Put Your Politics Aside - This Is a Sad statement

Jump to Last Post 1-3 of 3 discussions (38 posts)
  1. GA Anderson profile image92
    GA Andersonposted 6 months ago

    II heard a radio commercial today that absolutely stopped me in my tracks, (so to speak).

    "Bullet-Proof Child Backpack Inserts"

    Put your pro or anti-gun politics aside for a moment. Resist the urge to pronounce or defend a position. ( I know most won't).l

    But . . . This is our America . . . an advertisement for bullet-proof child backpack inserts.

    What are we going to do with the idiots among us? From those that promote this ad to those that made it a possibility, I am almost ready to go back to some 17th century 'cures'.

    Okay, I took a breath. Could our problem be that our current state of instant communications and social media networking that facilitates any nutcase to find similar nutcase validations be the problem?

    If it gives you a heads-up I don't intend this to be an anti-gun thread, but maybe a more anti-facilitation thread.

    If a nutcase can find validation, is he more likely to act on his 'nutcaseness'?

    GA

    1. Eastward profile image91
      Eastwardposted 6 months agoin reply to this

      Hi, GA. I don't think we can blame social media (video games, movies, books, fast food flyers, etc.) because the Baader-Meinhof phenomenon will cause someone this deranged to find that validation just about anywhere (bathroom stall scrawling, peculiarly shaped clouds, lotto ticket number sequences, etc.). Just my two cents...

    2. Credence2 profile image80
      Credence2posted 6 months agoin reply to this

      America is deevolving. Maybe, that idea of moving to either Canada or Portugal may not be so bad of one.

      Rightwingers use excuses like video games, pornography, etc.to explain the ramp up of violence, as a precursor to the censorship that the Rightwinger has always craved.

      I just got through with an article tha pointed to Japan and South Korea having a society far more immersed in this form of entertainment, but they are not shooting one another down like dogs.

      Unfortunately, I remain quite pessimistic about this society and its future.

    3. PrettyPanther profile image81
      PrettyPantherposted 6 months agoin reply to this

      Hi GA, this is just another step along the path of crazy that this country is traveling along right now. What shall we do to protect our children from school shootings? Armed guards at every door! Check. Arm the teachers!  Check. Armed shooter situation drills for kindergartners! Check. Bulletproof backpacks for children!  Check.

      Re your validation theory, you're onto something.

    4. dianetrotter profile image67
      dianetrotterposted 6 months agoin reply to this

      Is it really because a person is a nutcase?

    5. profile image0
      RTalloniposted 6 months agoin reply to this

      "If a nutcase can find validation, is he more likely to act on his 'nutcaseness'?" is an important question. The answer is yes. An Anti-facilitation discussion is so important.

      To think that a bullet proof pack or insert is going to protect students is on the same level as thinking any store of firearms in a home/community is going to protect from a modern government's action against citizens.

      Society should demand that there be a law against news media using mass shooter's names and face in their reports, especially when they are endlessly repeated for days on end. They do it not to help, but to make money off of the victims and to promote their agendas. 

      If someone really wants to see clear photos of their faces or read their names, social media gossip will provide that. News media should raise the bar high and refuse to give them the celebrity status they seek. They should use their opportunity to focus on the victims, the first responders, and investigators giving their lives to helping and finding solutions, but they won't because money and their agenda of misrepresenting America is their goal.

      Just because these people are nut cases does not mean they do not know that what they are doing is criminal and that they will face our judicial system if they live through the ordeal. It is time to stop giving them the attention they seek.

      1. Credence2 profile image80
        Credence2posted 6 months agoin reply to this

        So, RT, we are suppose to muzzle the press from reporting on massacres like El Paso? So whose agenda would see that as an advantage?

        Of course, the pro gun and  rightwing fanatics would prefer not having these events splash across in newspaper headlines,

        So, I tell the press to keep it up, let everyone see the result of gun violence. Maybe, and it might encourage the drive for solutions.

        1. profile image0
          RTalloniposted 6 months agoin reply to this

          Nothing in the comment said the tragedies should not be reported. One way I've seen it handled was for a reporter to be upfront and say they would not use the perpetrators name or show their face because of the issue with glorification, but they did report the crimes and related details, just as I mentioned in my comment above. Why you would think the comment said they shouldn't be reported is a puzzle.

          1. Credence2 profile image80
            Credence2posted 6 months agoin reply to this

            The only protection like that goes to perpetrators who are minors.

