opens the doors to God.
  
  They say:
  
  Neuropsychology researchers consistently have shown that impairment on the right side of the brain decreases one’s focus on the self,' said Johnstone.
  'Since our research shows that people with this impairment are more spiritual, this suggests spiritual experiences are associated with a decreased focus on the self.
  reply report
  0
  jomineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  It simple means non functioning of any area of brain can affect your behavior and thoughts and if it is mild you will go off as an extremely religious person and if it is severe you end up in asylum.
  It will be helpful to know that stimlating appropriate areas of brain can bring out any thoughts or feelings including oneness with the universe.
  reply report
  71
  aguasilverposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Oh PUleeese... you get more desperate by the minute!
  reply report
  0
  jomineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Lack of education. Just find out what an injury to frontal and parietal lobe can cause!! Also find out what can occur by stimulating the temporo-parietal area. Don't showcase your ignorance.
  reply report
  58
  A Troubled Manposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  No, that's what YOU'RE saying. They are saying that your beliefs are all in your head.
  reply report
  67
  aka-djposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Gee, here I thought my faith was in my heart!
  
  Go figure!
  reply report
  58
  A Troubled Manposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Interestingly enough, when we attend places called "schools" we learn about something called "biology" that shows us the heart pumps blood and really doesn't show it's a container of mythical fantasies.
  reply report
  67
  aka-djposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Sorry, I missed that class.
  I was attending church all that day.
  reply report
  58
  A Troubled Manposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Yes, I can see how your posts would indicate that.
  reply report
  67
  aka-djposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  You are such a cool character.
  
  Maybe that's the right colour on your avatar.
  
  Which reminds me, you could have played that Iceman in the Batman movie.
  What was his name? Mr Freeze, or something?
  reply report
60
janesixposted 12 years ago
The article didnt say anything that isnt common knowledge.
reply report
60
janesixposted 12 years ago
Its not surprising that there is increased activity in the part of the brain responsible for higher mental function.
reply report
1. 60
  janesixposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Its also not surprising that no one is trying to debunk this part of the article.
  
  Because they cant.
  reply report
  0
  Chasukposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Yes, the article does state that, "aspects of spiritual functioning are related to increased activity in the frontal lobe," and, yes, the frontal lobe is indisputably involved in higher mental functions.
  
  However, the article also states:
  
  Further, if you google even minimally, you find this statement -- from the Kansas City Star -- concerning exactly the same research:
  
  http://www.kansascity.com/2012/04/19/35 … otion.html
  
  Notice the same explanation twice, with the second example including a descriptive preamble, from which it can be inferred that the author of the second article was more concerned with his audience understanding what the research had actually uncovered.
  
  Title of the article from the Daily Mail:
  
  "The God spots revealed: Scientists find areas of the brain responsible for spirituality"
  
  Title of the article from the Kansas City Star:
  
  "MU researcher dispels notion of a single ‘God spot’ in brain"
  
  Clearly, the title of the Kansas City Star article provides a much more accurate summary.
  reply report
  60
  janesixposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  It basically says the same thing as the first article.
  reply report
  0
  Chasukposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  The research did not reveal that the awakening of the "God spot" was related specifically to increased activity in the part of the brain responsible for higher mental functioning (the frontal lobe), but rather that the notion of a single ‘God spot’ is incorrect.
  
  The second article made this clearer than the first, which is possibly why you were under the misapprehension that there was something to debunk.
  reply report
  60
  janesixposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Yes. I got that multiple areas Of the brain are involved. Including the frontal lobe. I didnt say ot was specifically related to that one spot.
  reply report
  0
  Chasukposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I'll give you the benefit of that doubt, that you aren't being disingenuous.
  
  To which part of the article were you referring?
  reply report
  60
  janesixposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I am having trouble copying and pasting with my phone, but i was refering to the last three paragraphs. It didnt say the words higher mental function, but i assumed most people would get i meant the frontal lobe.
  reply report
  0
  Chasukposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Thank you.
  
  That's what I presumed you meant.
  
  The article gave no special significance to the awakening of the "God spot" being related to increased activity in the the frontal lobe, but your wording suggested that it did.
  
  That's what I've been responding to.
  reply report
  60
  janesixposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  In a roundabout way i was suggesting that spiritual people are smarter.
  
  I know the article doesnt actually suggest that
  
  Nor do i actually believe that
  
  It was kind of a joke.
  
  I know these studies are in their infancy, and are far from being conclusive in any way as far as i can tell
  reply report
  0
  Chasukposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Ah. I didn't detect the joke.
  
