Do you feel that Adam Lanza was so good a shot that he did not injure or wound a

1. 65

   LAURENS WRIGHTposted 11 years ago

   Do you feel that Adam Lanza was so good a shot that he did not injure or wound anyone?
   
   Adam Lanza was said to have stolen the guns he used in the mass shooting.  Were there any children or adults that were injured?  Were there any taken to the hospitals?  Were there any treated by doctors?  With the mass bombing in Boston, there were over 180 people hurt?  How could  Adam Lanza shoot moving targets and with deadly Accuracy and Precision to have killed each person ?
   NOTE: Wikipedia states that Sandy Hook is owned by the Federal Government.  Only 11 % of the population can think outside the box while the other 89% stays with in boundries and can not see through.

   replyreport
2. 93

   FatFreddysCatposted 11 years ago

   Ummm...what???
   Someone's tin foil hat is DEFINITELY on too tight.

   replyreport
   1. 88

      Georgie Loweryposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      I'm inclined to agree!

      replyreport
3. 74

   Cantuhearmescreamposted 11 years ago

   I'm not sure what your asking... so maybe I shouldn't be anwsering, but I guess I'd like to know where your going with this. Um, Adam Lanza did hurt/kill lots of people and I don't know if shooting multiple rounds of bullets until you eventually hit someone would be considered "deadly accuracy". I really hope that you're not one of those people that suggests everything is a conspiracy theory. I've heard it about Sandy Hook, today some moron suggested it about the Boston Marathon bombing and I don't know if that's where your going. All I have to say is ask the people who buried their loved ones their opinion about these conspiracies.

   replyreport
4. 68

   Angela Blairposted 11 years ago

   Adam Lanza was not a good shot -- he was a deranged idiot. There was no accuracy/deadly accuracy involved -- he just kept firing until he was ready to quit. I have no idea at all on your "note" -- but definitely wonder how Wikipedia came up with that information -- sounds pretty presumptious to me.

   replyreport
5. 60

   duffsmomposted 11 years ago

   Exactly what conspiracy are you putting forth - that the federal government saw to it that all of these children were killed?

   replyreport
6. 55

   Alberic Oposted 11 years ago

   When some one is shot, you only have minutes or seconds to stop the bleeding. It is harder to treat and stabilize the wounded in an active shooting than after a bombing. You don't have to be a good shot to kill a bunch of unarmed people too.

   replyreport
7. 0

   Justsilvieposted 11 years ago

   Sometime we take facts out of a chaotic situation and work hard to make them meet a scenario we are happy with...  It does not make it so!

   replyreport
8. 79

   junksellerposted 11 years ago

   Two adults were injured in the shooting and treated at Danbury Hospital. Last I have heard, Lanza fired 154 rounds from the rifle. At three hits each that's only 72 hits, which is right around 50% accuracy. That doesn't sound deadly accurate to me. Three hits is more than enough for tiny bodies. (we don't know how many hits people received. I'm just suggesting it as an average.)
   
   Believing in crap evidence isn't thinking outside of the box. It's just a different box.

   replyreport