jump to last post 1-6 of 6 discussions (18 posts)

Does anyone else feel that Hillary's latest speech is encouraging violence betwe

  1. gregas profile image80
    gregasposted 17 months ago

    Does anyone else feel that Hillary's latest speech is encouraging violence between party voters?

    If Trump would have said anything close to what she said yesterday the media would be all over it claiming he was encouraging violence. Why don't they say something about her doing it and the veracity she said it with.

  2. Gorun1 profile image74
    Gorun1posted 17 months ago

    It's plain and simple the liberal socialist media bias. For almost 20 years the GOP has been slammed and had socialist extreme baby killer views push down there throats. Hilary has more issues than that speech. It's that she lied to the FBI and to Congress. I personally don't want to Clinton as president or back in the White House. Trump might not be perfect as we know but he's getting 30 to 40,000 people at his rallies and people fired up about a nontraditional politician as president. I am all for lower taxes, protecting our borders, not killing babies, right to bear arms. Oh and I approve this message.

    1. Dont Taze Me Bro profile image60
      Dont Taze Me Broposted 17 months agoin reply to this

      So do I.

  3. lions44 profile image99
    lions44posted 17 months ago

    Par for the course during this campaign.

    Trump is really the one who laid down that marker.  And now that things have tightened, anything goes.  Could it incite violence? Maybe. But only among the stupid.  It's the same thing among Trump's supporters. Most are good people but there are racist, violent losers out there looking to start trouble.

    I think we will all be glad this is over in a week. Really disgusting election season.

    1. Dont Taze Me Bro profile image60
      Dont Taze Me Broposted 17 months agoin reply to this

      Hmm, "...only among the stupid?" Who do you think are Hillary supporters? Not the smartest, certainly not the most honest or moral among us, that's a fact. They pay people to cause violence.

    2. tamarawilhite profile image92
      tamarawilhiteposted 17 months agoin reply to this

      The Democrats "birddogged", sent in people to incite violence to blame on Trump supporters. Then they excused the SJWs for attacking conservatives from San Jose to Chicago to college campuses. That is fascism and it is coming from the left.

    3. MizBejabbers profile image91
      MizBejabbersposted 17 months agoin reply to this

      Proof of this, please?

    4. gregas profile image80
      gregasposted 17 months agoin reply to this

      Just watch the news. All of the stations.

  4. The Old Guard profile image73
    The Old Guardposted 17 months ago

    You read about white rioters in Baltimore and Ferguson?
    You read about the hiring of thugs by the DNC to incite violence at Trump rallies.
    All I see Trump people doing is supporting Trump.
    hillary killary hates everything that is not hillary killary. And I mean HATES.
    JMHO
    Cheers

    1. gregas profile image80
      gregasposted 17 months agoin reply to this

      Watch her speech from yesterday and you can see her rage, hate and the temperament that we DON'T need running this country.

    2. MizBejabbers profile image91
      MizBejabbersposted 17 months agoin reply to this

      Really, Trump blows up each time anyone disagrees with him. Hillary gets her can full and exhibits some emotion and you criticize her rage. One sided as usual.

  5. Ken Burgess profile image89
    Ken Burgessposted 17 months ago

    I think what is interesting about her... is that while so many like to characterize Trump as a Hitler like figure... I think the reality is that Clinton is far closer to a deranged Hitler type, one willing to do anything to reach her goal and then do away with her enemies than Trump could ever hope to be.

  6. junkseller profile image83
    junksellerposted 17 months ago

    Is this a joke? Speaking passionately. Saying she is tired of negativity, doesn't want to go backwards, wants to focus on what matters. Did I miss something?

    Looked like someone who was a bit fired up and trying to be heard over a loud crowd. A charge of inciting violence is just plain absurd. You people need to get a grip on reality.

    1. gregas profile image80
      gregasposted 17 months agoin reply to this

      She had hate in her voice. Besides, every time Trump would even insinuate anything even close the media would be all over it.

    2. The Old Guard profile image73
      The Old Guardposted 17 months agoin reply to this

      hillary killary talking about negativity? HAHAHAHA
      who's she blaming for all the email illegalities?
      pay to play - now that's american greatness, for sure!
      obama lying about his knowledge of the private emails servers
      nah - no negativity there

    3. junkseller profile image83
      junksellerposted 17 months agoin reply to this

      People generally see what they want to see. And Trump doesn't insinuate. He literally says things like "knock the crap out of them".

      John - I am simply identifying the reality of what was said. There was no encouragement of violence.

    4. The Old Guard profile image73
      The Old Guardposted 17 months agoin reply to this

      Junkseller,
      As the saying goes, I don't listen I watch"
      I watch the DNC hire thugs to disrupt Trump rally's.
      I wouldn't mind seeing a few people slapped around, but I haven't seen any Trump supporters rioting in Baltimore or Ferguson.
      Cheers

    5. junkseller profile image83
      junksellerposted 17 months agoin reply to this

      That exposition is all fantastic but completely unrelated to the question or my comment. That particular speech in that particular moment was not an incitation of violence.

 
working