This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: "https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr"

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
jump to last post 1-17 of 17 discussions (112 posts)

In four words how would you describe the bevy of latest Obama administration sca

  1. bethperry profile image90
    bethperryposted 5 years ago

    In four words how would you describe the bevy of latest Obama administration scandals?

    The Benghazi embassy murders. The IRS targeting conservative groups. The DOJ's invasion of journalists' phone records. DOJ head, Eric Holder, poised to investigate himself.
    In only four words, how would you sum up the bevy of scandals currently surrounding the Obama administration?

  2. stclairjack profile image82
    stclairjackposted 5 years ago

    making.....  nixon.....  look ..... good

    1. bethperry profile image90
      bethperryposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      stclairjack, methinks they missed the boat not using this as a campaign slogan! lol

    2. stclairjack profile image82
      stclairjackposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      i'm humbled, i'd like to thank the GOP, the academy, and my mom,.... i always dreamed of this day but never realy though it get a "best answer"

    3. Mitch Alan profile image82
      Mitch Alanposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Funny...

    4. bethperry profile image90
      bethperryposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      stclairjack, just don't forget to return the evening gown back to Michelle O. wink

    5. IDONO profile image81
      IDONOposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Congrats stclairjack. bethperry. You're smart! You're sitting there, watching us bicker back and forth, below somewhere, and the whole time, you are going," CHA-CHING" . I had one of those questions recently. They are fun. Good Job.

    6. bethperry profile image90
      bethperryposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      IDONO, I had intended this as a light-hearted way for ppl to express a simple opinion on the topic. But now I wish I knew how to limit the political squabbling without disabling others the opportunity to post their original answers, lol!

  3. duffsmom profile image61
    duffsmomposted 5 years ago

    Unfortunately, business as usual....................................................

    1. bethperry profile image90
      bethperryposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Nice, duffsmom!

  4. Skarlet profile image85
    Skarletposted 5 years ago

    I guess if I only have four words it would have to be...Obama lied, people died.

  5. lovemychris profile image62
    lovemychrisposted 5 years ago

    Republican.....Media.....Machine...... Lies.

  6. LandmarkWealth profile image81
    LandmarkWealthposted 5 years ago

    "Exactly what I expected"

    I am just am amazed there is anyone who didn't see this coming.  And I thought the Clinton's were arrogant with a high sense of entitlement.   This administration makes them looks humble.

    1. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Curtis Morrison is a freelance journalist and political activist who plans to attend Whittier Law School in the fall, but is currently under FBI investigation at the request of Sen. Mitch McConnell (KY-R).
      and HE'S going after Holder? P-u-leeeeeeeez

    2. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      He is under investigation because he illegally recorded conversations in violation of Fed & State Law.  That is actually a crime.  Had someone else recorded the conversation and turned it over to him, there would be no crime. Nice try again.

    3. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      well, I keep asking you: what did Holder do that was illegal, deserving of perjury charge? GOP is splitting hairs. Holder not inquire for repeating info, but for acquiring it. What Rosen did was illegal too-he asked for classified info. GetsGOP pass!

    4. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Holder himself said under oath it is widely recognized it is NOT illegal for the PRESS to solicit info.  The hearing was to directly address if the press was being prosecuted for such actions. He mislead and lied by omission of material info.

    5. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      It's NOT illegal to solicit classified info? On what planet? And he did not lie. He said prosecuting was not in his mind.But gvt has right to know who is messing w lives, and how and why. AND this was 4 yrs ago,is he in jail? GOPPolitical malfeasance

    6. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      It is not illegal for the PRESS. They have always been exempt as it is part of their job to uncover wrong doing.  And he lied because he was naming Rosen co-conspirator as he was claiming it was not appropriate to do so and had no knowledge of it.

