jump to last post 1-18 of 18 discussions (39 posts)

ARE HUMANS MAD?

  1. Pamda Man profile image51
    Pamda Manposted 8 years ago

    Seeing the forum main page spammed with pointless religion threads, I finally realized that the main question is, are humans mad?

    Both athiests and thiests are mad, don't you think so?

    I've now come up with an idea. It's called the Religion Protocol. It is an agreement signed by athiests and thiests. No more endless pointless debating on religion threads.

    Reason: We aren't going to change our views, thus we are heading nowhere but pointlessness.

    Once you sign the protocol, it is advised that you do not argue or debate on religion threads. You are not forbidden to post on them though. But you should not argue or debate on them. Please do remember this is a protocol, not a rule. This is just a guideline, if you sign it, it means that you agree not to debate and argue on them. If you choose to do so, then I suggest you should not sign this protocol.

    We now need people to sign up.

    Religion Protocol Signers
    Pamda Man
    CEN7777 (Mahesh)
    candice5

    1. CEN7777 profile image56
      CEN7777posted 8 years ago in reply to this
    2. tantrum profile image60
      tantrumposted 8 years ago in reply to this

      So what is a THIEST Pandaman ?... And an ATHIEST ?  lol If you explain that 2 me , I'll sign  smile

      1. Pamda Man profile image51
        Pamda Manposted 8 years ago in reply to this

        lol I'm so sorry. This spelling is just irrational. I always spell ei words ie. Like receive. Thanks for the reminder.

    3. Pamda Man profile image51
      Pamda Manposted 8 years ago in reply to this

      Well seemingly I cannot edit this post. =/

    4. mohitmisra profile image54
      mohitmisraposted 8 years ago in reply to this

      Everything around is so strange,
      The human is certainly deranged.

    5. profile image0
      Writer Riderposted 8 years ago in reply to this

      It's a mad, mad world.

  2. profile image65
    logic,commonsenseposted 8 years ago

    Just those that take themselves too seriously!

  3. ethel smith profile image84
    ethel smithposted 8 years ago

    I'm with you

    1. Pamda Man profile image51
      Pamda Manposted 8 years ago in reply to this

      Are you signing the protocol or are you agreeing with the second poster? O.o Lol.

      1. candice5 profile image61
        candice5posted 8 years ago in reply to this

        Candice signing up.

  4. earnestshub profile image87
    earnestshubposted 8 years ago

    Well I am totally mad... and loving it! Any definition of sane from this crazy world would scare the hell outta me!!

  5. Pamda Man profile image51
    Pamda Manposted 8 years ago

    Hello???

    1. fierycj profile image79
      fierycjposted 8 years ago in reply to this

      Dude, is all this weirdo stuff an act or are you really weird?

      1. candice5 profile image61
        candice5posted 8 years ago in reply to this

        He is way too smart to be weird.

        1. Pamda Man profile image51
          Pamda Manposted 8 years ago in reply to this

          Thank you, my friend.

        2. fierycj profile image79
          fierycjposted 8 years ago in reply to this

          And you think weirdness is synonymous to dumbness. Trust me, weirdness and smartness goes hand in hand...these days anyway.

  6. Pamda Man profile image51
    Pamda Manposted 8 years ago

    Dude, are you signing the protocol?

  7. Pamda Man profile image51
    Pamda Manposted 8 years ago

    Let's just stay on-topic. smile

    1. fierycj profile image79
      fierycjposted 8 years ago in reply to this

      Ok, you mean signing your wuchmacallit protocol - nah, I'll pass. How do you even come up with weirdo stuff like that. lol

    2. Mark Knowles profile image61
      Mark Knowlesposted 8 years ago in reply to this

      I can't sign it because I am absolutely 100% ready to change my views as soon as I have some evidence presented to me. I will take just about anything actually.

