This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: "https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr"

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
jump to last post 1-7 of 7 discussions (22 posts)

Can't we just butt out?

  1. superwags profile image79
    superwagsposted 7 years ago

    After the detainment of six SAS soldiers in Eastern Libya I was left wondering; Can't we just keep our noses out and stop playing James Bond?!

    The last thing the Libyan opposition needs is surely the Brits charging around in the desert and giving Gaddafi's lot a chance to show that this revolution is a western plot. I think this is fairly obvious in the way they were detained and deported promptly!

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12665575

    If we're going to do anything there then let's establish a no fly zone and give protection to the rebels that they desperately need. We can surely wait until this is all over until establishing diplomatic links which require deployment of SAS troops in the desert?!

    1. John Holden profile image59
      John Holdenposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      This whole thing puzzles me!
      Somebody was saying this morning that they could have walked in totally unobserved!

      1. superwags profile image79
        superwagsposted 7 years agoin reply to this

        Yeah, it's crackers. Makes no sense at all. Apparently, given that there's been a Royal Navy ship docked in Benghazi for the past week, I'm not sure why they had to go all James Bond about it and do an airdrop in the middle of the desert, rather than just walk down a gangplank.

        Good old Britain though; always looking for a new foreign  mess to get themselves inolved in. We don't lack persistence!

    2. pisean282311 profile image60
      pisean282311posted 7 years agoin reply to this

      short answer in NO...brits , us needs to be there ...

    3. Ralph Deeds profile image68
      Ralph Deedsposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      U.S. Defense Secretary Gates has spoken out against the idea of a Lybya no-fly zone, all but ruling this action out. He says it's tantamount to declaring war and requires preliminary air strikes at ground facilities to prevent air or ground counter measures. Beyond that he said that any future defense secretary who recommended military action on the ground in the Middle East or Africa "should have his head examined" or words to that effect.

      1. superwags profile image79
        superwagsposted 7 years agoin reply to this

        The British govt had initially made noises that they would support a no fly zone from their bases in the med. They seem to have altered their stance since the Americans made their views clear though. I understand that a no fly zone would require an initial stage of taking out the anti-air infrastructure, but the alternative seems to be allowing an increasingly desperate Gaddafi to attack his own people from the air. I agree, it'd be a disaster if we went in on the ground.

        These decisions can't be made by one country, they should be the responsibility of the UN or Nato so that a course of action can't be seen as "Us versus Them" by the middle east as a whole. Once again though I'm questioning what the point of the UN is?

        Also returning to the OP, what the hell the UK special forces are doing there is anyone's guess. If they want to make diplomatic contacts, as Whitehall has claimed today, then they should do it through the front door. This story hasn't helped anyone.

  2. Jeff Berndt profile image85
    Jeff Berndtposted 7 years ago

    Lately it's us Yanks that have been blundering into ill-advised foreign adventures; it's kinda weird seeing the UK do it.

    'Course, you didn't do a full-scale invasion costing millions of pounds and thousands of lives, only to further destabilize the region, so you shouldn't feel too bad about it.

    1. superwags profile image79
      superwagsposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Well we've embarked on the last couple with you. It appears we're relative amateurs to you lot! Just six SAS guys dodging around with fake passports and light weapons is harly shock and awe!

      Reminds me of a spoof headline before Iraq in which the newsreader said, "It appears America are attempting to make up for being late for the last two world wars, by being really punctual for this one."

      1. Jeff Berndt profile image85
        Jeff Berndtposted 7 years agoin reply to this

        That's a good one.

  3. profile image0
    ryankettposted 7 years ago

    The SAS have been in there for a while now, evacuating diplomats and other British nationals; probably agents.

    There is no reason to suggest that the 8 caught with the diplomat were doing anything other than trying to get him out too. The rebels have stated that the SAS were trying to contact Gadaffi, that doesn't sit with me, that is outside of SAS remit.

    So, basically, a failed attempt to evacuate another diplomat. They have already sent a couple of plane loads back, so the place is probably crawling with SAS crack squads.

    1. superwags profile image79
      superwagsposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Well that's not what William Hague's told the house today. He said that they were escorting two diplomatic officials into the country to try and make contact with rebel authorities. Not trying to evacuate people. Why on earth didn't they just do this in full sight?!

      The rebels are probably wrong and have misunderstood what they were there for, but if they'd been more open this wouldn't have happened. I don't doubt that there are more SAS there, I know the BBC have reported that there are special forces on Libya's Egyptian and Tunisian borders "helping" with the evacuation process.

      1. profile image0
        ryankettposted 7 years agoin reply to this

        Oh right, not sure. I wouldn't rule out British and American involvement in the unrest in each of these countries. Libya has got oil and gas, hasn't it? There you go, your answer wink

        1. superwags profile image79
          superwagsposted 7 years agoin reply to this

          Haha! That's more like the cynicism I like to hear!

  4. Hugh Williamson profile image91
    Hugh Williamsonposted 7 years ago

    No one has a crystal ball to predict what Libya's next government will look like. It may be another rogue extremist state like Iran.

    The US and Britain are doing the right thing by waiting rather than charging in.

    The 6 SAS who were captured obviously were doing some small specialized task (rescue mission, info gathering, etc) and got caught at it. These things happen. Whatever the mission was, these 6 are heroes.

    My thoughts.

    1. superwags profile image79
      superwagsposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Let's hope that it's the democratic country that the rebels seem to want.

      The six captured SAS men (they're actually back in Malta now, thankfully) were escorting two diplomats IN! I'm not questioning these guys' bravery at all - anyone in the SAS is a hero in my eyes - just questioning the political decision making that went into this.

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12665575

      1. Hugh Williamson profile image91
        Hugh Williamsonposted 7 years agoin reply to this

        Agreed.

        Any no-fly zone or other large scale op should be done through the UN. Since oil is involved, there is a lot of world attention being focused on this and a rare UN agreement may be possible.

        The last thing we need is for the US & UK to expend our blood and treasure without even knowing if we're helping or making things worse.

  5. lady_love158 profile image57
    lady_love158posted 7 years ago

    We should butt out... when Muslims are busy killing each other they don't have time to kill us.

    1. superwags profile image79
      superwagsposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      How drole. Well done Love, another spectacularly ignorant comment.

      Don't you have a huge list of complaints about the Obama administration's handling of this one with links back to obscure right wing blogs? I thought that was normally what you stuck with ad nauseum?

  6. profile image50
    frosty eagleposted 7 years ago

    the o-bam-ma era was set up by the pun's of the land era of the 80's and 90's, the hinckely affair and the thomas and hill affair,each which lasted 11 years; 3 weeks after tonya hardings people hit nancy keriggen, which was the "hard ding" that started the "care again" era the ice dancer punslan had her pop die in level-land ohio; the answer to the hinckely affair, was that the butler did it, and the answer to thomas and hill, was that a woman should have been nominated; and the more that any laugh, or the harder that any laugh, the more seriously they should think of such info...frosty eagle

    1. manlypoetryman profile image76
      manlypoetrymanposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      !Que?

      1. Hugh Williamson profile image91
        Hugh Williamsonposted 7 years agoin reply to this

        A quote from Charlie Sheen?

  7. maven101 profile image81
    maven101posted 7 years ago

    Frosty Eagle needs to get out more...Whew...

    For once I am in complete agreement with the Obama administration's decision to do nothing militarily in Libya...humanitarian assistance, promoting UN lines of communication, diplomacy, and demanding Gaddafi step down, are all mature and pragmatic decisions that has been sadly lacking in foreign policy machinations...

 
working