Number of mass shootings committed by white people in the US overblown

Jump to Last Post 1-4 of 4 discussions (62 posts)

95
Readmikenowposted 5 years ago
“Despite common misperceptions that all mass shooters are white, the findings indicate that while a majority are, this proportion is just over half of the perpetrators (53.9 percent),” the study found. “More than one in four shooters is black and nearly one in ten is of Hispanic descent.”

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news … own-report
reply report
1. 60
  Randy Godwinposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  You may get to score another for the white shooters, Mike. There are reports of an armed gunman in the USA Today headquarters as we speak. Don't know what ethnicity he is yet though.
  reply report
2. 80
  Credence2posted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Perhaps, but outside the Malvo affair in Virginia a few years ago, I am hard pressed to recall massacres on the scale that we have been seeing lately as initiated by an African American.
  
  Outside the affair in Dallas a year or two ago, can you think of any?
  reply report
  66
  awareposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  So when African-Americans kill each other one by one day after day in every major city across the United States. It doesn't count as a massacre to you? When 50% of the murders committed in Baltimore last year we're committed with a single gunshot to the Head. That's not a massacre to you? In 1994 in Rwanda in a hundred days a hundred thousand African people were slaughtered in a racist genocide by other African people. . Does that not count to you either? This whole thread is designed to create hatred and Division. And everyone's eating it up. And blaming the white man.
  reply report
  80
  Credence2posted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Crime is crime, but to take the violence to innocents just because they are there is a notch or two lower in my opinion.
  
  So what, we had Khmer Rouge and the Third Reich, who is innocent? So let's talk about America, ok and yes for these ideological motivated shootings having no apparent provocation except some hate doctrine, if the shoe fits, wear it.....
  reply report
  66
  awareposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Let's talk about the
  reply report
  66
  awareposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  If we were at war with a Latin American Nation you would have no problem with sending our young people to kill their young people
  reply report
  80
  Credence2posted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Seriously now, where do you get that idea?
  
  Rightwingers are the best at saber rattling, that is out of my purview
  reply report
  66
  awareposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Iran Contra
  reply report
  80
  Credence2posted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Iran Contra? Don't need to couch to everything in riddles.
  
  What about Iran Contra, Reagan's illegal support of rightists in Central America?
  
  What does that have to do with me and my sentiments?
  reply report
  66
  awareposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  It's not a riddle. If we were at war with the Latin American country you would have no problem sending our young kids off to kill their young kids for no reason at all
  reply report
  66
  awareposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  There are a lot of people out there waving a saber saying we should be down in Venezuela doing something about the government so that these people don't have to flee their country
  reply report
  80
  Credence2posted 5 years agoin reply to this
  I am not one of them, I don't like imperialism and believe the Monroe Doctrine is passé. Revolutions and Civil War is part and parcel of living anywhere, after all we had our own. I just won't give the militarist an excuse
  reply report
  66
  awareposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  I do not make excuses for The Human Condition. Or assign it a color
  reply report
  66
  awareposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  1846 - 1848
  reply report
  80
  Credence2posted 5 years agoin reply to this
  1846-48, yes?
  reply report
  66
  awareposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Firebombing campaign in Tokyo
  reply report
  66
  awareposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Now you mentioned Malvo and said a few years back. 2002 is more than a few. And he wasn't an African-American he was born in Jamaica. Misinformation pisses me off
  reply report
  66
  awareposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Especially when you're using it to make some kind of point
  reply report
  80
  Credence2posted 5 years agoin reply to this
  The father was born in the US and if I made the mistake as to the son's point of origin, I guess you can sue me. If you are that touchy, I have got a whole lot more that you are going to be pi$$ed off about, you and all your Rightwinger buddies.
  reply report
3. 81
  Don Wposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  The Washington Examiner is not the most reliable source. Have you verified the information Mike?
  reply report
4. 81
  Don Wposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  "Despite common misperceptions that all mass shooters are white, the findings indicate that . . . "
  
  Let's stop there.
  