  O.o
  
  Ignore my debunking, then.
  reply report
73
lone77starposted 12 years ago
Interesting article, but nothing in the article proved "cause" to be in the brain.

From my own experience, the brain is merely a switchboard and perhaps only part of the interface between spirit and the physical body.

Being outside of your physical body tends to discount this kind of thing. Sure, some will think people who experience such things are subject to dementia, drugs and or trauma. But my most vivid experience involved no physical trauma and no drugs, but included very vivid moments of clear, full-color vision of a point in space several meters outside of this physical body. I saw things that my body could not have, because the blinds were closed at the time in the second-story room where my body sat. In fact, while outside, I could not feel my body, though I could clearly see the grayish-blue blinds between me and my body.

The stimulus for this excursion? Spiritual counseling. Imagine that. It works! And ooooh! It was Scientology. Despite all its controversy, there is some good there. When I came back to Christianity, I felt a deep debt of gratitude for my experiences in that far younger religion.

That the true self (soul, child of God) has an effect on the brain and gets scientists studying the brain all excited, is not really anything special. This is no more special than the effect of a driver pressing their foot on the acceleration pedal in their car. The scientist are studying the pedal and its linkage to the engine, and missing the driver entirely.

Oh, well!
reply report
1. 60
  janesixposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  But at least things are being looked into.
  reply report
  0
  Chasukposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Unfortunately, the article which recounts this research -- "Right Parietal Lobe-Related 'Selflessness' as the Neuropsychological Basis of Spiritual Transcendence" -- is still behind a pay firewall, costing USD 36.00.
  
  Here is an excerpt from the abstract:
  
  "Objective: to replicate studies that suggest that a frontal-parietal circuit is related to spiritual-religious experiences, and specifically that a decreased focus on the self (i.e., selflessness), associated with decreased right parietal lobe (RPL) functioning, serves as the primary neuropsychological foundation for spiritual transcendence."
  
  http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1 … 012.657524
  reply report
  71
  aguasilverposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Maybe we could have a whip round!
  reply report
2. 58
  A Troubled Manposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Unfortunately, scientists don't agree with your personal fantasies about how the brain works, but instead, are finding evidence that your personal fantasies are indeed conjured in your brain.
  reply report
86
rebekahELLEposted 12 years ago
Spiritual experiences aren't necessarily religious. If this part of the brain takes the focus off self, I see that more as awareness and having a sense of presence. Someone meditating could feel this awareness. Watching a sunset or being in a nature setting could activate this part of the brain.

Actually I think religion puts a lot of emphasis on self. Listen to how preachers preach, it's almost always centered around getting what you want, or don't want (burning eternally in a pit of fire ).
reply report
1. 61
  mischeviousmeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Religion is almost a venture into pure egotism...
  reply report
  60
  janesixposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  You certainly have first hand experience of that.
  reply report
  61
  mischeviousmeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  One needs the ego, just not so much of it.
  reply report
71
aguasilverposted 12 years ago
Apologies that you guys had bad experiences of churches, or were then later deceived into rejecting what you had seen and presumably believed.

Speaking in tongues is when your spirit cries out to God, it is 'encoded' because you cannot actually express what is inside of you.

The Holy Spirit then gives you the 'word' to express what you are unable to express yourself.

It's encoded so that the enemy cannot know what your inner pleadings are.

Whenever I have broken out into tongues, it has cleared the blockage that the enemy has placed on me, and I have then been able to communicate directly with God through Christ.

Many cannot accept these 'utterances' and I agree that many in churches use them unwisely, however they do have a correct usage in some situations.

It is sad that the enemy has managed to distract you from your walks with God, however it is also written that some will fall on bare earth, and will die due to lack of roots.

My wish is that you will find fertile soil again and dig deeply into what God provided.
reply report
1. 61
  mischeviousmeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I was once watching a program and I understood everything they were saying, I found out I was watching the spanish channel and I ceased to understand the language. I can't explain it, but I don't think religion had anything to do with the experience.
  reply report
  0
  Chasukposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I've had a similar experience with Korean television. Of course, I don't know much I understood versus how much I thought I understood. However, I don't -- and didn't -- consider it supernatural.
  
  I've experienced a bond with a very significant other -- a soulmate, if there actually is such a relationship -- that seems to transcend the need for words. I've had other "supernatural" experiences, but that's the one that makes me wonder.
  reply report
93
wildernessposted 12 years ago
I watched a TV special on what appears to be the same thing. The experiment was to put a volunteer into a quiet room and cover their eyes. Basically a room with no other stimulus.

