Trump promotes "Stop and Frisk" and wants my vote?

Jump to Last Post 1-2 of 2 discussions (50 posts)
  1. Credence2 profile image82
    Credence2posted 9 months ago

    Yes, one of my background links is Salon, is the content not correct? So, don't have a cow...

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/tru … rcna157084

    https://www.salon.com/2024/10/19/not-de … -his-word/

    This form of policing had been declared unconstitutional over 10 years ago. But, Trump and his lemming like followers cant wait to strap on their jack boots, it's coming. The idea that has adversely affected minority communities in a sense that 89 percent of those accosted this way by police were not guilty of anything. These Gestapo style tactics give police a Carte-Blanche to terrorize minority communities where the bulk of abuses have occurred. Imagine a man that cannot even spell Constitution allowed to even utter such inane thoughts? So, what will Trump attack next, Miranda?

    What about the concepts of probable cause or reasonable suspicion, are they to be just discarded? Trump want to pressure police departments to employ this tactic in cities or face loss of federal funds. I have nothing against cops, but they have proper rules of engagement and I expect them to follow them.

    This Trumpian policy will be resisted by me and and others like me, and there will be no peace under the circumstances as I prepare for my arrest based on my resistance to an upcoming Trump regime.

    You will all elect him because as I have said, I KNOW YOu

    1. wilderness profile image75
      wildernessposted 9 months agoin reply to this

      Better by far that we simply defund all police to the point that the single one left never leaves the precinct office.  That way there will be no police killings, no police violence and no police discrimination.  We can all bow at the BLM altar as we leave behind the police state where criminals are taken from our society to the state of anarchy where criminals share our home with us whether we like it or not.

      And yes, it's sarcasm, in direct response to the foolish exaggerations posted here.

      1. Credence2 profile image82
        Credence2posted 9 months agoin reply to this

        Better to defund police than to accommodate a police state. The fact that you won't accept Trumps words and threats and take them seriously is at the height of foolishness from my point of view.

        The comments you make are always easy to say, after all Trump is not going disturb YOUR world... yeah, I know you....

        1. Ken Burgess profile image72
          Ken Burgessposted 9 months agoin reply to this

          You will have a police state... one run by Federal and International agencies.

          But you know that... you have to by now, if you still support this Party.

          Or maybe I should say Military state... whatever it is where you live in fear of your neighbor reporting on you, or your child, or your co-worker.

          The FBI becomes our KGB... what you type online gets you arrested... fun stuff.

          1. Credence2 profile image82
            Credence2posted 9 months agoin reply to this

            Ken, all that you speak of is merely speculative. The introduction of “stop and frisk: has been found unconstitutional and its use and its abuse is here and quite real. I regard that as a real life step toward the police state. That is enough to oppose Trump and MAGA right there.

            1. Ken Burgess profile image72
              Ken Burgessposted 9 months agoin reply to this

              Yeah, I know bud, you want to remain blind to the real threat...

              Its happened in other countries in the past... your side is acting a lot more like the early days of the revolution in Russia, or even Germany, than you are willing to see.

              Biden On Trump: ‘We Gotta Lock Him Up’

              President Joe Biden said at a campaign event on Tuesday that former President Donald Trump had to be locked up because of the threat that he presents to the country.

              Biden made the remarks during an event in Concord, New Hampshire, for Democratic candidates Joyce Craig and Maggie Goodlander.

              Donald Trump Jr. quickly responded to the clip, posting on X: “They’re not even hiding it. The lawfare against my dad was always about election interference!”

              I think Harris is doing just fine coming across as someone who will be willing to lock up all political opponents and restrict speech so much that anyone speaking out against her government will face jail time.

              Its coming... some of us can see just where this lunacy is going to lead us.

              1. Willowarbor profile image61
                Willowarborposted 9 months agoin reply to this

                "Biden On Trump: ‘We Gotta Lock Him Up’"

                Misinformation as usual. How about the rest of the quote? 

                "We’ve got to lock him up,” Biden said Tuesday. “Politically lock him up. Lock him out. That’s what we have to do.”


                Meanwhile, your guy....

                "We have some very bad people. We have some sick people, radical left lunatics... And it should be very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard or really necessary by the military, because they can't let that happen," he said.

                1. Ken Burgess profile image72
                  Ken Burgessposted 9 months agoin reply to this

                  Your quote from Biden is out of context and itself mis-information.

                  It was clear what he said, he wanted Trump locked up.

                  Then he went back moments later, after realizing what he said, and stated your quote.

