Is this the level of intelligence of Atheists?

Jump to Last Post 51-100 of 116 discussions (1589 posts)
  1. Jerami profile image59
    Jeramiposted 13 years ago

    do you think that Jesus might have turned over the tables of the money changers ;  because he knew that his time had come, and this act was simply to instigate the Pharasee into doing what they did.

      Was this the first time that Jesus saw them doing that which they were doing?

    1. Claire Evans profile image66
      Claire Evansposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      It was definitely the catalyst but Jesus was genuinely angry because of such blasphemy.  It was an automatic reaction that He sure didn't plan before hand.  If that didn't happen, something else would have happened to warrant the Pharisees plotting His death.

    2. Kikilari profile image60
      Kikilariposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      He was angry at sin.  Wow, you people need to smart up.  Look in the Holy Bible for answers.  Thank you.  See ya.

  2. Kikilari profile image60
    Kikilariposted 13 years ago

    Divoraced is wrong in the Holy Bible.  You really need to read it.  Thank you.  See ya,

    1. Claire Evans profile image66
      Claire Evansposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Did Jesus say it was wrong? He said sexual infidelity warranted the wronged spouse divorcing him/her.

      1. Eaglekiwi profile image73
        Eaglekiwiposted 13 years agoin reply to this

        True that.

      2. vector7 profile image61
        vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

        Yes, but though I've been there (not divorce, but lied to and left when engaged) and am sure the pain it causes is why God allows divorce on those terms.

        I do believe He would rather it not happen at all, not saying we have control all the time.. Therefore making it the less righteous action, though staying is impossible it seems(Hardness of heart)?

        Just thinking on this one, it's a tough situation when in unbearable pain...

        1. Claire Evans profile image66
          Claire Evansposted 13 years agoin reply to this

          We live in a complex world.  Nothing is black and white and there are various reasons why divorce is warranted.  I believe Jesus did not believe that sexual infidelity is not the only reason that warrants a divorce.  I don't think He could have mentioned all the reasons that provide grounds for divorce.  For example, if your spouse murders someone, it would only be expected that you would divorce him.   This is common sense.  Many don't know what to do when considering divorce and that is why the gift of the Holy Spirit can guide us to either allow the divorce if it is His will or block it if that is His will.

          It is important to realize that God is a compassionate one and cannot be unreasonable.

          1. vector7 profile image61
            vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

            I agree. I was simply saying that it was not the original intention of marriage, to then divorce. I also believe, and have seen, people who love God which believe in the holiness of marriage enough to stay even through the pain of a cheating spouse(not constant cheating, but an incident) I can't believe that God wouldn't reward that person likewise, and be pleased with them for working so hard to uphold the marriage to please Him. After all, God does make all things new.

            This is what I meant. Not that God held it against you. I surely am aware of His compassion for His mercy endureth forever, as king David puts it in the Psalms.

            smile

            1. Claire Evans profile image66
              Claire Evansposted 13 years agoin reply to this

              Absolutely! My mom told me that last night, funny enough. smile There are some people who can still make a marriage work even one of the spouses have cheated.  I believe that it is important to know why the spouse cheated and what is wrong with marriage.  Marriage counselling is a great thing.

              I didn't mean to imply that I am a divorcee.  I was speaking in general. smile

              1. vector7 profile image61
                vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

                Oh dear Claire, lol.. I wasn't pointing in about anything personal with you. no no.

                That is your business. God knows and you know. wink

                Tell your mom thank you for me.. lol j/kidn

                smile

                1. Claire Evans profile image66
                  Claire Evansposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  I'll tell my mom! smile

          2. A Troubled Man profile image60
            A Troubled Manposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            lol Still making up nonsense as you go along and calling it common sense. Hilarious.

            Considering how high the divorce rate is amongst Christians, there is either a whole lot of murdering going on or a whole lot of common sense abounding. lol

            1. vector7 profile image61
              vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

              Still basing your arguement on claims I see.

              We see your thought processes are full of short circuits.

              Speaking of common sense, someone lacks the sense to do their research..

              Jesus Christ said many shall call on His name and be rejected because they were liars using the name of Christianity as a comfort method or a social empowerment method. Hypocrites listening to prosperity preachers like Joel Olsteen and the like..

              Your accusations are worthless and baseless because you have no knowledge to base it on.

              A midget can claim NBA professional, guess your gullible enough to suck that lie up your uninformed straw too...

              Goodness you people are more annoying than flies with the SAME posts as last year from other atheists..

              How mant times do I have to disprove the SAME ridiculous accusations that MAKE NO SENSE WHATSOEVER? lol

              That group of midgets telling you their dunks are getting better sure is going to leave everyone laughing at your newsflash....

              Claims are claims, nots facts genius.. lol

              We see who's making up nonsense. roll

              Wonderful attempt though, but so not original......

              Ugh, I need a fly swatter bad. lol

              cool

              1. profile image0
                AKA Winstonposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                (A midget can claim NBA professional, guess your gullible enough to suck that lie up your uninformed straw too...)

                vector7,

                Yes, and a tax collector can claim a blinding light and voice came from heaven.

                A few short people have been successful in the NBA (Calvin Murphy, Nate Robinson).  Not one time, though, has there been objective evidence presented that there is a location called heaven, and heaven can produce audible vocalizations - all you have is one guy's claim of the miraculous - during a time when magic and mystical occurences were common lore and legend.

                Now, what were you saying about being gullible?

                1. vector7 profile image61
                  vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  Yes, and I suppose the facts don't line up with the thousands of years of previous writing in the same regard..

                  That is a child like comparison, as if the whole world went nuts over a midget basketball team who could dunk, you would call them all liars.

                  The truth is it's the truth, because if it weren't true all the Christians wouldn't have been convinced because the witnesses they questioned wouldn't have anything to tell.

                  Paul writes of 500 people seeing the resurected Christ, and wrote it in a LETTER telling them to go ask the 500 people that seen.

                  WHY DO YOU THINK THEY BELIEVED THEM THENN??? They asked 500 people about it...


                  He didn't write a book title it Jesus the life changer and expect to get rich.

                  Like I said your ridiculous and grasping at straws..

                  Get over it. The facts are against you and your getting quite annoying.

                  Attacking me on a seperate post with completely different context is pathetic, but nice attempt.

                  Maybe your overlooking how gullible you are to yourself overlooking you having not done your research either little buddy. wink

                  And I said a FULL TEAM of ABSOLUTE GENETIC midgets.. not short people

                  Way to attempt changing how things look, goodness your methods are ANNOYING...

                  lol

                  cool

                  1. A Troubled Man profile image60
                    A Troubled Manposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                    lol There are well over 500 documented cases of people being abducted by aliens, too. Over 500 cases of people seeing Bigfoot.

                    Your argument is nothing more than an Appeal to Belief.

                  2. profile image0
                    AKA Winstonposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                    (The truth is it's the truth, because if it weren't true all the Christians wouldn't have been convinced)

                    vector7,

                    This is really lame.  Uri Geller claimed to be able to bend spoons with the power of his mind.  Millions of people, including the leading paranormal researchers of the day, considered him a genuine psychic.  And then along came a mostly unknown professional magician named James Randi and showed the world how the spoon-bending trick was done.  He later established the James Randi foundation which offers $1,000,000 prize to anyone who can perform a supernatural feat under testable, controlled conditions.

                    That prize has never been claimed.

                    Your belief is in the truthfulness of humans, not gods - and the sad thing is you don't even realize it.

              2. A Troubled Man profile image60
                A Troubled Manposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                Believers have nothing else but claims to their beliefs, hence they are the only things that can be argued.



                Another unfounded claim. So what?



                lol Like, the God knowledge you possess? lol



                Gibberish.

                1. vector7 profile image61
                  vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  Back to no arguement?

                  It's cool, I know it's hard to admit even when you have the advantage of making anything up while I have to stick to pre-written words. wink

                  And you still have nothing, save babbling to conclude with laughy faces and nothing to laugh at.

                  Guess you don't think the universe follows laws and rules and patterns with structure TO THE T every time without a hiccup either do you?

                  roll

                  How about it captain gibberish? What say you to the fact?

                  cool

                  1. A Troubled Man profile image60
                    A Troubled Manposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                    You mean your gibberish is actually pre-written? lol

          3. DoubleScorpion profile image77
            DoubleScorpionposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            Mark 10:5-12

            5 “It was because your hearts were hard that Moses wrote you this law,” Jesus replied.
            6 “But at the beginning of creation God ‘made them male and female.’ 
            7 ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife,
            8 and the two will become one flesh.’c So they are no longer two, but one.
            9 Therefore what God has joined together, let man not separate.”
            10 When they were in the house again, the disciples asked Jesus about this.
            11 He answered, “Anyone who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her.
            12 And if she divorces her husband and marries another man, she commits adultery.”


            Matthew 19:8-9

            8 Jesus replied, “Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning.
            9 I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, and marries another woman commits adultery.”


            Seems fairly straight forward to me...

            1. profile image0
              AKA Winstonposted 13 years agoin reply to this

              And equally as clear is this:

              Catch-22, Chapter 27, pg. 309

              "You have no respect for excessive authority or obsolete traditions. You're dangerous and depraved, and you ought to be taken outside and shot!"

              1. DoubleScorpion profile image77
                DoubleScorpionposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                LOL...

            2. Claire Evans profile image66
              Claire Evansposted 13 years agoin reply to this

              I truly do not believe that Jesus would expect anyone to stay with her husband if he raped a child.  If Jesus has a problem with that, and He most certainly doesn't, then He must go preach somewhere else.

              I think it is pretty self explanatory and I do believe the gospel writers did, too.  I think the context is that the topic of adultery was brought up.  Another thing, I think Jesus was emphasizing the fact that marriage is to be respected and one is not to divorce just because one is bored.  For example, in Moses' time, you could divorce your wife if she messed up the dinner.  Jesus was saying that the two spouses of one and both spouses should be respected and the marriage.

              I think this is logical.

              1. DoubleScorpion profile image77
                DoubleScorpionposted 13 years agoin reply to this



                Doesn't this fall under Marital Unfaithfullness?

                1. vector7 profile image61
                  vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  What's "this" DS?

                  smile

                2. Eaglekiwi profile image73
                  Eaglekiwiposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  I would think it falls under a few other catergories as well DS and the best thing is there won't be lawyers in heaven wheeling and dealing like their is now in our so called courts of justice.

                  1. DoubleScorpion profile image77
                    DoubleScorpionposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                    Yes it does indeed.

          4. profile image0
            AKA Winstonposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            (We live in a complex world.  Nothing is black and white....)

            Claire,

            Exactly!  And if you think about it you have to realize that your argument means there can be no absolute moral standard, either.  We cannot cherry-pick the applications we wish our arguments pertain to - if divorce can be justified then so can any action - because nothing is black and white.

            1. autumn18 profile image58
              autumn18posted 13 years agoin reply to this

              Well said. It's interesting because I have a co worker who is Christian who sometimes mentions that in her religion they often say there is no grey area. Meaning sin is sin there is no grey area with that. Now we have Claire saying its not black and white meaning there is grey area. Maybe it's a difference of denomination. Who knows.

