Some believe that every red streak or overexposure on film is a ghost. most don't believe in ghosts at all. have you had experiences with ghosts/angels or anything associated with life after death or do you believe most photos around of ghosts are an elaborate hoax with a trick of the camera by the photogrophers hand?
some nuances can be attributed to light, reflection, and/or lens flare. However some different colored objects that appear in the same general vicinity (like a home) in photographs, may very well be something paranormal. A few TV based references suggest that orbs or objects that are green in hue are negative, and the same is said about dark/black shadows too. Who knows? Personally, I haven't had any experiences outside what I can explain, but perhaps someone else can share. Good topic btw.
I think that ghosts/spirits are definitely hanging around these days...have had some incredible encounters that cannot be explain in any other way...but I also think that some people like to use film to play hoaxes...perhaps it's best to just cultivate a certain nonchalance towards it all and not make too big of a deal about it...
I am a psychic medium so I would have to say yes I believe in the paranormal and supernatural because I have witnessed countless oddities my whole life on the subject. I write about my paranormal experiences on hub pages.
If you had your psychic abilities tested and they were real, there is a Nobel Prize waiting for you. Of course, many other Nobel Prizes would have to be taken away from a vast array of scientists who discovered the very laws of the universe that your skills would violate.
I have published a lot of my own hubs on the subject of ghosts and the paranormal.
I have saw ghosts and shadow people all my life as have many other people I know. Recently we investigated a old closed down nursing home and captured a mans voice saying " Oh God Please Help Me "
Its interesting to note that some people can see ghosts and hear things while other people can not. Why its like that I don't know it just is.
But some people will tell you ghosts don't exist. But I can tell you from my own personal experiences that ghosts are very real and most are the spirits of a person who has lived. No they are not demons.
Quite often in places where great tragedy has happened you will find ghosts or other paranormal activity.
How that supports the existing of the paranormal would be the same as the people who believe Scientology is real just because it's written in a book.
Uh-huh.
I think that says more about those who allegedly see and hear those things in regards to mental health.
You can tell me they are real? If I turn to science, it tells me those things can't possibly exist without violating a number of physical laws. Since science is based on evidence and experimentation and the paranormal is based on testimonials, the paranormal hasn't a leg to stand on and we are left wondering about the mental health of it's claimants.
Yet, nothing of the sort has ever been reported.
There are many physics on this planet ,I have my abilities,why the Nobel Prize?
I have seen and communicated with Ghosts?
why the picture of Albert Einstein ,he believed in a higher intelligence.
Whether you believe it or not .
But why the Albert Einstein picture, his thoughts were so different from yours.
Hi Earnesthub ,he did belive ina higher intelligence.
"I want to know God's thoughts; the rest are details."
# "I am convinced that He (God) does not play dice."
# "God is subtle but he is not malicious."
"God does not care about our mathematical difficulties. He integrates empirically."
"God gave me the stubbornness of a mule and a fairly keen scent."
"There comes a time when the mind takes a higher plane of knowledge but can never prove how it got there. All great discoveries have involved such a leap."
I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know his thoughts. The rest are details.
I see a pattern, but my imagination cannot picture the maker of that pattern. I see a clock, but I cannot envision the clockmaker. The human mind is unable to conceive of the four dimensions, so how can it conceive of a God, before whom a thousand years and a thousand dimensions are as one?
Then there are the fanatical atheists whose intolerance is the same as that of the religious fanatics, and it springs from the same source . . . They are creatures who can't hear the music of the spheres.
In the view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognise, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what makes me really angry is that they quote me for support for such views-
Albert Einstein
Many Thanks to you my friend.. Good stuff you have written.
Because the good scientist said so himself.
Check your sources Mohit.
No, you quoted what a bunch of religionists said he said. He did however believe that Jesus existed as a person. I guess he wasn't that smart in that way.
Many clever people are not clever in every way.
http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/einstein.html
Many great scientists have believed in a higher intelligence and not only Albert Einstein.
Show me one, and I will show you someone who was indoctrinated into religion at an early age, as was Albert by the way!
Do you seriously believe all scientists are atheists.
In the view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognise, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what makes me really angry is that they quote me for support for such views-
Albert Einstein
http://english.sdaglobal.org/research/sctstbel.htm
have a look at this link
I looked Mohit. You made my case for me.
The very first person mentioned (Schaefer) is a discredited religious fanatic. (Read about his background.)
I haven't bothered to check them all, but guarantee they will all be the same based on the link itself.