      1. Pamda Man profile image51
        Pamda Manposted 8 years ago in reply to this

        That's good to hear. I'm not forcing anyone. smile

  8. Pamda Man profile image51
    Pamda Manposted 8 years ago

    Bump.

  9. world of the wise profile image22
    world of the wiseposted 8 years ago

    You talk about the protocol but i havent seen it yet,
    I need to see its details and i sign, otherwise, i may sign a for a death sentence

  10. Pamda Man profile image51
    Pamda Manposted 8 years ago

    Actually can a moderator close this thread? I think I should open a new one instead.

  11. Darrell Roberts profile image75
    Darrell Robertsposted 8 years ago

    I am with you, there is no need to argue about if God exist or does not exist we will find out sooner or later.

    1. manlypoetryman profile image68
      manlypoetrymanposted 8 years ago in reply to this

      Well Said!

  12. Pamda Man profile image51
    Pamda Manposted 8 years ago

    Post in the other thread from now on please. Thanks. smile

    THREAD CLOSED

    http://hubpages.com/forum/topic/18558

    1. Paraglider profile image88
      Paragliderposted 8 years ago in reply to this

      no

  13. mobilephone guide profile image57
    mobilephone guideposted 8 years ago

    no

  14. earnestshub profile image87
    earnestshubposted 8 years ago

    Are humans mad?
    I'm not sure
    but I know some as thick as a door
    they get out of bed
    with one thought in their head
    and then they don't think anymore!

    Sorry ... just left the limerick page!

    1. profile image0
      wordscribe41posted 8 years ago in reply to this

      Cant' tell you how many times I've wanted to do that after leaving the limericks thread.  So glad it's not just me.  I'm scared to even go there, Earnest.  smile

  15. earnestshub profile image87
    earnestshubposted 8 years ago

    I aint signin till I see the fanatics listed here!

  16. earnestshub profile image87
    earnestshubposted 8 years ago

    This from paradise engineering abstract.
    The molecular biology of paradise.
    "...sadly, if God exists, then He has chosen cunningly to hide His existence from most of His creatures. Indeed a physicist once noted that things make much more sense if you assume the world was created, not by an all-good and all-powerful being, but by a God who is 100 percent malevolent yet only 90 percent effective. Less heretically expressed, if He does lurk benevolently in the background, then one must presumably be confident that He is greater than all of us, not just in the depth, but also the range of His compassion. If so, then He will scarcely favour a more restrictive or mean-spirited project than paradise-engineering - with its commitment to the molecular biology of univeral well-being... Statistically, the bulk of the world's suffering is undergone by members of other species. Sometimes their anguish is ghastly and prolonged. Such suffering doesn't, even notionally, have any redeeming features. It isn't character-building. It never issues in great art and literature. Non-human suffering can't support even the kinds of sophistry we use to rationalise our own ills... Mercifully, as the abolitionist project gathers pace, the pain and malaise of non-humans as well as humans from the Nightmare Era of primordial life is likely to be phased out too. Legacy genomes will be rewritten. The entire global ecosystem will be redesigned. For there is no need to pay homage to the product of selfish genes - as though self-replicating DNA from the old Darwinian era were some sort of secular equivalent to Providence. The genetically pre-programmed well-being of the post-Transition epoch shouldn't, and probably won't, remain arbitrarily species-specific...."

  17. Pamda Man profile image51
    Pamda Manposted 8 years ago

    I still can't believe the fire is still burning.

    1. earnestshub profile image87
      earnestshubposted 8 years ago in reply to this

      read and comment Panda man!

  18. Pamda Man profile image51
    Pamda Manposted 8 years ago

    I don't understand. If God is 10% ineffective, then what?

    1. earnestshub profile image87
      earnestshubposted 8 years ago in reply to this

      !0% ineffective at being malevolent which would leave 10% that is ineffective and therefore good. Looks about right to me!

      1. Pamda Man profile image51
        Pamda Manposted 8 years ago in reply to this

        This is another religion. God-is-ineffective-at-being-bad-ism.

 
working