              1. Claire Evans profile image66
                Claire Evansposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                Let's take a few examples.  Fundamentalist Christians are dead against abortion.  Now what if the woman was a victim of rape or the pregnancy threatened her life? Is it now wrong for her to abort?

                Say a mother shoots a man in the processing of attempting to murder her daughter and kills him.  Is that an evil act?

                What if you were tied up by intruders and they asked if anyone else was in the house and you said no but there really was just to protect them?  Lying is considered a sin.   

                I just think saying there are no shades of grey makes one terribly judgmental and just is not in touch with the real world.

                1. A Troubled Man profile image60
                  A Troubled Manposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  lol Hilairious. It's as if those type of scenarios happen everyday to common folk and they must be prepared at all times to know exactly what to do based on Gods word.

                  In touch with the real world, indeed. lol

                2. profile image0
                  AKA Winstonposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  (I just think saying there are no shades of grey makes one terribly judgmental and just is not in touch with the real world)

                  Claire,

                  Amazing.  We agree.

                  If you take your thinking one step further, you can only conclude that man is responsible for his own choices and actions - and while following a creed because it has positive values is not harmful, to believe there is a magical solution carried by a superbeing that will be whispered to you personally by this spirit is harmful - because it makes you "unique and special", i.e., having something that no one else possesses unless they adopt your beliefs.

                  What else is fundamentalism than the conviction that one's beliefs are totally right and unassailable?

                3. autumn18 profile image58
                  autumn18posted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  I happen to think people who say gay is a sin are terribly judgemental and not in touch with the real world. It's easy to pick and choose what's right and wrong based on your own morals and the society you live in. Some may say that a certain lie is justifiable and others may say not. So what's the point in following an ancient book if you are still going to rely on your own morals and the laws of today?

              2. Eaglekiwi profile image73
                Eaglekiwiposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                It probably matters more what God thinks (no disrespect intended) but if we look for answers from a book alone, or people alone ,it is always possible to get all kinds of answers.

            2. Claire Evans profile image66
              Claire Evansposted 13 years agoin reply to this

              God's values are absolute but we aren't God.  We are human and I realize that.  That is why I let God guide me in my life.  I don't always know what the right thing to do is.

              1. A Troubled Man profile image60
                A Troubled Manposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                It isn't difficult to see why you don't always know what the right thing to do is. In fact, it's obvious. You're letting ancient medieval myths rule your life. Duh.

                1. Claire Evans profile image66
                  Claire Evansposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  Imagine if I said, "I ALWAYS know what the right thing to do is!"? I'd be chastised for being holier-than-thou and lying.  So you always know what is right and what should be done? If you did, you wouldn't be writing such asinine things.

                  1. A Troubled Man profile image60
                    A Troubled Manposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                    Never said that, did I? But, if you wish to claim I said something entirely different so you could call it asinine, wouldn't that say more about you than me?

              2. profile image0
                AKA Winstonposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                (That is why I let God guide me in my life.)

                Claire,

                This is where your argument breaks down.  If there is a god or gods, mortals have no way of discerning his or their will.   What we confuse as the will of god(s) is human interpretation of human feelings or human words or applying false correlations to events.

                Humans are notoriously good at pattern recognition and notoriously bad at determing if the pattern represents a valid correlation.  This is why science tests objectively - if a claim is valid, it should be repeatable and testable.

                We can pray and see a sudden end to cancer.  Did the prayer work?  No one knows.  To establish a correlation, we have to determine by testing if the event can be repeated.  Of course, there is no proof prayer did not work that one time - there is never going to be that type of proof.  All we have to rely on is our inductive reasoning abilities and our intuition.  We can have a million prayers and a million failures to cure cancer, and that still does not disprove the one time cancer stopped - but it is strong evidence that prayer does not work for stopping cancer.

                You may think you know the will of your god - but if your beliefs cannot be objectively tested for reliability, they should be considered no different than any other legend.

                1. Claire Evans profile image66
                  Claire Evansposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  I really don't care what people think of my relationship with God.  They can think what they like.

                  1. vector7 profile image61
                    vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

                    Amen.

                    Opinions of humans are a dime a dozen.

                    Only God knows what's on the inside, and all the facts.

                    Well said.

                    smile

                  2. profile image0
                    AKA Winstonposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                    "Faith" - the willing abandonment of critical thinking.

  3. Kikilari profile image60
    Kikilariposted 13 years ago

    See ya

  4. Kikilari profile image60
    Kikilariposted 13 years ago

    Please up have brains.

  5. Kikilari profile image60
    Kikilariposted 13 years ago

    See ya

  6. Kikilari profile image60
    Kikilariposted 13 years ago

    God gave us brains, so use them.

  7. Kikilari profile image60
    Kikilariposted 13 years ago

    Please do.

  8. Kikilari profile image60
    Kikilariposted 13 years ago

    :-)

  9. Kikilari profile image60
    Kikilariposted 13 years ago

    :-)

  10. Kikilari profile image60
    Kikilariposted 13 years ago

    We are done.

  11. Kikilari profile image60
    Kikilariposted 13 years ago

    Answers in the Holy Bible.

  12. Kikilari profile image60
    Kikilariposted 13 years ago

    Thanks

  13. Kikilari profile image60
    Kikilariposted 13 years ago

    Use common sense and knowledge too.

  14. Kikilari profile image60
    Kikilariposted 13 years ago

    Yeah

  15. Kikilari profile image60
    Kikilariposted 13 years ago

    :-)

  16. Kikilari profile image60
    Kikilariposted 13 years ago

    :-)

  17. Kikilari profile image60
    Kikilariposted 13 years ago

    :-)

  18. Kikilari profile image60
    Kikilariposted 13 years ago

    :-)

    1. Jerami profile image59
      Jeramiposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      I see you have made the top ten list for activity in this section.

        Good for you  ..    how in the world did you do it?  LOL

  19. skinsman82000 profile image81
    skinsman82000posted 13 years ago

    kikilari- "la, la, la, la...I can't hear you atheists...."

    Not flaming, but I really do think that the only difference between religion and insanity is a book written a very long time ago that has been changed and molded so many times by whomever is in power to suite them.  Not exactly something to believe in 100% and live your life by. 

    And I'm not athiest.  Someone with intelligence once told me "The more you know, the more you know you don't know."  Kind of a simple way to say it, but it speaks volumes and can be used in so many different ways.  Ego is the reason religion is still around today.  No one really wants to ever admit they are wrong or that they don't know.

    1. vector7 profile image61
      vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

      I have heard, believe myself, and still use that phrase in quotations above, ego has nothing to do with religion still being around and sounds quite unreasonable placed directly underneath the very quote I would reply to you with, but seems you know yet disregard..

      And no, I have come to understand plenty that I don't know much of anything and admit it easily, but that gives me a capability you overlook, which is to go beyond and to learn more than is generally accepted that one is able.

      Not only this, BUT, you are a single perspective in a world of not trillions of perspectives, but countless perspectives, for we may attempt to number humanity's impact in numbers all we like, yet scientists refuse to admit that their astronomical number approximations are astronomically innacurate.

      I have experiences in my mind still fresh, and others do as well I'm more than certain, that changed their life which is the cause of the effect of their boldness to, irregardless of the countless ways they are formed to look ignorant and stupid which should say tons to anyone with sensibilities, profess with their mouths that God is real, due to their OWN experiences which they cannot pass into your mind, especially those minds which REFUSE to hear as you portray Kikilari above.

      Athiests have NO experience with God being real.

      Theists HAVE experiences with God being real.

      You have NOTHING to tell SAVE your general knowledge of things you CAN'T see.

      I have PLENTY to tell INCLUDING my general knowledge of things I CAN see.

      Also, friend, advice seems to be seldom practiced it seems by those who boldly employ it. smile


      cool

      1. profile image0
        Sooner28posted 13 years agoin reply to this

        FALSE!

        1. aguasilver profile image76
          aguasilverposted 13 years agoin reply to this

          Oh that's OK then, a one word answer solves all our debate, we can go home now and toast teacakes by the vicarage fireplace, whilst tea is served.

          By default, the believer will point out that ONLY someone who was never truly saved, and therefore had never experienced the Holy Spirit, could reject Christ.

          This of course is based upon the fact that all believers we have ever met will have shared those common experiences, and having done so could not lie and refute what they have experienced first hand, and in the fellowship of others... sometimes multitudes.

          There is an excellent site for former 'christians' where you will be most welcomed to express your views, thought I find that most of them use more words.

          1. profile image0
            Chasukposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            When I was a Christian, the Holy Spirit  revealed to me God's existence, or so I believed then. Now, as an atheist, I believe that I was deluded, then. I may have been right then and wrong now, I honestly don't know.

            1. aguasilver profile image76
              aguasilverposted 13 years agoin reply to this

              That's an honest reply, thank you.

              If you were truly saved, then your current situation will not be a problem, as your 'sins' (including rejecting Christ in your 'confusion') were forgiven.

              I have had my dark moments of the soul, when I have doubted my belief, we all have, but mine have always been driven away by the Holy Spirit falling on me at some point, or from witnessing Gods intervention in my life.

              I also had the advantage of starting off in adult non belief and slowly coming to faith, via working for the other team, which made my decision less emotive based, more formed from necessitation.

              Like I often say, I was a defector, not a convert! smile

          2. profile image0
            Sooner28posted 13 years agoin reply to this

            I'm sorry my computer went nuts.  As you can see if you scroll down, that isn't all I was trying to say.

            1. aguasilver profile image76
              aguasilverposted 13 years agoin reply to this

              OK, can see that now, here is what you ended up saying:



              Which in itself is a reasonable statement, and which I replied as follows:



              So, having spent some time on the Ex Christians website, I agree, they are now firmly convinced that whatever they experienced it was a delusion, and having reached that conclusion now live comfortably with their unbelief, and that's fine by me, because as in all things, scripture told us that this would happen in the end times:

              2 Thessalonians 2 1:17

              BUT RELATIVE to the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ (the Messiah) and our gathering together to [meet] Him, we beg you, brethren,

              Not to allow your minds to be quickly unsettled or disturbed or kept excited or alarmed, whether it be by some [pretended] revelation of [the] Spirit or by word or by letter [alleged to be] from us, to the effect that the day of the Lord has [already] arrived and is here.

              Let no one deceive or beguile you in any way, for that day will not come except the apostasy comes first  [unless the predicted great falling away of those who have professed to be Christians has come] , and the man of lawlessness (sin) is revealed, who is the son of doom (of perdition),

              Who opposes and exalts himself so proudly and insolently against and over all that is called God or that is worshiped, [even to his actually] taking his seat in the temple of God, proclaiming that he himself is God.

              Do you not recollect that when I was still with you, I told you these things?

              And now you know what is restraining him [from being revealed at this time]; it is so that he may be manifested (revealed) in his own [appointed] time.

              For the mystery of lawlessness (that hidden principle of rebellion against constituted authority) is already at work in the world, [but it is] restrained only until he who restrains is taken out of the way.

              And then the lawless one (the antichrist) will be revealed and the Lord Jesus will slay him with the breath of His mouth and bring him to an end by His appearing at His coming.

              The coming [of the lawless one, the antichrist] is through the activity and working of Satan and will be attended by great power and with all sorts of [pretended] miracles and signs and delusive marvels--[all of them] lying wonders--

              And by unlimited seduction to evil and with all wicked deception for those who are perishing (going to perdition) because they did not welcome the Truth but refused to love it that they might be saved.