Because you dont believe in god doesn't mean all scientists don't believe in god as well.
http://www.godandscience.org/apologetic … faith.html
1. Nicholas Copernicus (1473-1543)
Copernicus was the Polish astronomer who put forward the first mathematically based system of planets going around the sun. He attended various European universities, and became a Canon in the Catholic church in 1497. His new system was actually first presented in the Vatican gardens in 1533 before Pope Clement VII who approved, and urged Copernicus to publish it around this time. Copernicus was never under any threat of religious persecution - and was urged to publish both by Catholic Bishop Guise, Cardinal Schonberg, and the Protestant Professor George Rheticus. Copernicus referred sometimes to God in his works, and did not see his system as in conflict with the Bible.
2. Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1627)
Bacon was a philosopher who is known for establishing the scientific method of inquiry based on experimentation and inductive reasoning. In De Interpretatione Naturae Prooemium, Bacon established his goals as being the discovery of truth, service to his country, and service to the church. Although his work was based upon experimentation and reasoning, he rejected atheism as being the result of insufficient depth of philosophy, stating, "It is true, that a little philosophy inclineth man’s mind to atheism, but depth in philosophy bringeth men's minds about to religion; for while the mind of man looketh upon second causes scattered, it may sometimes rest in them, and go no further; but when it beholdeth the chain of them confederate, and linked together, it must needs fly to Providence and Deity." (Of Atheism)
3. Johannes Kepler (1571-1630)
Kepler was a brilliant mathematician and astronomer. He did early work on light, and established the laws of planetary motion about the sun. He also came close to reaching the Newtonian concept of universal gravity - well before Newton was born! His introduction of the idea of force in astronomy changed it radically in a modern direction. Kepler was an extremely sincere and pious Lutheran, whose works on astronomy contain writings about how space and the heavenly bodies represent the Trinity. Kepler suffered no persecution for his open avowal of the sun-centered system, and, indeed, was allowed as a Protestant to stay in Catholic Graz as a Professor (1595-1600) when other Protestants had been expelled!
4. Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
Galileo is often remembered for his conflict with the Roman Catholic Church. His controversial work on the solar system was published in 1633. It had no proofs of a sun-centered system (Galileo's telescope discoveries did not indicate a moving earth) and his one "proof" based upon the tides was invalid. It ignored the correct elliptical orbits of planets published twenty five years earlier by Kepler. Since his work finished by putting the Pope's favorite argument in the mouth of the simpleton in the dialogue, the Pope (an old friend of Galileo's) was very offended. After the "trial" and being forbidden to teach the sun-centered system, Galileo did his most useful theoretical work, which was on dynamics. Galileo expressly said that the Bible cannot err, and saw his system as an alternate interpretation of the biblical texts.
5. Rene Descartes (1596-1650)
Descartes was a French mathematician, scientist and philosopher who has been called the father of modern philosophy. His school studies made him dissatisfied with previous philosophy: He had a deep religious faith as a Roman Catholic, which he retained to his dying day, along with a resolute, passionate desire to discover the truth. At the age of 24 he had a dream, and felt the vocational call to seek to bring knowledge together in one system of thought. His system began by asking what could be known if all else were doubted - suggesting the famous "I think therefore I am". Actually, it is often forgotten that the next step for Descartes was to establish the near certainty of the existence of God - for only if God both exists and would not want us to be deceived by our experiences - can we trust our senses and logical thought processes. God is, therefore, central to his whole philosophy. What he really wanted to see was that his philosophy be adopted as standard Roman Catholic teaching. Rene Descartes and Francis Bacon (1561-1626) are generally regarded as the key figures in the development of scientific methodology. Both had systems in which God was important, and both seem more devout than the average for their era.
6. Isaac Newton (1642-1727)
In optics, mechanics, and mathematics, Newton was a figure of undisputed genius and innovation. In all his science (including chemistry) he saw mathematics and numbers as central. What is less well known is that he was devoutly religious and saw numbers as involved in understanding God's plan for history from the Bible. He did a considerable work on biblical numerology, and, though aspects of his beliefs were not orthodox, he thought theology was very important. In his system of physics, God is essential to the nature and absoluteness of space. In Principia he stated, "The most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion on an intelligent and powerful Being."
7. Robert Boyle (1791-1867)
One of the founders and key early members of the Royal Society, Boyle gave his name to "Boyle's Law" for gases, and also wrote an important work on chemistry. Encyclopedia Britannica says of him: "By his will he endowed a series of Boyle lectures, or sermons, which still continue, 'for proving the Christian religion against notorious infidels...' As a devout Protestant, Boyle took a special interest in promoting the Christian religion abroad, giving money to translate and publish the New Testament into Irish and Turkish. In 1690 he developed his theological views in The Christian Virtuoso, which he wrote to show that the study of nature was a central religious duty." Boyle wrote against atheists in his day (the notion that atheism is a modern invention is a myth), and was clearly much more devoutly Christian than the average in his era.
