At last count there are between 600, 000 and 800,000 disabled , or awiting disability benifits ,Iraq and Afghan verterans waiting up to two years or longer for approval for VA. benifits ? More veterans are commiting suicide than are being killed in Action ! In five years time the waiting list has increased by 2,ooo percent ? That my friends is absolutely akin to treasonous on this and HIS administrations part !
Let me hear anyone justify this ! The World media is absolutely out of touch with accountability in reporting against this administrations atrocious failures .
Questions to ask yourself before pointing fingers.
1. Who put them in harms way?
2. Who did the most to cut their benefits?
Incidentally, the answers to #1 and #2 are the same.
Well, if the Bush administration caused the cuts, what has this administration done to correct the problem? Up to this point they seem to have no fear when it comes to spending money.
It is a serious problem that needs to be fixed.
Bill , its time to let the Bush fault Line go isn't it ! Your guys been there for FIVE , count them IIIII years ! one .two three , are you there? , four five !
Actually only a little over 4 but still time to do something.
This administration will be blaming Bush until most of us are dead and gone. They absolutely refuse to recognize our almost 17 Trillion debt as an issue even though they can't blame that on Bush.
Is that your answer as to why this administration does nothing...its Bush's fault?
I believe that was almost 5 years ago. Its time for the current democratic senate and executive to do something.
Why don't you call the Senate , Congress and the White House to ask them to change it if you think that's why?
Why? Why would you do that when you can keep the blame Bush thing going?
But that's the best way to serve our veterans isn't it? Blame George Bush.
He is not, the Obama administration has spent the most on veterans affairs of any president, more people have been hired, records have finally been computerized (and the process for computer processing is to be completed by 2015) and the Obama Administration has radically increased the number of application offices, unfortunately in the changeover period from the old system to the computerized system there has been ad division of labor that has resulted in a backlog.
I am fully with you more Veterans care is an excellent idea, indeed Obama worked hard to exempt veterans services from the sequester. The system needs more employees to handle the backlog until the system is computerized, unfortunately that requires funds that are all but impossible to get past Congress.
We all know that sequestration was intended to be a painful as possible, and cuts were selected for issues that would cause the most pain. I'm not sure who made these decisions, but Obama would certainly have input and the power to exclude certain cuts. Robo Squirrel is still getting funded, but veterans suffer? Air traffic controllers get cut even while they are recruiting for new employees? Take the blinders off Josak, it is not that difficult to see through the smoke screen surrounding sequestration.
As noted Obama already passed legislation so that the sequester will not affect veterans.
Good, was that a part of all his hard work you mentioned? We all know that the areas selected to cut were hand picked to prove a point and make us come to our senses about increased taxes and runaway spending. Sequestration was Obama's idea, and then he tried to blame it on others. Josak, a school child could see through this sequestration farce yet many adults can't figure it out? You just proved Obama can pick and choose what he wants to cut.
He needs congressional approval to do so, republicans did not oppose that measure (bad for business that is) unfortunately not so with a lot of the other stuff, since compromise could not be reached both sides got cuts they did not want.
Sequestration is the result of "fiscal responsibility" a central ideology of the Republican party in contrast to stimulus recovery favored by Democrats so it's pretty funny to suggest that a measure passed by a Republican congress on Republican ideals is some how Obama's fault. What is really happening is conservatives want cuts, refused to prevent the cuts then attempted to pass on the responsibility for the inevitable consequences of their ideology.
Josak, get real on this for once. If we have to cut our household spending we use common sense in the selection process. Can you honestly tell us that common sense prevailed in selecting where cuts were applied?
Are you saying you are opposed to "fiscal responsibility?" It doesn't look like the "stimulus recovery" is working all that well.
I am trying to point out that this whole sequestration idea is nothing more than a political game, and all of us are the losers. By the time they get finished with the game, they want us begging to pay higher taxes and insisting they spend more money that we don't have.
Why is it so hard for so many to see how this was intended to work?
Fiscal responsibility in the ideological sense has never worked in this nation (nor indeed anywhere else it is currently failing hard in Europe), Reagan, Clinton etc, have all used stimulus growth and it is indeed working, while Bush crushed our economy we just had our best month in the retail sector in American history.
No political division decided where the cuts were applied and failure to properly compromise.
Sure it's partly politics but that is what happens in two party systems.
You are actually going to play THAT card? Like Harry Reid???????????
I better quit before i get banned...........