  Do you know anyone who has ever said they believe all mass shooters are white? Do you know of any public figures who have said they believe all mass shooters are white? Do you know of any article, study, or public statement from anyone, anywhere that says all mass shooters are white?
  
  Is this really a "common misperception" Mike?
  
  Sure, I suspect lots of people think most mass shooters are white certainly, but the figures cited confirm that to be true, so what's the big reveal here?
  reply report
  95
  wildernessposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  The figures cited seem to confirm that, as a percentage of the population, white shooters are less common than other races.
  reply report
60
Randy Godwinposted 5 years ago
Thankfully the USA Today scare was a mistake. Whew, we don't need anymore deaths from mass shooters!
reply report
60
Live to Learnposted 5 years ago
I don't care who is doing the shooting. We need to find a way to stop it.

Either way, I'm not surprised it's spun to look like it's a white person problem. What isn't these days?
reply report
1. 95
  Readmikenowposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  THAT's the point. Everything is now about race. Including mass shootings.
  reply report
  60
  Live to Learnposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Well, the democrats have nothing to run with, no message that appeals to the majority, so their current strategy is 'divide and conquer'.
  reply report
  95
  Readmikenowposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  I agree with you. I saw a documentary about defense attorneys. One said if they didn't have evidence to prove their client was innocent, they would "throw up anything and everything and yell about it." I think this is what the Democrat party is doing. I believe this is what desperation looks like.
  reply report
  60
  Live to Learnposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Makes sense. Most of the ones in Congress are lawyers, I think.
  reply report
  0
  PrettyPantherposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  The majority of Americans want health care for all. The Democrats are the only party working toward that.
  
  The majority of Americans want to spend money on infrastructure, as do the Democrats.
  
  The majority of Americans want an increase in the minimum wage, a policy supported by Democrats.
  
  The majority of Americans want government funding for child care, as do Democrats.
  
  The majority of Americans support universal background checks for gun ownership, as do the Democrats.
  
  I'm sure I could think of more, but you get the idea.
  reply report
  60
  Live to Learnposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  I get the idea. I'd love all those things too. The problem is the democrats are promising all of that, and more.
  
  A chicken in every pot always sounds nice, but the average American understands all of that comes with a price tag that we don't have the money to pay for. Any average American who doesn't understand that can understand basic math.
  
  I've seen plenty of polls showing the vast change in support once the person understands how 'free' stuff will affect their tax bill.
  
  Edit. Throw in the Democratic stand on immigration and even a child can see the impossibility.
  reply report
  0
  PrettyPantherposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Yes, those polls apply to questions regarding health care. There is considerable disagreement on how to pay for it, and you are right, support for it goes down depending on the method. But universal background checks for guns doesn't have the same problem, nor does an increase in the minimum wage, or support for an infrastructure bill. The money can easily be found for these things; it's just a matter of priorities.
  reply report
  60
  Live to Learnposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Oddly, one of Trump's priorities was infrastructure. It's funny how the democrats in Washington wouldn'twork on that with him and it appears it may be a talking point for the democrats in the upcoming election?
  
  Well, that's ok. It's a subject both sides, if they stop playing politics and get down to work, could probably agree on.
  
  Background checks may be a hurdle in the short run, but I hear the president is pushing for red flag laws. That's a start. If we can start somewhere I'd call that a good thing.
  
  Like I said. There is good in wanting to have solid social programs and I have no problem with anything, as long as corresponding cuts in other things balances the unbalanced budget. Let's just not create larger deficits.
  reply report
  0
  PrettyPantherposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  From April 30, 2019:
  Congress and White House Agree to Spend 2 Trillion on Infrastucture
  
  On May 21, 2019:
  Trump Says USMCA Must be Passed Before Any Infrastrucutre Bill
  reply report
  60
  Live to Learnposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  I do remember that. Trump needs to do the same as all the others. Work together in the spirit of compromise, for the good of the nation.
  reply report
  95
  wildernessposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  I would agree. Unfortunately that's how our legislature works today - hold one thing hostage for passage of another. And it's called "compromise". I suppose it is in a back handed sort of way. Or maybe a better term is blackmail, but whatever it's called it's how it all works today.
  reply report
  95
  wildernessposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Really Think those people in Seattle that lost their jobs or businesses due to an increase in minimum wage still support it? As was said, once the cost of these things becomes known support falls dramatically.
  
