We've seen a lot of threads on the uprisings in Egypt and Libya that have spread throughout the Middle East/Asian Muslim population.
There has been speculation: Is all this violence really about some schlocky, tasteless anti-Islam movie?
Is it an indemnification of failed Obama administration polices?
Did the US "apologize" thus inviting more attacks?
Here's a view from FORBES magazine.
It basically asserts it's not about the US. It's about dismal living conditions that have not changed sufficiently or sufficiently quickly after Arab Spring installed new leaders.
If that's the "real" cause, I cannot help but see a parallel with US and the rabid disaffection with President Obama's ability to transform our lives quickly enough.
True, Americans are not rioting in the streets. They are not storming buildings and destroying property.
However, there's definitely an angry. angry, verbally violent mob mentality happening here.
Agree? Disagree? Why?
http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/20 … -they-are/
So they are killing US ambassadors and burning US flags from Libya to London because change hasn't happened quick enough?
Why in the world would we swallow such obvious silliness?
What are the people at the riots saying and doing and who is it directed towards? They didn't go storm there own governmental facilities they demolished the US embassy.
Lewis Carroll might disagree but I think it's us that's the target.
I was reading something very similar myself just the other day:
http://motherboard.vice.com/2012/9/10/w … orists-say
Broadly, I agree. At least, there certainly appears to be some correlation between rioting and hunger. The situation is perhaps too complex to assert that just one factor is responsible for the unrest, but I'm sure hunger and poverty can be quite powerful drivers.
If they are hungry it still stands to reason they should be going after their own people who after all are strangling us with oil prices. There are hungry people here too.
Indeed there are, and if you read the link I've provided you'll see that theorists are suggesting global riots within the next 12 months, I doubt this is *just* going to be a Mid East issue.
The banks have also profited handsomely from the food crisis.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/busin … 00011.html
You know I see hunger as a problem.
That however is not what has been going on the past several days in the Middle East. If that's the case they have been dealing with hunger pangs since at least 1979 in various places over there and destroying American embassies and killing Americans must satiate them somehow. Don't you think?
That however is not what has been going on the past several days in the Middle East.
How, exactly, do you know that is not at least part of what's going on in the Mid East? Arabs/Muslims are human beings just like us, the people that killed the US ambassador are extremists. People may have been hungry for decades, but recently they fought for some kind of freedom, and hope. It's not happened fast enough and they are frightened, largely uneducated and vulnerable to terrorists groups.
How would you react? You're reacting now, clearly. Are you starving, have you lived in a totalitarian state? Are all 1.2 billion Muslims protesting? If you were a Muslim that didn't protest but heard the US calling you an animal, a misogynist, what would you do? How would you react? Do you think about this?
Lot's of assumptions there.
I never said 1.2 billion Muslims now did I?
Secondly you don't what i have ever done in my life, whether I have faced starvation or not.
Thirdly is there no act that the ones who do feel the need to do will ever be responsible for.
I mean we are The Great Satan after all. You believe that too don't you?
Why blame Obama? This goes back decades, at least to the Israeli ethnic cleansing of Palestine in 1948, the destruction of democracy in Iran by the CIA and Mi6 in 1953 and most Presidents ever since have supported violent, repressive Arab regimes against their own people
But it's not an Arab thing.
The rioting goes well beyond the Arab world. Protests continue and are growing in Asia and North Africa, too.
Just saw there's a new death threat out against Salman Rushdie who incited similar reaction with his book "The Satanic Verses."
The biased media will babble about anything to get the heat off the failure of current leadership.
The truth is that failure at the top has led to this chaos.
Otherwise, they would be attacking their own leaders and buildings not those of the USA.
This chaos will only stop when we quit pandering the terrorists.
By the way, terrorists do not have any trouble getting food and shelter - they steal it from those who do not riot.
Biased liberal media.
The motto of Forbes magazine is "The Capitalist Tool."
I don't normally agree with syndicated columnist Kathleen Parker, but yesterday's column rang true.
Lots of news coverage today on Romney campaign's claim that "This wouldn't have happened under President Romney."
I'll find a clip of him being interviewed about Egypt. He sounds a lot like Sarah Palin claiming North Korea is our ally.
Meanwhile, Kathleen Parker link + excerpt:
http://lacrossetribune.com/news/opinion … 963f4.html
"... Mitt Romney decided to enter the fray .... His comments condemning President Obama’s “apologist” foreign policy were premature, inappropriate and too politically motivated to be effective either as proper criticism or as a campaign maneuver.