              Therefore God sends upon them a misleading influence, a working of error and a strong delusion to make them believe what is false, in order that all may be judged and condemned who did not believe in [who refused to adhere to, trust in, and rely on] the Truth, but [instead] took pleasure in unrighteousness.

              But we, brethren beloved by the Lord, ought and are obligated [as those who are in debt] to give thanks always to God for you, because God chose you from the beginning as His firstfruits (first converts) for salvation through the sanctifying work of the [Holy] Spirit and [your] belief in (adherence to, trust in, and reliance on) the Truth.

              [It was] to this end that He called you through our Gospel, so that you may obtain and share in the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ (the Messiah).

              So then, brethren, stand firm and hold fast to the traditions and instructions which you were taught by us, whether by our word of mouth or by letter.

              Now may our Lord Jesus Christ Himself and God our Father, Who loved us and gave us everlasting consolation and encouragement and well-founded hope through [His] grace (unmerited favor),

              Comfort and encourage your hearts and strengthen them [make them steadfast and keep them unswerving] in every good work and word.

              ---------------

              Taking this into account, believers welcome the apostasy (which) comes first  [unless the predicted great falling away of those who have professed to be Christians has come]

              It's encouraging to see scripture confirmed and know that as believers our redemption draws near. smile

              John

              1. profile image0
                Emile Rposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                The apostasy that comes first? These words were written thousands of years ago. Speaking of people alive then. It amazes me how the spiritually dead  (also called the religious) never bother to think. They keep revamping and pretending that something new has developed under the sun. By doing so, you remain at odds with reality. By choice you have turned your backs on the ability to ponder the true nature of the spiritual.

                1. aguasilver profile image76
                  aguasilverposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  Errrm.... these words specifically relate to the return of Christ, which has not occurred yet, so I suggest that despite being written nearly 2000 years ago, they were written to be read by those who will be here when Christ returns to wrap things up, which looks very liable to be soonish.

                  I say soonish because nobody knows the exact time, however scripture was liberally littered with clues that 'those that have eyes to see' can pick up upon, and from most eschatology study viewpoints, we are about done and the return is imminent.

                  Of course you are entitled to your own viewpoint, though I would also suggest that those who are 'spiritually dead' are more probably those who have never encountered the Holy Spirit (or any spirit, there are plenty to go around, once someone spiritually awakens)than those who in comparative terms hold daily communication with the spiritual plane via Gods Holy Spirit.

                  Time will tell what is correct, but from my observations scripture is being fulfilled daily, so to speak.

                  1. profile image0
                    Emile Rposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                    And the religious have always claimed that the scripture you refer to is being fulfilled daily. Obviously, there is nothing new under the sun.

      2. profile image0
        Sooner28posted 13 years agoin reply to this

        FALSE!

      3. profile image0
        Sooner28posted 13 years agoin reply to this

        FALSE!

        Many atheists are former Christians.  In some cases, it was very difficult to give up the religion, due to the emotional attachment.  However, reading the Bible itself is the best way to turn someone.  The Christians who "convert" to atheism are the ones who cannot be answered for, because they were involved in the Church and the "inside" speak of the Christian community.

        1. vector7 profile image61
          vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

          many Christians are former atheists..

          suppose thats 'different' though huh? lol

          your point is invalid friend. they attest themselves 'no God' therefore validating what i have wrote by their own testimony.

          smile

          1. profile image0
            Sooner28posted 13 years agoin reply to this

            It is vastly different.  The atheists are born into a society that is already priming them socially to be a Christian, and putting social pressure on them in Churches and families to go have a "personal experience" with God.  If someone rejects that, they have actually gone through "being a Christian" so there can be no appeals to "you just haven't experienced God yet."

            An atheist who converts has done nothing but buy into the propaganda of his society, since he is a former Christian.  If religious experiences were real, how could an atheist possibly have it and then say God didn't exist?  Most atheists never wanted to give up Christianity to begin with.  Social ties are formed, and the majority of society will look down on you for taking that position, possibly even your own family.  Atheism is something that requires a fight, against yourself and society.

            1. aguasilver profile image76
              aguasilverposted 13 years agoin reply to this

              And there I suspect you highlight the issue, for you define that for anybody to say they were a Christian and became an atheist, they must first accept that they never were believers who had experienced Christ and the Holy Spirit.

              Churchianity has a lot to answer for!

              For too long the emphasis has been on growing church membership rather than making disciples of those coming to 'faith'.

              No wonder some folk are left empty and disillusioned, and fall prey to atheist propaganda.

              1. profile image0
                Sooner28posted 13 years agoin reply to this

                "And there I suspect you highlight the issue, for you define that for anybody to say they were a Christian and became an atheist, they must first accept that they never were believers who had experienced Christ and the Holy Spirit."

                If this is the way I came across, this is a mistake in my communication, so I apologize.  Atheists did experience something in most cases.  I experienced an emotional feeling that I still cannot really explain to this day.  However, there are a plethora of stories from people talking about religious experiences, dating back to the Greeks and Mount Olympus.  it doesn't mean the experience was actually GOD.  Did a Greek praying to Zeus actually talk to a lightning-wielding deity?

                I'm not saying this to be insulting, but the human mind is able to do some very strange things.  We can drug ourselves and see things that do not actually exist.  There are also schizophrenics.  I really sum up my former experience as a form of psychological delusion.  That doesn't mean the experience itself was not real, for I would not deny something so obvious.  I am only denying that it was divine in origin.

                1. aguasilver profile image76
                  aguasilverposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  You still cannot explain it, yet you can dismiss it as a 'delusion'?

                  I cannot dismiss what I have seen and witnessed in 20 years of challenging faith, nor can I dismiss it as a delusion, there have been too many incidents over too long a period of time, and I can honestly say I never actually WANTED to be a believer and spent two thirds of my current lifespan avoiding faith in God.

                  I am not some starry eyed convert looking for personal gain or encouragement, far from it, but I have been involved in ministry that I have seen change lives, neighbourhoods and circumstances.

                  Those were not delusions, I suspect yours were not also, but you were convinced otherwise and so that is how it should be, and I wish you well in your future life.

              2. A Troubled Man profile image60
                A Troubled Manposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                In other words, they knew they were lying to themselves if they claimed to have had "experienced Christ and the Holy Spirit"



                lol Falling prey to honesty leaves one empty and disillusioned? Obviously, one's mind would have to be so empty already if all it contained was dishonesty in the first place.

            2. profile image0
              jonnycomelatelyposted 13 years agoin reply to this

              Sooner28, please note that I am not "an atheist."  From outward appearance, the way I dress, move, conduct my life, and the way I interact with other people, would not indicate to you that I was "an atheist."  You use the word as a noun. 

              More correctly the word is an adjective.  It describes my point of view, and my outlook on religious discussions.

              Second point is that I have become atheist in my thinking by doing a lot of inner contemplation.  It was not a totally negative reaction to organised religion.

              1. profile image0
                Sooner28posted 13 years agoin reply to this

                No it wouldn't.  But political affiliation also could not be determined by outward appearance either.  A noun is a person, place thing, or idea.  So since I vote Democrat, I take the position that they are superior to the Republican party.  That's all I mean by the use of the word.

                I also didn't mean to imply it was a completely negative reaction to organized religion.  The thing that happened to me though, and many others I have read about, is that it is not easy to become an atheist when you grow up in a Christian household.  Even though you eventually realize that Christianity is no longer true, you are still fighting a psychological battle to give it up.  I went from growing up in church (literally, from the time I was born) to not believing at all.

                The reason it is given up is due to the lack of logic, or empirical evidence, which is where the inner contemplation definitely comes into play.  I wasn't denying that at all.

  20. profile image0
    AKA Winstonposted 13 years ago

    (Christians rely on Gods Authority)

    Eaglekiwi,

    And tell me, how do Christian go about "knowing" God's authority when the bible was written by men and the only other source of authority is mankind itself claiming to somehow "know" what cannot be known?

    You only have three choices, and all are nothing but empty assertions:a) the bible was inspired by god but men wrote down what god wanted to be said: b) religious leaders have been taught what god's authority is and they pass it on, perfectly or c) one claims he can personally know or talk to god and get the information direct from the source.

    Do you see what your empty claim involves?   In all cases, you are trusting man to be telling the truth and not simply repeating a hallucination, lie, or deception.

    Saul, renamed Paul, claimed a light blinded him and he heard a voice from heaven.  Son of Sam said the neighbor's dog talked to him.

    What is the difference between those two claims?

    1. vector7 profile image61
      vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Blah, blah, blah...

      Have you no other route to explanation than questioning?

      This mirage of mess is redundant which you use, as the methods leave you unaccountable for anything.

      Why, also, do you feel the need to poke at one?? Are there not plenty here who believe in what your questions are in regard to?

      Seriously?

      What are YOUR claims, and where is YOUR evidence?

      Where lies the reasoning and logic to spend alllll your days trying to write on reeds and animals skins with charcoal and water in a feather in order to lie to a world you dare not see in 20 or forty years??

      What in the world could his motivation be to tell these things but they are true?

      Insanity?? Oh, well I suppose there was a disease floating around that just hit those with writing capabilities, which weren't common in that time, and that were intellectual enough to explain things consistently and kindly, umm, even though he were insane?

      Your attacks on the credibility are getting ridiculous, and your logic is severely flawed.. ridiculous is more what it generally is as your sarcasm shows lack of thought or reasoning, and lack of anything to write at all, save your imagination's productions.

      Making anyone out to be a liar is easy, keep going with your posts doing it and I'll give you an example. If you ask nicely. wink

      cool

      1. profile image0
        AKA Winstonposted 13 years agoin reply to this

        (Blah, blah, blah... Have you no other route to explanation than questioning?)

        vector7,

        Yes, but why cast pearls before swine, eh?

      2. profile image0
        AKA Winstonposted 13 years agoin reply to this

        (What are YOUR claims, and where is YOUR evidence?)

        vector7,

        I never got around to this question earlier, and that is because I have no claims other than that there is no objective, testable evidence for the hypothesis of god, and on further examination, the hypothesis cannot support a rational explanation for existence, and the logical inferences used to argue for the necessity of a god do hold up to close reasoning.

        The "god of the gaps" claim is not a valid argument, but it is what the theist uses as a basis for his argument.  That mankind cannot explain every mystery is not a valid argument that the supernatural is real and plugs those knowledge "gaps". 

        God is your claim, not mine.  It is up to the claimant to make the argument that supports his position. 

        I refuse to give any credence, though, to hogwash, so I don't offer any degree of respect for bad arguments - the people making the argument I can forgive, as no one knows the psychology of another person that makes them dependent upon dulusional belief to function.

        I am not trying to prove there is no god - I simply point out that the arguments used by theists are unsupportable.  That makes those who believe in the supernatural no different than those who believed that Uri Geller could really bend spoons with his psychic abilities or that Benny Hinn really could heal incurable illnesses - there is one of these born every minute, according to P.T. Barnum.

        I cannot change a person's viewpoint; however, I can hope that some random reader may acknowledge the reality of what I point out and determine on his own that functioning in reality does not have to include delusional belief in irrational hocus pocus. 

        If I succeed only once in this goal, I will have helped make the world a safer and saner place.

