After what we have endured would it really surprise you, if Republicans win the

Jump to Last Post 1-6 of 6 discussions (31 posts)
  1. Perspycacious profile image80
    Perspycaciousposted 3 years ago

    After what we have endured would it really surprise you, if Republicans win the Senate?

  2. ChristinS profile image94
    ChristinSposted 3 years ago

    It would dishearten but not surprise me.  I am of the firm belief however that it is all a show, and all politicians are bought and paid for by a select few who own and control them.  I have never felt more that my vote doesn't actually matter, but I still intend to do it for as long as I have that right.

    1. gmwilliams profile image86
      gmwilliamsposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      How DARE this intelligent answer get voted down!

    2. ChristinS profile image94
      ChristinSposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      I think people are in denial that they aren't as "free" as they think - time will show everyone the game is rigged. Hopefully by then it isn't too late.

  3. profile image0
    Lybrahposted 3 years ago

    No, it would not. It depends on who they get to run in 2016.  If Hillary runs, she will be a tough nut to crack, given that she has a humongous following, and people who are in support of her husband still.

    1. profile image59
      retief2000posted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Hillary Clinton is a shockingly abrasive person.

  4. M. T. Dremer profile image94
    M. T. Dremerposted 3 years ago

    It would surprise me, but at the same time I kind of expect it. I would find it surprising because of how low the approval rating is for congress right now. I'm not saying the republicans are solely responsible for that poor approval rating, but their obstructionist tactics and our-way-or-the-highway mentality has left a sour taste even in the mouths of their followers. Seeing them win the senate would be a shocking display of apathy and/or amnesia. Neither of which is a good thing.

    However, I expect it to happen because nothing has come along to disrupt the pendulum effect of U.S. Politics. Until serious issues like gerrymandering and campaign finance reform can be resolved, we're just going to keep swinging back and forth.

    1. profile image59
      retief2000posted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Are you aware of the hundreds of bills passed by the House that now languish in the Democrat Senate or that the vast majority of legislation the President Obama has signed originated in the House? Harry Reid is the culprit, not Republicans.

    2. Arco Hess Designs profile image71
      Arco Hess Designsposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      retief, many of the bills passed in congress were sent to the Senate for the very reason that they knew it wouldn't get passed. That is a very old tactic. Also, most bills are suppose to originate in the House. Only budget concerns are for the Senate

    3. Perspycacious profile image80
      Perspycaciousposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Spending measures originate in the House.  Treaties and foreign affairs are more the focus of the Senate, though it still has to pass on the House measures (or not.) and confirmation of presidential nominations.

    4. profile image59
      retief2000posted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Arco, NO - financial bills are to originate in the House, otherwise it doesn't matter where a bill originates.Treaties are negotiated by the Executive and submitted for approval in the Senate. Otherwise the chamber of origin doesn't matter.

  5. profile image59
    retief2000posted 3 years ago

    I am not at all surprised. I will be surprised if the Republicans do not pick up 8 or 9 Senate seats and run their total in governors up to 32 or 34.

    1. profile image59
      retief2000posted 3 years agoin reply to this

      WOW, I got that so right its scary.

  6. junkseller profile image84
    junksellerposted 3 years ago

    We live in a country that elected George Bush twice and where the most watched 'news' network is FOX. There really is no point having a brain in this country. You might as well stick a handful of crayons up your nose and drool happily on your GOP bib.

    1. profile image59
      retief2000posted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Nothing like  fading faith in the very same electorate that has awarded Barrack Obama the White House twice, just like GWB.

    2. junkseller profile image84
      junksellerposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      That wasn't me either, though, Obama is vastly superior to Bush or the ridiculous McCain or Romney. Really, we need to have a much higher bar all around, but like I said, in a FOX News country, that isn't going to happen.

    3. profile image59
      retief2000posted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Fox was the most watched cable news in 2008 and 2012 - the years of Obama's victories. If Obama is so amazing we did members of his own party run away from him prior to this election?

    4. junkseller profile image84
      junksellerposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      I said better, not amazing, and also unpopular. Of course people kept their distance.

    5. profile image59
      retief2000posted 3 years agoin reply to this

      How is Fox News even a factor when any of the 3 broadcast networks eclipse Fox News ratings for news. How is Fox News even factor when as many people read the NYT as watch Fox News? The Huffington Post gets as many hits as Fox News does viewers.

    6. junkseller profile image84
      junksellerposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      We are all weighed down by the weakest link.

    7. profile image59
      retief2000posted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Apparently the weakest link is Barrack Obama and the Clintons. I hope their ineffectiveness and alienation of voters continues for years to come. The entire Arkansas delegation is now Republican and Illinois has a new Republican governor.

    8. junkseller profile image84
      junksellerposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      drivel

    9. profile image59
      retief2000posted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Such a strong counter argument - Obama lost this midterm for his party and they all know it. The Clintons are surprisingly weak.29 of the 30 Senators who supported Obamacare are gone.The House has the largest Republican majority since 1947.

    10. junkseller profile image84
      junksellerposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      This midterm was lost by gerrymandering, being a midterm, and being heavily GOP-leaning and had little, if anything, to do with any of FOX's favorite delusions.

      Polls have Hilary easily beating any challenger. How is that weak?

    11. profile image59
      retief2000posted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Gerrymandering had nothing to do with the GOP winning in the midterm-do a little research.The polls got this entire midterm wrong and HIllary is too damaged to win anything and there will be no GOP circular fire squad next time around.

    12. junkseller profile image84
      junksellerposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Calling Hilary a weak candidate and not understanding that she is damaged only to irrelevant voters is a good example of the FOX News dumbification that I was referring to.

    13. profile image59
      retief2000posted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Interesting, I don't have cable. Hard to be "dumified" by something one cannot consume. What is an irrelevant voter, the only ones irrelevant are non-voters - you know, the ones Obama says he represents.An imperial impulse on display.

    14. profile image52
      robgonzalez58posted 3 years agoin reply to this

      did anyone know that the democrats held congress since 2006. and are we still going to blame a particular party responsible. I don't believe that a news organization should be held responsible for the action and decisions that we make as an indivdual

    15. junkseller profile image84
      junksellerposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      You are correct. The media isn't responsible, people paying attention to them are. And FOX news is meant as code for the entire cabal of stupidity. It isn't just them by a longshot, they are just the biggest.

    16. profile image59
      retief2000posted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Than they have done a fantastic job turning everyone stupid in just 6 short years. From BRILLIANT in 2008 to stupid in 2010, back to BRILLIANT in 2012 and finally back to profoundly stupid in 2014. Amazing!!

    17. junkseller profile image84
      junksellerposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Don't know who "they" is since I clearly agreed with the notion that the individual is responsible for their own ignorance. Not sure what all this brainpower flip-flopping is about either. Our voting has been dumb for a long time.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)