    7. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Naming is not the same as saying you will prosecute.It is looking into. And,as AG, that is his duty!"It even seems possible that the Republican-controlled House would go for a perjury indictment since it was a Fox reporter that Holder targeted."Bingo

    8. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Thats the point, he named someone as a potential Co-Conspirator for actions he KNEW and STATED was not illegal. Meaning he was attempting to subvert the freedom of the Press, and violated their 1st amd rights. Then failed to notify Rosen or congress.

    9. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      By law, he doesn't have to notify them. He got a warrant. And the press absolutely has no right to subvert the USA, 1st amendment or not.They are no better than anyone else in that regard.In fact:the access makes it worse! Phony witch-hunt,as usual.

    10. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Wrong he is required by law to notify Rosen of the seizure. It is also illegal under the 4th amendment to seize someones records for actions you know are not illegal and cant be prosecuted, according to Holder himself and 100yrs of legal precedent.

    11. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Espionage against USA is most certainly illegal and can be prosecuted. Therefore, he had every right to seize records, phone calls whatever.All Holder said is that he wasn't thinking of prosecuting Rosen, and didn't believe in it. That is no lie.

    12. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Holder himself said under oath, it was NOT illegal for members of the PRESS to solicit information as is legal precedent.  While he was simultaneously seizing records for what HE said was un-prosecuteable.  4th amendment violation.  Pretty simple

    13. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      May not be illegal, but Holder had right to find out what Rosen was up to. And sorry to tell you: the 4th amendment went out with the Patriot Act. Thanks to Bush:Holder is in his rights.Don't you recall?"If you're doing nothing wrong,what's the prob?

    14. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      he has the right to seize only the records of the Gov't employee leaking. I suggested you read the origins of the constitution for a history lesson on the 4th.  I guess the NY times was guilty of sedition for leaking classified Abu Gharib info.

    15. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      they did.He in jail. But,"the source did not turn over the information to Rosen on his own initiative. Rather, Rosen allegedly persuaded him to do so.In general, it is unlawful for one person to solicit another to commit a criminal act." Rosen guilty

    16. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      No it is not if you are member of the media.  There is a Century of legal standing to back that up as Holder himself affirmed under oath. If he were guilty, they'd bring charges.But they can't. They were simply attacking anyone critical in the media.

    17. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      a century huh?"the Bush administration has decided that they are going to prosecute potentially the Washington Post reporter on secret prisons in Eastern Europe, may prosecute the New York Times reporter who reported on secret eavesdropping (NSA)]."

    18. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Your really grasping.  Eavesdropping  can be illegal.  Media can't steal information. They can however ask for and receive it if turned over voluntarily.  The ability to inquire is a pillar of a free press.Which is why this has never happened before

    19. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Bulloney. It happens all the time, and the reason they are going after Holder is political. They have power now, they had power then. Holder gets harassed, Ashcroft, Gonzales got free pass. You can't pick and choose law by political power.Just-Us USA

    20. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Happens all the time...please cite one case of a media member ever being named as a co-conspirator for soliciting information since the sedition act was enacted.  I will give you as much time as you need.  just one example...shouldn't be hard to find

    21. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Gvt in charge going after media happens all time. Miller went to jail during Buschco remember?And, did it ever occur to you that Rosen did commit sedition? That he IS working against USA? Cause it did me. I think all of Fox is enemy organization.

    22. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Miller went to jail for failing to reveal a source. Not for reporting which was her job.  And NO, he didn't because he is constitutionally protected, as Obama, Holder, SCOTUS and every AG since 1917 have stated. They just subverted the law secretly.

    23. Skarlet profile image85
      Skarletposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      I agree with you LandmarkWealth. The Clinton administration was the most corrupt ever, and Obama has actually topped it. And the liberals are saying everything they can come up with to talk about how bad Republicans are in effort to divert attention.

    24. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Please tell me what tops invading a sovereign nation and torturing. Lying to Congress and outing a CIA agent. Framing an official into prison and firing for not going after Dems. Asking "are you a Christian?" when hiring for WH. Falsifying evidence?