        1. vector7 profile image61
          vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

          i guess majority of the world is 'delusional' just because you've never seen anything beyond your hand? lol

          the things gone unseen for decades and denied for years by most are now admitted to.

          radio waves were once denied in a court of law as true, now we know that was asinine.

          YOU are the court, I am the man protesting radio wave existence.

          now, you can continue your denial without further interuption, including denial of my statements facts for lack of knowledge of the occurance in historical recorded documents.

          by all means, continue.

          smile

          1. profile image0
            jomineposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            You lack comprehension too!

            1. vector7 profile image61
              vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

              lol

              wow.

              you've stunned me into awe with your wisdom.

              have a good one jomine

              smile

              1. profile image0
                jomineposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                No I cannot. To be stunned, need intelligence to comprehend!

          2. profile image0
            AKA Winstonposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            (the things gone unseen for decades and denied for years by most are now admitted to)

            vector7,

            Not only are you an authoritarian/individualist who believes in heirarchial knowledge, but you lack basic reading comprehension skills and rudimentary reasoning ability.

            This is not an issue of monkey see - this is an issue of can monkey reason?   This is an issue simply between shape/no shape.

            If you cannot grasp the discussion, if it is over your head, perhaps you should sit back and try to learn?

  21. Evankovach profile image61
    Evankovachposted 13 years ago

    Now that this box has been opened, I feel inclined to comment.  I think the biggest flaw in some of the arguments discussed here is the fact that not all people will have the same opinion and that is acceptable.  There is no right or wrong when it comes to these arguments, people will have opinions and opinions are not fact.  People of faith shouldn't force their opinions of the presence of some higher being on those who believe one does not exist. This works both ways.

    I personally feel religion is an invented phenomena used as a controlling mechanism for people. I'm comfortable knowing that most religions would accept this as my opinion and not torment me for this belief.  I've always been a "see it to believe it person." To me, God is a lot like Santa Claus. I found out Santa wasn't real in elementary school, and I'm sure the verdict will be out on God once my time comes.  Until then, I can still live worry-free as I feel science is the guiding principle in the world.

    1. Sagittarius 2012 profile image61
      Sagittarius 2012posted 13 years agoin reply to this

      From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Nicholas



      St NicholasSaint Nicholas (Greek: Ἅγιος Νικόλαος, Hagios ["Saint", literally "Holy", Latin: Sanctus] Nicolaos ["victory of the people"]) (270 – 6 December 343),[3][4] also called Nikolaos of Myra, was a historic 4th-century saint and Greek[5] Bishop of Myra (Demre, part of modern-day Turkey) in Lycia.

      Because of the many miracles attributed to his intercession, he is also known as Nikolaos the Wonderworker (Νικόλαος ὁ Θαυματουργός, Nikolaos ho Thaumaturgos).

      He had a reputation for secret gift-giving, such as putting coins in the shoes of those who left them out for him, and thus became the model for Santa Claus, whose modern name comes from the Dutch Sinterklaas, itself from a series of elisions and corruptions of the transliteration of "Saint Nikolaos".

      His reputation evolved among the faithful, as was common for early Christian saints.[6] In 1087, his relics were furtively translated to Bari, in southeastern Italy; for this reason, he is also known as Nikolaos of Bari. His feastday is 6 December [O.S. 19 December].

      The historical Saint Nicholas is remembered and revered among Catholic and Orthodox Christians. He is also honored by various Anglican and Lutheran churches.

      Saint Nicholas is the patron saint of sailors, merchants, archers, thieves, children, and students in various countries in the Balkans and Eastern Europe (Albania, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Georgia, Greece, Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia), as well as in parts of Western Europe (Belgium, France, Netherlands, Portugal).

      He is also the patron saint of Aberdeen, Amsterdam, Barranquilla, Bari, Beit Jala, Fribourg, Huguenots, Kozani, Liverpool, Paternopoli, Sassari, Siggiewi and Lorraine. He was also a patron of the Varangian Guard of the Byzantine emperors, who protected his relics in Bari.


      Evankovach,

      now you know that there was a Santa, so - there is God.

      1. vector7 profile image61
        vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

        No God? But everything follows rules?

        Why, people can't get their computers to run consistently with all their might and effort and INTELLIGENCE, yet nothing in the universe ever breaks a rule, save people and their devices..

        I suppose there are no laws either that govern existence and the physical materials therein? Or rules that govern the patterns within substances which create the structure thereof?

        Or protocols which dictate in what way one element of the system acts in relation to the other with accurate and precise consistency?

        What say you almighty dictator of truth? smile

        cool

  22. jacharless profile image72
    jacharlessposted 13 years ago

    To re-quote,

    No doubt most know who 'invented' this thing called religion. The exact same characteristic people who are doing everything possible to control the masses, with yet another invented religion.

    They have unearthed theories, bones and more -as old as mankind itself- painted them anew, placed them in their temples for the many to view, awe and worship for a nominal fee/donation.

    The newest of all, is portable temples -the apple of our i, err, eye.
    Now man carries god/desses in his/her pockets. The gods of information/knowledge.

    4200 years ago, information/knowledge was also called god and defined by the semiotics, technology, affluence/intelligent, even language and volume/size of the culture. That culture dominated and enslaved the masses. This is why Egyptian, Babylonian, Persian, Roman, Anglican cultures seized control and scooped up 80% of the world -during their time periods. Not at all surprising is -watch closely- as each of those cultures reached their greatness of power/stronghold/grip, a religion was added/created/rekindled to appease the masses. Certainly not a coincidence...

    Some of the mightiest in history -and today as well agreed- this last generation has reached the sum of human information/knowledge. Unless something/someone alters/adds to that information, humanity will eventually stagnate and dissolve.
    there is no religion to fall back on and nothing 'new'. Humanity is regressing with post-information/reading only the past with no understanding of how to create a future.

    Food for thought.

    James.

    1. vector7 profile image61
      vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Without the past, you had no future.

      You didn't create the past, and you only experience the future.

      The world will still spin, the stars have nowhere to fall, but the mystery of God, will stay mystery to those who know it all.

      Thoughts for food.

      cool

      1. jacharless profile image72
        jacharlessposted 13 years agoin reply to this

        Hullo Vector,

        I cannot -well, shall not-- agree with that statement.
        A simple example is a new born baby, even a just conceived child has no past, yet indeed they have only a future.

        Yes, I do create a past -all things do. but it does conclude we can experience the future because of the have or have not of the past.

        Time is a man made concept.
        If the string theory of \a/ to \b/ to \c/ is an indication of \past/ \present/ \future/, then by simply reversing our perspective, have turned the past into the future and the future into the past. So, in actuality, one could experience the past-future together, interchange them as will. The only constant is the present. In any direction, it remains the same. The present keeps the madness of the past-future paradigm from consuming everything into oblivion.

        As for G/gods, well my position remains.
        As for the mystery of Creator, there is no mystery.
        Even if the minimalist believing would engage both 'time' and dialogue with Creator, not a single thing would be hidden. After all, should the information be remotely correct, all the facets, elements and attributes of Creator were genetically build into every human -then backed up by a direct power source/energy called spirit, to unite the tangible physique with the intangible physique. Also known as heaven-earth.

        To further exemplify this calls regard to just one man. A man who explained quite clearly what I said above. And should the events of the past be true, also showed that unity --in its entirety-- to many.

        Unfortunately, equation & sensation [humanism divided], spawned battles, mechanics, voodoo-woodoo, etc and thoroughly 'forsaken' the reality of their true purpose and worth.

        Why? Many reasons come to mind.
        Forefinger Independence/ Self & Self Imposed Sustainability/Necessity (?)
        Defense for Cause-Effect (past-future) (?)
        To continue enjoying the 'high of knowledge' [Adamic Inception] (?)
        Justification for the neglect of one another and worlds presented to them as gifts, just because -- just for simply being. (?)

        ...

        James.

        1. vector7 profile image61
          vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

          I must admit I like your thinking sir, not certain I ageee or disagree yet as time is pressing me. But I will say a quick look has spiked intrigue.

          I'll contemplate in depth soon. Thank you.

          smile

  23. Jerami profile image59
    Jeramiposted 13 years ago

    When it is ALL Said and done .....   very little, if any of what we do ..  "Over here" ... is going to change what happens .. over there.

  24. Eaglekiwi profile image73
    Eaglekiwiposted 13 years ago

    People do not want to accept the teachings or faith of Jesus Christ,because in order to do so they must also accept they are a sinner and that they need Christs forgiveness.

    The biggest lie that Satan has ever told is that God doesnt exist and he can use whatever means he wants to perpetrate that lie.
    Intellects are a pushover because he uses ego combined with a few facts and before you know it many intellectuals are now virtual scientific professors lol

    Get rid of pride and ego,replace it with humilty and grace , then one would be amazed at just how insignificant one is in the great scheme of things.

    1. A Troubled Man profile image60
      A Troubled Manposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      It's funny enough believers believe the nonsense they embrace as fact, but it's even funnier when they attempt to explain why others don't accept their nonsense based entirely on the nonsense itself.



      In their magical fantasies, believers must justify why others don't accept their invisible sky fairy by making up another evil invisible anti-sky fairy.



      Believers who have their noses in the Bible all day long must justify their ignorance of the world around them by claiming their evil invisible anti-sky fairy uses facts to persuade others to not accept their invisible sky fairy.



      Or, how amazingly ignorant and delusional one can become in the great scheme of things.

      1. Eaglekiwi profile image73
        Eaglekiwiposted 13 years agoin reply to this

        If you continue with ego, then it must work for you.
        It doesnt for me;)

        1. vector7 profile image61
          vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

          lol

          Thank God for love.

          smile

          1. Eaglekiwi profile image73
            Eaglekiwiposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            wink

    2. Woman Of Courage profile image61
      Woman Of Courageposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Very well stated Kiwi. Humility is the first step in accepting the Lord as our personal savior. smile

      1. profile image0
        AKA Winstonposted 13 years agoin reply to this

        (Humility is the first step in accepting the Lord as our personal savior.)

        Christianity is a Catch-22.  In order to humble onesself, one has to arrogantly believe one knows this is necessary.

        1. profile image0
          Sooner28posted 13 years agoin reply to this

          Very good point actually.  One must believe that he/she is simply a humble human being who needs to be saved by God, but also must affirm that Christianity is the only correct religion, and do this all based on FAITH!  If that isn't arrogant, I don't know what is.

          And there is also the problem of "grace" actually being based on an action, i.e. saying the sinner's prayer.  Salvation doesn't come without that (at least for a conservative Christian).

        2. Claire Evans profile image66
          Claire Evansposted 13 years agoin reply to this

          This makes no sense! An arrogant person would in no way think bowing down to a personal saviour is necessary.

          1. profile image0
            jomineposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            An arrogant person always say there is a god and He knows what this god needs and says, and ask others to follow that, which actually is his own opinion in disguise.

            1. aka-dj profile image81
              aka-djposted 13 years agoin reply to this

              How about the possibility that God has said certain things He wants everyone to know, and all we are doing is exactly that?
              Declaring HIS word to everyone. Knowing full well that not everyone will want to hear it, or receive it (gladly).

              So, if you don't want to hear it, stay out of the forum. For someone who claims logic as their guiding principle, you contradict it!

