I don't think he will get involved, unless backed into a corner. At that time any opinions about whether he "should" will be moot.
Americans hate the idea of more war involvement, but the day the terrorists bring it back to our soil ( and ISIS is very focused on doing that) is the time no one will be asking this type of question.
Can we afford to ignore the threat? That is the better question.
The idea that we could lightly disengage from the area and leave Iraq vulnerable has now been answered by the the threat of ISIS... Obama will be looking at just how bad a situation has been created and will move ahead accordingly, I think.
Yes. The mission at hand cannot be successful without American ground troops. This is the most dangerous threat to the United States and its allies in over 70 years. They must be stopped! Only the United States can do this on the ground. Everyone else will follow our lead.
No US troops on the ground. Isis is looking to capture and b - head any US soldier. More propaganda videos for recruiting more radicalization Americans. Let them defend their own land. We already lost over 4,000 soldiers in iraq. Plus over 40,000 in
That's is what the enemy want. Good Muslims need to stand up to protect the Middle-East.
I think he's just prolonging the inevitable, which might have even more dire consequences because it's giving them time to continue growing stronger.
He should, he won't.
He's kicking the can down the road.
It'll be up to his successor to take any substantive action.
Remember, this is the guy who said he was elected to end wars, not start them.
Seems he's intent on keeping one campaign promise.....
If I recall when the Luftwaffe (WWII German Air force) was completely destroyed it was only a matter of relatively short time before the Germans were defeated. Having said that, yes we still had significant troops aligned with aircraft to beat them back and reclaim France and then reach Berlin... What we may have is a so called Democratic Government that may have made under the table agreements not to put troops on the ground for monies. More or less like the acceptance of 100 million from some donor not to build the Keystone pipeline. Wake up! The truth hurts us and it is most significantly far from democracy... Let the people rule.
YES, of course he should, and make it clear and powerful, so all of the future terrorists would tremble when they even consider hurting somebody.
by cjhunsinger3 years ago
Obama asserts that climate change is a larger threat than ISIS; do you agree?Obama is about to make a unilateral power grab, in the name of, Climate Change, in order to save the world from something that cannot be...
by Philip Cooper3 years ago
Is the Islamic State a greater threat to the world than Hitler and the Nazi's?At least this time the west has recognised the danger and is ready to cut the cancer out completely.
by Luke Souders3 years ago
Do you think the US should send ground troops to Iraq to fight ISIS. Why or why not?
by Thomas Byers3 years ago
Do you think the day is coming when ISIS will attack us here in America? Is there any way to stop a ISIS attack here in America? What do you think America should do about ISIS? Should we strike them in such a way as to...
by Writer Fox3 years ago
Obama has declared open war on ISIS/ISIL."We will conduct a systematic campaign of airstrikes against these terrorists," Obama said from the White House. "I will not hesitate to take action against ISIL...
by Jimbo'daNimbo5 years ago
Can you help?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.