    25. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Lying to congress...Try fact checking.  The Clinton adm and every agency around the world had the same intel. Congress was not mislead.  And The torture cases in Abu Garhib were isolated and prosecuted

    26. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Morrison taped McConnell, leaked it to Mother Jones...McConnell is going after him. Rosen solicited classified info of the US gvt--is safe because he's journo? nah...he's safe because he's Fox journo in Repub House.Nothing more or less.

    27. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Do you suffer short term memory loss.  We already discussed that it is illegal under Federal & State Law to record someone without their knowledge.That is what he is being prosecuted for. Rosen did not break the law as the WH & Holder said.

  7. Cassie Smith profile image70
    Cassie Smithposted 5 years ago

    Obviously Obama hates America..........................................

    1. taburkett profile image60
      taburkettposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      definitely - it shows every time another scandal surfaces.

  8. Tom Koecke profile image60
    Tom Koeckeposted 5 years ago

    Grasping by hypocritical Republicans.

    This is similar to them going after Clinton for fiduciary failures as a director of an S&L, and trying to make getting a BJ high treason.

    1. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      "when I was subpoenaed in the probe of the leak of the identity of CIA covert officer Valerie Plame Wilson, it became clear that reporters could be labeled co-conspirators, aiders and abettors or accessories in criminal leak cases." Walter Pincus

    2. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Pincus was  never labeled a co-conspirator, aider or abettor.  He was subpoenaed and refused to reveal a sources as his right.  He only came forward after his source revealed themselves anyway. There was no warrant issued to seize his records.

    3. IDONO profile image81
      IDONOposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      lovemychris. Why shouldn't they be? If I refuse to reveal the identity of a person I witnessed committing a crime such as murder or any other, I go to jail. While respecting free press, are they not obligated to obey the law like every other citizen?

    4. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      I agree. They no more moral or free from crooked intent as anyone else. And the scary part is their power. Just look at how Fox has steered the agenda. People abuse 1st just like they abuse 2nd. 4th is long gone.Way pre-Obama.Media is paid informant.

    5. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Except he didn't break the Law as the President and Holder have stated.  Which means they were simply using the authority of their agency to persecute Rosen for doing his job, as well as the AP reporters and possible a CBS reporter.

  9. getitrite profile image79
    getitriteposted 5 years ago

    Republicans Are Sore Losers.

    They would love to see another impeachment.  Whether conservative or democrat, we shouldn't have to go these extremes.

    1. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Yeah...the Dept of Justice should be allowed to persecute reporters for doing their job.  Who needs that pesky 1st amendment.  And what's wrong with the IRS being used as a weapon to target political enemies ? The law is only for some of us..not all

    2. getitrite profile image79
      getitriteposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Bush and Cheney duped the country into going to war using intelligence that they knew was inaccurate....not to mention The Patriot Act.  But as you say....the law is only for some of us.  Conservatives are no better.

    3. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Bush's adm has nothing to do with the issues at hand.  And the intelligence was the same from every intelligence agency around the world. MI5.DGSE etc.  As well as the same intelligence the Clinton adm reported to the American people.

    4. getitrite profile image79
      getitriteposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Apparently there is no evidence to prove any of the charges the rightwing opposition is asserting, so I am going to just assume that these allegations are only part of a hidden agenda.  I think they couldn't care less about the victims of Benghazi.

    5. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      There is a lot of evidence, as of yesterdays evidence that Holder signed off on Rosen's email and phone invasion. he has officially perjured himself.  And he is already in contempt of congress over failure to release fast and furious documents

    6. getitrite profile image79
      getitriteposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      OK.  I guess Holder should resign or go to prison.
      And about the IRS scandal:   http://www.opposingviews.com/i/politics … utrage-gop

    7. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Yes he should...and churches engaged in political speech are supposed to loose their tax exempt status.  However, their was no specific administrative procedure set up to flag liberal groups during those years as was the case here.