              1. profile image0
                jomineposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                If you don't want to be treated as a fool, do the same.

                1. aka-dj profile image81
                  aka-djposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  Don't post like ones, and you won't be treated like ones.

              2. profile image0
                AKA Winstonposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                (Declaring HIS word to everyone....So, if you don't want to hear it, stay out of the forum)

                aka-dj,

                First, this thread is under the heading of religion/philosophy and under the subheading of atheism/agnosticism - and then you want to castigate someone for coming to the thread that doesn't want to hear your personal views about what you believe an invisible superbeing said?

                If you go hunting for bear, don't start crying because the bear eats the tent.

                1. aka-dj profile image81
                  aka-djposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  lol

                  Onya Winston!

                  lol

                2. vector7 profile image61
                  vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  Eats the tent? hmm

                  lol

                  This is better than a comedy tour..

                  smile

      2. profile image0
        jomineposted 13 years agoin reply to this

        Very well stated Kiwi. Arrogance that others are idiots and not using once brain is the first step in accepting the Lord as our personal savior.

        1. aguasilver profile image76
          aguasilverposted 13 years agoin reply to this

          Or you could also say:

          Acceptance that we have been idiots and only using our brain is the first step in accepting the Lord as our personal saviour.

          1. profile image0
            jomineposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            accepting the lord? It'll be like from being idiot to being brain dead!

            1. aguasilver profile image76
              aguasilverposted 13 years agoin reply to this

              Being spiritually dead is preferable to you?

              I find it insulting that you have the pomposity to indicate that to be a believer is to be brain dead, especially when believers are normally the better educated on the forum (judging from the level of response they give to your reactions).

              1. profile image0
                jomineposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                I too find it insulting when you believers tell us to believe you and your experience about magic, which has no grounds on reason, logic or reality.

              2. A Troubled Man profile image60
                A Troubled Manposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                You would first have to show there is such a thing a "spiritually alive"



                lol lol <--- coveted double laughie award

                1. aka-dj profile image81
                  aka-djposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  Please show us where, and who, coveted this?

                  Or is that just an ego trip you are on?

                  1. vector7 profile image61
                    vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

                    No one..

                    He still hasn't realized I was doing the triple before he ever done the double.

                    lol lol lol

          2. Claire Evans profile image66
            Claire Evansposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            Wow! Well said!

            1. profile image0
              jonnycomelatelyposted 13 years agoin reply to this

              And I suppose that, since you both agree, you both must be absolutely right,  Right?  Non-sense.

      3. profile image0
        jonnycomelatelyposted 13 years agoin reply to this

        Ok, so for your first step in humility, you could start by accepting that just because you believe what you do, in the christian ethic, that does not mean you know everything there is to know.  Accept that there is lots lots more to see, hear, listen to and contemplate, outside of what christianity has taught down through the ages.

        You only need to "believe" something when you don't "know" for sure.  Once you "know" then "belief" goes out the window. 

        Keep the belief if you desire to.  Only share that with others if they really want to join in.  You can't expect everyone to accept your beliefs if they just don't ring true to everyone.

    3. EinderDarkwolf profile image60
      EinderDarkwolfposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Kiwi, The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was to convince the world that he didn't exist. By doing so he makes man take credit for what he has done instead of using him as scapegoat (wow go figure). In the same instance if Satan doesn't exist, then neither does God, which leaves you to yourself and realising that you have to make peace with things you do. That was the devils greatest trick/lie. It had nothing to do with God to begin with, but you can't have one without the other.

      It has come to light in recent years that as good as people may profess themselves to be, they really are not. The greatest evil that we know of on this planet, that is accepted across all religions everywhere, is the evil of good men and women doing nothing when another evil befalls. If your not willing to stand up for others, in essence, you are committing one of the greatest evils ever to be accepted by mass consensus. Something so profoundly accepted, is as of yet, to be taken to heart by most. They saunter on through their lives and don't worry about helping anyone else. Insult them, accuse them of ignorance, put them down, and call others not of their faith (this is for religions across the board as they all require faith), they do consistently. It is not often that they will turn to help the fellow sleeping on the side walk, or give some extra change to the person at the counter trying to buy some milk, or any number of other things that I have seen happen.

      Understanding that you are Christian and wish to hold to this belief is fine. Not everyone is of your faith, in fact, there are over 6 trillion people in the world that are not of your faith. If it was the only possible right one, then at least more than a small fraction of people would be part of it.

      1. aka-dj profile image81
        aka-djposted 13 years agoin reply to this

        Typo!

        Better check your facts. Even if you said billion, you'd be wrong on the numbers.

        1. EinderDarkwolf profile image60
          EinderDarkwolfposted 13 years agoin reply to this

          Your right, there are 6.8 Billion people in the world and only 2.1 Billion of them are Christian as of 2005. Strip away anyone below the age of 14 or not given a choice in their religion and I'm sure that number would've been even smaller. That not with standing, that's still less than 1/3 of the total world population at that point and time. That means that over 4 Billion people on this planet are not of your faith in 2005, a number that could be widely different now.  Even still that's a very significant number of people who do not, and may never have believed in Christianity.

  25. Jo_Goldsmith11 profile image61
    Jo_Goldsmith11posted 13 years ago

    I think it is sad that Hub Pages would allow such hate be written for all to see. go figure?

  26. HattieMattieMae profile image61
    HattieMattieMaeposted 13 years ago

    If you don't like what believers think or have to say, why do you keep going in forums talking to them. Why not just go do something else if you don't agree.

    1. Pcunix profile image83
      Pcunixposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      We all have our own reasons.

      I speak against religious absurdities because I know that some atheists are isolated and feel that they have no community, no people who share their beliefs.  By speaking out against religion, I help show them that they are not alone.

      1. HattieMattieMae profile image61
        HattieMattieMaeposted 13 years agoin reply to this

        Ha Ha no problem Pcunix, just find it funny when some just complain, and than they don't realise well if they don't come in the forums in the first place and find something better to do, than they don't have no complaining. I guess I don't see the point with some saying Christian's bash them etc, but than forums give you more religion, and atheist points of view than your own neighborhood, so of course I just question, well if you don't want to hear, why sit here and listen, no one forcing you too. So why complain. I don't know if you do this, but i see others doing it. If you don't want to feel they yuckiness of it, quit particpating. That is all I'm saying. lol

        1. A Troubled Man profile image60
          A Troubled Manposted 13 years agoin reply to this

          Said the pot to the kettle. lol

        2. Pcunix profile image83
          Pcunixposted 13 years agoin reply to this

          Ayup.  There is little point in complaining about your clothing being ruined when no one dragged you into the muck to wrestle with the pigs, is there?

    2. A Troubled Man profile image60
      A Troubled Manposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      If believers did think, they wouldn't be believers. Unfortunately, what they believe and say affects others, societies and mankind, negatively.

      Of course, I understand believers wish to spread the Gospel unfettered, negatively impacting others in order to fulfill their selfish needs. And, that is precisely why you would rather we just go away. smile

      1. HattieMattieMae profile image61
        HattieMattieMaeposted 13 years agoin reply to this

        No I don't need you to go away. If you think about it no one can persuade you, so why do  you think you can persuade them. I have the philosophy to understand no matter who I am talking too, you can change who they are and maybe right where they are for a reason. So of course it don't matter what side your on, no one is going to change anyone's beliefs.

        1. A Troubled Man profile image60
          A Troubled Manposted 13 years agoin reply to this

          Changing your tune, now?



          Show me your God, that will persuade me more than you can imagine.



          In other words, no one is going to convince a believer of the reality in which they reside, no matter how much reality does not support their beliefs in any way.

          1. HattieMattieMae profile image61
            HattieMattieMaeposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            I think personally you just like finding someone to debate with, probably over any topic. lol

            1. A Troubled Man profile image60
              A Troubled Manposted 13 years agoin reply to this

              Yes, I know you can't see the damage faith and religions do to our world and believe others criticize it just for something to do.

              1. HattieMattieMae profile image61
                HattieMattieMaeposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                I can see the damage that people all together do no matter what they believe or label you put on them. Fortunately you only pick one group while it is many all over the world that can't live in peace and accept the diversity in each other. It's been there for centuries. Before you and I have ever been alive. Before Christianity even existed. It is easy to blame it on one group, but in my book we are all responsible for the world we live in today, it goes beyond religion, but generations of beliefs, values, morals in each family. Besides the society you grew up in, and the country. While you like to blame it one group, I know better and see the bigger picture. Sorry to say we are all responsible for the world's condition as it is now.

                1. A Troubled Man profile image60
                  A Troubled Manposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  Yes, one religious group can't live in peace or accept any other religious group.



                  No, it's religions that poison everything and have done so long before Christianity.



                  No, you don't.

                  1. HattieMattieMae profile image61
                    HattieMattieMaeposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                    We all play a part in it no matter who we are, or where we come from! It's part of being a social worker, you study societies, not so much religions in a college or university. I've studies science and all the mumbo jumbo you do Trouble. I just don't need to blame it on anyone, but realise it's the human condition. I study all the political leaders and when they have succeeded and failed all over the globe, leaders of companies etc. I still learn more and more every day. I don't need to get my info from you, believe it or not their authorities higher than you that have done the work to share why the world is a mess. You ever been on CATO. Various sites, books and information out there. If you want to blame it on religion that your own, I do know it is much more than that.

              2. Eaglekiwi profile image73
                Eaglekiwiposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                If a car slams into a pedestrian killing an innocent person, do we blame the car?, the manufacturer? the cars previous owners ,cars history, pedestrians right to be there.

                No, we blame the driver ,he/she is the one to be held accountable, and so it is with every single human being.
                We decide who and how we love and we decide who and how we hate.

                Choices.

                Gotta quit blaming the 'other person' imagined or not. That includes blaming our past, our cultures, our religion,our government.

    3. Claire Evans profile image66
      Claire Evansposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      It's because ATM thrives when putting other people down.  Sad but true.

  27. HattieMattieMae profile image61
    HattieMattieMaeposted 13 years ago

    See you said it better than me Pcunix! lol

  28. HattieMattieMae profile image61
    HattieMattieMaeposted 13 years ago

    This is the thing, we all take part in this world, we do need to take responsibility for our own actions and behaviors. It is easy to blame others. I agree with you Eagle, doesn't matter who we are, we take part in making this disaster every day in this world, by what we do or don't do individually to make it a better place.

  29. leenamartha profile image39
    leenamarthaposted 13 years ago

    I'm pretty sure that was a pointless barb, but I guess I'm not intelligent enough to grasp it.

  30. profile image0
    Chasukposted 13 years ago

    Why do you choose to believe these things, Claire? I'm not being mocking or disrespectful, but I am absolutely gobsmacked when I encounter beliefs such as yours. Why do you believe such things?

    1. profile image0
      Emile Rposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      I've come to assume this has to be an elaborate joke. No one could believe half the stuff that persona has posted within this thread.

    2. Claire Evans profile image66
      Claire Evansposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Because it's the truth.

      1. profile image0
        Chasukposted 13 years agoin reply to this

        I'm not actually disputing the truth of falsity of your claims. While your claims surprise me, I'm prepared to acknowledge that they are true, if I eventually satisfy myself that they are. How did you come to believe these things? That's all that I'm asking.

