http://www.revolutionpac.com/2012/02/ne … lls-fishy/
The primary/caucus votes that you make in your state are counted behind closed doors by the party's officials.
If this happened in any other country, we'd mock them for obvious voter fraud.
But this is happening in YOUR country. In YOUR state. In YOUR county.
Thanks for this interesting article from a web site with a declared objective:
“The SuperPAC is dedicated to the single goal of getting Ron Paul elected.”
Out of respect for you and your candidate, I followed your link, read the article, and this is what I learned:
The entire article is unsupported innuendo. In summary, it says nothing more than "This smells fishy." Furthermore, the intellectual writing this article thinks, "Maybe the UN should monitor our primaries and elections like they do in third world countries."
Did you notice that this article did not make one supported accusation of vote tampering? Did you notice that not one Republican in the race agrees publically with this absurd notion? Did you also notice that state party officials are permitted to count their primary/caucus votes behind closed doors? Do you really buy into these empty arguments just because they come from Ron Paul’s supporters?
There is no doubt in my mind that this kind of illogical rhetoric resonates with many on the fringe. Never the less, the manner in which state political organizations select and empower delegates to their national conventions is a party issue. This is hardly a matter for the UN. Who counts and where is determined by the party.
Then you pick up on the baseless exaggerations in the article and carry them to an extreme by claiming this would be mocked as “obvious voter fraud” in another country. If this were not obvious fraud here, why would it be obvious fraud elsewhere? This seems like an abuse of logic and the English language to me!
Oh! In addition, thanks for, “But this is happening in YOUR country. In YOUR state. In YOUR county.” What is happening in MY party, in MY State, or in MY County, is MY concern, so there is no need for you worry.
Thanks again, Evan, for posting this link. It is amazing how far some people will go to fill WebPages?
If vote tallies are being counted behind closed doors, then they're being counted behind closed doors.
I didn't comment on anything other than this statement.
Evan, you did comment beyond that statement. You compared it to “obvious voter fraud.”
The act of counting votes behind closed doors is obvious voter fraud. Yes.
And it seems that there is evidence that this has been going on.
IN every state so far, Ron Paul has doubled to tripled his vote numbers from 4 years ago.
In Nevada, he received the same number of votes.
Anyway, it's pointless to continue because I know that "America would never have voter fraud" -- ESPECIALLY against someone who terrifies the status quo.
It's not "voter" fraud. It's fraud on the part of dishonest election officials.
Um, it is an internal party function, so of course it is done by party personnel inside a building. If anything is a miss the members need to take it up with the party, not expect the general public to sort it out for them. For a start, find out what anti-fraud procedures are already in place. I bet you can't even tell me that.
Very true, Evan. The ballot counting in Iowa and Maine was really screwed up, more like in a communist country or African dictatorship, apparently. However, it's inaccurate to call what happened in Maine voter fraud as if people who were ineligible to vote voted. Rather, if there was fraud it was on the part of the GOP officials who were counting the votes. Apparently they were Romney supporters. Voting by ineligible voters is not significant for one reason--there is no financial incentive for them to vote, in contrast to the banking and securities industry where fraud is quite common. Rather, the real problem is the fact that many citizens who are eligible to vote don't bother to do so. That's why GOP voter suppression efforts are exactly the wrong thing needed in our democracy.
Mmm . . . now who was it who said "It matters not how the votes are cast. What matters is how the votes are counted" . .
In every state Paul's vote totals doubled, tripled, or even quintupled when compared to 2008....
... except Colorado.... where it stayed EXACTLY THE SAME, despite a large amount of spending in the state.
http://www.ronpaul2012.com/2012/02/06/r … of-voting/
More evidence of rampant Voter Fraud in our elections:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl … qsyzTrWS0g
All of it is anti-Paul.
In ANY other country, we would say "this is obviously voter fraud". However "we the saints of democracy" could NEVER have voter fraud!... right?
More evidence that your democracy is a sham:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pngwcQQW … ata_player
by Mike Russo 20 months ago
Should Trump have ordered major investigation into voter fraud of him not winning the popular vote?This is what Trump did with the Birther Movement. He made allegations of Obama not being born in this country and no record of his going to college. He never proved it one way or the...
by sunforged 6 years ago
Disenfranchisement Movement?Must have had my head in the dirt or clouds or something, but this topic is new "news" to me. Today I have read reports from Rolling Stone, 3rd party Think Tanks, Non Partisan Watchdog groups and many many traditional news sources.So has it been mainstream news...
by Judy Specht 6 years ago
Why don't I have to show an ID to vote for president or anyone else?I have to show an ID to any policeman that asks, to get a prescription,see the doctor, get my blood drawn, board an air plane, get my taxes done, write a check, accept a job, withdraw money at the bank and sometimes when I use a...
by Joan Whetzel 6 years ago
What about the Photo ID requirent for voting?One side says it's necessary to prevent voter fraud. The other side argues that it's a form of disenfranchisement along the lines of the poll taxes. Which way do you lean on this issue and why?
by breathe2travel 5 years ago
Do you think requiring identification to vote is a a violation of Constitutional rights?There have been boycotts against Coca-Cola for their support of voter i.d. requirement. There have been protests against various state legislations requiring i.d. The fallacy? Some sects find...
by American View 6 years ago
Here is a quote from Holder, do you agree? Do you find it interesting that no one can get into the Democratic National Convention if they do not have a picture ID, but you do not need one to vote? “…some of the achievements that defined the civil rights movement now hang in the balance.”--...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|