    8. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      “In regard to potential prosecution of the press for the disclosure of material — this is not something I’ve ever been involved in,heard of, or would think would be wise policy,”Holder said during the hearing.
      Another Goose Chase, political sabotage

    9. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      He never heard of it...LOL. He only signed off on the request for the subpoena, was denied by two Federal Judges and then shopped around until the third one approved it.  How could have possibly known about the request he personally made.

    10. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      They don't prosecute for disclosure, they prosecute for the manner in which the material was obtained. This is what FOX/GOP is skewering to make it look like a lie. As usual, they are Koo-Koo-Ville pretending to be Deep Throat. Ridiculous characters.

    11. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      The manner in which it is obtained is not a crime either unless he personally stole it. Which nobody ever even suggested.  Nice try.  And guys like Bob Woodward whom have been all over these scandals doesn't work for FOX.

    12. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      "Rosen was not under investigation for his purported "disclosure," rather for soliciting a government official's disclosure of classified information. Holder's testimony is completely reconcilable with the warrant request"
      Where's the perjury?

    13. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Because it is not illegal for a member of the Media to solicit classified info and Holder knows that full well. media have never been charged for seeking info. Which means he knew he was requesting a subpoena for something that couldn't be prosecuted

    14. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      1917 Espionage Act, which made it a crime for an unauthorized person to receive national defense information and transmit it to others.

    15. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      The media is and has been exempt under the first amendment. Otherwise the NY times would have been guilty of espionage in the 2003-05 leaks. Instead the White asked them not to print sensitive info.(They did anyway)They didn't attempt to charge them

    16. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Obama hasn't fired Republican lawyers for not prosecuting enough Republicans either...I still don't see where is Holder's perjury? And Alberto Gonzales lied to Congress--they never charged him. It's not gvt by political persuasion, so what gives?

    17. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      The hearing inquired specifically about attempts to criminalize reporters doing there jobs. He intentionally gave an answer that was intended to mislead them.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5e5B5ysVI2o. " The focus should not be on who acquired "

    18. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Wait a sec. if you are exposing classified info, you are committing a crime! Why wasn't the hearing on that? Why go after Holder for investigating possible betrayal? Plus--Wiretapping and spying was made law by Bush. You can't get Holder or using it!

    19. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      I don't why this is so hard for you...Holder and everyone except you seems to understand the Media has special privileges protected by the constitution that make it legal. There is not and never has been any law by any Administration to change that.

    20. IDONO profile image81
      IDONOposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Did I miss something or am I being told that the media has special, protected privileges to commit treason? I guess I had better read that 1st amendment a little better because I must have skipped over that part.

    21. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Soliciting classified information in not treason for the media.  If they can't actively inquire about misdeeds than we have no free press, which is why the have ALWAYS been exempt.  Apparently you both missed holders testimony affirming this fact.

    22. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      If he affirmed it, and traitor Rosen has not gone to jail: what is your beef?

    23. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Because he used the threat of prosecution as a form of political intimidation of the media for acts that weren't illegal.  Without the media free to report on Gov't it can not serve as a check on gov't and nullifies the concept of a free press.

    24. larryprice5372 profile image69
      larryprice5372posted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Republicans did not shot themselves in their own foot, Obama brought this on himself.

  10. IDONO profile image81
    IDONOposted 5 years ago

    don't.......... forget.......... Iran...........Contra.

    It out-weighs them all together.

    1. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Outweighs them all...That's a stretch.  Selling arms to free hostages was bad policy and illegal, but well intended.  But hardly compares to using the IRS against your own citizens and trying to intimidate the media when they investigate you.

    2. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Umm, they were selling arms TO Iran to fund the Sandinistas They actually made deals to KEEP hostages longer to make Carter look bad. October Surprise.
      IRS was looking into possible tax cheats...which is what the Tea Party is.Just doing their job.IMO

    3. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      They were trying to fund anti communist rebels.  There was no evidence that they kept hostages longer on purpose.Baseless accusation.And searching for tax cheats does not mean screening for political opposition. Otherwise you miss Tim Geithners file.