8. Michael Faraday (1791-1867)
Michael Faraday was the son of a blacksmith who became one of the greatest scientists of the 19th century. His work on electricity and magnetism not only revolutionized physics, but led to much of our lifestyles today, which depends on them (including computers and telephone lines and, so, web sites). Faraday was a devoutly Christian member of the Sandemanians, which significantly influenced him and strongly affected the way in which he approached and interpreted nature. Originating from Presbyterians, the Sandemanians rejected the idea of state churches, and tried to go back to a New Testament type of Christianity.
9. Gregor Mendel (1822-1884)
Mendel was the first to lay the mathematical foundations of genetics, in what came to be called "Mendelianism". He began his research in 1856 (three years before Darwin published his Origin of Species) in the garden of the Monastery in which he was a monk. Mendel was elected Abbot of his Monastery in 1868. His work remained comparatively unknown until the turn of the century, when a new generation of botanists began finding similar results and "rediscovered" him (though their ideas were not identical to his). An interesting point is that the 1860's was notable for formation of the X-Club, which was dedicated to lessening religious influences and propagating an image of "conflict" between science and religion. One sympathizer was Darwin's cousin Francis Galton, whose scientific interest was in genetics (a proponent of eugenics - selective breeding among humans to "improve" the stock). He was writing how the "priestly mind" was not conducive to science while, at around the same time, an Austrian monk was making the breakthrough in genetics. The rediscovery of the work of Mendel came too late to affect Galton's contribution.
10. William Thomson Kelvin (1824-1907)
Kelvin was foremost among the small group of British scientists who helped to lay the foundations of modern physics. His work covered many areas of physics, and he was said to have more letters after his name than anyone else in the Commonwealth, since he received numerous honorary degrees from European Universities, which recognized the value of his work. He was a very committed Christian, who was certainly more religious than the average for his era. Interestingly, his fellow physicists George Gabriel Stokes (1819-1903) and James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879) were also men of deep Christian commitment, in an era when many were nominal, apathetic, or anti-Christian. The Encyclopedia Britannica says "Maxwell is regarded by most modern physicists as the scientist of the 19th century who had the greatest influence on 20th century physics; he is ranked with Sir Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein for the fundamental nature of his contributions." Lord Kelvin was an Old Earth creationist, who estimated the Earth's age to be somewhere between 20 million and 100 million years, with an upper limit at 500 million years based on cooling rates (a low estimate due to his lack of knowledge about radiogenic heating).
11. Max Planck (1858-1947)
Planck made many contributions to physics, but is best known for quantum theory, which revolutionized our understanding of the atomic and sub-atomic worlds. In his 1937 lecture "Religion and Naturwissenschaft," Planck expressed the view that God is everywhere present, and held that "the holiness of the unintelligible Godhead is conveyed by the holiness of symbols." Atheists, he thought, attach too much importance to what are merely symbols. Planck was a churchwarden from 1920 until his death, and believed in an almighty, all-knowing, beneficent God (though not necessarily a personal one). Both science and religion wage a "tireless battle against skepticism and dogmatism, against unbelief and superstition" with the goal "toward God!"
12. Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
Einstein is probably the best known and most highly revered scientist of the twentieth century, and is associated with major revolutions in our thinking about time, gravity, and the conversion of matter to energy (E=mc2). Although never coming to belief in a personal God, he recognized the impossibility of a non-created universe. The Encyclopedia Britannica says of him: "Firmly denying atheism, Einstein expressed a belief in "Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the harmony of what exists." This actually motivated his interest in science, as he once remarked to a young physicist: "I want to know how God created this world, I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts, the rest are details." Einstein's famous epithet on the "uncertainty principle" was "God does not play dice" - and to him this was a real statement about a God in whom he believed. A famous saying of his was "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."
want more names let me know : ) will give you hundreds.
and like those you have listed, all indoctrinated into religion, or living in an age when to deny the existence of a god meant certain death.
None of these people, their knowledge and understanding are new to me Mohit. I know them all very well.
Forget it earnesthub, if you insist all scientists have been atheists ad all scientists today are also atheists you are living in weird world.
Why not address the issue Mohit?
It would make more sense than selectively replying to a past posting.
I have quoted form some great scientists yet you twist it around and say it wasn't their quote but religious fundamentalist fabricated them.
This is not going anywhere,even if I post thousands of scientists who believed in god ,you will still say the opposite.
I did not "twist" anything Mohit.
