Is it true, that the size of a man shoes can determine the size of his penis?

1. 70

   Darknlovely3436posted 13 years ago

   Is it true, that the size of a man  shoes
   can determine the size of his penis?

   replyreport
2. 80

   camloposted 13 years ago

   I read an article about such myths somewhere, and it said it is a myth. So's the one about the size of his nose. But the over all size of the man can determine the size of his penis, apparently.

   replyreport
3. 60

   T.Y._Hudsonposted 13 years ago

   It may be in some cases. But I can personally tell you that my shoe size, hand size, and overall body size is VERY deceiving. Plus, isn't Ron Jeremy like 5 feet tall? That should be all the answer you need!

   replyreport
4. 61

   duffsmomposted 13 years ago

   It would be interesting to ask that question of a man with a small shoe size and see if he says it is a myth or...

   replyreport
5. 61

   Bronson_Hubposted 13 years ago

   If this were true, people who use sites like Craigslist would put up far more pictures of their feet than...  Well, you get the gist of it.

   replyreport
6. 82

   kallini2010posted 13 years ago

   The easiest way to tell (I am speaking as an engineer while containing my laughter):
   
   You need a pool of volunteers, measure shoe size and the other size as well and see if there is any correlation.
   
   The number of participants should be considerable and no cheating in measuring....
   
   On a personal note: why men are so obsessed with THE size?  Is it not the skill that matters most?
   
   But skill is harder to measure, harder being the operative word.  I should really stop now.!!! LOL
   
   Feel free to report your findings!  Good luck!

   replyreport
7. 85

   wychicposted 13 years ago

   The one I've heard is that shoe size correlates with arm length from elbow to wrist, while hand size is what correlates to penis size. I don't know how accurate it is, I can only say that in my own experience...well...my ex has tiny hands, and my husband's are about twice the size of my own. 'Nough said.

   replyreport
8. 68

   Rosie2010posted 13 years ago

   well, I've seen a couple of guy's profile pic here showing their feet and nothing else.  Does that mean they are bragging about the size of their manhood?

   replyreport
9. 75

   arbposted 13 years ago

   I hope not or every guy here is going to run out and by size 15 and trip all over himself.

   replyreport
10. 73

    Zubair Ahmedposted 13 years ago

    
    
    NO it is not.  You can't have it that easy, having a big 'member' requires allot more work than buying a big pair of shoes.  IF that was the case, you would probably see most men wearing shoes 10 sizes bigger than what they need.

    replyreport
11. 0

    Butch Newsposted 13 years ago

    As a gay male who has been around I find no evidence to support this idea.
    
    I've seen some really big members and there seems to be no rhyme nor reason behind it.
    
    It seems to relate to genetics.  From experience I can say that black males tend to be larger while Asians tend to be smaller.
    
    Many Greeks seem to be well endowed.  There seems to be no reason for any of it.

    replyreport
    1. 51

       almorrposted 10 years agoin reply to this

       I don't know about that but my hands measure 7" from wrist to finger tip, my shoe size is also size 7 and guess what my penis is ??????? long. LOL, however,  my friends shoe and hand size is also is 7 and 7" long but his penis is only ????? long.

       replyreport
12. 61

    fundguruposted 13 years ago

    It depends. There are men who are generally taller and bigger than others, and everything really is bigger. They then also have bigger shoes. But I doubt that you could say it in general for all people.
    
    I heard from a few women that instead of the shoes or nose, the size of hands and thumbs gives a good indication.
    
    Nevertheless the size has to do much which genetic. People in Asia have smaller penises than in the western world, but probably similar shoe size. And people in Africa than have longer penises than people in the western world.
    
    Therefore genetic plays a more important role than shoe size.
    
    Then also do not oversee that some men use surgery and other methods to have an enlargement. You would not recognize it just with view to the shoes size.
    
    Well and of course there are two kinds, blood and flesh penises. A flesh penis normally seems to be very huge, while a blood penis seems to be small. But in action a flesh penis does not grow much while a blood penis can grow to multiple size.
    