  (Just curious, but where do you "find the money" for an increase in minimum wage? From the pockets of mom and pop store owners?)
  reply report
  78
  DoubleScorpionposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  I could be off or wrong....But don't Democrats make up a majority of voters? So I would expect Democrat voters to support democrat ideas...
  reply report
  95
  Readmikenowposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  I would like to point out that many Democrats voted for President Donald Trump in 2016. It's obvious that Democrats do not vote as a block.
  
  "Places that supported President Obama over Mitt Romney in the 2012 election switched their support to Trump — some with hefty margins."
  
  https://www.cnbc.com/heres-a-map-of-the … democrats/
  reply report
  78
  DoubleScorpionposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Yeah. I noticed that as well...
  
  And the independents like me...can and do vote either party... depending on what policies might happen to be close to our views.
  
  And most of the information for these "most of Americans" comes from polls that can be biased in who was asked...
  
  I know for me personally...I never get asked poll questions...
  
  The one poll I did see on a twitter page (Socialist Superwomen- @AoCgang) which asked "who would be president in 2020?" and it had Trump at 93% out of 89,000+ votes when I saw it. I think the tweet as has been deleted now...I did happen to screen shot it though...
  reply report
  95
  Readmikenowposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  As an Independent, how would you assess the current political situation in the United States?
  
  I admit to having a bias, as I am a Republican and have been for years.
  reply report
  78
  DoubleScorpionposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  I would say both sides have faults...no doubt on that...
  
  But recently...The Democrats have been pushing ideas that I consider very divisive and even dangerous.
  
  I have noticed, that it seems to me, that the democrat side is always reducing everything down to race, sex, or various other factors that places a separation between the various melting pot that we call Americans. That seems to be very racist, sexist, etc. etc. grooming in nature.
  
  In a college class that my wife was taking awhile back...I was a guest speaker and we talked about people being reduced to their appearance and that many in politics see them as nothing more than a black vote, woman vote, latino(a) vote...and not a vote from a fellow American.
  Like the Argument surrounding requiring a Photo ID to vote....there are many who say that this is racist, as it affects the minority voters....That sounds a lot like an "old white guy" saying that minorities can't manage to get or don't have a photo ID because they are minorities...The question I have is this...How many people do you know, regardless of skin color or anything else for that matter, that do not have some form of Photo ID...Personally, I don't know anyone that does not have a photo ID...as it is almost impossible to live your life without a photo ID...You need a Photo ID for pretty much everything these days...
  
  So...I would say in recent times, The Democrat party is seriously guilty of what they claim others are doing...Inciting violence (even outright calling for it), pushing racism support as an agenda, divisive rhetoric and the list goes on...
  
  The republicans need to start working with the democrats (and vice versa) on common sense policies that help Americans. The also need to grow a backbone and stop bowing to pressure just because someone doesn't agree with them...and republicans need to seriously stop fighting things just because it was proposed by a democrat.
  
  At this point, I don't see much difference between the parties...as the Democrats are going seriously extremely left...and the Republicans are to scared to take a real stand on anything...
  reply report
  95
  Readmikenowposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Thanks for sharing. I enjoyed reading your response.
  reply report
  80
  Credence2posted 5 years agoin reply to this
  DS, There is no such thing as a "melting pot", it is just something that sounds good. We are not all the same nor have the same aspirations.
  
  I don't see things the way you and other Right leaning people do, as a matter of fact, I don't think that I ever could. My reality is simply different.
  
  The current system is exploitive and it sucks, I welcome the changes presented by the Democratic left.
  
  We have always been separated and in the current political climate, I doubt that we will have any accord anytime soon. When the system is more equitable and fair, maybe then we can then start talking about "fellow American"
  
  I accept the idea of a photo ID, but I will rain hell on the GOP if these IDs are not made available and easily accessible to all without cost. They would like nothing better than to illegally suppress the votes of demographics that they know generally won't vote for them.
  