    4. Tom Koecke profile image60
      Tom Koeckeposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Bad policy? Oliver North was convicted for crimes because of it! Granted, the convictions were overturned, but because of immunity and not because it wasn't illegal!

    5. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      As I said it was illegal. But the motive was to free hostages which was well intended. Nothing in the recent white house scandals was well intended.  Only designed to attack political opposition and silence the media from investigating their actions.

    6. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this
    7. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      You have confused two separate and distinct issues.  The Iran Contra incident happened 5years after Carter left office. The so-called October surprise was related to the US Embassy in Iran. So Reagans Adm foiled a rescue before they took office...lol

    8. IDONO profile image81
      IDONOposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      I believe Iran-Contra was by direct orders from the White House. None of the scandals came by direct order of the President, as far as we know. Those good intentions ended up in the hands of gorillas. The whole picture speaks volumes.

    9. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Actually Iran contra did not come directly from Reagan...There was no evidence of it.  And again they were trying to free hostages, not supress the press or punish political enemies. Hardly a moral equivalent.

    10. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      That could be true. Have read it was HW Bush behind it. Have read that Reagan didn't trust him at all. Bush/North did Iran/Contra. Now North commentator on Fox. Go figure. G Gordon Liddy had gig on RW radio. Go figure.

    11. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      You missing the point. I am not defending Iran Contra.  But rather Just explaining there is no moral equivalent behind the motives versus todays scandals.  Freeing hostages was noble.  The methods were foolish and illegal.

    12. IDONO profile image81
      IDONOposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      If we are blaming Obama for not knowing about Benghazi or not knowing about the IRS, why not blame Reagan/Bush for not knowing where Iran-Contra would end up? Obama's scandals were created from the events. Reagan/Bush's created the event.

    13. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      No where blaming him for covering up. Changing the Benghazi story five times. Hadn't heard about the IRS, but then every one in the oval office knew before the election. Then they arrange to plant questions for Lois Lerner.

    14. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Oh, I see. Everything R's do is noble and good, everything D's do is criminal. Gee, how MANY reasons were there for invading Iraq? How many times did they change? Gee, those House R's and the MSM sure didn't call that a Bush scandal, did they? Nope.

    15. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      I don't believe I suggested anything of the sort.  The difference is the scandals in the current adm are not one off's.  They are a pattern of lawlessness in every agency unlike any other Dem or Repub administration in recent history.

    16. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      I'm sorry...anyone who thinks Obama is worse than Bush is not living in the same universe. We are on such different planes, might as well be different planet.But the R's don't get to harass because of it! And they are. IF lying so bad,Gonzales first!

    17. IDONO profile image81
      IDONOposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      They are all guilty of something. But since we are splitting hairs, which is worse; the covering up of an event or initiating the event? The end result of Iran-Contra was loss of life. The result of a cover-up maybe loss of some jobs, but not lives.

    18. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      The question is the motives.  We don't know if Obama directed this yet. And may never know as long as people like Mrs Lerner take the 5th.  But whoever ordered it, there motives in each case were not to help anyone and pose a threat to democracy.

    19. IDONO profile image81
      IDONOposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Landmark. I'm talking about Benghazi compared to Iran- Contra. I think you knew that but tried to pull an O'Reilly on me. The IRS thing may be a threat to democracy, but is dwarfed by the impact an armed group of gorillas could have on the world.

    20. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      "Bush secretly authorized the NSA to intercept phone calls and e-mails of individuals inside the United States without judicial warrants.
      Info leaked:Federal agents launched a criminal investigation to determine the identity of the leaker." Impeach?

    21. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      No the Bush adm obtained FISA warrants. They work differently.  In terms if Benghazi, for all we know the order to stand down may have come from the WH.  We won't know until they stop stonewalling and allow those involved to be interviewed.