            I don't see "glorification" as a reason to avoid showing the face of the attacker, giving his name and providing us all with his or her background, as it appears that many of these are killed in the act anyway, so what and who are we trying to protect? Knowing it ALL allows us to determine the nature and motives behind the crime and I certainly want to know that.

        2. aware profile image66
          awareposted 6 months agoin reply to this

          Around a hundred people a day are killed by gun violence in America. That's the news

          1. Credence2 profile image80
            Credence2posted 6 months agoin reply to this

            Let's openly report that as well.

            1. aware profile image66
              awareposted 6 months agoin reply to this

              Seems as the media loves to report when it is a white person that is killing people the same should be done when it is black people killing each other. Seems as the media loves to interject Killers political leanings. The same should be done with all of the hundred a day.

              1. Credence2 profile image80
                Credence2posted 6 months agoin reply to this

                Gang violence, does it have a racist or intolerant bent? Yes, I want to know the political motivation behind the shootings. Yes it going to be hardest on white Supremacist or Klan that is behind killing minorities groups JUST BECAuSE they are not of the white race.

                That, in my opinion between the two forms of violence, the latter is far more reprehensible.

                1. aware profile image66
                  awareposted 6 months agoin reply to this

                  Have you ever listened to gangster rap music? .its totally racist and intolerant. The KKK isn't out killing people every day white supremacists are not out killing people everyday. You are not going to solve anything if you go after the exceptions instead of the rule.

                  1. Credence2 profile image80
                    Credence2posted 6 months agoin reply to this

                    Aware, people can believe and say what they want, you have plenty of racist and intolerant rightwing literature. I draw the line between speech and violent activity. When has a black or any minority group member massacred people like dogs just because they were white. Do we have an El Paso equivalent?

            2. profile image0
              RTalloniposted 6 months agoin reply to this

              Yes, please!  We should know the details surrounding the incidents if they are going to be reported, but we do not need to satisfy any shooters desire to use that method to get their message out or encourage those who may follow or support that method.

              1. Credence2 profile image80
                Credence2posted 6 months agoin reply to this

                I am understanding your position somewhat better, discourage copy cat, but not suppress news related data concerning the shooter and the event.

    6. Sharlee01 profile image83
      Sharlee01posted 6 months agoin reply to this

      "If a nutcase can find validation, is he more likely to act on his 'nutcaseness'? "

      This question made my common sense kick into overdrive. It would seem that if a thought becomes validated by outside sources. Such as social media, media, friends... The thought could become validated in the mind of a "nutcase".  If one finds their thoughts excepted, validated by peers, it just may give them the strength to act on their nutcaseness.

      The power that validation offers is strong. One only has to have a long look at what some buy into from the media. A is a perfect example of validation. Today much of what the media are reporting is speculative and it is picked up quickly and spread quickly via social media.  Any given news report gathers false validity as it is spread. Soon, that speculative news report has grown legs and is considered factual.

      I would think it easier to commit a crime if the nut thinks he has a large crowds support.

      1. wilderness profile image96
        wildernessposted 6 months agoin reply to this

        "I would think it easier to commit a crime if the nut thinks he has a large crowds support."

        Or if he thinks the large crowd is persecuting him or is against him in some way.  "I'll show them!" kind of thing.  Giving the vitriolic divide in the country, and the amount of hatred spread on social media, this seems possible.

        1. Sharlee01 profile image83
          Sharlee01posted 6 months agoin reply to this

          Good point... Agree

      2. dianetrotter profile image67
        dianetrotterposted 6 months agoin reply to this

        Or the directive from a higher power.

        1. Sharlee01 profile image83
          Sharlee01posted 6 months agoin reply to this

          Good point...

    7. Ken Burgess profile image92
      Ken Burgessposted 6 months agoin reply to this

      GA what is there to say, where do you begin?

      Take a step back in time to the 70s...

      Consider now, how much of what today is considered 'normal' back then would have been considered 'committable'.

      Back then they had classes in public schools on riflemanship, boyscouts were for boys, and being pro-American was not just considered normal, it was expected.

      What 'norm' is left in today's society?

      We want women to be supermen, pedophiles complain that they are being unfairly prosecuted, in fact we put them in the White House (IE- Bill Clinton... Joe Biden) and our media ignores it, or tries to destroy the people who expose it.

      In today's America boys acting like boys gets riddlin shoved down a kids throat, a father that acts up because he finds out men are sharing lockers with his little girl at school is told by a CNN news anchor he needs to learn to deal with today's 'normal'.