A magnetic field was then formed above that portion of the brain and left there for a period of time. Most volunteers reported a "feeling" of someone in the room with them, watching - the religious ones interpreted it as a feeling of spirituality, of God being with them. When the magnetic field was turned off the feeling went away.

Can we then produce God with a simple electromagnet? Or is it just a quirk of our brain formation, an "input" that we don't know how else to interpret or understand? Basically a hallucination?
reply report
1. 61
  mischeviousmeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Could very well be a hallucination.. When we are conditioned to tack meanings onto things, no matter how illogical or irrational, we will tack on similar meanings. It's the human condition to understand by the words of another, though most times, it's a personal opinion and that is all..
  reply report
  93
  wildernessposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  You've got it. We always try to understand what we experience, whether it is a strange light in the sky or a sudden influx of adrenaline for no apparent reason.
  
  And when we don't have a good reference for that understanding we use what we DO have whether it be pure imagination, past experiences of something semi-similar or just a desire that something be true.
  reply report
  61
  mischeviousmeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  It's all ego my friend, ie; desire, fear, angst, hope, dream, virtue, title, position or attitude. The list is a long one and goes on as far as the mind can grasp. One just has to let go of it and it will come to them. That's how it is, moments come from nothing and fade into nothing. Like a bolt of lightining... Bam! another moment and it's gone.
  reply report
  71
  aguasilverposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Keep clutching at those straws.....
  reply report
  0
  jomineposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  You ought to know a little more neuro-psychiatry before labelling it as straw!
  reply report
2. 71
  aguasilverposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  So, you are proposing that at random times during my day, somehow an electromagnetic field spontaneously surrounds my head and I hear God speaking to me?
  
  OK, that sounds totally rational, far more logical than the fact that God may actually be communicating with me.
  
  Amazingly this can also happen when I am in a situation where I am ministering to someone, and they can get it to on occassion.
  
  OK, I think we can assume that we have no comparative experience of these matters.
  reply report
  58
  A Troubled Manposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Maybe, maybe not, but certainly your belief that your god is speaking to you has been conjured in your head, spontaneously, or otherwise.
  reply report
  71
  aguasilverposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I know you REALLY NEED to think that, and believe that, but you have NO EVIDENCE to present that could confirm that.
  reply report
  58
  Mark Knowlesposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  There is plenty. Unless you can show us the majik of course? In which case - as your video posits - it is all in your head.
  
  Having a bad week are we? I see you have been here arguing with the heathen for about 3 days straight.
  reply report
  71
  aguasilverposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Show it, prove it, obey your own rules.
  
  Your empty rhetoric is worthless, by your own admission.
  
  Nah, just waiting for some deals to transpire that are held up in getting the authorities to approve them, so not much to do business wise, thought I would spend some time in the forums countering you guys and getting my stats up.
  
  Off travelling again next week, so making the most of my free time to spread the word and have tussles with some egos that need reduction.
  reply report
  58
  Mark Knowlesposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  There is plenty of evidence that "spirituality," is a wholly internal, subjective experience. Otherwise - you would be able to show us the majik.
  
  Speaking of egos..........
  
  No wonder your religion causes so many fights.
  reply report
  58
  A Troubled Manposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Scientists are already beginning to confirm that, with EVIDENCE.
  reply report
  71
  aguasilverposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  So present it TM, just present the EVIDENCE... until then....(YAWN)
  reply report
  58
  A Troubled Manposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  YOU presented the evidence, see the OP and the link YOU provided.
  reply report
79
Aficionadaposted 12 years ago
Wow. Your quotes remind me of how fortunate I have been in the churches I have attended and do still attend. None of this sounds like anything I have been around. I know that it exists - somewhere in this vast universe - but I haven't had to suffer through such things.

rebekahELLE, what empirical evidence do you have that preachers "almost always" preach about "getting what you want, or don't want"? "Almost always" is a rather sweeping statement. Maybe it's true in your experience, but how do you know that your own experience is actually representative of the majority?
reply report
1. 61
  mischeviousmeposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  You want to get into heaven, do you not?
  reply report
  79
  Aficionadaposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  
  Makes no difference to me. There have been times in my life, as a Christian, when I have actively wanted not to go to the "heaven" that I heard some people describe. At this time in my life, I do not have an active interest either in entering or in avoiding "heaven."
  
  What I do desire is to live a life conscious of the presence of God; when I am close to death to be able to look back on my life knowing or believing that I did what I believed God wanted me to do with my life; and in whatever eternity offers after this life, to be able to experience God even more deeply and satisfyingly than I have here on earth.
  