        1. Claire Evans profile image66
          Claire Evansposted 13 years agoin reply to this

          I'm not actually disputing the truth of falsity of your claims. While your claims surprise me, I'm prepared to acknowledge that they are true, if I eventually satisfy myself that they are. How did you come to believe these things? That's all that I'm asking.

          Thank you for the respectful manner in which you have addressed me. One who really seeks the truth starts on neutral grounds, like you, and listens to other people's argument to assess whether they have truth in them or not.

          You should go back a few pages and read the correspondences I made with other people for you to get a good idea how I have come to know these things.  I iterate, I have had guidance from the Holy Spirit but one can only know how if one knows the opposite entity and that is Satan.  You cannot appreciate God's glory unless you know Satan's depravity.  I've had experiences with evil that validate what he is like.  I've researched quite a bit into the occult over the years and the secret societies of our world leaders.  It's indisputable that it is Satanism.  Bohemian Grove, for example, is where American leaders perform mock sacrifices of a man to Lillith.  I'm not the one who makes these things up.  They happen and the symbols of Satanism they associate themselves with needs to be explained.

          Both God and Satan are vying for our souls and it is a daily battle.  When you realize in retrospect that God was allowing things to happen, or not happen, for our own good.  When things appear to be going in the opposite direction but doesn't happen, you realize it is Satan. A person can only know these things over years of experience and has spiritual intuition.

          It's a very difficult thing to understand but one realizes the power of the Holy Spirit in that people are drawn to Jesus even in a negative way.  How many times are atheists going to try and convince themselves He didn't exist or is not the Holy Spirit? Is it that important? I'm looking for a forum topic where Allah's existence or Mohammed's but have yet to find it.  Nobody seems to care.

          Hope this makes some sense.

          1. profile image0
            jomineposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            It is important because when ever religions ruled the world, in the name of spirit/god guidance they destroyed civilizations.
            because people who come here are mostly Americans and Europeans and the fight against the thing they come against mostly. Besides Muslims in general are more indoctrinated that they won't discuss their faith. Inspite of this there are topics related to that in the forums.

            May be to a deluded mind, but it will never make sense or make as much as sense as that of tooth faires or FSM or Dracula/vampires.
            And this will be my last reply to you. Unless you can rationally and logically explain what this god/ spirit, this will all be your opinions/subjective hallucinations and though you'll be convinced, nobody is going to care except similarly delude people

            1. Claire Evans profile image66
              Claire Evansposted 13 years agoin reply to this

              So you combat the evils of religion by trying to delude yourself Jesus didn’t exist? So you automatically think because the religion is corrupted that means Jesus couldn’t possibly be the son of God or that He didn’t exist? How about separating the Holy Spirit from the corrupted religion? How about Judaism? Do you ever try and debunk the Genesis story or Moses’ existence?



              Fight against Al Qaeda! I saw a Muslim saying Allah was more omnipotent than Jesus! Did you try and debate the Muslim there? 

              “And this will be my last reply to you. Unless you can rationally and logically explain what this god/ spirit, this will all be your opinions/subjective hallucinations and though you'll be convinced, nobody is going to care except similarly delude people”

              I will still address your pigs in the lake, etc, argument. Whether you respond or not is up to you.  You say nobody cares? Why have you invested so much time in writing to me? Because you didn’t care a damn? It’s not only Christians who address me, you know. 

              I wouldn’t brush me off as deluded you know.  Truth has a way of coming up from behind you and kicking you in the butt.

              One last thing, what would constitute as rational explaining the Holy Spirit?

              1. profile image0
                jomineposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                This is why I say, you don't understand a thing. Jesus don't exist because there is no historical facts to substantiate that claim. In history there some accepted methods to verify the existence of a person or the occurrence of an event, which jesus does not fulfill.
                "To be son of god", there should be a god. No theist, whoever they are, still has to come with a rational theory about god. God is just the imagination of the ill.  Same is the case with what ever spirit your are claiming, irrespective of holy or unholy.
                Genesis story, its debunked many times. Moses, what is the relevance? [for your information, there is no Egyptian slavery of jews, no moses. But as I already told you the jews won't come to my place to convert or kill, they are a headache only in the middle east.]


                I have, and I did. The problems with Muslims are, you rarely get a sane muslim to debate. Debates and discussions occur between sane, intelligent men, who try to understand what each other say, you cannot debate with people who simply repeat what ever they say, irrespective of being shown the irrationality. I don't debate with Dave, Aquasilver and some others in this forum, though sometimes I make fun of them.


                .
                I didn't know. Till you talk with someone, how do anybody know what whether they talk rationally or not? I start discussions with so many people, but if I find that they are deluded, I leave. I persisted on till you repeated this "spirit" thing, irrespective of so many people pointing to you its just your subjective feeling. Then when some questions are directed at me, in spite of me, sometimes I respond.


                Can you say whether it is an object or concept? If it is an object what are it attributes, how it looks like, and how this object can inspire you, though you cannot see it, feel it or touch it?

                1. Druid Dude profile image61
                  Druid Dudeposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  The Jews don't even deny that such a person lived.  They only deny his divine status. So many people mentioned were real people. You are taking a ridiculous stance. Don't quit your day job.

                  1. profile image0
                    jomineposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                    Get yourself educated, and study some history.(A clue, history is not based on democracy)

                  2. recommend1 profile image59
                    recommend1posted 13 years agoin reply to this

                    There is nothing ridiculous in the lack of any proof of the existence of any jesus figure as depicted in the bible. 

                    No jesus is mentioned anywhere except in the bible and there were dozens of 'messiahs' wandering around in that period.  There is no mention of any of the events associated with the jesus figure from the myth of the murdered, first-born to the absence of any significant sky darkening 'event' at the time of the supposed crucifixion.

                    The only mention is in the story book and, whilst he might have been a real person, he could just as easily be a constructed 'hero'.

                    What most of these stupid discussions fail to address is that the 'reality' of it all is unimportant and focussing on this kind of trivia is just avoiding the message contained in the real or fictional events - and the message has merits. Being rude to Jomine is a sure sign that you are not in tune with the message in any way.

          2. profile image0
            AKA Winstonposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            (I iterate, I have had guidance from the Holy Spirit but one can only know how if one knows the opposite entity and that is Satan.  You cannot appreciate God's glory unless you know Satan's depravity)

            Claire,

            The one thing religious people always screw up is the concept of the burden of proof.

            The religious person states a proposition for which there is no objective evidence, and then they boast that they are right because they can't be proven wrong.

            Have you noticed about yourself how many times you write, How am I wrong, or Show me where I am wrong?

            There is no other area of human activity or thought in which this type of "prove me wrong" absurd 'reasoning' is met with anything other than ridicule....yet the believers, who would often scorn similar statements in other areas of human endeavour, see nothing wrong with the argument. When someone asserts a proposition that is contrary to the rules by which the observable universe operates, then the usual requirement is to expect compelling evidence. Extraordinary claims should require extraordinary evidence.

            The only reason these "prove me wrong' arguments are not laughed out of existence is due to the privileged position that religion holds in our society and the utter waste of so much effort and human ability sucked so futilely into worship of an entity that, if it existed, is shown biblically to be genocidal, homicidal, racist, sexist, and a sadist.

            Claiming an immaterial spirit exists and tells you how to live is irrational, an abandonment of critical thinking and an adoption of blind faith in the infallibility of emotive intuition.

            I don't have to prove that wrong - it is self-refuting.

            1. Claire Evans profile image66
              Claire Evansposted 13 years agoin reply to this

              I wasn't referring to Satan and the Holy Spirit's existence.  I was referring to the links I posted.  Sorry if that wasn't clear.






              If you prove me wrong about the links I've posted, the ones that are factual, then I will take into consideration what you write.




              The OT god is, yet.  But do you know what the OT god is? If I knew God to be like He is in the OT I'll rather go to hell than worship him.



              When I talk about God and Satan and the spiritual realm I do not expect people to believe me because I cannot provide evidence for it over the Internet.  The evidence of the Holy Spirit that is obvious is exorcism of possessed people which my grandfather had to do to a poor bewitched girl.

              1. profile image0
                AKA Winstonposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                (The evidence of the Holy Spirit that is obvious is exorcism of possessed people which my grandfather had to do to a poor bewitched girl.)

                Claire,

                My grandfather told me tales of the "tail-ee-po", a sasquatch-like creature who would come in the middle of the night to steal sleeping children from their beds.

                Fortunately, I outgrew believing my grandfather's tall tales.

                So, all I can do in response to your continued belief in the veracity of your grandfather's tales is modify my last statement and say: Claiming an all-good immaterial spirit exists and can force out an all-bad immaterial spirit that has invaded the body of a human is irrational, an abandonment of critical thinking and an adoption of blind faith in the infallibility of emotive intuition.

                I don't have to prove that wrong - it is self-refuting

                1. vector7 profile image61
                  vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  To closed minded individuals who claim 'everything' is a pretense.

                  smile

                  1. mischeviousme profile image60
                    mischeviousmeposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                    And you would be open minded toward a buddhist? I highly doubt it, for your christian attitude is highly evident.

                  2. profile image0
                    jonnycomelatelyposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                    One finger pointing forward, three pointing backwards and the thumb holding them there!!!!  lol

  31. christianajohan profile image59
    christianajohanposted 13 years ago

    Our understanding on the evolution doesn't connect with Jesus. Human understanding has always been limited compared to the things around us, thus, these things are created by the Almighty.

    Therefore, God has no limitation and we just a piece of something compared to God. We must respect and praise God always for these wonderful things he has given.

    Try to view my simple hub about this.

    http://christianajohan.hubpages.com/hub … ose-Part-1

  32. Alyson Modlin profile image64
    Alyson Modlinposted 13 years ago

    Just because someone decides to blog drunk doesn't mean they represent an entire population of people equal to the entire state population of California....just saying.  Stereotypes are SO limiting.

  33. christianajohan profile image59
    christianajohanposted 13 years ago

    Discussion is the better word with "argument" I should say. We can respect each other's opinion with discussion and not by argument.

    1. aguasilver profile image76
      aguasilverposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Amen Sister,

      ....and thank you also Jonnycomelately!

      John

    2. profile image0
      AKA Winstonposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      (We can respect each other's opinion with discussion and not by argument)

      christianajohan,

      No, we cannot.  I can respect the other person's right to hold his ridiculous opinion, but it is the argument for the belief that is either compelling or not compelling.  If the argument for the belief is invalid, the belief itself cannot be respected.

      I think Mitt Romney is a smart guy.  I also happen to believe his Mormon religious beliefs are stupid and based on delusion and nonsense.  If Romney wants to discuss religion with me, he had better do better than claim, "it is possible that x,y,z happened, and you can't prove me wrong."

      Where that falls on the respect-the-person scale I don't know.

  34. HattieMattieMae profile image61
    HattieMattieMaeposted 13 years ago

    Ha ha well that okay, I don't need to be here, I've got a book to write. lol

  35. HattieMattieMae profile image61
    HattieMattieMaeposted 13 years ago

    Well thank you Trouble! Gotta love you! smile

  36. peterxdunn profile image59
    peterxdunnposted 13 years ago

    Using a statement posted by one atheist to cast aspersions on ALL atheists only illustrates your own intellectual shortcomings. It also evinces the kind of disregard for the truth normally found in the gutter press and in the statements of politicians.

