Does The U.S. government overplay the national security card trumping our Constitutional rights
Do you think the U.S. government creates or infers national security threats as an excuse to override your Constitutional rights in order to more easily implement whatever goals it may have. And if yes, are you comfortable with that? Or, do you prefer safety be attempted at all cost no matter how many boots trample your Constitutional rights? Or, are you willing to run some risk in order to preserve the rights your forefathers and so many following them fought for you?
Yes, I think the Gov't does overplay the "security card," and no, I'm not comfortable with that.
I don't have a problem with the Government being /capable/ of wiretapping or surveilling our citizens, but if they're going to do so, they should absolutely have to get a warrant beforehand. You want to search through someone's home, papers, or effects, you get a warrant. No warrant, no search/surveillance/wiretap.
Why is that so difficult?
Now, I like this question. Well formed. And quite interesting, too.
How do you know if it's really "national security" or merely a thug hiding their crimes? If there's no oversight, then you'll never know.
Ben Franklin had it right. If you give up some of your liberties for security, you will deserve neither and will likely lose both.
I couldn't believe my ears when one reporter proclaimed that he just wanted to be "safe." Well, I have a nice prison cell over here, and you can be safe for the rest of your life. Dumb!
It took me a decade to wake up, but it is now so obvious to me that 9/11 was an inside job. Elements within the American government either participated or merely allowed it to happen. And then Mayor Giuliani committed a felony by cleaning up the largest crime scene in American history, long before an investigation could be started. And then the investigation -- grudgingly started by Bush after families created a stink -- was under-funded and under-supported. Far more was spent on Clinton's sexual indiscretion. How low have we sunk?
And when the military officers responsible for the massive security failures on 9/11 were given promotions instead of courts martial, you know something is rotten in America.
There were numerous individuals who came forward after 9/11 to describe fishy activities in and around the WTC buildings before that day. The Corporate Party news paid them no attention. Corporations had what they were after. The Military Industrial Complex had another juicy war -- several of them. In fact, they had a never-ending money-making machine -- a War on Terror that would create more terror by blow-back, and could never be defined as "done."
It's almost funny how George W. looked when asked by a reporter about his foreknowledge of 9/11. The PoTUS looked as though he'd been caught with his hand in the cookie jar. Guilty as sin. And when he made light at a fundraiser how the WMDs were never to be found, it turned my stomach how the crowd laughed while thousands of our soldiers were dying and hundreds of thousands of men, women and children were dying to pad their bank accounts.
America was a beautiful idea. We might see the reality of it again, some day.
In the meantime, a true American patriot -- a journalist's journalist -- is attempting to build an alternative source of news that's trustworthy:
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/439 … -project-0
by Jack Lee 8 months ago
Where is the fiscal discipline? And where is the money to build the wall?As a conservative, I am disapppointed in this proposal.At a time when deficits is running high, we don’t need to spend this amount now.
by Jaggedfrost 6 years ago
Is assassination an acceptable tool for government to use to prevent war or deal with its enemies?If not, how far do you feel Government should be allowed to go in order to defend its interests as it deems necessary.?
by John Wilson 24 months ago
What's more important - The possible Russian hack or the exposed lies from the Democrats?We've had the opportunity to see inside the workings of the DNC and Hillary Clinton. The expose from Wikileaks shows that Clinton lied about her emails, possible bribe offerings to the FBI agents, lies about...
by Sooner28 5 years ago
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/21/opini … odayspaperNational Security can justify anything. What if the president was dying of cancer? If a reporter wrote a story about it then "enemies" would know the U.S. president was dying and would thus possibly in a far out way...
by OLYHOOCH 6 years ago
A History Lesson on Your Social Security Card1934 - 1980With the elections just a little over 3 months away you'll soon be hearing some Democrats running for political office, warning how the Republicans want to take away the old people's Social Security. Just in...
by Mike Russo 6 years ago
Should Americans who have put our national security in jeopardy be prosecuted for their actions? This is from the Associated Press:"CAIRO - Egypt's general prosecutor has issued arrest warrants for seven Egyptian Coptic Christians and a Florida-based American pastor and referred them to trial...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|