      That lunatics are roaming the streets out there and committing grave atrocities shouldn't be a surprise in today's America, we have worked so hard to destroy the 'norms' of society, how could you expect anything else?

      1. Randy Godwin profile image93
        Randy Godwinposted 6 months agoin reply to this

        Really, Bill Clinton and Joe Biden are pedophiles, Ken? Got some proof of that claim? Or are you just "trumping it" as usual? roll

        1. Sharlee01 profile image83
          Sharlee01posted 6 months agoin reply to this

          Randy, Lewinsky was 22 when Bill used a cigar on her. Former President Bill Clinton was a much more frequent flyer on a registered sex offender’s infamous jet than previously reported, with flight logs showing the former president taking at least 26 trips aboard the “Lolita Express” -- even apparently ditching his Secret Service detail for at least five of the flights, according to records obtained by FoxNews.com

          1. wilderness profile image96
            wildernessposted 6 months agoin reply to this

            ??  The first has nothing to do with being a pedophile, and the second provides zero indication of it either.  It might raise suspicions, but does NOT make a person a pedophile to ride in a plane owned by a sex offender.

            1. Sharlee01 profile image83
              Sharlee01posted 6 months agoin reply to this

              Why visit 28 visits to the island? No proof Bill dud anything on the island, but odd he frequented it so often.   I was not referring to her age, I was referring to the cigar. Pretty sick...

          2. Randy Godwin profile image93
            Randy Godwinposted 6 months agoin reply to this

            Shar, how old is the age of consent where you live? And there were many people, including Prince Andrew, who used Epstein's airplane for travel and business. How old was Melania when Epstein introduced her to Trump?

            Are you aware one of Epstein's Lolita's was working at Mar-a-Lago when she was recruited by him. She was a 16 year old towel girl in the spa if I understand it correctly. Who was her boss

            1. Sharlee01 profile image83
              Sharlee01posted 6 months agoin reply to this

              Oh, I was not referring to her age, I was referring to the cigar. Just an ugly fact. You can read Monica's disposition online. It's disgusting. All the rest of your comment is ridiculous.

              1. Randy Godwin profile image93
                Randy Godwinposted 6 months agoin reply to this

                So ridiculous you avoided responding to the queries....nothing unusual for you, Shar.

                So using a cigar is a sign of a pedophile? How old was Melania when Epstein introduced her to Donald, Shar? Or did you know about the event?

                1. Sharlee01 profile image83
                  Sharlee01posted 6 months agoin reply to this

                  Your correct using a cigar does not indict Bill is a pedophile only that he is a sick puppy...  Did I make mention of what he did after he used the cigar? Maybe you should have a look-see at her deposition.  Like I said facts can be so ugly. Lolita island 28 times...

                  Please offer a credible reference for how Melania met the president. Once again you post a comment that is inflammatory without any form of facts to present.

                  "In 1998, Trump attended a party for Fashion Week with his date named Celina Midelfart. During the party, he was introduced to the beautiful supermodel: Melania Knauss. Trump was quick to ditch his current date to go and chat with the young and vibrant supermodel. He had asked Knauss for her number, but she was hesitant to give it to him. Instead, she took his number and after making him sweat it out for a few weeks, she finally gave him a call and they were soon heading out on their first date, which led to a romantic relationship.

                  The New York Times previously reported that Jeffery Epstein was the one who had introduced Donald to Melania at the party. However, Page Six reports that a man named Francesco Belcaro was actually the one who had brought the couple together. Belcaro was recently spotted at another party where he was heard telling the guest that he was actually the one that introduced Trump to his current wife and that the other media outlets that were reporting otherwise are simply “fake news.”
                  https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainmen … meet.html/

                  https://www.bustle.com/p/miley-cyrus-fi … o-18567237

                  https://www.insider.com/donald-melania- … ne-2018-11

                  I don't intend to continue this subject, it is far off the original subject.  But then you are well known for deflecting off subject.

                  1. Randy Godwin profile image93
                    Randy Godwinposted 6 months agoin reply to this

                    You didn't say how old Melania was, Shar. No surprise again...

                    And you are well known for avoiding answering questions..

  2. Live to Learn profile image80
    Live to Learnposted 6 months ago

    Yes. I believe the internet is part of the problem. I don't know that it is all of it. But, people find an echo chamber available for any crazy idea and if they get validation from another it can embolden them. It can make a crazy idea seem sane, to them.

  3. Randy Godwin profile image93
    Randy Godwinposted 6 months ago

    They'll make a bundle selling them.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://maven.io/company/pages/privacy

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)