    1. mischeviousme profile image60
      mischeviousmeposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Good one.. +1

    2. aka-dj profile image81
      aka-djposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      You just may be right, however the example used in the OP
      was VERY TYPICAL! NOT a one off.

      So, are you saying you would never resort to this?

  37. A Troubled Man profile image60
    A Troubled Manposted 13 years ago

    lol Believers and their personal insults.

    They must really, really, really feel intelligent. lol

    1. aguasilver profile image76
      aguasilverposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      No, just humorously conspirational, enjoy the joke, it's directed at ATM whoever that is.... anybody know?

      1. A Troubled Man profile image60
        A Troubled Manposted 13 years agoin reply to this

        No, they are personal insults an you know it. Of course, with nothing else to say, believers must resort to them.

        1. mischeviousme profile image60
          mischeviousmeposted 13 years agoin reply to this

          If you hate being insulted so, then why not refrain from using the laughie face icon?

          1. A Troubled Man profile image60
            A Troubled Manposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            Because the personal insults are laughable and childish. Who said I hated them, they are simply prohibited on these forums. Are you done focusing on me, yet?

            1. mischeviousme profile image60
              mischeviousmeposted 13 years agoin reply to this

              No, because I struggle to understand your motives. I just like to talk and debate, that's my motivation. What's your's?

              1. A Troubled Man profile image60
                A Troubled Manposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                Yes, I know.

                1. aguasilver profile image76
                  aguasilverposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  Maybe you need to check your computer, it seems to have left of most of the question, so in order to help you answer, here it is again...

                  "No, because I struggle to understand your motives. I just like to talk and debate, that's my motivation. What's your's?"

                  We'd all like to know that answer!

                  1. aka-dj profile image81
                    aka-djposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                    The real question, and the real answers are always avoided.

                2. Disappearinghead profile image59
                  Disappearingheadposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  Yeah what is your point for coming here ATM? All you do is insult people then cry foul when you interpret their rebuttals as an insult. Those that live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones chummy.

                  1. A Troubled Man profile image60
                    A Troubled Manposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                    You are free to show me where I personally insulted anyone, that is, if you actually understand the difference between personally insulting someone and ridiculing their ideals and beliefs.

            2. profile image0
              jonnycomelatelyposted 13 years agoin reply to this

              Sorry, "A Troubled Man," when I first made that joke of ATM it was not directed at you as an insult.  I was just displaying my often-warped sense of humour.  Nothing personal against you, but it has been taken up in that way.

              Ok, sometimes you do put your point of view in a somewhat aggressive way, and that does tend to raise peoples' ire.  However, it is your right to put your opinions here, as for everyone else.

              1. aka-dj profile image81
                aka-djposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                It seems everyone else got the joke.

                Don't be too hard on yourself.
                Aussies have a way of being able to laugh at themselves, but I guess that's not true of everyone.

              2. A Troubled Man profile image60
                A Troubled Manposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                That is their problem, not mine.

                And, I do understand why their ire's are raised, it is because believers are unable to distinguish their ideals and beliefs from their arms and legs. To them, they are one and the same, but of course, that is an obvious logical fallacy.

                If I were to call someone fat, ugly or and idiot, I am insulting them "personally" but if I were to say their beliefs and statements were irrational, dishonest, false or utterly ridiculous, I am criticizing and mocking those beliefs and statements, which have nothing to do with them personally.

                smile

                1. aguasilver profile image76
                  aguasilverposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  I would beg to differ, believers find it highly personally offensive to have their beliefs ridiculed without any other reason than some anonymous forum user taking a dig at them.

                  But it's a two way street, and what is good for the goose is obviously good for the gander.

                  Of course nobody can make a personal attack at an avatar with no identity disclosed, for there is no person to attack.

                  1. profile image0
                    Emile Rposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                    That's not really fair. Now is it? You know there is a person there. Very few people here have pictures of themselves. How do I know that is a picture of you? Many don't reveal their real names. I don't share mine out of deference to my husband's concerns.

                    Yours is a jab for the sake of the jab. It serves little purpose but to appease your emotional reaction to his posts.

                  2. A Troubled Man profile image60
                    A Troubled Manposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                    That's too bad, isn't it? Of course, believers could care less if they tell others they will burn in hell for an eternity, or tell us that having abortions or using contraceptives is blasphemous, or deriding homosexuals... the list goes on and on as to what believers find acceptable, but if anyone criticizes their irrational beliefs that drive them to tell us those things, it's highly offensive.

                    Hilarious hypocrisy. lol



                    Yes, you are free to ridicule any belief I hold, that is, if you can actually find one. But, that would just mean you're ridiculing reality and understanding.

                    But hey, feel free to do so. lol

  38. jacharless profile image72
    jacharlessposted 13 years ago

    The only Hubber who talks that way is Mark [the Borg] Knowles. lol. more Hub Persona's than Jethro had daughters.

  39. mischeviousme profile image60
    mischeviousmeposted 13 years ago
  40. mischeviousme profile image60
    mischeviousmeposted 13 years ago
  41. profile image0
    CJ Sledgehammerposted 13 years ago

    I realize forums like this are a complete waste of time, because the lines have already been drawn in the sand. But, since I had some time to kill, here goes nothing. 

    Having said that, I would just like to mention that ignorance makes the impossible...possible. I see Christians here who do not really know why they should be confident and I see atheists here who are confident without reason.

    I think Blaise Pascal's "Wager Argument" is the best way to approach this issue. He states that the evidence for a Creator and against one are evenly matched. Therefore, reason cannot be used in this debate.

    He simply stated: If one believes there is a Creator and one is right, then eternal life has been won. If one is wrong, however, and there is no Creator, then one has lost nothing.

    Conversely, if one believes there is no Creator and one just happens to be right, then one has gained nothing. However, if one is wrong and there is a Creator, then one has lost everything...eternally.

    So, according to our good friend, Blaise Pascal, the prudent man (woman) should choose the option which completely covers the bet and makes one happiest...namely, believing in a Creator who made the heavens and the earth and who gave purpose and meaning to life.

    1. profile image0
      JaxsonRaineposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Do you think God would consider that a sincere belief?

      1. profile image0
        CJ Sledgehammerposted 13 years agoin reply to this

        JaxsonRaine:

        To answer your question........yes and no.

        The Almighty has deliberately hidden Himself out of the range of the telescope and mircroscope, hence our belief cannot fully rest on reason, logic, or observation, but instead relies mostly on faith with reason and logic playing a smaller part.

        You see, without faith one cannot please the Almighty, so discovering Him with a telescope requires no faith at all, hence observation would be a faith killer, so to speak, not to mention counter-productive. For the same reason, one cannot discover "God" through mathematical equations or through humanistic philosophies. He has, therefore, covered His tracks (somewhat), in order for one to use the spirit of truth and eyes of faith to find Him.

        The Almighty and His Only Begotten Son, Christ Yeshua, want us to knock, seek, ask, and find Him, but does not want His followers to base their faith and belief in Him on silly superstitions or blind faith - which is faith without reason or faith without authentic authority.

        Essentially, blind faith is faith that stands alone, which is not what He wants. The Word of God therefore states, "Blessed is he who believes and hasn't seen", because faith and belief are what He will judge us on and not on our intellect or ability to notice the obvious.

        It is also important to note that just believing in a "Creator" is not sufficient for salvation: Knowing who the Creator is thus becomes the obvious second step, while the third step is findiing out what He wants to communicate to us and what He wants from us.

        So, basing an initial decision on logic and sound reason, such as in Blaise Pascal's "Wager Argument", can serve a good purpose, but it cannot, on its own, lead one to Paradise;  it can only point one in the right direction.

        Happy hunting.  :0)

        1. profile image0
          jomineposted 13 years agoin reply to this

          Why do you need a telescope to detect god, he is sitting in my basement? There are some aborigines who worship some peculiar stones as god and for them that is god. There are people who think sun and moon are god. So which is your god?
          Anyhow since there is no creator, what wager you are taking?

          1. vector7 profile image61
            vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

            Here, reply to me.

            There is a creator.

            Your wrong.

            Bam. See I can do i too. wink lol

            smile

            1. profile image0
              jomineposted 13 years agoin reply to this

              what is there to create?
              What made you assume a beginning for matter?

              1. vector7 profile image61
                vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

                Is that a joke?

                Or are you seriously telling me you think there wasn't a 'beginning' for matter??

                The entire human race agrees on that.

                Please consider your next statements carefully..

                You sound like your on some heavy dosages... of what - I couldn't guess.. hmm

    2. vector7 profile image61
      vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

      I recently was told to 'let the little children come'.

      no mention of headstrong......

      This adds to some of my studies on logic and full account as well.

      you certainly dropped a sledgehammer.

      Thank you.

      smile

      1. profile image0
        CJ Sledgehammerposted 13 years agoin reply to this

        Always good to run into a friend, Vector7, but I am sad to see that one of my paragraphs mysteriously disappeared from the above post.

        You are right in your observation: "let the little children come to me...." is important to remember because the Lord said His kingdom belonged to such as these.

        I believe, therefore, that the wealthy and intellectually affluent will have a difficult time impressing the Almighty on Judgement Day, because one relies on their money to save them, while the other relies solely on reason to guide them through life. Unfortunately, the Almighty owns everything so the rich man cannot impress God with his wealth and since the Almighty is the author of truth, the intellectual's grasp on knowledge is relegated to that of foolishness.

        1. A Troubled Man profile image60
          A Troubled Manposted 13 years agoin reply to this

          Yes, those who imagine gods and demons swirling round their heads within the thin air considers others who understand the world around them as fools.

          How else to better serve their superiority and defend their irrational beliefs? lol

          1. vector7 profile image61
            vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

            Should I collect the objective lacking insults just from this thread alone and see just how big the post is when I'm done?

            smile

            1. aguasilver profile image76
              aguasilverposted 13 years agoin reply to this

              You could do that, if you had enough time to waste, and wanted to fill a whole forum with inane comments, but don't copy and paste any hubs, or they would end up being downed for duplication.... oh hang on, that would be no problem, there are no hubs....

              Actually for the most part what you copied from the forum posts would be duplication anyway.

      2. A Troubled Man profile image60
        A Troubled Manposted 13 years agoin reply to this

        lol Of course, magical thinking makes anything possible within ones imagination, but not beyond it.



        A tired, old argument long refuted with very simple arguments.

        1. mischeviousme profile image60
          mischeviousmeposted 13 years agoin reply to this

          It makes about as much sense as selling one's soul to sky faries and believing one's free will is under the control of demons. It's actually almost laughable, if that level of insanity wasn't scary.

        2. profile image0
          CJ Sledgehammerposted 13 years agoin reply to this

          A Troubled Mind:

          I have read your simplistic arguments and I am both unimpressed and bored. I heard the same old drivel back in junior high school. Do you have anything else to offer?

          Your master, Earnest, was my whipping post and could not defend himself either. As I have said before: "Ignorance makes the impossible...possible" and your lack of understanding allows for many possibilities to exist that shouldn't.

          They say that ignorance is bliss, is that the reason behind your laughing emoticon? In my mind, I do not find this a laughing matter and I certainly don't see where you have much to be happy about.

