What is wrong with searching for proof of God's existence?
Believers are almost scared that we will not find proof of God. A typical comment from a believer when asked about God is, "God exists beyond this universe. He cannot be seen. God works in mysterious ways." The Bible talks a lot about faith. Yet I see believers at the doctor's office all the time. In fact, many hospitals are religious. Should scientists stop looking for cures for illnesses? Should we all just rely on faith alone for cures? Why are believers so afraid of what scientists might uncover?
Who says there is something wrong with searching for God's existence? I say search all you want to. I will just be totally surprised if anyone actually finds such proof.
The biggest problem that I have with "believers" is that they practice "blind faith". It's their pride and joy.
Personally, I would be ashamed to identify with a cult that can provide no proof of its deity's existence.
Meanwhile, they just use their religion's "escape clause" to be forgiven for committing heinous crimes against nature and little 4 y.o. girls that they can freely choose (free will ) to rape and beat until they are dead (and many other crimes against humans).
Then how come every time I bring up Kurt Gödel's perfect scientific proof of God you turn a blind eye?
I do not do that. And Godel's equation is not and never will be proof of a god or gods. Why do you keep insisting that it is?
Duh, cuz it's called an ontological proof.
I only state that Gödel's theorem is on an equal footing with all other theorems. Why should it be solely singled out for special negativity by certain person's?
The only proof of a god or gods would be when one of them shows itself and regrows severed limbs, fixes our ruined climate, cures child cancer instantly, or any other impossible task.
The axioms are questionable. In basic terms, Godel's theorem can be described as wishful thinking at best. Sorry. Nice try though.
Once again it is incumbent upon me to bring up the mathematical proof of God's existence as proven by Kurt Gödel. Please don't confuse this with his Incompleteness theorem (save us all some time and do a little homework).
The naysayers will immediately jump up and down with all kinds of reasons why this is ridiculous, but the truth is Gödel's theorem has been proven correct by modern supercomputers and has never been faulted by ACTUAL scientists as opposed to uneducated HP cynics.
The irony is that even some fundamentalist believers get edgy about Gödel's God Theorem!
Gödel showed us that there is in fact nothing wrong with searching for God's existence. He had Albert Einstein giving him maximum moral support during Einstein's last years. There is certainly no doubt that Einstein discussed and had input into Gödel's ideas and he considered Gödel a kind of successor. Many scientists were trying to beat a path to Einstein's door but he only had time for Kurt Gödel.
Nice try. Godel's theorem is questionable. One would have to assume his axioms are correct. They are questionable. Godel would have to know what God is to come up with accurate axioms.
As usual specious arguments are put forward poo pooing Godel. All math theorems have the same legitimacy until proven false. If any proofs are provided you choose to ignore them or rationalize.
Proof is in the pudding, and there isn't any pudding.
A theorem is just a theory, but a Truth transcends theory with undeniable proof. In this case, only the presence and demonstrations of a God can satisfy that proof. A missing God is not a God
How would all this stuff help you find Peace? It may please your mind all right, but is that what you seek? Some of these kind of approaches gives or creates very distasteful pages here in just a matter of days!
Time is not ours, and so before you leave this body,do something that elevates man, you may feel better for it. Much Love.
by M. T. Dremer 2 years ago
Atheists, can you make an argument for god's existence?They say that, in order to understand both sides of an issue, you must know enough that you could argue for the other side. It's a common practice in speech/debate classes. So this question is for atheists; can you make a convincing argument...
by Jason2917 6 years ago
Would proof of God's existence alone be enough for you to worship Him?(This is not a trick question and I'm not looking for a debate. I am genuinely curious in what someone who doesn't believe in God would think. Consider it this way, if all of the sudden all of the evidence of His existence was...
by amine sehibi 2 years ago
What are the most common and logically acceptable arguments atheists use against God's existence?I'm doing a research and require some tough-atheists's arguments that they use against God's existence, all arguments need to be objective, logically acceptable and valid. thanks
by Dgerrimea 8 years ago
A youtube user by the name of Theoretical Bullshit made a video called "Random...Necessarily", which states that God's existence and qualities must be random, and exist for no reason with no cause.The logic behind it is that God is said to exist prior to anything else, as it was God that...
by Kiss andTales 2 years ago
Why do atheist and other none believers not accept as proof human existenceIncluding them ?I ask this question because atheist are persistent with this line prove that God existBut as they are given proof they persist to say the same words, example a husband and wife claims to love one...
by Mahaveer Sanglikar 13 months ago
Many believers like to say that Atheists should prove that there is no God. Believers should know that existence has to be proved, not the non-existence. If a thing exists, it is possible to prove its existence. So believers should prove the existence of God if he exists. But if they want to do it,...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|