  America has a racist foundation and beginning, it is part of its DNA. That explains why when I met whites while in Europe, they were so much different.
  
  Calling for violence and carrying it out over some bigoted manifesto are two different things. At least we could be moving in the correct direction with incremental improvement. Trump takes us all back a century or more.
  
  You say the Democrats are clinging to the extreme left, I say the GOP and it conservatives/rightwing policies are akin to authoritarianism and fascism.
  
  We are not going to bowled over with right wing politics and propaganda. You can bet my side is just as determined to stop the Rightwinger from ruling the day. And it all starts with my affirmative vote in that direction in Nov, 2020.
  reply report
  78
  DoubleScorpionposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Seriously...requiring a photo ID for voting is a bad thing?
  
  And needs to be provided...
  
  How many people do you know that doesn't have some form of photo ID...?
  
  Making the claim that requiring a photo ID to vote is somehow racist or anything along those lines is in and of itself racist...as it makes the insinuation that only certain people can afford to have a photo ID...
  
  I am curious of something...Do we have a problem with places requiring REAL ID's to buy airplane tickets now? Wouldn't that be racist, as it requires renewing or getting a new Driver's License (in Virginia)...how is that different that requiring a photo ID to vote...not a special ID...just a normal, everyday photo ID.
  
  SNAP ID's
  Drivers license
  State ID's
  Military ID's
  School ID's
  reply report
  0
  promisemposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  "I accept the idea of a photo ID."
  
  A photo ID for voting is not a bad thing. Nor is a photo ID with a universal background check to buy a gun a bad thing.
  
  I think we all want to stop illegal voters and mass murderers.
  reply report
  80
  Credence2posted 5 years agoin reply to this
  We have to remember that voting is a right, not a privilege. Texas, for example will except licenses to carry as ID, but not student ID's for voting identification.
  
  There are a few people that may not have proper identification, and should not have to pay for it in order to vote. The elderly and the poor, not everybody has an ID, so the state rather than imposing a cost for voting my supply it free of expense.
  reply report
  95
  Readmikenowposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  "The majority of Americans want health care for all. The Democrats are the only party working toward that.
  
  The majority of Americans want to spend money on infrastructure, as do the Democrats.
  
  The majority of Americans want an increase in the minimum wage, a policy supported by Democrats.
  
  The majority of Americans want government funding for child care, as do Democrats.
  
  The majority of Americans support universal background checks for gun ownership, as do the Democrats."
  
  I don't agree with these assumptions. I don't think there is any evidence available to support such assumptions..
  reply report
  85
  Annkfposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  The US National Dept Clock has us at $22,467,795,131,451, in debt.
  This is a debt that will likely never be brought under control. At least the current POTUS is working to end foolish spending in trade and other areas.
  
  While democrats are promising all this "free stuff," they currently have budgets to allot money to different programs in their districts. NY recently voted against education funds for the families of fallen soldiers in favor of free educations for Illegals. CA is already funding free healthcare for illegals.
  
  If democrat's take office in 2020, they will fling the borders wide open and millions of people will pour in. The democrats will prioritize them as they see them as their "constituents." AOC said this outright. Beto and others have even campaigned on the other side of the southern border.
  Anyone who thinks for one second that they are actually going to get "free healthcare. free money, or free anything is insane. They only thing they'll get by voting democrat is an economic free fall!
  
  If that happens, good luck finding your next meal. I hear that in Venezuela they squired a taste for their dogs and even zoo animals.
  reply report
76
Valeantposted 5 years ago
Here is a different source for the discussion...since the Rockefeller only goes to May 2018.

Totals from 1982-2019: https://www.statista.com/statistics/476 … er-s-race/

Year-by-year glance: https://www.statista.com/statistics/811 … in-the-us/
reply report
1. 60
  Live to Learnposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  That's interesting. So if 76 percent of the US population is white they should account for more shootings than that. If we compare that to the number of blacks involved and their percentage of the population they account for a disproportionately high percentage.
  
