It's the God's duty to prove that God is there to protect everybody?
No, God doesn't have to prove anything to anyone. He knows who He is and that truth doesn't change whether anyone believes it or not.
As to protection, He doesn't have to do that either nor does He do things out of duty. God is not obligated to anyone but His own Word.
His love, grace and mercy is what allows us to fall under His protective shadow when we abide in Him. If we don't do that, then we aren't under that covering. However, there are unbelievers who have been protected, but it all falls into the plan of God.
Not at all. Does a mother need to prove that she is there to care for his child? The child himself goes to her or calls her for attracting her attention to him/her. He does not wait or require any proof of her being there.
Similarly God is there and it is you that have to find and go to him to get his attention. He need not prove for his existence.
Reality seems to prove that God is not there to protect ANYBODY. There has never been any confirmed interaction between any human and a God. And any perceived intervention can be attributed to mere chance. So given that chance can account for any perceived intervention, the only way to confirm that there was actually interaction, with God, is for God to prove that He did, indeed, intervene. Why would God not prove that He is real, and that He is protecting us? Why didn't He protect that baby who drowned right inside that church in a Baptismal Pool? God didn't even see fit to revive the child, and instead, left the child to die. This is beyond heartless, given the fact that the mother had prayed to this same God to give her a son...for years. What kind of PROTECTOR is that?
Sorry, I may not agree with you. It is not his duty. Suppose a mother has thousands of children, all doing lots of mischiefs and wandering all over there out . If some accident or untoward incident happens, how can she attend to and save the child
Dear Venkatachari ~I fail to see the comparison you are making. Why would you compare a mortal, earthly, human mother to the omnipotent creator of the universe? I'm talking about Gods, and you're talking about humans. Please come outside the box.
I want to establish that just like mother, God who is having billions of children in our form, may not be able to attend to the requirements of all of us at the lapse of others; because He is to take care of all and not at one's cost the other
No, it's our duty to decide whether we will follow self-concern or love.
God is Love.
Self-concern (ego) is the source of all suffering and evil. Most people find it easier to follow their own ego self.
When we love others as ourselves, and wish for them everything that they desire, then we heal the world and remove some of the suffering to come.
God is purposefully hidden to get us to grow up! We have to decide if we want to wallow in the action-reaction world of self-concern, or take responsibility for it all and love others as ourselves, forsaking "ego-self."
by Gener Geminiano 8 years ago
You base your answers as much as possible with Science...
by Sean Thomas Gartland 6 years ago
I have seen this in too many places. That is why I ask, I am seriously intrigued on this.
by wordscribe41 9 years ago
The following post is in response to a statement made by another hubber and the many posts I've read using logical fallacies:"the burden of proof" is NOT on the believers. There is no burden to prove He exists because it is by FAITH that we believe. It is by faith we called on to believe....
by John Harper 4 years ago
If scientists found proof that God existed, would you atheists then believe it?http://witscience.org/first-scientific-proof-god-found/
by Apostle Jack 6 years ago
Atheist say that they can't prove that God do not exist,so.......that make them just as ignorant about the matter as those that they say can't prove that He does.That is a clear view of the Pot calling the kettle black.Do you agree.There is more proof that He does exist than He doesn't.They don't...
by SaiKit 8 years ago
A lot of skeptics made the following logical fallacy:Skeptics: Can you prove that God exists? if not, then you are illogical if you believe in a God that you can't prove to be existing! This is the fallacy of "False Delimma" Just because you can't prove a theory or belief, doesn't mean...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|