    Further it said that up to 30% of the penis stays inside and only in action move forward. This makes it pretty difficult to measure size a all.

    replyreport
13. 60

    MarcellusShaleposted 13 years ago

    No, I wear size 13 shoes and have a very average penis.

    replyreport
14. 61

    philirodjeposted 13 years ago

    It is definitely not true. don't be deceived

    replyreport
15. 61

    mrshinyshoesposted 13 years ago

    Well, apes have big feet and big penises, so it stands to reason those guys who have 'big of everything' are also more primitive and closer to apes than more civilized and evolved men with finer, slicker features (ie.., Asian men). 

    replyreport
16. 60

    perfectperceptionposted 13 years ago

    Not at all.....They are two different parts of the body and one has nothing to do with the other.

    replyreport
17. 57

    webguyonlineposted 13 years ago

    i think it's not, there are no scientific explanation that can support that myth.

    replyreport
18. 0

    anonamanposted 13 years ago

    Feet and shoes and penises, both in size and in function are in fact linked. For example, a little-known but guaranteed form of male contraception is the simple act of placing a very small, very hard, angular stone inside a shoe. As soon as you exert any weight, it makes you limp....
    
    Your best guide to penis vs shoe size is simply the old rule. If your penis is longer than 12 inches...it's a foot.

    replyreport
19. 60

    Bellamieposted 13 years ago

    OMG!! Seriously!??  How many of you men wear size 8 inch shoes?!! Lmao!!

    replyreport
20. 60

    Lovesloveposted 13 years ago

    In my experience absolutely not !!  The man in my life has small feet....I am saying no more !!

    replyreport
21. 59

    JayDee Sterlingposted 13 years ago

    Is this a trick question? No? Ok, let's put it this way. No, that is a not a true correlation.

    replyreport
22. 60

    Ashantinaposted 13 years ago

    You know what they say: 'big feet.. big shoes'!

    replyreport
23. 80

    A.A. Zavalaposted 13 years ago

    Maybe the quickest way to find out is just to ask?  Men with big members may look for chances to show off, while men with tiny members may beat around the bush.  If a guy wears sandles all the time, does than mean he's circumsized?

    replyreport
24. 55

    ibbarkingmadposted 13 years ago

    Nope. Otherwise his shoe size would change every time he was aroused. I'm not trying to be nasty, just pointing out the absurdity of the idea is all.

    replyreport
25. 0

    ExoticHippieQueenposted 13 years ago

    Oh gawd, I have been laughing my way through these answers.  I just had to click on it to read what everybody wrote. As a woman of a "certain age" and "certain experience", I can tell you that some men who are very large bodied have only an average and sometimes even a small penis, while a 5'9" man had the biggest penis I had ever seen.  As one person said, there seems to be no rhyme or reason for it, always a mystery.  If only it were that easy to tell, lol!

    replyreport
26. 60

    Kyle Riversposted 13 years ago

    That's a myth! A bloody myth I tell you! No seriously, is there even a real study for that?

    replyreport
27. 67

    Allen Williamsposted 13 years ago

    The size of the shoes don't have any impact on the size of the penis.  The real factor is how good are the eyes of the person looking at it, and what is the experience level of that person?  I had woman tell me I was the largest man she has ever seen, and I have also had the opposite reaction.  OK, It was the same women but she had to put her glasses on to see the real thing.  I won't say which way it looked the largest but she turned out to be pretty happy anyway.  Oh, her experience level; let's just say, "who cares?".

    replyreport
28. 60

    smzclarkposted 13 years ago

    no. but i did read once that indian men were on average 1/2 an inch bigger

    replyreport
29. 83

    Pamela N Redposted 12 years ago

    No. People are usually proportionate in size but just like some people have very large noses, some huge hands and others big ears. Sometimes an appendage is just large.
    
    Work on your Kegel exercises and you won't have to be concerned about the size of a man's endowment.
    
    Too much emphasis is put on the size of people's body parts. It's why women pay large sums of money to have their breasts enlarged.
    
    Whether or not a person is kind, intelligent and have traits in common are much more important than whether or not he is large.

    replyreport