  Would it then follow that we could conclude black men are more dangerous? Because, those figures supplied in that article are pointing that way.
  reply report
  76
  Valeantposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  The data, by proportions, does support your conclusion.
  reply report
  60
  Live to Learnposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  And you know why that is not a valid conclusion? The same reason blaming white guys isn't.
  reply report
  95
  wildernessposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  It may well be true (and appears to be) that blacks are more likely to commit mass murder than whites are. Would that be particularly surprising given than poverty promotes violence and blacks are disproportionately represented in the rolls of the poverty stricken?
  
  There are many reasons, some coinciding with race, for violence. But skin melanin is not one of them. Coincidence does not equal causality.
  reply report
  60
  Live to Learnposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Exactly. Unless you are on the left trying to prove white supremacy. Then, skin tone is the only thing they look at.
  reply report
  76
  Valeantposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Snopes does bring up a good point that how 'mass shooting' is defined that has a big effect on the data people present.
  
  I think that when the definition is 'indiscriminate rampages in public places resulting in four or more victims killed by the attacker,' this tends to skew more towards white males. Example, from Jan. 1, 2018 to June 28, there were six instances that fit this description. Five instances the shooter was white and in the other Asain-American.
  
  With a more liberal definition such as 'an occurrence in which four or more people (not including the attacker) are shot in a single incident,' the numbers spike to 153 and fit the narrative being argued in this thread.
  reply report
  95
  wildernessposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  You lost me. How do the numbers spike when the data goes from "indiscriminate killing" to "people shot" - the second being a subset of the first? Are you counting all injured, but not killed, in one but not the other? Because if so I'd have to say it is a real effort at cherry picking and skewing data in order to produce a desired conclusion.
  reply report
  76
  Valeantposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  You focused on the wrong words that were different. The three words after indiscriminate rampages, 'in public places' versus in a single incident, which can include shootings that are part of other crimes (robberies) or family shootings.
  reply report
  95
  wildernessposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Got it. Are there really that many killings of 4 or more people in family shootings, or robberies on private property? I would not have thought so - you're indicating a factor of over 20, after all!
  
  ( I recognize that there are far, far more people killed outside of "mass murders" than in them, but you did specify killing 4 or more in a single incident - mass murder by definition (depending on the speaker and country).
  reply report
  60
  Live to Learnposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  I'll assume you are disregarding drive by massacres, shootings at parties and such. Which is quite convenient.
  
  Let's take the guns from neo nazis and their ilk and see if gun violence has much of a decline.
  reply report
  76
  Valeantposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  I'm not disregarding anything. I'm just noting that there are a variety of different ways people determine mass shooting, and that may affect their perception of who is committing them.
  reply report
  60
  Live to Learnposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Then I would suggest we all be fair and even. We should look at violence, as a whole, and not use some subsets to skew the discussion.
  reply report

Post a Reply

jump to first post

Necessary
HubPages Device ID	This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
Login	This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google Recaptcha	This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
Akismet	This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google Analytics	This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic Pixel	This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web Services	This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
Cloudflare	This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted Libraries	Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)

Features
Google Custom Search	This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google Maps	Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google Charts	This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host API	This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTube	Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Vimeo	Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Paypal	This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Login	You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Maven	This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)

Marketing
Google AdSense	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClick	Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index Exchange	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Sovrn	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Ads	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexus	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Openx	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon Project	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLift	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say Media	We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing Pixels	We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking Pixels	We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.

Statistics
Author Google Analytics	This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
Comscore	ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking Pixel	Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
Clicksco	This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)

Number of mass shootings committed by white people in the US overblown

Arts and Design

Autos

Books, Literature, and Writing

Business and Employment

Education and Science

Entertainment and Media

Family and Parenting

Fashion and Beauty

Food and Cooking

Games, Toys, and Hobbies

Gender and Relationships

Health

Holidays and Celebrations

Home and Garden

HubPages Tutorials and Community

Personal Finance

Pets and Animals

Politics and Social Issues

Religion and Philosophy

Sports and Recreation

Technology

Travel and Places

About Us

This website uses cookies

Number of mass shootings committed by white people in the US overblown

Related Discussions

This website uses cookies