|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
I've got a feeling that there is no free will. My train of thought is thus:
Either each event (B) has a cause (A), or it does not have a cause.
If A causes B, then you can never have one without the other, thus each is proof of the other. If B is not caused, then B is necessarily random, as its nature and/or qualities are not the result of the nature/qualities of the universe, because it was not caused by anything (in the universe).
Most people's definition of free will requires that there be multiple possible outcomes, and a conscious decider to pick one. If the concious decider (A) picks one (B), then there was only one choice. If there was more than one choice, there could be no cause for any of them.
You are comparing cause and effect against free will of choice?
This comparsion isn't fair.
Free will is about thoughts and the ability to think such thoughts. How you act on those thoughts is what cause and effect is really.
Cause and effect happens only when action has been taken. The effect the cause creates is determined by what sort of action was taken.
Self-contradictory? No in the slightest. Being SELF-responsible for your own thoughts and actions, you can limit the cause and effect, on society.
Cagsil, I may be missing the point but while I agree with your first two points, the last assumes that each effect is "caused" by said person which isn't always true. I personally believe the domino effect - every cause does have an effect but it may or may not be to the person making the decision.
But even thought processes are events which were either caused or not caused. If they were caused, then they are part of the 'domino' chain and there is no real choice because there is no real outcome. If they are not caused, then they are random and unrelated to personality, desire, anything else. It would be like making every decision by rolling some dice, only less deterministic.
You are assuming that only one outcome exists in "reality".
If you look at quantum physics, it is entirely possible that all the alternatives are equally real, and the "choice" is not which alternative will become "real" and all others then become "not real", but rather, which alternative to observe/experience in this "lifetime" - sequence of moments of experience.
In that case, both free will and determinism are true, across an infinite number of possible universes. Each sequence of events is determined (including determinations made by the mechanism of random selection), and every possible sequence of events actually exists at once.
Free will enters in when one point of consciousness moves along a sequence, as it can can only visit one branch of each choice point.
The other branches do not cease to exist, but they become invisible (inexperiencable) to the point of consciousness once it is on the part of the timeline "after" the choice is made.
Free will and determinism aren't qualities of a particle, they are, and if my logic is valid and sound, then there can never be free will in any universe.
And even if you do play the quantum card and say that multiple possible outcomes can exist/co exist, then you are agreeing with me because the conscious agent is not the one making the choice.
Events are either caused or random. Neither option allows for free will.
We cannot deny the reality of the free will in the decisions we are faced with in our lives.
But as we seek to understand further, we do realize our limitations. These limitations though does not negate the reality of free will but rather embraces them.
The limitations are a result of our individual thoughts can be ultimately categorized in to Good or evil.
As we continue further we would also realize that truth and Good are inextricably linked likewise lies and evil.
For any evil to exist it must be established with some good or truth otherwise it will self destruct. And therefore for Good to exist, it must be with purity of truth, for any lie will corrupt good and transform it into evil.
I have said all this to say, yes there is a freewill which is embraced by the motivation for Good or for evil of which all truth vs truth and lie as the options.
If you then contend that I have proven that freewill does not exist for we are either agents for Good using only truth as our standard, or we are agents for evil using some truth and some lies as our standard.
I also fully agree.
All good exist as God and truth exist as his Son Christ.
I do not have the (free) will to answer this question. It's my destiny.
Something forced my hand and fingers to type.
by H C Palting3 years ago
Is causality/cause and effect the same as victim blaming? Why or Why not?
by Buildreps3 years ago
Do you believe in Karma? And why?Christians believe that after this earthly life the Abrahamistic deity sends our soul to Heaven or Hell, depending on our behaviour during our earthly life. Turning yourself to the Hindu...
by TruthDebater7 years ago
Do you believe that things in the universe is uncertain in what will happen, or do you believe in determinism that the future can be predicted in everything from the past and present? Which do you believe and why? Also,...
by Dave Mathews6 years ago
How many people know and understand that "No Man" not even one, has had, has, or, ever will have, the so called power of "Free Will"? This term is a misnomer a term improperly used to describe...
by marinealways248 years ago
-I made a response to a comment posted on one of my hubs. I feel that the response proves Divine Intervention false by contradiction of Free Will. Here was my response to a creator that intervenes. "You and I both...
by Deepes Mind5 years ago
On several hubs and forums, I see a lot of my fellow (to an extent) believers posting about how God give us the free will to do things our way, then on other hubs state that we must "Pray that God's will be...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.