controversial and contentious subject in this postmodern American society. Despite the liberalization of women's roles pertaining to sexuality, there is still an underlying premise that women are to be as unobtrusive as possible. Women who are highly confident sexually and wear revealing clothes are viewed somewhat negatively. She is seen as "indecent" and "asking for trouble" as if there was something inherently "wrong" and "sinful" with a women's body. Certains parts of women's bodies are considered to be taboo, even "obscene."
This attitude is a leftover from biblical mythologies that indicated that women's bodies are inherently inferior and sinful. Based upon biblical folklore that Eve tempted Adam, women, especially their bodies, were viewed as harbingers of temptation or worse. There seems to be a threat when women's bodies are exposed often with negative sexual connotatoins attached.
The context of many religions to view women's bodies as evil. Many religions, especially the Judeo-Christian religions, exalt modesty in women because they see women's bodies as impure and temptations Such religions contend that if a woman's body is covered, there is a less likelihood of temptation. Women's sexuality is also a loaded area. There is still a double standard regarding women's sexuality but not as much as in previous centuries. A woman who is bold with her body and sexuality is viewed as a threat because she is powerful and refuses to be owned whereas a woman who is reticient regarding her body and sexuailty is viewed as the good girl/woman and is considered to be manageable. What are YOUR thoughts on this subject?
Human sexuality is based on the beauty of the woman's body. Actually, the beauty of the man's body too. (Also, we have to remember that beauty is in the eye of the beholder...) God made these beautiful bodies and the human population is becoming (has become) more beautiful with every passing generation due to natural selection. So, it is really a matter of advertising. The women below are not *advertising* an interest in populating the species. The woman above IS.
Women have to be careful what they are advertising. If what they are advertising does not come with the product (eggs to fertilize, happy home, nest, love...) then it is not really fair to the "customer…"
Fore instance, is it fair to the butterfly looking for nectar or the bee trying to gather pollen when either one comes upon a flower made in China?
by PrettyPanther 4 months ago
“Can you think of any laws that give government the power to make decisions about the male body?” Harris asked.After a long pause and a bizarre back-and-forth in which Kavanaugh asked for a more specific question and then claimed he thought Harris was “asking about medical procedures that are...
by Grace Marguerite Williams 5 years ago
Religions have inculcated people that the feminine principle is evil as a result of the Adam and Eve mythology. Religions, especially patriarchical religions, have indoctrinated people that women were to controlled and subjugated to male authority. All aspects of women's power,...
by Jacqui 4 years ago
Do you believe your religion could be viewed as violent?Several religions are accused of being violent, yet followers feel that they aren't. So my question is - do you believe your religion, whatever religion that is, could be viewed as violent? If yes, why? And if no, why not? PLEASE be civil, and...
by Tigercub684 20 months ago
Can a gay man be attracted to a specific girl, but not women in general, and still be gay, not bi?As a writer, i'm wondering if it's possible for a gay or straight character to be attracted to a person of the gender that opposes their typical sexuality? Like, a gay person to be in love with a...
by Dip Mtra 3 years ago
Most religions bury their dead. Why do some religions burn their dead?
by Debra Allen 5 years ago
What is it with the human body and Sex?In Genesis Adam and Eve walked around naked and were not ashamed. Religions are now implying that the body is a sin to do what comes natural for it? When did it change from good to bad and who changed it and why?
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|