          1. Randy Godwin profile image60
            Randy Godwinposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            lollollol  Earnest could have taken two Ex-Lax and cr*pped a better argument than you've ever spewed in your attempts at rationalizing the existence of your invisible, imaginary, boogeyman.  lol

            And many of us are extremely happy not to have your mindset!   


                                                    http://s1.hubimg.com/u/6186572.jpg

            1. profile image0
              CJ Sledgehammerposted 13 years agoin reply to this

              Earnest coulda, woulda, shoulda, but didn't. Yeah, and I once saw Earnest fry a pack of dingos by shooting lightning bolts out of his eyes.

              I realize he was a hero in certain circles, but he has now gone off to his eternal reward, and left a legacy of religious intolerance and vitriol in his wake. He was a smug, hateful little man, who only cared about those who agreed with him.

              As I said before, some of you think you have something intelligent to say and you revel in your rhetoric, but it only serves to drive the nails deeper into your own coffins.

              I have read the arguments, I have seen enough mud-slinging, but I still have not seen any proof that God doesn't exist.

              Are you the one, Randy Godwin, who can lead the slaves out of captivity and to the promised land of a purposeless and meaningless existence, where we can worship the god of chance or the god within?

              Please, I beg you, shake my faith in the Almighty through your vast intellect, wisdom and army of laughing emoticons. I fear, however, that all you will deliver is yet another sophomoric response, with little or no substance. Earnest couldn't deliver..........can you?

              1. Randy Godwin profile image60
                Randy Godwinposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                No one is enslaved but you and your fellow fundies.  End of story.


                                             http://s1.hubimg.com/u/6186572.jpg

                1. vector7 profile image61
                  vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  Jesus Christ disagrees.

                  John 8:34

                  You are enslaved to sin, and have no way free but through Christ.

                  Yet, you want come to Him that He might heal you and open your eyes.

                  John 5:40

                  And yet if you didn't think you knew everything God would open your eyes but you're too busy telling everybody you can see.

                  John 9:41

                  Therefore you will remain a slave to your sins out of stubborness.

                  Such a perfect example as well: Dictator Godwin believes he says when the story ends.

                  I, and all servants of the Lord Christ Jesus, are free.

                  1. profile image0
                    AKA Winstonposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                    (Jesus Christ disagrees.)

                    vector7,

                    Let's be accurate - unknown author claims to know what was said 60+ years before he wrote it down, and he didn't personally hear it: John 8:34

                    Me, I prefer to know my authors:  Joseph Heller, Catch 22

                    "There was no telling what people might find out once they felt free to ask whatever questions they wanted to. "

                    1. vector7 profile image61
                      vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

                      You mean guilty before proven innocent?

                      Thought the way the court seen it was the right way?

                      Innocent until proven guilty.

                      Yeah, that's the problem.

                      You distrust first, because your kind is distrustful.

                      Your too used to everyone lying so everything must be a lie.

                      Politicians, Presidents, Drama Shows.

                      Who DOESN'T lie right?

                      God.

                      You pick it apart before you ever understand it, because you treat everything as lie lie lie.

                      So how then can you ever distinguish what is true? You haven't got anything to analyze but the amazing facts of the story that you 'just can't believe' and you think YOUR verdict is right?

                      Play chess against a super computer. You will lose.

                      Why? Because it will take into account every move. Full account.

                      And will conclude correctly on it's choice on that basis alone against you, and will provide you with the conclusion your choices were incorrect.

                      Why? Because your account was Partial and not a Full Account. Therefore your analysis incomplete. As well, your Conclusion.

                      Incomplete Conclusions are Conclusions lacking Details. Details which alter the Relative Information you do have.

                      But you can't see the Relative Connections because you don't even have all of the Details...

                      You didn't obtain a full account, you lost the chess game, and you are blind to the fact that you are blind.

                      Why ask any questions? If it doesn't fit 'seeable' or 'touchable' it's already a lie.

                      And therefore you will dismiss it and continue to build your 'empty' account of 'nothing' that you built out of 'some' of the details....

                      Whatever Winston.

                      You must be joking me...

                      roll

                      No. I think I know exactly why you deny it.

          2. DoubleScorpion profile image77
            DoubleScorpionposted 13 years agoin reply to this



            The same can be said for both sides of these types of debates.

            1. profile image0
              CJ Sledgehammerposted 13 years agoin reply to this

              Exactly, my point, Double Scorpion. The lines have already been drawn in the sand and I would wager that not one in a thousand (in this forum) is open to change.

              I, therefore,  will find something better to do with my time seeing that no one has the mental capacity to convert me to an atheistic viewpoint, and the likelihood of me converting them to a better way of life is remote.

              A wise man knows when to hold 'em and knows when to fold 'em. So, I will fold, knowing that spiritual conversions are a personal matter and not something that will ever happen on a public forum.

              Peace and goodwill to all - C.J. Sledgehammer

              1. aka-dj profile image81
                aka-djposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                I hope you choose NOT to leave!

                I was just getting into your style and wit.
                Not to mention the power of what you say.
                I for one thoroughly enjoyed it.

                Having said that, I thoroughly understand what  you mean. I've had my own thoughts along those lines.
                My early, initial intention was to help people come to the knowledge of Him, but pretty soon found out there is a totally different tone here.

                1. aguasilver profile image76
                  aguasilverposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  Me too CJ, just ignore the trolls and only comment where there are signs of intelligence, except when you want to wind up a troll! smile

    3. Meg Moon profile image71
      Meg Moonposted 13 years ago

      I hardly think it is fair to take one quotation from an atheist and say it is indicative of all atheists- I could give you some ridiculous quotations from religious people too but then I wouldn't fall prey to such flawed logic and sweeping generalizations.

      1. mischeviousme profile image60
        mischeviousmeposted 13 years agoin reply to this

        Yet they get angry when those same generalizations are aimed at them. They also call it false logic and craziness. But who's crazier, us or them?

      2. profile image0
        CJ Sledgehammerposted 13 years agoin reply to this

        You are right, Meg Moon, when you stated, "I hardly think it is fair to take one quotation from an atheist and say it is indicative of all atheists."

        The fact is, and I wish my brothers and sisters in Christ knew this, but there are at least a dozen "types" of atheists, who differ as much in their views as Christian denominations do.

    4. profile image51
      thietkelogoposted 13 years ago

      I agree with you, thanks

    5. profile image51
      thietkelogoposted 13 years ago

      There is no evidence at all of a creator

      1. aguasilver profile image76
        aguasilverposted 13 years agoin reply to this

        Until you surrender your rebellion and meet with Him.

        1. profile image0
          jomineposted 13 years agoin reply to this

          Correction, Until yo surrender reason and logic and trust some ancient charlatans.

          1. vector7 profile image61
            vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

            You just said in an above post "What made you assume a beginning for matter?"

            ::ahem:: - Correction:       lol

            No one agrees with you, and they all think it's 'illogical' that matter has no beginning.

            Big Bang - Creation = Either way you go you're screwed. lol

            There IS a beginning.  And you didn't use 'reason' or 'logic' to conclude otherwise. wink

            Humanity is against you friend. Give up.

            smile

            1. profile image0
              jomineposted 13 years agoin reply to this

              I know you are deluded and cannot think anything by yourself. Know this, nobody has ever demonstrated "nothing" suddenly getting width, length and height to become "something" or the converse. "Beginning" is a concept, which based on another concept "time" whose basis is our memory and motion of objects.

              1. vector7 profile image61
                vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

                lol

                Let me help..

                Time: is a tool - A 'measuring' tool.

                'Measurements' have: a Beginning and an End.

                There. Confusing made simple. lol wink

                smile

                1. profile image0
                  jomineposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  Very good, you are picking up fast. Now find out what does it measure.

                  1. vector7 profile image61
                    vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

                    roll oh dear- lol

                    Events.......

                    Don't worry, it gets even deeper than that. Want the sub-categories??


                    You going to act like you were aware of that now? tongue

                    You give ME the sub-categories! LOL [they aren't on wiki either] wink

                    I like how you act like you're teaching me something.. lol

                    You're alright Jomine. A little nutty, but I can deal.
                    You crack me up....

                    smile

                    1. profile image0
                      jomineposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                      You are not ok vector, you act like a psychotic. Time is a measurement. It is what we define it to be. It never start or end, for it measure not a thing, but change of locations.
                      However "back you go in time" you'll never see the things existing today vanish into nothing, but only changing its location to each other.

    6. artblack01 profile image61
      artblack01posted 13 years ago

      Oh, the Hypocricy of Christians is astounding!  Thanks vector7!

    7. artblack01 profile image61
      artblack01posted 13 years ago

      Oh, the Hypocricy of Christians is astounding!  Thanks vector7!

    8. artblack01 profile image61
      artblack01posted 13 years ago

      Oh, the Hypocricy of Christians is astounding!  Thanks vector7!

      1. vector7 profile image61
        vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

        lol lol lol

        I'm just a human buddy. That's your excuse?

        The standard is Jesus Christ. Not me.

        You people crack me up.. I could die laughing at your high school postings....

        Reminds me of the kid that said 'well jimmy done it first!'... lol

        No.. That's called an excuse. I'm sure YOUR perfect though right? lol

        And yes, my name is vector7.

        Three clone posts.. what a waste of thread space.. roll

        No, I get agitated.. Anyone see why? Ohh looky.. Useless finger pointers without a neuron of perspective on the OP.. lol

        Peace blackart.

        smile

        1. artblack01 profile image61
          artblack01posted 13 years agoin reply to this

          Jesus was a poor standard, a Plagiarized Savior.
          As far as the 3 posts at once, I have no idea why that happened, I only posted that once.

          1. artblack01 profile image61
            artblack01posted 13 years agoin reply to this

            So your interpretation of that was the joke.

            1. vector7 profile image61
              vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

              No sir. I absolutely knew you only posted once.

              YOU failed to notice the forums error within four hours which means you don't pay much attention to what you write.

              Very loose with your thinking that is..

              Enjoy your reply.

              smile

    9. mischeviousme profile image60
      mischeviousmeposted 13 years ago
    10. profile image51
      thietkelogoposted 13 years ago

      thanks

    11. Atheist Anthony profile image60
      Atheist Anthonyposted 13 years ago

      Just because one atheist doesn't have a solid argument nor does he have the slightest comprehension of his beliefs that doesn't necessarily mean all atheists are unintelligent.

      1. aka-dj profile image81
        aka-djposted 13 years agoin reply to this

        Hi there.
        It is people like you that I was hoping to attract to this thread.

        Please tell us why we should become atheists.

        Or, present arguments that actually give us content, value and meaningful discussion, instead of the likes of the OP.
        (Sincere request big_smile)

        1. profile image0
          jonnycomelatelyposted 13 years agoin reply to this

          dj, "Please tell us why we should become atheists."..... It is never my intention that you or anyone else should be atheist.  It is my choice for myself to be atheist.  Your choice is your choice. 

          Contrast my approach to the subject with the approach of christians who, in most cases want me to become christian.

          1. aka-dj profile image81
            aka-djposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            You, sir, are a real gentleman, compared to many atheists on this forum.
            I would not ask this of you (personally)!
            But, thanks for your post! smile

          2. vector7 profile image61
            vector7posted 13 years agoin reply to this

            Hey.. LOL

            I only tried once!  lol wink

            smile

     
    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)