    22. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      The order to stand down came from David Patreous--CIA. and-
      "Court Says Bush Illegally Wiretapped Two Americans" By David Kravets
      03.31.10. And Gonzales lied to congress about getting approval by gang of 8. Impeach? Nope-R's are Untouchable. Dirty.

    23. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Davis Patraeus  Oct 26-2012  "No one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need; claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate. ”  Are you just making this stuff up now.  And I believe Gonzales was forced to resign as Holder will.

    24. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      "If true, then somebody else did order them to stand down and Petraeus needs to name names. He also need to explain why he spouted the line on the video causing the Benghazi attack when he had to have known that talking point was utterly false."

    25. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      I am assuming you haven't seen the emails turned over to congress the show it was the Adm changing the narrative of what transpired.  Perhaps if the Adm would allow the witnesses to be deposed we might get some answers.

    26. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      changed "embassy" to "center", or something? wow. treason. And you mean Pickering,who wanted to testify in  public,but Felon Issa won't allow? Why is that, I wonder? And why not subpoena the IRS adm who requested the investigation?Bush's man?politics

    27. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Bit more than that.And the interim head of the IRS was not a Bush man but a donor to the BO campaign.Benghazi survivors been hid by state dept http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-575 … ng-points/

    28. lovemychris profile image62
      lovemychrisposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      What more than Issa won't  allow a man engaged in the issue to testify publically....and the man WANTS to. So--what's the hold up? Issa wants what he says to remain secret. Maybe you should ask: what
      's Issa's motive?

    29. LandmarkWealth profile image81
      LandmarkWealthposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      What are you talking about...He was subpoenaed by Issa...He wants to be able to question him on classified issues first before he has a public hearing because you can't discuss classified info publicly.  One step at a time.

  11. junkseller profile image85
    junksellerposted 5 years ago

    Conservative news stimulus program...............................................................

  12. taburkett profile image60
    taburkettposted 5 years ago

    who is guilty - Obama...........................................

  13. Mitch Alan profile image82
    Mitch Alanposted 5 years ago

    As Per Chicago Politics...
    Bush was not a great President, but Obama is worse...

  14. Borsia profile image46
    Borsiaposted 5 years ago

    "Their true nature revealed." are the 4 words I would use.
    Washington's corruption brought into the light would be the longer version.
    That said I don't think the Republicans are any more honest or any less corrupt.
    These things have been going on in every administration for decades if not centuries, certainly since WWII.
    It has gotten worse with each passing term and today the cancer that is our government may well be past the operable phase and into the incurable time bomb state.

    1. IDONO profile image81
      IDONOposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      You're right about always going on. Analogy: We don't have anymore tornadoes than years ago. Just better ways to detect them all. Same with government.

    2. bethperry profile image90
      bethperryposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Agreed

  15. larryprice5372 profile image69
    larryprice5372posted 5 years ago

    Amatuer at the helm.

    A very intelligent man making foolish choices indeed.

  16. prektjr.dc profile image86
    prektjr.dcposted 5 years ago

    Obama. Thinks. He's. god.

    Tired of the fake pretending he is exempt from the laws of the constitution and the democrats who are blind to his faults and failures.  He is not a god, therefore, like anyone else he has faults.  No politician is perfect, but the ability of Obama to blind people to his imperfections is almost freaky.....reminds me of the Nicolai Carpathia in the "Left Behind" series.

  17. MPChris profile image78
    MPChrisposted 5 years ago

    "More Important than HSBC"

    Conservatives are up in arms about this. It goes back and forth, I will admit that there is some support for the allegations (at least as far as the IRS is concerned; I think trying to lay Benghazi at anyone's feet is ridiculous, and could just as likely backfire, due to concerns over funding).

    But what gets me, is we have HSBC, a private institution, now operating above the law. No jail time, a slap on the wrist. This despite funneling money for both the Cartels and Terrorist organizations. And when it happens, barely a peep, out of either party.

 
working