                  1. Willowarbor profile image61
                    Willowarborposted 9 months agoin reply to this

                    No Ken.  People were clapping, he paused during the clapping and finished the thought.  Certainly not "moments later ".


                    https://x.com/Rifleman4WVU/status/18490 … fleman4WVU

                  2. Sharlee01 profile image84
                    Sharlee01posted 9 months agoin reply to this

                    Ken this man is deranged one only needs to listen to his full presentation.

                    NO HOW ABOUT THE entire quote full context  --- "This is a guy also wants to replace every civil servant — every single one; thinks he has a right under the Supreme Court ruling on immunity to be able, if need be — if he — if it was the case — to actually  ELIMINATE — physically eliminate — SHOOT, KILL— someone who is — he believes to be a threat to him.

                    I mean — so, I know this sounds bizarre.  It sounds like — if I said this five years ago, you’d lock me up.  (Laughter.)  We got to lock him up — (applause) — politically lock him up.  Lock him out, that’s what we have to do."

                    Biden needs to be impeached, he is not fit to be in office. Can you even believe this nut would make such an action? That Trump would kill people...

                2. Sharlee01 profile image84
                  Sharlee01posted 9 months agoin reply to this

                  NO HOW ABOUT THE entire quote full context  --- "This is a guy also wants to replace every civil servant — every single one; thinks he has a right under the Supreme Court ruling on immunity to be able, if need be — if he — if it was the case — to actually  ELIMINATE — physically eliminate — SHOOT, KILL— someone who is — he believes to be a threat to him.

                  I mean — so, I know this sounds bizarre.  It sounds like — if I said this five years ago, you’d lock me up.  (Laughter.)  We got to lock him up — (applause) — politically lock him up.  Lock him out, that’s what we have to do." Joe Biden   Source  https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-roo … oncord-nh/

                  This nut job actually said this to a group of people--- I am sure they thought him to be as nuts as I do. This man should be taken out of office immediately. He is badly confused. I hope Trump will bring a lawsuit against him for such a slanderous statement.   HEY! Full context matters.

                  Watch video -   https://www.fox4news.com/news/biden-tru … -hampshire

                  Yes, we have some really sick people a president that could be called a lunatic, in my view...   

                  In a recent interview on Fox News, Trump expressed concern about potential unrest on Election Day, suggesting that the National Guard or military may need to intervene against what he described as “radical left lunatics” and the "enemy from within." He emphasized that he believes the threat comes more from domestic sources rather than foreign adversaries like China or Russia.

                  Trump's comments were made in response to a question about the possibility of chaos during the elections. He stated, "We have some very bad people, we have some sick people," and asserted that these issues should be manageable with military or National Guard support if necessary.  Context matters

                  In my view, he needs to think about what could happen on election day. We have many leftists that could very well become violent. And I would be onboard if violence occurs the Guard be sent in to stop it. As it was on Yes, the National Guard was deployed in response to the events of January 6, 2021.   We need to have equal justice if left-wing activists riot.

                  1. Willowarbor profile image61
                    Willowarborposted 9 months agoin reply to this

                    I found absolutely nothing wrong with Biden's comments. The statement about Trump ordering someone to be killed was part of his legal teams argument to the Supreme court. Remember the seal team six argument?  Yes, his attorney argued that if it were considered an act of his presidential duties it would be okay.  Biden is not wrong on this.  As long as he labels it and official act, the Supreme Court has said it is a-ok

                    "Trump team argues assassination of rivals is covered by presidential immunity "



                    I don't think Trump should be making any statements about election day security because he's not in office.

                    https://thehill.com/regulation/court-ba … -immunity/

              2. Credence2 profile image82
                Credence2posted 9 months agoin reply to this

                I do not acknowledge the truth in anything that you posted here, Ken.

                1. Ken Burgess profile image72
                  Ken Burgessposted 9 months agoin reply to this

                  I'd be upset with such a lame one liner retort...

                  But after rereading what I wrote there...  uughghh... not my best...

                  Sooo... ehm... thanks... ???

                  1. Credence2 profile image82
                    Credence2posted 9 months agoin reply to this

                    That’s all right Ken, I apologize if my comment came off as a bit brusque.

        2. gmwilliams profile image83
          gmwilliamsposted 9 months agoin reply to this

          Oh dear God,  that is the problem.  Because of the defunding of the police by leftist radicals,  crime has escalated.   The police is needed.  We need law & order.  When there was stop & frisk, cities were SO MUCH safer.

