|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
Would you rather vote your conscience even if that means throwing your vote away?
Voting for the lesser evil is NOT a real choice and I refuse to play the game; what about you?
I would say if you don't vote your conscience you're giving your vote to someone else. That's the same as throwing it away. The lesser evil is still evil.
Enjoying getting to "meet" you, BTW
California has two impossible choises both for governor and for congress.
I can't in good conscience vote for either candidate so my only choice is either NOT to vote or to vote a candidate that has ZERO chances
If you wait for a perfect candidate you'll never vote. Jerry Brown is an experienced, solid, well motivated public servant. Barbara Boxer is right more often than not. Carly Fiorina is ill-equipped for high public office.
Another option is to join and support the party that comes closest to your views and work within that party to push your goals and candidates.
I agree that Brown is well intentioned and honest, but he proved inefficient more than once. Barbara Boxer is rarely making an appearance on the floor and as opposed to my other senator (Diane F) she seems to be absent even when she is present.
Fiorina is so out of question as a senator, I will not even considere her for California congerss.
Working for either party and trying to change anything will be a waste of time; the system is wrong and I can't fix it since most people will only look for their best interest and care little or nothing for regular people.
The only time I had no doubt during an election was when I voted for Obama
I would vote the zero chance ... the reason being that the vote is only valid if it's honest ... theoretically, the polls, the media etc. could all be wrong and when the votes are counted all the people who thought there was zero chance, voted the way they really felt and there's actually a win.
Of course, I haven't voted in the past several elections.
I would agree with BDazzler...said perfectly.
For the first time in my life I absolutely, positively despise both of the major candidates for a particular race. Voting for any of the other 3 contenders isn’t feasible either. What a mess.
And thank you for your opening post. I will thoroughly read the statements, etc of the three contenders. If I detect one who is good of heart, I will vote for that person and just forget about the previous experience factor and the fact that they have zero chances of winning.
I will do the same, because it is just impossible for me to choose between the proven incompetence of Brown and the money-hungry, power-obsessed Meg Whitman.
As for congress my choices are no better; how do I choose between the greed of Fiorina and the inefficiency and laziness of Boxer?
I am a registered independent and I only vote if I feel the candidate is at least half way decent
Voting for the Lesser Evil is pretty much what many Americans or any other disillusioned and pragmatic citizen of any other country perceives as their choice in casting a vote -- not knew news probably for a couple hundred years in one political race or another.
What is really pathetic is when someone thinks voting for an obvious loon (I'm thinking of that Florida? idiot? an utter dolt who makes you wonder at the electorate that ever gave him a voice) over a normal person is taking the high road (haha, purely jest, but not in their brain) on some policy issue -- shows a clear lack of integrity -- on the part of the voter, they'd rather vote for someone with zero integrity or respect among their peers, who is a guaranteed 'vote' in Congress for something they think is important (to a gimmeemeemee bill) -- with utter disregard for the damage they will do both to the office and their district and their country in the long run. Just IMHO.
PS -- and I consider Boxer a well-packaged and well-backed (financially and otherwise) 'loon' actually, detest the woman. Fiorina is the clear choice, and next time around, vote her out if she screws up, but she can't possibly be an ill-choice for bankrupt California, and Boxer is old news, old hat, washed up and an embarrassment to the USA -- change the laundry.
I always vote my conscience, despite living in a state where the elections are always lopsided. And lucky for me, the overwhelming majority agrees with me, which is part of the reason I choose to live here. But I noticed that the greater number of votes cast for the loser, the more the loser's ideas are respected and occasionally supported, after the election, by the winner.
Conscience, without a doubt. If we all do it, eventually we will make a difference.
by Petra Vlah7 years ago
What choice does California has?I live in California and our choice for Senate this November...is between Fiorina and Boxer. Both of them have shipped jobs out of the country and neglected the interest of the American...
by G. Diane Nelson Trotter2 weeks ago
Why is Blankenship the leading GOP senate primary candidate in West Virginia?According to the polls, Blankenship is ahead of two other GOP candidates. Why?the former chief executive of Massey Energy, served a year...
by David Stillwell5 years ago
As voters, Why are we excepting either Romney or Obama as presidential candidates for 2012.The argument over leadership and leadership abilities, lost job, jobs sent overseas, economic policy, foreign policy, national...
by GA Anderson21 months ago
Is it time to consider a coalition government?It is my opinion that neither party, Democrat or Republican, can win a national election with just their base. Both parties need some part of the Independent or undecided...
by hockey8mn5 years ago
To the people who don't like either major candidate: who are you voting for and why?
by ptosis22 months ago
If Trump & Clinton are so despised then why not vote third party?The Founding Fathers were vehemently against a national party (faction) system, especially a two-party model. 2016 3rd party Prez...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.