  Some people would call that "heaven." And so, if that's the name you give what I have described, then in that sense I would agree. But do I want "to get into heaven"? - no, that's not the language I use, because it means something radically different to me than what I want after this life.
  reply report
  79
  Aficionadaposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  
  A different response to what I believe you are trying to imply:
  
  In the hundreds of sermons I have heard through the decades, a very, very few of them have related to the issue of "getting into heaven." Some of them have, I admit freely. But the majority? Not even close.
  reply report
0
klarawieckposted 12 years ago
Thanks for sharing this link. It's very interesting.
I think I was dropped as a baby...
reply report
86
rebekahELLEposted 12 years ago

As I see it, and have seen in the past, religion itself is an answer to someone's need for something they think they can't provide on their own. Preachers preach about getting answers to prayers, having abundance without doing anything but praying, getting healed, saved from hell, forgiveness for sins, on and on. That's all centered around self. 'do this and you'll get this.'

I don't go to church but studied theology for years while in college. Cultures form their religious beliefs. It's been this way throughout history. Why do you think there are so many different beliefs?
reply report
63
SandyMcCollumposted 12 years ago
Very interesting read, and so is this thread. I was left handed and my first grade teacher used to whack my knuckles with a ruler because being left handed was 'a sign of the devil' and she wasn't having it in her classroom. I am largely ambidextrous today because of her, but she could have been nicer.

As for the God-Spot, I'm going to have to think about his for a while. Kind of hard to wrap my brain around it this early in the day!
reply report
1. 0
  Billie Paglioloposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  Sandy, I find your relationship to left-handed ness and this discussion very appropo. I myself am left-hand and have had the privilege of working in an office where 5 out of the 7 of us were left-handed, and 3 of us who had expressed atheistic inclinations. (I never knew the religious views of the other two. The connection between aquasilver's assertion that atheists, etc. are more self--involved as this article would indicate means to me that (1.) either the connection with self does not imply SELFISHNESS (All of the individuals who worked in this department were exceptionaly giving individuals in all aspects of their lives) or it indicates that (2). the use of the right side of the brain as is prevalent in left-handers is not connected with the type of brain activity (or injury) described in this study. As Spock would say "Fascinating."
  reply report
  71
  aguasilverposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  My daughter is left handed also...
  reply report
60
Druid Dudeposted 12 years ago
I talk in my sleep. Sometimes it isn't english. I know a little german, some spanish, a little French, but not enough to hold conversations....witnesses told me I was talking. Sometimes, it is in a language which isn't identifiable. Weird.
reply report
1. 0
  klarawieckposted 12 years agoin reply to this
  I've done this, too... or so I've been told. But the way I see it, it's a spirit guide coming through in her native tongue. It would be interesting if I could get my husband to record it and then try to find out the language.
  reply report
63
SandyMcCollumposted 12 years ago
Maybe you dream in GerSpanEnch. Bilingual people have often told me they dream in both languages, which I can't even imagine, only speaking English, myself.
reply report
61
By His Wayposted 12 years ago
Well, greeeeat.

Now I'm considered brain damaged.
reply report
60
Druid Dudeposted 12 years ago
They say there is a genetic causation for political philosophies. I always suspected Republicans were mutants.
reply report

Post a Reply

jump to first post

Necessary
HubPages Device ID	This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
Login	This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google Recaptcha	This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
Akismet	This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google Analytics	This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic Pixel	This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web Services	This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
Cloudflare	This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted Libraries	Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)

Features
Google Custom Search	This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google Maps	Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google Charts	This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host API	This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTube	Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Vimeo	Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Paypal	This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Login	You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Maven	This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)

Marketing
Google AdSense	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClick	Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index Exchange	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Sovrn	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Ads	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexus	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Openx	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon Project	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLift	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say Media	We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing Pixels	We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking Pixels	We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.

Statistics
Author Google Analytics	This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
Comscore	ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking Pixel	Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
Clicksco	This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)

Scientists find areas of the brain responsible for spirituality

Arts and Design

Autos

Books, Literature, and Writing

Business and Employment

Education and Science

Entertainment and Media

Family and Parenting

Fashion and Beauty

Food and Cooking

Games, Toys, and Hobbies

Gender and Relationships

Health

Holidays and Celebrations

Home and Garden

HubPages Tutorials and Community

Personal Finance

Pets and Animals

Politics and Social Issues

Religion and Philosophy

Sports and Recreation

Technology

Travel and Places

About Us

This website uses cookies

Scientists find areas of the brain responsible for spirituality

Related Discussions

This website uses cookies