          1. Ken Burgess profile image72
            Ken Burgessposted 9 months agoin reply to this

            They need to create the chaos and unrest, the rampant crime...

            So that they can then unleash the government forces on the people...

            Steal their guns, eliminate their political opponents...

            They have done a masterful job over the last 9 years of making Americans fear Donald Trump, to villainize him, characterize him as every evil known to man...

            On some weak minded Americans it has worked, in spades... typically the more educated a person is, the more willing they are to conform to the manipulation, more willing to accept the ideology, the alternative is to be cast out and lose one's friends, one's job.

            This is a test of the American people themselves, are they sheep ready to conform to the tyranny and control that is imminent to befall us... or will they stand up and say no... reject the propaganda and lies... and vote for Trump, RFK Jr., Tulsi Gabbard and all the rest that stand with Trump.

          2. Credence2 profile image82
            Credence2posted 9 months agoin reply to this

            So, you tell me that it is ok for police to pull people at random and search without probable cause, reasonable suspicion or a warrant? Is that not the foundation for fascism and the police state? NO WAY, totally unacceptable.

    2. Sharlee01 profile image84
      Sharlee01posted 9 months agoin reply to this

      Harris was a prosecutor in San Francisco from 2004 to 2011. During that time, she supported policies that included aggressive policing tactics, such as "stop and frisk." While the practice itself is more closely associated with New York City, her approach to law enforcement during her tenure as district attorney involved tough-on-crime measures that aligned with those principles.

      After her time in San Francisco, she faced criticism for these policies, especially during her 2020 presidential campaign, where she began to acknowledge the negative consequences of such approaches and called for reforms in policing.

      Yet today
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylvW1mp8frY

      1. Kathryn L Hill profile image85
        Kathryn L Hillposted 9 months agoin reply to this

        "... where she began to acknowledge the negative consequences of such approaches and called for reforms in policing."

        Back on Track:
        23:13 ~ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afIy2rDVecI

        1. Sharlee01 profile image84
          Sharlee01posted 9 months agoin reply to this

          It appears Harris is now offering a completely different view of stop and frisk. In my view, this shows a lack of conviction because it is a very opposite view from what she felt about stop and frisk while she was working in San Francisco. This issue gives a view into her values.

  2. Sharlee01 profile image84
    Sharlee01posted 9 months ago

    When properly implemented with good training and ongoing monitoring, stop and frisk can serve as a proactive policing strategy aimed at enhancing public safety. It allows law enforcement officers to engage with individuals in high-crime areas, potentially deterring criminal activity through increased visibility and presence. This tactic can lead to the discovery of illegal weapons or drugs, contributing to the prevention of violent crimes and enhancing community security. Additionally, when conducted with clear guidelines and accountability, stop and frisk can foster community-police relations by allowing officers to address suspicious behavior without immediate escalation. Effective training ensures that officers understand the legal and ethical boundaries of the practice, while ongoing monitoring helps maintain accountability and build trust within the community. This approach can also aid in gathering intelligence that helps police understand crime patterns, ultimately benefiting the overall safety and well-being of the community.

    It could provide law-abiding citizens who live in high crime areas a feeling that not only something is being done, but a feeling they can more safely have access to their neighborhoods. Many Americans live in high-crime areas feeling helpless. We need solutions for law-abiding citizens.

    1. Credence2 profile image82
      Credence2posted 9 months agoin reply to this

      But, it also has the potential for great abuse as the reasons the courts ruled against its use. Without guardrails, I don't trust anybody. I would not want a policeman stopping and searching me without cause, would you?

      My being black male in of itself is suspicious and justify an accosting by a police officer? As I said, 89 percent of these searches yielded nothing. I won't tolerate and have to be resistant against Trump in every way regarding this.

      What legal and ethical balance? They can search whenever and whatever they want without justification or warrant. The community's answer cannot involve just that much more police harassment. I expect these people to do their jobs as prescribed  by the Bill of Rights and the Constitution and not make exception for minority communities. Proper police work is well possible to address crime in minority communities just as it is for your community.

      1. Sharlee01 profile image84
        Sharlee01posted 9 months agoin reply to this

        I sought to offer a bit of a debate, but you have made some very valid points.

        1. Credence2 profile image82
          Credence2posted 9 months agoin reply to this

          Thank you for acknowledging that…

    2. gmwilliams profile image83
      gmwilliamsposted 9 months agoin reply to this

      Thank you Sharlee.  We certainly need solutions.  It is the law-abiding citiizens who are suffering en masse because of the defunding of the police.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)