What a great idea for a hub. I've seen studies and observational data that points both ways (so perhaps it depends on the culture), but I think an even more probing question is, "even if it is effective, is it morally justified?"
Between considering the burden placed on jails (and therefore taxpayers) to keep morally corrupt people in jail for life, the hypocrisy of legally exacting systematic and premeditated killing (or "killing people to show people that killing people is wrong"), and how many innocent people have been (and thanks to the nature of human error, will be) executed, it's a very difficult question to answer.
The short answer: It prevents further crime by the person being executed, but not for the criminally inclined still at large in the community.
Not trying to divert from the actual question, but there is the matter of justice for victims. The issue of whether the death penalty is a deterrent is only part of a complex and bigger question. It's important to consider the answers to this question, but only useful if all the issues surrounding the problems of dealing with crime are addressed.
Very good point. Can anyone tell me why that animal who grabbed a 10 year old girl, shot her brains out and dumped her, should have three hot meals, free health care, TV and a room for the next 40 years? Tell me why he should ever get out on parole ?
The death penalty as an effective deterrent to crime is only "as" effective the person in whom it pertains to. In other words people in the states where the death penalty is law, they may consider the death penalty as a way out, means to an end or may feel it they will not be caught. As you and I, the death penalty is and will be a deterrent to crime.
Here are some of the crimes of which death penalty is the perfect solution.
Murder - If someone intentionally kills your mother, brother or anyone who is close to your heart in any means, ask yourself, what do you think they deserve? I don't know about you but I find death the right answer.
Rape - Apply the same process and you'll get the same results. Actually, if someone ever rapes my sister I would wish to torture them to death but that's how it works. They will deserve death but in the most merciful possible way, so will I for letting it happen, morally not literally.
Betrayal - Corroborating with the enemy for personal benefits leading to the deaths of hundreds of people is definitely a death deserving act. Not all betrayals require death penalties, however. Every case should be studied deeply and given the right judgement.
Death penalty is legal in many countries, including most of US states, and yet, crime still occurs. So I suppose the answer is no.
No. Not an effective deterrent. There is no proof for this.
I don't think it is. If someone thinks they have a reason to kill another human being, they're going to do it whether or not it means they themselves may end up being executed. As for other crimes people mention that does have or should have the death penalty (rape, betraying your country, etc), I still don't see it as a deterrent. It may make them more cautious and they'll try to cover their tracks because they at least think they can get away with it.
I feel that criminals have something haywire in their brains. They think differently then the average person so no I think they would still do the things they do. The death penalty would not stop them but it would help to keep costs down in the prison systems if they just disposed of the ones that have life sentence's, and have committed hanis crimes why keep them sitting in prison, and the tax payers are paying for them.
No not really. Some people are just hardwired for crime and others have dug problems making rational thinking impossible. Also, many criminals believe that they are either above the law or won't get caught.
This is why people need the right to defend themselves. In countries where the government disarmed the public, criminals are pretty much getting their way.
I think it is .. ever heard of someone even remotely trying to smuggle drugs in countries like Saudi Arabia or Singapore?
I absolutely think so, I think we should adopt some of the punishments from other countries. If you rape some one, castrate them, an eye for an eye. It says alot when almost a third of your population is incarcerated.
I believe the death penalty is a deterrent to crime and all hardcore murderers should get the death penalty. Even if it wasn't a deterrent to crime, I would be for it because I believe if you take a life intentionally that is not self defense, you should suffer the same fate.
If someone takes a life than I believe their life should be taken. However there have been cases of innocent people sent to jail. Many of these cases occurred before DNA testing. Not all states have the death penalty. In those circumstances I feel those who commit murder should get life in prison.
by Don W 7 years ago
In jurisdictions that maintain capital punishment are the rates of aggravated murder and felony murder lower than in jurisdictions where capital punishment has been banned?
by KK Trainor 7 years ago
Texas executed Humberto Leal yesterday evening. Leal murdered a 16 year old girl after raping and brutalizing her and bashing her head in with a huge chunk of asphalt. He was kind enough to leave a stick with a nail on the end of it sticking out of her vagina. As a Mexican national, Leal was living...
by RealityTalk 5 years ago
Should Jodi Arias get the death penalty or life without parole?Jodi Arias has been found guilty of first degree murder and guilty of cruelty in the aggravation phase of her trial for the murder of her ex-boyfriend, Travis Alexander. The jurors who found her guilty of the first two phases of...
by CWanamaker 7 years ago
Do you think the family of a murder victim should have a say in what punishment is given to him?Do you think any victims of a crime should have a say in the punishment?
by Shil1978 6 years ago
Do You Support The Death Penalty?
by mike king 7 years ago
About three in ten murderers were later found not guilty and executed. shoud we stop executions overThe law says innocence is no bar to a finding of guilty in a capital case. 30% error seems acceptable. Other crimes which are pled before trial and forced through intimidation probably have a...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|