Romney’s foreign policy adviser, Rich Williamson, subsequently asserted that events would have been different under a President Romney. Perhaps, but might we use the same powers of extrapolation to infer that 9/11 wouldn’t have occurred if George W. Bush hadn’t been president?
Obama critics have long held that his post-exceptionalist, lead-from-behind model only invites contempt in the Middle East.
Since no policy thus far seems to have been very effective, we’ll have to rely on history for more information."
That's a very superficial comment. Both parties have recently supported the overthrow of dictators in the Middle East although in the name of stability both parties supported
U.S. aid and comfort to them in the past, especially Mubarak. Have you heard that differences over U.S. foreign policy stops at the water's edge? Apparently not.
Oh goody they're not mad at us I don't have to cancel my vacation to Libya! Jeeeeeeeeeesus
Interesting argument, I wonder how much food stuff they were able to lute from the school, consulate and bodies of our fallen countrymen and women.
Egypt Protesters Paid to Riot Embassy SOURCE: CNN!
Imagine that, someone actually paying folks to kill Americans. Soldiers for fortune, terrorist, or just poor starving people better yet all the above.
1. Wonder where that money trail stops?
Hmm. Probably an offshore bank account somewhere. Untraceable.
2. Did you notice in the column on the right there is a YouTube video urging people to burn the Q'ran -- a Q'ran burning contest.
I am not going to post a link here and inadvertently increase traffic to the site.
Al Qaeda is notorious for exploiting any news headline or rumor to excuse their activity. I stopped taking that mess seriously two days ago. My worry is the jihadists who are in America and who can't be found. How did we let that happen, post 911?
In my humble opinion, it is two fold. It started out being about the movie which is just an excuse for them to riot about our preferential treatment of Israel compared to the Palestinians. Then it morphed into the movie being an insult to certain factions of the muslim world. Don't forget, Islam is a world wide religion. Therefore, the rioting is not confined just to the mid-eastern region, but has now spread world wide. Is the entire muslim world angry at Americans, I don't think so. I think it is just certain radical factions.
Forbes - Ask a billionaire the reason for riots in middle east?
I'm in the no news zone, no TV or phone, No news paper, just this box since 2008 so I'm a bit slow catching on to whats going on.
Is this the movie in part:
If so it's the stupidest production imaginable and the inter dubbing of words that are clearly not what the person appearing. I've heard that many who played part are claiming they didn't know they would have their lines changed with voice overs would not have taken part.
I don't believe that to be truth, I believe they are trying to escape any blame for death in a riot no matter where the violence bursts to rampant killing.
I do agree that it was an excuse in the beginning but is morphing into wholesale violence world wide with other issues, like hunger and other things that keep them a bit primitive, butt some one had to have a computer to see it.
I'm glad to be out of the world for the most part, a trip to town every 3 months and I think my next trip will be to stock up for enough time to stick it out until February to see what the election brings.
I think the nations that help with providing aid to these muslim nations - should cut off that aid we are not the one's going beyond our borders 'warring' against 'non-believers' or murdering their 'ambassadors'. I think it's time for us to get tough too and show that we don't appreciate the murder of our citizens nor accept blame, for their current state of affairs. I am so tired of their violence.
by Marwan Asmar 10 years ago
What do think US President Obama feels about the regional turbulance in the Middle East and should America be worried about the change of governments and the general protests sweeping the area?
by Readmikenow 10 months ago
Should President Donald Trump invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807 to end the violence in America's big cities?“The Insurrection Act of 1807 is a United States federal law (10 U.S.C. §§ 251–255; prior to 2016, 10 U.S.C. §§ 331–335; amended 2006, 2007) that empowers the President of the United...
by Readmikenow 12 months ago
I don't agree with much this leftest from the LA Times says, BUT I do believe the rioting is benefiting President Donald TrumpHow the nightly clashes on American streets benefit TrumpAn eight-inch hole blown through the wall of a police precinct house in Seattle. A courthouse set on fire in...
by Ashutosh Joshi 4 years ago
What's your opinion on this 'War on Terrorism' in the Middle East?
by Sharlee 3 years ago
The Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995 is a public law of the United States passed by the 104th Congress on October 23, 1995. The Act became law without a presidential signature on November 8, 1995. After 23 years we now have a president that will keep America's promise to Israel.
by nightwork4 10 years ago
Will things in the middle east ever become stable?it seems like throught history the middle east is always in some kind of conflict, is it possible for this to end?
Copyright © 2021 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of Maven Coalition, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|