I have no problem with you quoting these great scientists who are believers.
I simply pointed out that they were all indoctrinated into their beliefs as is evident from their backgrounds, and told you to find those who were not.
You replied by quoting the ones who are religionist, with religious backgrounds as I previously stated.
I would not quote a Ford fanatic if I wanted to get an honest opinion about Fords, and would expect you to point out the obviously biased source.
If they had arrived at religious belief without the background they have, I would accept your argument had validity.
Do your methods of argument lead to fallacy? Or do you minimize down to pointing out the elephant's toe when people have been asking what the elephant looked like?
earnestshub, it seems in many arguments I have seen of yours, the elephant's toe always ends up being "indoctrination" when nobody asked for that minute focus.
How can you see the whole if you're so focused on the toe?
Its as god as saying you have been indoctrinated into being an atheist when you were young, no mind of your own.
Common we are not talking about kids here but acknowledged great minds who could think for themselves.
Truthfully Mohit, I was indoctrinated in to religion as a child.
Apparently very few escape religion.
It seems the mind closes over so as not to allow thinking about it.
I know I was terrified as a kid of the loony god who was going to kill me if I didn't obey it and have only ever seen a handful of people intelligent or otherwise who could open their minds and see what a pile of stinking rot it really is once they buy into it.
Not surprising really. Fear of death is a great motivator. .
The title of the article is a dead set giveaway.
Quote a religious site to support religious beliefs?
Not logical evidence of anything really.
I know you were Earnesthub and thats my point, you chose whether to believe or not, no one is putting a gun on your head and forcing you to
.
Similarly give credit to these intelligent humans, no one is forcing them to believe in god.
My parents taught me about religion when I was young but chose to e an atheist as i didnt believe them.
Then I came across God and became a poet earnesthub.
I am a science graduate who believes in God.
The point is that religion is based on threats. I did not just choose to not believe, it is never that easy.
One needs an open mind on the matter. Hardly likely when one believes all the threats through indoctrination.
I believe many return to religion when that is how they were educated.
I didn't believe in God no matter how many threatened me about the consequences.
I don't like being threatened just like you.
I meditated and came across God my inner self, threats didnt help me convert.
Fair enough. I studied it as I do with anything I wish to have knowledge of, and decided it was the most ridiculous belief a human could have. A fairy in the sky who kills himself as his own son because what he made was faulty?
My studies and meditations (some 20 years now for meditation) have led me to a psychological understanding of religion.
I wasn't looking for god while meditating ,it juts happened.
Fair enough. Where did you graduate in science from Mohit?
Mumbai Jaihind College ,then studied further science and mathematics for
a Navigating Officer in the Merchant Navy.
I am not a psychic medium, never been to one...
Have had no training and have read no books on the subject...YET I have had many many experiences of several kinds of manifestations. I can not prove beyond any shadow of boubt any of my experiences of both the normal or paranormal.
There is something out there. FACT! IT only shows itself as much as it chooses when IT wants to whoever is receptive.
We can not, by normal means, prove the paranormal.
Even if I could ? To prove this to someone else doesn't increase its' value to me. It is there for the seeing if ya want to see it.
Hi friends
There are no ghosts; it is only a superstition.
The Angels are true and are mentioned with definite functions in Quran, the Word of the Creator-God Allah YHWH existing in the original Arabic text; one may however understand it in the translations also.
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
All these questions just prove how small and insignificant we are in this great universe we live in. There are multitudes of unanswered questions that we can only speculate on. Even my faith in God is based on faith,no concrete existance can be proven.
I believe ghosts and evil spirits do exist. I havent seen tho (I hope I never see one) but my brother has seen some crazy stuff. Its a long story not in mood to type.
There are some people who will never accept anything a real unless they can sense it with one or another of their five senses; or the tried-and-true instruments of our present day. Skeptic Societies are filled with them. Such people generally hark back to that old argument, 'Scientific Proof' forgetting entirely that the scientists of earlier days mocked 'radio' 'heavier than air flight' and more recently Quantum Physics, and how our reality is changed by how we expect it to be (e.g. either as a wavelet or a particle)
Of course there are things in existence outside of our sensory ranges! Look at the sky on a cloudless day. It appears there is nothing there. A simple temperature drop and voila! the sky is filled with seemingly completely separated clouds. This would have seemed like magic to early humankind.
I support those who say they are psychics. There are just far too many around, and right down through the millenia of human existence to claim they are all mistaken or all frauds.
I have a picture my daughter took of me in my loving room, it looks as though theres a little girl sitting above me...