I would like to agree with your assessment, but as an honorably discharged veteran, I can't complain about my treatment during this administration...so far. In fact, in my situation, I have seen a remarkable improvement. In 2005 I had to wait forever to book an appointment at the VA Hospital, but lately I have seen a radical change in protocol. Over the past three years I have received the most comprehensive care that I have witnessed since my discharge, over ten years ago. I can call the VA, to set an appointment, and can rest assured that I will be seen within a very reasonable time frame. And the payment is amazing. It's on a scale, so I pay very little. If not for the VA I would have NO health care.
It's because Obama stated that since this is an all voluntary military they get what they deserve. There should be no help in any way to the veterans because they knew what they were getting into when they joined. Obama is an A$$ and all Presidents should have military training prior to be elected. Not to mention that all Presidents should be Americans. Yes, this is what he said and as a disabled veteran myself this just sucks! Even the doctors at the VA don't want to help the veterans it's a terrible place to go for any medical help.
When did he make such a statement? This just seems simply not factual, or you have taken a statement completely out of context.
Could you provide a link, so that we can corroborate your accusations? Thanks.
Maybe it's your state. In my state, the VA is doing, at least, a satisfactory job.
I don't know why it takes my husband five months to get an appointment when he tells them chest pains. I don't know why it takes two months to get an appointment when he has to change a mental health appointment. He is a disabled Vietnam Vet that had to fight for 17 years to get disability. He expects it from our government. They have been documented as passing the word to delay until they all die or commit suicide so that they won't have to pay them any disability. What more can we expect from our government?
Mostly because the VA is basically socialized medicine. Health care run by the government. Precursor to Obamacare.
Obviously then we should not have V.A. Benefits right? Amazing, pretend to care about veterans then immediately leave them out in the cold with their health problems.
It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.
Uninvited , thats true too ! Yet we can't fire them all ? Whats with that !
We can't fire them all, but we should!
At any rate, the problem of the ways veterans have been treated (or mistreated) is a shameful act of indifference that dates back to the Vietnam war and is still going on today with the same disregard for their sacrifice
I agree Petra , one thousand percent , If four years can't change enough for an administration . then maybe it should be One six year term ! Who knows ! But somethings got to give . Veterans have always suffered from an intentional lack of care ! And as I too am guilty of an over agressive patriotism , and ask as much as anyone of thier sacrifice , I have for years been writing letters and editorials for Vets , locally in city and state papers ! I am truely ashamed of America's worst oversight ! Veteran care !
The lack of Tax REVENUES or a Creditcard for the Obama Presidency is being felt by many Federal Gvt programs and State Gvt programs. The economy and people suffer without tax collection, but Capitalism does good without regulations and taxes.
Josak Actually , your wrong about how much Obama has do to "change " the way veterans are cared for , Yes he passed an order for 1,300 new shrinks for treatment of PTDS , more staff and doctors , and something less than 10 percent have actually been hired , He ordered ,or bush did , the computerization of records , less than ten percent of which is done , The hospital hallways , closets and storage rooms are full of paper records everywhere ! Veterans are waiting up to eight months for appointments for anything , Va hospital buildings everywhere are falling into shambles ! More vets and soldiers are commiting suicide than are being killed each year in battle ! This is the most anti- veteran president in our modern history .
by Jack Lee 5 years ago
It has been almost a year since he left office. Though he seems to stick around DC and make his comments occasionally about policies...The question I have for all is this - what is your opinion of this President in his 8 years in office...?Overall, has he been good or bad for America?Please use...
by ga anderson 9 years ago
Political pundits are saying the Obama admin is floating the typical "trial balloons", (ie. rumors to pundits to get it in the public conversation/news), of a wealth tax - to see if it would have a chance of acceptance.The "rumors" floating around are talking about a 1%...
by Kathleen Cochran 5 years ago
"One of the many underappreciated legacies of the Obama administration has been its widespread implementation of pro-consumer policies. Under the outgoing president’s leadership, multiple executive branch departments and independent agencies have enacted laws, rules and regulations designed to...
by Reality Bytes 9 years ago
A report Monday night on the nature of the administration's drone program has the potential to dramatically revamp the debate over President Barack Obama's foreign policy and the confirmation process for his incoming cabinet.The report, by Michael Isikoff of NBC News, reveals that the Obama...
by Sharlee 2 years ago
And now we have Obamagate... Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell on Wednesday sent top Republican senators a list of former senior Obama administration officials who appear to have been involved in efforts that “unmasked” former national security adviser Michael Flynn — the...
by Beth Perry 9 years ago
In four words how would you describe the bevy of latest Obama administration scandals?The Benghazi embassy murders. The IRS targeting conservative groups. The DOJ's invasion of journalists' phone records. DOJ head, Eric Holder, poised to investigate himself.In only four words, how would you sum up...
Copyright © 2022 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of Maven Coalition, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|