Some people's kids! Those who cite "physical law" should really read up on where science is going. Transporters and cloaks of invisibilty, string theory and alternate universes. Theoeretically speaking, it could be said that string theory allows whole universes which follow physical laws foreign to our reality. Could also be one where God doesn't exist, does exist or even one where no one sits around talking about it.
Far as ghosts go, those who cannot directly effect their surroundings are ghosts. They could be evidence of high energy imprintation of a past image. There is an incredible amount of it in the human body (energy) and a camera works by light to imprint an image. Leonardo's obscurer demonstrates that film is not a requirement for an image to be captured. After Hiroshima and Nagasaki, images were imprinted on remaining surfaces which were humans who had been annihilated. Poltergeists are those who do effect local surroundings, they too may be some form of energy release emanating from someone closely involved in the paranormal activity. A man once told me that he saw Elvis, in the clouds! Not clouds that resembled Elvis. ELVIS! Be areal shocker if he was really JC
Some peoples kids might want to understand the differences between science and science fiction.
They are primarily signs that someone needs to learn to take photos better.
I used to teach sunday school in an Abbey Church - I was taking the children up to the room above the vestry for class and opened the door, only to find a lady in there, arranging flowers. She had on a twinset and pearls and neat hair. The flowers were on a large iron stand and were very beautiful. I apologised, closed the door, then thought NO, hang on, we ARE supposed to be in here so I opened the door again and guess what, no lady, just the iron stand - and I could still smell the flowers! There was no other exit from that room except from the door I opened. I am not given to fancy but the image of that lady has stayed with me for over thirty years!
This is fascinating to me. You were the only one who saw? Were there never any other incidents you heard about in the same building?
Ghosts or reflection of imaginations?
Hi friends
I think ghosts are imaginations of weak persons who are superstitious.
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
Hi friends
There are no many gods; there is only ONE God, the Creator-God Allah YHWH.
The Angels also do exist; they obey commandments of God.
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
Okay angels exit but ghosts do not.How convenient because Muhammadan communicated with an angel.
“The Messenger of Allaah May Allah's peace and blessings be on him said: ‘The jinn are of three types: a types that has wings, and they fly through the air; a type that looks like snakes and dogs; and a type that stops for a rest then resumes its journey.”
Hi friend
While discussing about Islam please quote from Quran, the first and the foremost source of Muslims, whatever the denomination. Hadith did not exist at the time of Muhammad; it was collected 200/250 years after his demise and is only accepted if it is not against Quran.
Thanks
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
Surah 6:100
Yet they make the Jinns equals with Allah, though Allah did create the Jinns;
And they falsely, having no knowledge, attribute to Him Sons and Daughters.
Praise and glory be to Him! For He is above what they attribute to Him!
Surah 46:29 to 31
29: Behold, We turned towards you a company of Jinns quietly listening to the Quran: When they stood in the presence thereof, they said, "Listen in silence!" When the reading was finished, they returned to their people, to warn them of their sins.
Surah 55:14 and 15
14: Allah created man from sounding clay like unto pottery,
15: and Allah created Jinns from fire free of smoke.
The Noble Qur'an - Saad 38:35-39
35. He said: "My Lord! Forgive me, and bestow upon me a kingdom such as shall not belong to any other after me: Verily, You are the Bestower."
36. So, We subjected to him the wind, it blew gently to his order whithersoever he willed,
37. And also the Shayâtin (devils) from the jinns (including) every kind of builder and diver,
The Noble Qur'an - Saba' 34:12-14
14. Then when We decreed death for him [Sulaimân (Solomon)], nothing informed them (jinns) of his death except a little worm of the earth, which kept (slowly) gnawing away at his stick, so when he fell down, the jinns saw clearly that if they had known the unseen, they would not have stayed in the humiliating torment.
I do not believe I am a weak person, nor am I superstitious, I merely reported something I saw and that I cannot explain.
by TANYA CANNING 10 years ago
Do you believe that ghosts and spirits and other entities actually exist? well if you would have asked me that question about 4 years ago I would have said no... I had 1 unexplained episode back then but over the last year I have been experiencing some very frightening things and its getting worse...
by manofmystery24 11 years ago
Believer or Skeptic, please write why.
by Leaderofmany 8 years ago
I often feel like my Grandmother is still here with me, walking the halls and just being near. Is this allowed by GOD?
by rlaha 12 years ago
Do you believe in the occult, or paranormal, or even ghosts?I do. How about you?
by flacoinohio 12 years ago
Do you believe in ghosts or paranormal activity and why?
by ngureco 11 years ago
Has Scientists Ever Proven The Existent Of Ghosts Or Any Paranormal Activity?
Copyright © 2024 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2024 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |