do you think that Jesus might have turned over the tables of the money changers ; because he knew that his time had come, and this act was simply to instigate the Pharasee into doing what they did.
Was this the first time that Jesus saw them doing that which they were doing?
It was definitely the catalyst but Jesus was genuinely angry because of such blasphemy. It was an automatic reaction that He sure didn't plan before hand. If that didn't happen, something else would have happened to warrant the Pharisees plotting His death.
He was angry at sin. Wow, you people need to smart up. Look in the Holy Bible for answers. Thank you. See ya.
Divoraced is wrong in the Holy Bible. You really need to read it. Thank you. See ya,
Did Jesus say it was wrong? He said sexual infidelity warranted the wronged spouse divorcing him/her.
Yes, but though I've been there (not divorce, but lied to and left when engaged) and am sure the pain it causes is why God allows divorce on those terms.
I do believe He would rather it not happen at all, not saying we have control all the time.. Therefore making it the less righteous action, though staying is impossible it seems(Hardness of heart)?
Just thinking on this one, it's a tough situation when in unbearable pain...
We live in a complex world. Nothing is black and white and there are various reasons why divorce is warranted. I believe Jesus did not believe that sexual infidelity is not the only reason that warrants a divorce. I don't think He could have mentioned all the reasons that provide grounds for divorce. For example, if your spouse murders someone, it would only be expected that you would divorce him. This is common sense. Many don't know what to do when considering divorce and that is why the gift of the Holy Spirit can guide us to either allow the divorce if it is His will or block it if that is His will.
It is important to realize that God is a compassionate one and cannot be unreasonable.
I agree. I was simply saying that it was not the original intention of marriage, to then divorce. I also believe, and have seen, people who love God which believe in the holiness of marriage enough to stay even through the pain of a cheating spouse(not constant cheating, but an incident) I can't believe that God wouldn't reward that person likewise, and be pleased with them for working so hard to uphold the marriage to please Him. After all, God does make all things new.
This is what I meant. Not that God held it against you. I surely am aware of His compassion for His mercy endureth forever, as king David puts it in the Psalms.
Absolutely! My mom told me that last night, funny enough. There are some people who can still make a marriage work even one of the spouses have cheated. I believe that it is important to know why the spouse cheated and what is wrong with marriage. Marriage counselling is a great thing.
I didn't mean to imply that I am a divorcee. I was speaking in general.
Oh dear Claire, lol.. I wasn't pointing in about anything personal with you. no no.
That is your business. God knows and you know.
Tell your mom thank you for me.. lol j/kidn
Still making up nonsense as you go along and calling it common sense. Hilarious.
Considering how high the divorce rate is amongst Christians, there is either a whole lot of murdering going on or a whole lot of common sense abounding.
Still basing your arguement on claims I see.
We see your thought processes are full of short circuits.
Speaking of common sense, someone lacks the sense to do their research..
Jesus Christ said many shall call on His name and be rejected because they were liars using the name of Christianity as a comfort method or a social empowerment method. Hypocrites listening to prosperity preachers like Joel Olsteen and the like..
Your accusations are worthless and baseless because you have no knowledge to base it on.
A midget can claim NBA professional, guess your gullible enough to suck that lie up your uninformed straw too...
Goodness you people are more annoying than flies with the SAME posts as last year from other atheists..
How mant times do I have to disprove the SAME ridiculous accusations that MAKE NO SENSE WHATSOEVER? lol
That group of midgets telling you their dunks are getting better sure is going to leave everyone laughing at your newsflash....
Claims are claims, nots facts genius.. lol
We see who's making up nonsense.
Wonderful attempt though, but so not original......
Ugh, I need a fly swatter bad.
(A midget can claim NBA professional, guess your gullible enough to suck that lie up your uninformed straw too...)
vector7,
Yes, and a tax collector can claim a blinding light and voice came from heaven.
A few short people have been successful in the NBA (Calvin Murphy, Nate Robinson). Not one time, though, has there been objective evidence presented that there is a location called heaven, and heaven can produce audible vocalizations - all you have is one guy's claim of the miraculous - during a time when magic and mystical occurences were common lore and legend.
Now, what were you saying about being gullible?
Yes, and I suppose the facts don't line up with the thousands of years of previous writing in the same regard..
That is a child like comparison, as if the whole world went nuts over a midget basketball team who could dunk, you would call them all liars.
The truth is it's the truth, because if it weren't true all the Christians wouldn't have been convinced because the witnesses they questioned wouldn't have anything to tell.
Paul writes of 500 people seeing the resurected Christ, and wrote it in a LETTER telling them to go ask the 500 people that seen.
WHY DO YOU THINK THEY BELIEVED THEM THENN??? They asked 500 people about it...
He didn't write a book title it Jesus the life changer and expect to get rich.
Like I said your ridiculous and grasping at straws..
Get over it. The facts are against you and your getting quite annoying.
Attacking me on a seperate post with completely different context is pathetic, but nice attempt.
Maybe your overlooking how gullible you are to yourself overlooking you having not done your research either little buddy.
And I said a FULL TEAM of ABSOLUTE GENETIC midgets.. not short people
Way to attempt changing how things look, goodness your methods are ANNOYING...
There are well over 500 documented cases of people being abducted by aliens, too. Over 500 cases of people seeing Bigfoot.
Your argument is nothing more than an Appeal to Belief.
One time, at one place, also claimed true by government records..
Pathetic comparison, nothing in common whatsoever.
Please, like I said, annoying.
I won't continue to appeal to ignorance.
You haven't looked at fact one. Redundant attempts to shed doubt, which is easy as I noted earlier.
Well done moving back to child's play with your imagination again..
That is a false statement. They are exactly the same comparison and those folks are lying or delusional or both.
That would make a nice change.
You wouldn't believe in God if He bit you on the butt..
You don't look for Him, and won't ever see Him, until you meet Him.
I hope you change your mind before then, but hold my breath I will not.
Peace and love sir.
That's where you're wrong, again. If Jesus had come down in the middle of the Superbowl to show us all he existed, I would have to admit to have been wrong about his existence. The difference is, I would actually admit to being wrong in the face of reality.
Why would anyone change their mind about reality if reality did not show it?
Fantasies and delusions of gods have yet to bite me in the butt...
(The truth is it's the truth, because if it weren't true all the Christians wouldn't have been convinced)
vector7,
This is really lame. Uri Geller claimed to be able to bend spoons with the power of his mind. Millions of people, including the leading paranormal researchers of the day, considered him a genuine psychic. And then along came a mostly unknown professional magician named James Randi and showed the world how the spoon-bending trick was done. He later established the James Randi foundation which offers $1,000,000 prize to anyone who can perform a supernatural feat under testable, controlled conditions.
That prize has never been claimed.
Your belief is in the truthfulness of humans, not gods - and the sad thing is you don't even realize it.
You're right, very lame.
Your mind is made, and always was made.
Nothing will change your outlook until you walk through the door of death.
Peace and love Winston, I do enjoy how well you debate though we disagree.
Have a good one sir.
You actually bring up a good point here Winston. If the Bible was the infalliable word of God, then why does it continuously get revised? Why are words repetitively used in the original manuscript that have several different meaning? In fact the very word for God in the texts have several different meanings. I'm not saying that there isn't anything worth knowing the bible. I'm just not understanding how full confidence is placed in a bunch of assembled texts, which we know for a fact were assembled, and that have been re-translated and revised many many many times over. It honestly seems to me like cutting your nose of to spite your face just because you think it may look better.
This is too easy to explain.
Try giving a KJV to a young person today, and ask them what they read.
The revisions are nothing more than updating the language for the common man on the street to understand.
The Bible and is't message was always intended for the masses. The "simple" have no problem with it's message. The self righteous always did, and will do.
Even Jesus was rejected by the elite of His day, but the common people received Him gladly. Same thing today.
Which group are you in?
I'm in the group that seems to derive something completely different from the bible than what the masses do. Therefore I'm not considered a Christian or the masses. I'm not simple enough to be one of them unfortunately.
Sorry but when Rue those who Rue the Day who are skillful to rouse Leviathan become Mourn those who Mourn the day who are skillful to raise up their Mourning, there is a serious lack of translation and even understanding. Paying attention to only part of the revisions and not all of them causes more the message to be lost than is gained. That passage by the way is difference between Job 3:8 in 1996 and Job 3:8 in 2006. Huge difference with two completely different meanings. Revisions aren't always such a good thing when someone who doesn't understand is trying to make others come around to their way of understanding.
Believers have nothing else but claims to their beliefs, hence they are the only things that can be argued.
Another unfounded claim. So what?
Like, the God knowledge you possess?
Gibberish.
Back to no arguement?
It's cool, I know it's hard to admit even when you have the advantage of making anything up while I have to stick to pre-written words.
And you still have nothing, save babbling to conclude with laughy faces and nothing to laugh at.
Guess you don't think the universe follows laws and rules and patterns with structure TO THE T every time without a hiccup either do you?
How about it captain gibberish? What say you to the fact?
Mark 10:5-12
5 “It was because your hearts were hard that Moses wrote you this law,” Jesus replied.
6 “But at the beginning of creation God ‘made them male and female.’
7 ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife,
8 and the two will become one flesh.’c So they are no longer two, but one.
9 Therefore what God has joined together, let man not separate.”
10 When they were in the house again, the disciples asked Jesus about this.
11 He answered, “Anyone who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her.
12 And if she divorces her husband and marries another man, she commits adultery.”
Matthew 19:8-9
8 Jesus replied, “Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning.
9 I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, and marries another woman commits adultery.”
Seems fairly straight forward to me...
And equally as clear is this:
Catch-22, Chapter 27, pg. 309
"You have no respect for excessive authority or obsolete traditions. You're dangerous and depraved, and you ought to be taken outside and shot!"
I truly do not believe that Jesus would expect anyone to stay with her husband if he raped a child. If Jesus has a problem with that, and He most certainly doesn't, then He must go preach somewhere else.
I think it is pretty self explanatory and I do believe the gospel writers did, too. I think the context is that the topic of adultery was brought up. Another thing, I think Jesus was emphasizing the fact that marriage is to be respected and one is not to divorce just because one is bored. For example, in Moses' time, you could divorce your wife if she messed up the dinner. Jesus was saying that the two spouses of one and both spouses should be respected and the marriage.
I think this is logical.
Doesn't this fall under Marital Unfaithfullness?
I would think it falls under a few other catergories as well DS and the best thing is there won't be lawyers in heaven wheeling and dealing like their is now in our so called courts of justice.
(We live in a complex world. Nothing is black and white....)
Claire,
Exactly! And if you think about it you have to realize that your argument means there can be no absolute moral standard, either. We cannot cherry-pick the applications we wish our arguments pertain to - if divorce can be justified then so can any action - because nothing is black and white.
Well said. It's interesting because I have a co worker who is Christian who sometimes mentions that in her religion they often say there is no grey area. Meaning sin is sin there is no grey area with that. Now we have Claire saying its not black and white meaning there is grey area. Maybe it's a difference of denomination. Who knows.
Let's take a few examples. Fundamentalist Christians are dead against abortion. Now what if the woman was a victim of rape or the pregnancy threatened her life? Is it now wrong for her to abort?
Say a mother shoots a man in the processing of attempting to murder her daughter and kills him. Is that an evil act?
What if you were tied up by intruders and they asked if anyone else was in the house and you said no but there really was just to protect them? Lying is considered a sin.
I just think saying there are no shades of grey makes one terribly judgmental and just is not in touch with the real world.
Hilairious. It's as if those type of scenarios happen everyday to common folk and they must be prepared at all times to know exactly what to do based on Gods word.
In touch with the real world, indeed.
(I just think saying there are no shades of grey makes one terribly judgmental and just is not in touch with the real world)
Claire,
Amazing. We agree.
If you take your thinking one step further, you can only conclude that man is responsible for his own choices and actions - and while following a creed because it has positive values is not harmful, to believe there is a magical solution carried by a superbeing that will be whispered to you personally by this spirit is harmful - because it makes you "unique and special", i.e., having something that no one else possesses unless they adopt your beliefs.
What else is fundamentalism than the conviction that one's beliefs are totally right and unassailable?
I happen to think people who say gay is a sin are terribly judgemental and not in touch with the real world. It's easy to pick and choose what's right and wrong based on your own morals and the society you live in. Some may say that a certain lie is justifiable and others may say not. So what's the point in following an ancient book if you are still going to rely on your own morals and the laws of today?
It probably matters more what God thinks (no disrespect intended) but if we look for answers from a book alone, or people alone ,it is always possible to get all kinds of answers.
God's values are absolute but we aren't God. We are human and I realize that. That is why I let God guide me in my life. I don't always know what the right thing to do is.
It isn't difficult to see why you don't always know what the right thing to do is. In fact, it's obvious. You're letting ancient medieval myths rule your life. Duh.
Imagine if I said, "I ALWAYS know what the right thing to do is!"? I'd be chastised for being holier-than-thou and lying. So you always know what is right and what should be done? If you did, you wouldn't be writing such asinine things.
Never said that, did I? But, if you wish to claim I said something entirely different so you could call it asinine, wouldn't that say more about you than me?
(That is why I let God guide me in my life.)
Claire,
This is where your argument breaks down. If there is a god or gods, mortals have no way of discerning his or their will. What we confuse as the will of god(s) is human interpretation of human feelings or human words or applying false correlations to events.
Humans are notoriously good at pattern recognition and notoriously bad at determing if the pattern represents a valid correlation. This is why science tests objectively - if a claim is valid, it should be repeatable and testable.
We can pray and see a sudden end to cancer. Did the prayer work? No one knows. To establish a correlation, we have to determine by testing if the event can be repeated. Of course, there is no proof prayer did not work that one time - there is never going to be that type of proof. All we have to rely on is our inductive reasoning abilities and our intuition. We can have a million prayers and a million failures to cure cancer, and that still does not disprove the one time cancer stopped - but it is strong evidence that prayer does not work for stopping cancer.
You may think you know the will of your god - but if your beliefs cannot be objectively tested for reliability, they should be considered no different than any other legend.
I really don't care what people think of my relationship with God. They can think what they like.
Amen.
Opinions of humans are a dime a dozen.
Only God knows what's on the inside, and all the facts.
Well said.
"Faith" - the willing abandonment of critical thinking.
Correction:
"Faith" - the willing application of critical thinking.
Faith is the absence of imposition and denial.
Faith does not require equation, nor sensation, to be applied.
It merely requires the sustenance from desire to results/manifestation.
The lack of critical thinking or excess of critical thinking are the religions of sensation and equation --aka duality aka science and theology.
James
And, what dictionary did that come from?
Not actually. If you have faith in your wife it doesn't mean you don't possess critical thinking.
You are wrong again!
When you have faith in someone or some statement that means you lack critical thinking regarding that particular one, not in general.
Say, fanatical people are the ones with highest faith and have no thinking regarding their particular religion, but they can clearly show why the other religion is false or why one shouldn't jump from a cliff.
(If you have faith in your wife it doesn't mean you don't possess critical thinking.)
Claire,
Critical thinking is not something we possess, rather an instrument we use to achieve rationality. Faith, by its absence of rationality, is the antithesis of critical thinking.
Two very smart men, Martin Luther and William Lane Craig, both agree with this assessment, Luther when he wrote about magisterial evidence and Craig when he quoted Luther in his book and agreed with him, the essence being (paraphrased) "that when evidence and logic conflict with the holy ghost it is the latter that should be believed".
This is nothing more than a call to abandon critical thinking in lieu of faith.
The problem I have with this kind of belief system is that abandonment of critical thinking makes it possible to believe Iran is controlled by Islamic Satanists who worshsip a moon goddess and therefore it is justified by the "real" god (the one we have "faith" in) to go to war to protect our god's chosen people from Satan's minions.
Without that belief system, one must address the problems of foreign affairs as adults, using critical thinking, i.e., rationality.
""that when evidence and logic conflict with the holy ghost it is the latter that should be believed"."
Or you could see that from a believers viewpoint, the above IS critical thinking, being that they can clearly see that in Gods universe, not ALL things have a logical conclusion, and that ALL things which conflict with what the Holy Spirit guides one to are actually wrong, no matter how illogical that may sound to someone who does not have the Holy Spirit in their lives guiding them.
Just a thought.
(Or you could see that from a believers viewpoint, the above IS critical thinking,_
aguasilver,
You are confusing "logic" and "critical thinking" - they are not synonymous. It is entirely possible to come to a logical conclusion when starting with a false premise - it simply means the entire argument is invalid, not that it is illogical.
Critical thinking is about rational conclusions, not logical necessities.
"Critical thinking is about rational conclusions, not logical necessities."
And to anybody who has experienced and lives with the guidance of the Holy Spirit, it would be a rational conclusion to reject anything which conflicted with what the Holy Spirit guided them to understand, part of which is that the so called 'rational man' is incapable of understanding God and the workings of the Holy Spirit in the world.
No, critical thinking would have one question the existence of a Holy Spirit, the claim for "Gods universe" and the fact a believer believes their beliefs have anything to do with critical thinking.
See AKA's reply from me, how can I question the 'existence of a Holy Spirit' when I have experienced it?
That would be irrational.
Take some drugs, you will experience more of this holy spirit, or if you take the proper ones, you'll be cured of it.
Did all the drugs before I came to faith, and DID experience many spirits as a result, but that stopped when I came to faith, no more bad spirits, and after a few months, in-filled with THE Holy Spirit, much better.
Will still smoke a joint if one circulating is in the company I am with, but have learned that it precludes me from any ministry with them, though we do have some good discussions.
Last time I smokes some grass it was with Muslims, go figure!
You, though claim much knowledge, know nothing!!
Prayer, strong emotions, shock..... can stimulate brain and you can visualize, experience many creatures and spirit is the most common among them(near death experience is another).
So if you take drugs you may be able to get a touch with reality.
About being rational, when a rational man experience something, he will think about it rationally and try to find a natural explanation instead of a supernatural one.
But when the rational man cannot find a 'natural' explanation, the rational man realises that the supernatural one may be the answer, especially when they have experienced it clean cold sober for 20 years.
A rational man should know that there is no supernatural and saying so is dodging the question or answering "I'm too lazy to inquire", and too hypocritical to say so, and too proud to ask anybody else help.
It'll help you to understand your spirit experience if you try some human psychology and neurology.
The primitive man knew nothing about the working of brain or the universe, attributed everything to the supernatural and "the ignorants" of the present day continue to do the same.
In one reply you claim you "know", so if you know and still keep the belief you are delusional and I have sympathy for you, but then you should get treatment.
If you donot know you are ignorant and you should study instead of acting like you know, there by misleading those who really wanted to study.
If you know and still you are perpetuating all these, you are out right dishonest and what you get will only be contempt.
Well thank you jomine for your pretentious attack on me, it's certainly good to find someone so very sure of their humanist viewpoint that they will declare that I MUST be:
'too lazy to inquire'
'should know that there is no supernatural'
'too hypocritical to say so, and too proud to ask anybody else help'
Belong to "the ignorants"
By keeping my belief I am 'delusional and I have sympathy for you, but then you should get treatment.'
By not agreeing with you I am 'ignorant and you should study'
When I state my beliefs I am 'misleading those who really wanted to study'
Then you describe me as 'out right dishonest and what you get will only be contempt'
I presume our discussion is finished now that you have pronounced judgement on me, and will allow those reading the forum to conclude who is correct.
How old are you, as a matter of interest?
I seem to remember I was as precocious when I was also sure I knew everything.
Now I recognise that I do not know everything, but I do know Christ, and more essentially, He knows me.
Maturity is a wonderful learning curve, put these posts away for a time when you can look back on them.
Its you who claimed knowledge, not I.
So if you have knowledge those three are the only scenarios, to explain your current position.
For a rational man,
Everything that occurs in this nature is natural. When we do not know the explanation does not make it supernatural, but should only increase our efforts to understand it.
Spirit, by definition of the word, does not exist.
God(if by the term you mean a creator) is a self refuting term.
Sentience, by believers basic premise, needs be created hence a "supernatural sentient" being cannot logically occur.
Now your claim is "spirit guiding/helping you",
So, can you tell me, how a nonexistent entity can do that, rationally?
Regarding your christ thing, your only knowledge about that, is from a book written by unknown authors, we do not know what exactly he said. And from their claim of epilepsy being caused by spirits we can easily assume that they never had the knowledge as much as we had, so they had to attribute everything to supernatural(if they had, they would have written it in computers). Yet you trust those ancients to "believe" them, where is the rationality in that?
If you were born in a different part of the world, to a family of different religion, you might be arguing as vehemently for that god, as you are doing now for your jesus and spirit.
By your consideration, but then as you preclude the supernatural, you are blinded to seeing what is all around you.
We are souls with a body, not bodies with a soul.
Not understanding that can be a severe impediment to reaching our true destiny.
Let me reverse that!
Can you explain (rationally) how I can be guided by the Holy Spirit, who also guides millions of other believers over the last 6000 years (but only 20 years for myself)offer a rational explanation as to why this is experienced my all those millions of believers?
The phrase "Oh look, all those soldiers are marching out of time except my little Johnny"
Untrue, my understanding comes from the bible, my knowledge comes from personal relationship and revelation, as does every other believers
The rationality was in that NONE of the scientist medical establishment could cure my daughter, yet a 'spirit' led diet and prayer with some personal repentance and deliverance DID.
Now explain how that happened, rationally?
But I was not. I was born exactly where God designated I should be, and despite that being in a supposedly Christian country, my parents were at best 'token' Christians, and I rejected the whole subject aged 8, then spent until my 41st year exploring the alternatives, of belief and secularism.
I was in non belief for 41 years, and only 20 years in Christ, so I guess the argument is moot.
Again, I tell you , supernatural is the explanation put forward by ancient people to explain what they couldn't explain. Its like magic, there is no magic ones you know the trick.
Soul:The animating and vital principle in humans, credited with the faculties of thought, action, and emotion and often conceived as an immaterial entity
Immaterial, that is non-physical that means something which does not exist. What we call soul/mind is the personality of a person, which is dependent on the brain. Without body there is no soul, or the only soul after ones death is, the memory of him, in those who remember.
Can't you ask the question yourself? Why you attribute it to spirit, while muslim to allah, a buddhist to buddha, an aborigine who worship stones/sun, to the stones/sun?
I explained it already, we see patterns where there are none, we hate unfamiliarity, so attribute to something familiar, we ignore negatives, so find only positive where there is none!! It is just human thoughts we only attribute it to someone/something - and no one "god' is the psychological parent, a crutch of the mind. Its just part of being a human, an animal.
I too said the same thing. You first trusted an ancient book, then later attributed everything or judged everything based on that.
I explained it in the other thread where we were discussing the same.
You never were away from the belief, though consciously you tried to hide it, nor you ever tried to analyse the "beliefs" and that is why in your first crisis you run back to the same.
See, there are mysterious ways our brain works, mysterious because nobody tries to find the time nor inclination to analyse their own thoughts. Nobody wants to get rid of their psychological support, god. I ought not have any problem with anybody for having any sort of belief, but religion stifles critical thinking and ask for unquestioned obedience to authority. There is no grade of irrationality, hence when one is left alone, it breeds the most virulent types like bin laden, which makes the world a dangerous place. I'm not insulting/objecting you, but only your ideas you put forward as "true" and rational, which are actually irrational.
First, we are going seriously OFF TOPIC with this discussion, so this will be my last reply on what is becoming a hijacked thread, as I am sure neither of us wish to detract from the OP's question any further.
Your answers are stereotyped replies that white coat doctors push out when they are questioned.
Your profession kills more people than any other each year, (Over 750,000 people each year) and they kill them by the astounding arrogance that dictates that 'the doctor MUST be right' and so shut up and take what we give you.
The first religious 'physicians' were just as arrogant, except they believed that placing the patient in front of the altar and praying would offer a cure, then plastered them with goat dung and bled them.
Yours is a modern version of that insanity.
The drug regime that white coat medicine prescribed for my daughter almost killed her, but fortunately we were blessed and guided to a FORMER fully qualified white coat doctor who was (and is) also a qualified surgeon and cancer specialist.
This man ABANDONED his lucrative white coat practise and consultancy in his 50's because, as he told us, he was "Fed up of treating the symptoms and desired to cure people".
He then re-qualified as a naturopathic doctor and now runs a highly successful alternative medical cancer therapy centre which has a 75% CURE rate (as in no signs of cancer whatsoever when finished, and with a NORMAL life expectancy, not the measly five years that counts as 'cured' by BigPharma) and who deals mainly with the patients that white coat medicine has told to go home to die having poisoned them and burnt them, and then shrugged and moved on to poison the next victim of medical science.
In 18 months he repaired the damage done to our daughter, who had the blood of a sixty year old when she first attended him.
We were blessed to be able to afford this private treatment, had we not been blessed, or been dumb enough to trust the doctors we had first consulted, she would probably have died or still been in an epileptic state and getting progressively worse, as she was when the 'experts' were running the show.
The final piece of the jigsaw was provided by a renegade veterinarian, who likewise was excluded by his 'profession' for treating epileptic dogs with a non gluten diet.
From the time we excluded ALL gluten and MSG from our diet, it was three weeks until Jessica stopped fitting, and has been two years since her last attack, so even by your standards she is considered cured.
We owe NOTHING to white coat medicine, which is fine for broken bones and dealing with things they can fix mechanically, but has a dismal record for dealing with any complaint that they fail to understand, and are constrained by their BigPharma masters from truly investigating how to cure.
White coat medicine is the lap dog puppet of BigPharma, your study grants come from them, your research grants come from them, the FDA officials all go to work in lucrative positions with BigPharma, once they have obeyed their masters and held back any real medical research and experimentation sufficiently to ensure that the chemical garbage BigPharma produce is inflicted upon the generally ignorant public, just enough to keep them alive, yet with no hope of curing them (walking free from the original complaint).
Modern medical doctors are basically charlatans, well intentioned charlatan, but arrogant self opinionated charlatans never the less.
If I needed a broken arm fixed, I would use your profession, if I needed some diagnosis of what you thought was wrong, I would use your profession, but once I had been shown what was wrong, I would walk out and find a REAL naturopathic doctor to advise me on the options that offered themselves to me.
Sorry, I do feel strongly about how modern medical science is ruled by BigPharma and does so much damage to guarantee BigPharmas excessive profits.
The rest of your post I will dismiss, we have run the course and if you want to continue discussing this, use my comments boxes.
I have many hubs addressing the issue.
Jomine, I don't find this post of yours very "forgiving" of difference. Maybe my own posts have not been far off it, either.
I am coming around to the realisation that there are at least two sides to every argument, and at least 2 possible outcomes for each person in the argument.
If I am christian, and feel that this is the right way and acceptable belief for me, then I am not likely to be persuaded by anyone else's side of the argument.
If I am strongly atheist, (and having come through a christian phase in my life), then I have progressed so far from the acceptance of a metaphysical "god," that no amount of prayer and concern from the christian camp will sway my current opinion.
Therefore, I suggest, "argument" will probably get me no where useful.
However, if I engage in "discussion", where there is possibly a flow of new fresh information, then I might stay and even consider changing my mind on something that is put to me.
What do you think of this?
I have no problem in accepting the god hypothesis, provided they can explain it rationally. So far nobody has been able to tell what god is except as a personal deity who help them in crisis(But mysteriously do not help those poor children who really need help).
So if they cannot articulate what god is, let alone a theory with god, why should I agree, just for agreement sake?
aquasilver, being a christian is being a member of a club. When you say all the right things, and act in certain ways, and agree with most others in the club, then you are accepted as a bona fide member. This makes you feel you "belong," you are one of them, you feel safer because this human species is basically gregarious. The need for protection within a group is predominant in our genes.
Your own personal faith is one thing. It's for you, it belongs to you, and no one has the right to take it away.
However, the club which you belong to has an ulterior motive: that everyone should become a member. I have just read the link in your profile: 10 tips for dealing with atheists in the forums and that puts the whole thing in perspective. I would see it as very American-evangelist in substance and intent. It's open for anyone to read and make their own assessment, but I see it as basic premise to most of the pro-christian posts in this forum.
One thing is totally un-arguable. The Holy Spirit - you can attribute anything you like to the Holy Spirit, and no one can refute what you have said. Because it cannot be proven one way or the other. You are safe from attack!
Actually I attend no church currently, though I did help start one in Spain, but for now MOST of established Churchianity would reject the notion that I belonged to THEIR club.
I agree with you, most Churchianity is club mentality and membership, but that is their problem or solution, so I let them be.
As to the Holy Spirit, no contest, you either experience it and believe or don't, and yes, nobody can or should try to refute the experience.
Thanks for reading the hub!
(And to anybody who has experienced and lives with the guidance of the Holy Spirit, it would be a rational conclusion to reject anything which conflicted with what the Holy Spirit guided them to understand)
aguasilver,
It is impossible to reach a rational conclusion through contradiction. Before a claim can be considered rational, it must be shown as a hypothesis, which you have done - i.e., the holy spirit is an entity. Now, you have to show how this entity interacts physically with the world in such as way as to give you personal messages.
If you cannot show how that is done, your claim is irrational.
To you maybe, but then you have never met with Him, so how could you evaluate it as you refuse to 'examine' the evidence?
(how could you evaluate it as you refuse to 'examine' the evidence?)
aquasilver,
It seems that many theists think that calling their beliefs irrational is somehow degrading, but it is not. It is categorizing.
Surely you would admit there is no objective evidence of your faith, that what you have as a basis is subjectivity. Now, subjectivity may be the correct viewpoint, but it is not testable.
Many of us have believed as you do and ended up rejecting those beliefs because we decided it was flimflam, that we were simply being sold a bill of goods with no merchandise attached.
I am willing to concede the possibility that your beliefs may in time turn out to be right and I will burn in hell for my disbelief. I am not going to lose any sleep over the chances of that, though.
Surely, then, you can equally concede that your reasons for belief are nothing more than emotional ones - and that position is not rational?
AKA, I find you an intelligent person, and your posts are reasonable, and to a degree I can agree with you that many, if not most religious experience is emotional because those present can 'feel' the presence of God, but are afraid to experience it, to commit and dive in, because they just know that it will change their lives, and most folk are comfortable with how things are; live THEIR lives all week and get a 'spirit' fix and forgiveness on Sunday.
So for those folk, it is a subjective opinion and emotively based, unless and until something triggers a desire to dig deeper, or they see it as 'flimflam' and revert to character, turning away from the whole experience.
That is how it should be.
But amongst the many Christians and congregations I have experienced, I have found SOME who did commit, did dive in and dig deep, and have come to KNOW God, and more importantly be KNOWN by Him and there are the same biblical connotations in that sentence that we find relating to 'marriage' versus 'fornication.
The two things are different, and we chose which path to follow.
As for your presumption that you will 'burn in hell for my disbelief' the jury is still out on that issue, at least in my opinion, and I have no hard evidence to offer whether that assumption is correct or fallibly incorrect, and in truth neither does any bible confirm that, unless you want to promote the issue as a stick to beat folk with.
I do believe that God is obliged to create a place where those who refuse to countenance being with Him for eternity can be placed, but see nothing in your writing that declines God, should you recognise Him, just a rational mind which has not yet found enough personal or rational evidence that you should conjoin with Him.
Are we getting somewhere?
Critical thinking for me comes into play when there is evidence that can be laid on the table. You seem to have hit the nail on the head. I don't know if Iran's leaders know that Allah is Satan. Ahmedinejad sure has been spotted displaying the Satanic hand signal, though. If they looked into the background of their own religion they will discover that Allah is indeed a moon god. Those are facts.
If the West wants to pick a fight with Iran for no justifiable reason whatsoever then I'm not surprised Iran would consider Israel and America and the City of London little Satans and a threat to Islam. After all, they have murdered Gadhafi and done away with Muburak and Assad is going to be next. The West have condemned Muslim leaders as the axis of evil.
These are facts.
Like businesses are owned Satanists kind of evidence?
The plot thickens as does the insanity.
LMAO!!!
Can't stay away, can you? I thought you said you weren't going to address me anymore. I think you are going to comment until you have managed to stomp out doubt completely and that will be nothing so I'm stuck with you till I stop coming to these forums.
Let the loon speak in peace.
No Claire ,because while TM is busying with you,at least he's leaving the rest of us alone
You haven't been here much offering the usual dishonest and false statements.
Isn't saying that Zoroaster was crucified, born of a virgin, etc a false statement?
If you wish to be left alone to speak, I have no problem with that.
So then why aren't you leaving me alone since you said you would? In fact you said the most relevant thing I ever asked is why you people are addressing me if I'm so nuts. So what's changed?
kikilari- "la, la, la, la...I can't hear you atheists...."
Not flaming, but I really do think that the only difference between religion and insanity is a book written a very long time ago that has been changed and molded so many times by whomever is in power to suite them. Not exactly something to believe in 100% and live your life by.
And I'm not athiest. Someone with intelligence once told me "The more you know, the more you know you don't know." Kind of a simple way to say it, but it speaks volumes and can be used in so many different ways. Ego is the reason religion is still around today. No one really wants to ever admit they are wrong or that they don't know.
I have heard, believe myself, and still use that phrase in quotations above, ego has nothing to do with religion still being around and sounds quite unreasonable placed directly underneath the very quote I would reply to you with, but seems you know yet disregard..
And no, I have come to understand plenty that I don't know much of anything and admit it easily, but that gives me a capability you overlook, which is to go beyond and to learn more than is generally accepted that one is able.
Not only this, BUT, you are a single perspective in a world of not trillions of perspectives, but countless perspectives, for we may attempt to number humanity's impact in numbers all we like, yet scientists refuse to admit that their astronomical number approximations are astronomically innacurate.
I have experiences in my mind still fresh, and others do as well I'm more than certain, that changed their life which is the cause of the effect of their boldness to, irregardless of the countless ways they are formed to look ignorant and stupid which should say tons to anyone with sensibilities, profess with their mouths that God is real, due to their OWN experiences which they cannot pass into your mind, especially those minds which REFUSE to hear as you portray Kikilari above.
Athiests have NO experience with God being real.
Theists HAVE experiences with God being real.
You have NOTHING to tell SAVE your general knowledge of things you CAN'T see.
I have PLENTY to tell INCLUDING my general knowledge of things I CAN see.
Also, friend, advice seems to be seldom practiced it seems by those who boldly employ it.
Oh that's OK then, a one word answer solves all our debate, we can go home now and toast teacakes by the vicarage fireplace, whilst tea is served.
By default, the believer will point out that ONLY someone who was never truly saved, and therefore had never experienced the Holy Spirit, could reject Christ.
This of course is based upon the fact that all believers we have ever met will have shared those common experiences, and having done so could not lie and refute what they have experienced first hand, and in the fellowship of others... sometimes multitudes.
There is an excellent site for former 'christians' where you will be most welcomed to express your views, thought I find that most of them use more words.
When I was a Christian, the Holy Spirit revealed to me God's existence, or so I believed then. Now, as an atheist, I believe that I was deluded, then. I may have been right then and wrong now, I honestly don't know.
That's an honest reply, thank you.
If you were truly saved, then your current situation will not be a problem, as your 'sins' (including rejecting Christ in your 'confusion') were forgiven.
I have had my dark moments of the soul, when I have doubted my belief, we all have, but mine have always been driven away by the Holy Spirit falling on me at some point, or from witnessing Gods intervention in my life.
I also had the advantage of starting off in adult non belief and slowly coming to faith, via working for the other team, which made my decision less emotive based, more formed from necessitation.
Like I often say, I was a defector, not a convert!
I'm sorry my computer went nuts. As you can see if you scroll down, that isn't all I was trying to say.
OK, can see that now, here is what you ended up saying:
Which in itself is a reasonable statement, and which I replied as follows:
So, having spent some time on the Ex Christians website, I agree, they are now firmly convinced that whatever they experienced it was a delusion, and having reached that conclusion now live comfortably with their unbelief, and that's fine by me, because as in all things, scripture told us that this would happen in the end times:
2 Thessalonians 2 1:17
BUT RELATIVE to the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ (the Messiah) and our gathering together to [meet] Him, we beg you, brethren,
Not to allow your minds to be quickly unsettled or disturbed or kept excited or alarmed, whether it be by some [pretended] revelation of [the] Spirit or by word or by letter [alleged to be] from us, to the effect that the day of the Lord has [already] arrived and is here.
Let no one deceive or beguile you in any way, for that day will not come except the apostasy comes first [unless the predicted great falling away of those who have professed to be Christians has come] , and the man of lawlessness (sin) is revealed, who is the son of doom (of perdition),
Who opposes and exalts himself so proudly and insolently against and over all that is called God or that is worshiped, [even to his actually] taking his seat in the temple of God, proclaiming that he himself is God.
Do you not recollect that when I was still with you, I told you these things?
And now you know what is restraining him [from being revealed at this time]; it is so that he may be manifested (revealed) in his own [appointed] time.
For the mystery of lawlessness (that hidden principle of rebellion against constituted authority) is already at work in the world, [but it is] restrained only until he who restrains is taken out of the way.
And then the lawless one (the antichrist) will be revealed and the Lord Jesus will slay him with the breath of His mouth and bring him to an end by His appearing at His coming.
The coming [of the lawless one, the antichrist] is through the activity and working of Satan and will be attended by great power and with all sorts of [pretended] miracles and signs and delusive marvels--[all of them] lying wonders--
And by unlimited seduction to evil and with all wicked deception for those who are perishing (going to perdition) because they did not welcome the Truth but refused to love it that they might be saved.
Therefore God sends upon them a misleading influence, a working of error and a strong delusion to make them believe what is false, in order that all may be judged and condemned who did not believe in [who refused to adhere to, trust in, and rely on] the Truth, but [instead] took pleasure in unrighteousness.
But we, brethren beloved by the Lord, ought and are obligated [as those who are in debt] to give thanks always to God for you, because God chose you from the beginning as His firstfruits (first converts) for salvation through the sanctifying work of the [Holy] Spirit and [your] belief in (adherence to, trust in, and reliance on) the Truth.
[It was] to this end that He called you through our Gospel, so that you may obtain and share in the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ (the Messiah).
So then, brethren, stand firm and hold fast to the traditions and instructions which you were taught by us, whether by our word of mouth or by letter.
Now may our Lord Jesus Christ Himself and God our Father, Who loved us and gave us everlasting consolation and encouragement and well-founded hope through [His] grace (unmerited favor),
Comfort and encourage your hearts and strengthen them [make them steadfast and keep them unswerving] in every good work and word.
---------------
Taking this into account, believers welcome the apostasy (which) comes first [unless the predicted great falling away of those who have professed to be Christians has come]
It's encouraging to see scripture confirmed and know that as believers our redemption draws near.
John
The apostasy that comes first? These words were written thousands of years ago. Speaking of people alive then. It amazes me how the spiritually dead (also called the religious) never bother to think. They keep revamping and pretending that something new has developed under the sun. By doing so, you remain at odds with reality. By choice you have turned your backs on the ability to ponder the true nature of the spiritual.
Errrm.... these words specifically relate to the return of Christ, which has not occurred yet, so I suggest that despite being written nearly 2000 years ago, they were written to be read by those who will be here when Christ returns to wrap things up, which looks very liable to be soonish.
I say soonish because nobody knows the exact time, however scripture was liberally littered with clues that 'those that have eyes to see' can pick up upon, and from most eschatology study viewpoints, we are about done and the return is imminent.
Of course you are entitled to your own viewpoint, though I would also suggest that those who are 'spiritually dead' are more probably those who have never encountered the Holy Spirit (or any spirit, there are plenty to go around, once someone spiritually awakens)than those who in comparative terms hold daily communication with the spiritual plane via Gods Holy Spirit.
Time will tell what is correct, but from my observations scripture is being fulfilled daily, so to speak.
And the religious have always claimed that the scripture you refer to is being fulfilled daily. Obviously, there is nothing new under the sun.
You are correct of course:
2 Peter 3:2-4
Amplified Bible (AMP)
That you should recall the predictions of the holy (consecrated, dedicated) prophets and the commandment of the Lord and Savior [given] through your apostles (His special messengers).
To begin with, you must know and understand this, that scoffers (mockers) will come in the last days with scoffing, [people who] walk after their own fleshly desires
And say, Where is the promise of His coming? For since the forefathers fell asleep, all things have continued exactly as they did from the beginning of creation.
You do realize that not all scoffers are walking with their own fleshly desires? Or do you simply get your kicks by posting tripe? Many scoffers do not scoff at the idea of a Creator. Simply mock the religious. The need many of you display in setting yourselves above and apart.
All people are equal. Any consciousness that may exist on a higher plane has made this abundantly clear. Why must the religious be so wilfully obtuse?
That would only show your religion was created by men who are paranoid and delusional. You'll find that all despots and dictators make similar declarations to their followers.
FALSE!
Many atheists are former Christians. In some cases, it was very difficult to give up the religion, due to the emotional attachment. However, reading the Bible itself is the best way to turn someone. The Christians who "convert" to atheism are the ones who cannot be answered for, because they were involved in the Church and the "inside" speak of the Christian community.
many Christians are former atheists..
suppose thats 'different' though huh? lol
your point is invalid friend. they attest themselves 'no God' therefore validating what i have wrote by their own testimony.
It is vastly different. The atheists are born into a society that is already priming them socially to be a Christian, and putting social pressure on them in Churches and families to go have a "personal experience" with God. If someone rejects that, they have actually gone through "being a Christian" so there can be no appeals to "you just haven't experienced God yet."
An atheist who converts has done nothing but buy into the propaganda of his society, since he is a former Christian. If religious experiences were real, how could an atheist possibly have it and then say God didn't exist? Most atheists never wanted to give up Christianity to begin with. Social ties are formed, and the majority of society will look down on you for taking that position, possibly even your own family. Atheism is something that requires a fight, against yourself and society.
And there I suspect you highlight the issue, for you define that for anybody to say they were a Christian and became an atheist, they must first accept that they never were believers who had experienced Christ and the Holy Spirit.
Churchianity has a lot to answer for!
For too long the emphasis has been on growing church membership rather than making disciples of those coming to 'faith'.
No wonder some folk are left empty and disillusioned, and fall prey to atheist propaganda.
"And there I suspect you highlight the issue, for you define that for anybody to say they were a Christian and became an atheist, they must first accept that they never were believers who had experienced Christ and the Holy Spirit."
If this is the way I came across, this is a mistake in my communication, so I apologize. Atheists did experience something in most cases. I experienced an emotional feeling that I still cannot really explain to this day. However, there are a plethora of stories from people talking about religious experiences, dating back to the Greeks and Mount Olympus. it doesn't mean the experience was actually GOD. Did a Greek praying to Zeus actually talk to a lightning-wielding deity?
I'm not saying this to be insulting, but the human mind is able to do some very strange things. We can drug ourselves and see things that do not actually exist. There are also schizophrenics. I really sum up my former experience as a form of psychological delusion. That doesn't mean the experience itself was not real, for I would not deny something so obvious. I am only denying that it was divine in origin.
You still cannot explain it, yet you can dismiss it as a 'delusion'?
I cannot dismiss what I have seen and witnessed in 20 years of challenging faith, nor can I dismiss it as a delusion, there have been too many incidents over too long a period of time, and I can honestly say I never actually WANTED to be a believer and spent two thirds of my current lifespan avoiding faith in God.
I am not some starry eyed convert looking for personal gain or encouragement, far from it, but I have been involved in ministry that I have seen change lives, neighbourhoods and circumstances.
Those were not delusions, I suspect yours were not also, but you were convinced otherwise and so that is how it should be, and I wish you well in your future life.
In other words, they knew they were lying to themselves if they claimed to have had "experienced Christ and the Holy Spirit" Falling prey to honesty leaves one empty and disillusioned? Obviously, one's mind would have to be so empty already if all it contained was dishonesty in the first place.
Sooner28, please note that I am not "an atheist." From outward appearance, the way I dress, move, conduct my life, and the way I interact with other people, would not indicate to you that I was "an atheist." You use the word as a noun.
More correctly the word is an adjective. It describes my point of view, and my outlook on religious discussions.
Second point is that I have become atheist in my thinking by doing a lot of inner contemplation. It was not a totally negative reaction to organised religion.
No it wouldn't. But political affiliation also could not be determined by outward appearance either. A noun is a person, place thing, or idea. So since I vote Democrat, I take the position that they are superior to the Republican party. That's all I mean by the use of the word.
I also didn't mean to imply it was a completely negative reaction to organized religion. The thing that happened to me though, and many others I have read about, is that it is not easy to become an atheist when you grow up in a Christian household. Even though you eventually realize that Christianity is no longer true, you are still fighting a psychological battle to give it up. I went from growing up in church (literally, from the time I was born) to not believing at all.
The reason it is given up is due to the lack of logic, or empirical evidence, which is where the inner contemplation definitely comes into play. I wasn't denying that at all.
(Christians rely on Gods Authority)
Eaglekiwi,
And tell me, how do Christian go about "knowing" God's authority when the bible was written by men and the only other source of authority is mankind itself claiming to somehow "know" what cannot be known?
You only have three choices, and all are nothing but empty assertions:a) the bible was inspired by god but men wrote down what god wanted to be said: b) religious leaders have been taught what god's authority is and they pass it on, perfectly or c) one claims he can personally know or talk to god and get the information direct from the source.
Do you see what your empty claim involves? In all cases, you are trusting man to be telling the truth and not simply repeating a hallucination, lie, or deception.
Saul, renamed Paul, claimed a light blinded him and he heard a voice from heaven. Son of Sam said the neighbor's dog talked to him.
What is the difference between those two claims?
Blah, blah, blah...
Have you no other route to explanation than questioning?
This mirage of mess is redundant which you use, as the methods leave you unaccountable for anything.
Why, also, do you feel the need to poke at one?? Are there not plenty here who believe in what your questions are in regard to?
Seriously?
What are YOUR claims, and where is YOUR evidence?
Where lies the reasoning and logic to spend alllll your days trying to write on reeds and animals skins with charcoal and water in a feather in order to lie to a world you dare not see in 20 or forty years??
What in the world could his motivation be to tell these things but they are true?
Insanity?? Oh, well I suppose there was a disease floating around that just hit those with writing capabilities, which weren't common in that time, and that were intellectual enough to explain things consistently and kindly, umm, even though he were insane?
Your attacks on the credibility are getting ridiculous, and your logic is severely flawed.. ridiculous is more what it generally is as your sarcasm shows lack of thought or reasoning, and lack of anything to write at all, save your imagination's productions.
Making anyone out to be a liar is easy, keep going with your posts doing it and I'll give you an example. If you ask nicely.
(Blah, blah, blah... Have you no other route to explanation than questioning?)
vector7,
Yes, but why cast pearls before swine, eh?
(What are YOUR claims, and where is YOUR evidence?)
vector7,
I never got around to this question earlier, and that is because I have no claims other than that there is no objective, testable evidence for the hypothesis of god, and on further examination, the hypothesis cannot support a rational explanation for existence, and the logical inferences used to argue for the necessity of a god do hold up to close reasoning.
The "god of the gaps" claim is not a valid argument, but it is what the theist uses as a basis for his argument. That mankind cannot explain every mystery is not a valid argument that the supernatural is real and plugs those knowledge "gaps".
God is your claim, not mine. It is up to the claimant to make the argument that supports his position.
I refuse to give any credence, though, to hogwash, so I don't offer any degree of respect for bad arguments - the people making the argument I can forgive, as no one knows the psychology of another person that makes them dependent upon dulusional belief to function.
I am not trying to prove there is no god - I simply point out that the arguments used by theists are unsupportable. That makes those who believe in the supernatural no different than those who believed that Uri Geller could really bend spoons with his psychic abilities or that Benny Hinn really could heal incurable illnesses - there is one of these born every minute, according to P.T. Barnum.
I cannot change a person's viewpoint; however, I can hope that some random reader may acknowledge the reality of what I point out and determine on his own that functioning in reality does not have to include delusional belief in irrational hocus pocus.
If I succeed only once in this goal, I will have helped make the world a safer and saner place.
i guess majority of the world is 'delusional' just because you've never seen anything beyond your hand? lol
the things gone unseen for decades and denied for years by most are now admitted to.
radio waves were once denied in a court of law as true, now we know that was asinine.
YOU are the court, I am the man protesting radio wave existence.
now, you can continue your denial without further interuption, including denial of my statements facts for lack of knowledge of the occurance in historical recorded documents.
by all means, continue.
(the things gone unseen for decades and denied for years by most are now admitted to)
vector7,
Not only are you an authoritarian/individualist who believes in heirarchial knowledge, but you lack basic reading comprehension skills and rudimentary reasoning ability.
This is not an issue of monkey see - this is an issue of can monkey reason? This is an issue simply between shape/no shape.
If you cannot grasp the discussion, if it is over your head, perhaps you should sit back and try to learn?
Now that this box has been opened, I feel inclined to comment. I think the biggest flaw in some of the arguments discussed here is the fact that not all people will have the same opinion and that is acceptable. There is no right or wrong when it comes to these arguments, people will have opinions and opinions are not fact. People of faith shouldn't force their opinions of the presence of some higher being on those who believe one does not exist. This works both ways.
I personally feel religion is an invented phenomena used as a controlling mechanism for people. I'm comfortable knowing that most religions would accept this as my opinion and not torment me for this belief. I've always been a "see it to believe it person." To me, God is a lot like Santa Claus. I found out Santa wasn't real in elementary school, and I'm sure the verdict will be out on God once my time comes. Until then, I can still live worry-free as I feel science is the guiding principle in the world.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Nicholas
St NicholasSaint Nicholas (Greek: Ἅγιος Νικόλαος, Hagios ["Saint", literally "Holy", Latin: Sanctus] Nicolaos ["victory of the people"]) (270 – 6 December 343),[3][4] also called Nikolaos of Myra, was a historic 4th-century saint and Greek[5] Bishop of Myra (Demre, part of modern-day Turkey) in Lycia.
Because of the many miracles attributed to his intercession, he is also known as Nikolaos the Wonderworker (Νικόλαος ὁ Θαυματουργός, Nikolaos ho Thaumaturgos).
He had a reputation for secret gift-giving, such as putting coins in the shoes of those who left them out for him, and thus became the model for Santa Claus, whose modern name comes from the Dutch Sinterklaas, itself from a series of elisions and corruptions of the transliteration of "Saint Nikolaos".
His reputation evolved among the faithful, as was common for early Christian saints.[6] In 1087, his relics were furtively translated to Bari, in southeastern Italy; for this reason, he is also known as Nikolaos of Bari. His feastday is 6 December [O.S. 19 December].
The historical Saint Nicholas is remembered and revered among Catholic and Orthodox Christians. He is also honored by various Anglican and Lutheran churches.
Saint Nicholas is the patron saint of sailors, merchants, archers, thieves, children, and students in various countries in the Balkans and Eastern Europe (Albania, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Georgia, Greece, Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia), as well as in parts of Western Europe (Belgium, France, Netherlands, Portugal).
He is also the patron saint of Aberdeen, Amsterdam, Barranquilla, Bari, Beit Jala, Fribourg, Huguenots, Kozani, Liverpool, Paternopoli, Sassari, Siggiewi and Lorraine. He was also a patron of the Varangian Guard of the Byzantine emperors, who protected his relics in Bari.
Evankovach,
now you know that there was a Santa, so - there is God.
No God? But everything follows rules?
Why, people can't get their computers to run consistently with all their might and effort and INTELLIGENCE, yet nothing in the universe ever breaks a rule, save people and their devices..
I suppose there are no laws either that govern existence and the physical materials therein? Or rules that govern the patterns within substances which create the structure thereof?
Or protocols which dictate in what way one element of the system acts in relation to the other with accurate and precise consistency?
What say you almighty dictator of truth?
To re-quote,
No doubt most know who 'invented' this thing called religion. The exact same characteristic people who are doing everything possible to control the masses, with yet another invented religion.
They have unearthed theories, bones and more -as old as mankind itself- painted them anew, placed them in their temples for the many to view, awe and worship for a nominal fee/donation.
The newest of all, is portable temples -the apple of our i, err, eye.
Now man carries god/desses in his/her pockets. The gods of information/knowledge.
4200 years ago, information/knowledge was also called god and defined by the semiotics, technology, affluence/intelligent, even language and volume/size of the culture. That culture dominated and enslaved the masses. This is why Egyptian, Babylonian, Persian, Roman, Anglican cultures seized control and scooped up 80% of the world -during their time periods. Not at all surprising is -watch closely- as each of those cultures reached their greatness of power/stronghold/grip, a religion was added/created/rekindled to appease the masses. Certainly not a coincidence...
Some of the mightiest in history -and today as well agreed- this last generation has reached the sum of human information/knowledge. Unless something/someone alters/adds to that information, humanity will eventually stagnate and dissolve.
there is no religion to fall back on and nothing 'new'. Humanity is regressing with post-information/reading only the past with no understanding of how to create a future.
Food for thought.
James.
Without the past, you had no future.
You didn't create the past, and you only experience the future.
The world will still spin, the stars have nowhere to fall, but the mystery of God, will stay mystery to those who know it all.
Thoughts for food.
Hullo Vector,
I cannot -well, shall not-- agree with that statement.
A simple example is a new born baby, even a just conceived child has no past, yet indeed they have only a future.
Yes, I do create a past -all things do. but it does conclude we can experience the future because of the have or have not of the past.
Time is a man made concept.
If the string theory of \a/ to \b/ to \c/ is an indication of \past/ \present/ \future/, then by simply reversing our perspective, have turned the past into the future and the future into the past. So, in actuality, one could experience the past-future together, interchange them as will. The only constant is the present. In any direction, it remains the same. The present keeps the madness of the past-future paradigm from consuming everything into oblivion.
As for G/gods, well my position remains.
As for the mystery of Creator, there is no mystery.
Even if the minimalist believing would engage both 'time' and dialogue with Creator, not a single thing would be hidden. After all, should the information be remotely correct, all the facets, elements and attributes of Creator were genetically build into every human -then backed up by a direct power source/energy called spirit, to unite the tangible physique with the intangible physique. Also known as heaven-earth.
To further exemplify this calls regard to just one man. A man who explained quite clearly what I said above. And should the events of the past be true, also showed that unity --in its entirety-- to many.
Unfortunately, equation & sensation [humanism divided], spawned battles, mechanics, voodoo-woodoo, etc and thoroughly 'forsaken' the reality of their true purpose and worth.
Why? Many reasons come to mind.
Forefinger Independence/ Self & Self Imposed Sustainability/Necessity (?)
Defense for Cause-Effect (past-future) (?)
To continue enjoying the 'high of knowledge' [Adamic Inception] (?)
Justification for the neglect of one another and worlds presented to them as gifts, just because -- just for simply being. (?)
...
James.
When it is ALL Said and done ..... very little, if any of what we do .. "Over here" ... is going to change what happens .. over there.
People do not want to accept the teachings or faith of Jesus Christ,because in order to do so they must also accept they are a sinner and that they need Christs forgiveness.
The biggest lie that Satan has ever told is that God doesnt exist and he can use whatever means he wants to perpetrate that lie.
Intellects are a pushover because he uses ego combined with a few facts and before you know it many intellectuals are now virtual scientific professors
Get rid of pride and ego,replace it with humilty and grace , then one would be amazed at just how insignificant one is in the great scheme of things.
It's funny enough believers believe the nonsense they embrace as fact, but it's even funnier when they attempt to explain why others don't accept their nonsense based entirely on the nonsense itself.
In their magical fantasies, believers must justify why others don't accept their invisible sky fairy by making up another evil invisible anti-sky fairy.
Believers who have their noses in the Bible all day long must justify their ignorance of the world around them by claiming their evil invisible anti-sky fairy uses facts to persuade others to not accept their invisible sky fairy.
Or, how amazingly ignorant and delusional one can become in the great scheme of things.
Very well stated Kiwi. Humility is the first step in accepting the Lord as our personal savior.
(Humility is the first step in accepting the Lord as our personal savior.)
Christianity is a Catch-22. In order to humble onesself, one has to arrogantly believe one knows this is necessary.
Very good point actually. One must believe that he/she is simply a humble human being who needs to be saved by God, but also must affirm that Christianity is the only correct religion, and do this all based on FAITH! If that isn't arrogant, I don't know what is.
And there is also the problem of "grace" actually being based on an action, i.e. saying the sinner's prayer. Salvation doesn't come without that (at least for a conservative Christian).
This makes no sense! An arrogant person would in no way think bowing down to a personal saviour is necessary.
An arrogant person always say there is a god and He knows what this god needs and says, and ask others to follow that, which actually is his own opinion in disguise.
How about the possibility that God has said certain things He wants everyone to know, and all we are doing is exactly that?
Declaring HIS word to everyone. Knowing full well that not everyone will want to hear it, or receive it (gladly).
So, if you don't want to hear it, stay out of the forum. For someone who claims logic as their guiding principle, you contradict it!
If you don't want to be treated as a fool, do the same.
(Declaring HIS word to everyone....So, if you don't want to hear it, stay out of the forum)
aka-dj,
First, this thread is under the heading of religion/philosophy and under the subheading of atheism/agnosticism - and then you want to castigate someone for coming to the thread that doesn't want to hear your personal views about what you believe an invisible superbeing said?
If you go hunting for bear, don't start crying because the bear eats the tent.
Very well stated Kiwi. Arrogance that others are idiots and not using once brain is the first step in accepting the Lord as our personal savior.
Or you could also say:
Acceptance that we have been idiots and only using our brain is the first step in accepting the Lord as our personal saviour.
accepting the lord? It'll be like from being idiot to being brain dead!
Being spiritually dead is preferable to you?
I find it insulting that you have the pomposity to indicate that to be a believer is to be brain dead, especially when believers are normally the better educated on the forum (judging from the level of response they give to your reactions).
I too find it insulting when you believers tell us to believe you and your experience about magic, which has no grounds on reason, logic or reality.
You would first have to show there is such a thing a "spiritually alive"
<--- coveted double laughie award
Ok, so for your first step in humility, you could start by accepting that just because you believe what you do, in the christian ethic, that does not mean you know everything there is to know. Accept that there is lots lots more to see, hear, listen to and contemplate, outside of what christianity has taught down through the ages.
You only need to "believe" something when you don't "know" for sure. Once you "know" then "belief" goes out the window.
Keep the belief if you desire to. Only share that with others if they really want to join in. You can't expect everyone to accept your beliefs if they just don't ring true to everyone.
Kiwi, The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was to convince the world that he didn't exist. By doing so he makes man take credit for what he has done instead of using him as scapegoat (wow go figure). In the same instance if Satan doesn't exist, then neither does God, which leaves you to yourself and realising that you have to make peace with things you do. That was the devils greatest trick/lie. It had nothing to do with God to begin with, but you can't have one without the other.
It has come to light in recent years that as good as people may profess themselves to be, they really are not. The greatest evil that we know of on this planet, that is accepted across all religions everywhere, is the evil of good men and women doing nothing when another evil befalls. If your not willing to stand up for others, in essence, you are committing one of the greatest evils ever to be accepted by mass consensus. Something so profoundly accepted, is as of yet, to be taken to heart by most. They saunter on through their lives and don't worry about helping anyone else. Insult them, accuse them of ignorance, put them down, and call others not of their faith (this is for religions across the board as they all require faith), they do consistently. It is not often that they will turn to help the fellow sleeping on the side walk, or give some extra change to the person at the counter trying to buy some milk, or any number of other things that I have seen happen.
Understanding that you are Christian and wish to hold to this belief is fine. Not everyone is of your faith, in fact, there are over 6 trillion people in the world that are not of your faith. If it was the only possible right one, then at least more than a small fraction of people would be part of it.
Typo!
Better check your facts. Even if you said billion, you'd be wrong on the numbers.
Your right, there are 6.8 Billion people in the world and only 2.1 Billion of them are Christian as of 2005. Strip away anyone below the age of 14 or not given a choice in their religion and I'm sure that number would've been even smaller. That not with standing, that's still less than 1/3 of the total world population at that point and time. That means that over 4 Billion people on this planet are not of your faith in 2005, a number that could be widely different now. Even still that's a very significant number of people who do not, and may never have believed in Christianity.
I think it is sad that Hub Pages would allow such hate be written for all to see. go figure?
If you don't like what believers think or have to say, why do you keep going in forums talking to them. Why not just go do something else if you don't agree.
We all have our own reasons.
I speak against religious absurdities because I know that some atheists are isolated and feel that they have no community, no people who share their beliefs. By speaking out against religion, I help show them that they are not alone.
Ha Ha no problem Pcunix, just find it funny when some just complain, and than they don't realise well if they don't come in the forums in the first place and find something better to do, than they don't have no complaining. I guess I don't see the point with some saying Christian's bash them etc, but than forums give you more religion, and atheist points of view than your own neighborhood, so of course I just question, well if you don't want to hear, why sit here and listen, no one forcing you too. So why complain. I don't know if you do this, but i see others doing it. If you don't want to feel they yuckiness of it, quit particpating. That is all I'm saying. lol
If believers did think, they wouldn't be believers. Unfortunately, what they believe and say affects others, societies and mankind, negatively.
Of course, I understand believers wish to spread the Gospel unfettered, negatively impacting others in order to fulfill their selfish needs. And, that is precisely why you would rather we just go away.
No I don't need you to go away. If you think about it no one can persuade you, so why do you think you can persuade them. I have the philosophy to understand no matter who I am talking too, you can change who they are and maybe right where they are for a reason. So of course it don't matter what side your on, no one is going to change anyone's beliefs.
Changing your tune, now?
Show me your God, that will persuade me more than you can imagine.
In other words, no one is going to convince a believer of the reality in which they reside, no matter how much reality does not support their beliefs in any way.
I think personally you just like finding someone to debate with, probably over any topic. lol
Yes, I know you can't see the damage faith and religions do to our world and believe others criticize it just for something to do.
I can see the damage that people all together do no matter what they believe or label you put on them. Fortunately you only pick one group while it is many all over the world that can't live in peace and accept the diversity in each other. It's been there for centuries. Before you and I have ever been alive. Before Christianity even existed. It is easy to blame it on one group, but in my book we are all responsible for the world we live in today, it goes beyond religion, but generations of beliefs, values, morals in each family. Besides the society you grew up in, and the country. While you like to blame it one group, I know better and see the bigger picture. Sorry to say we are all responsible for the world's condition as it is now.
Yes, one religious group can't live in peace or accept any other religious group.
No, it's religions that poison everything and have done so long before Christianity.
No, you don't.
We all play a part in it no matter who we are, or where we come from! It's part of being a social worker, you study societies, not so much religions in a college or university. I've studies science and all the mumbo jumbo you do Trouble. I just don't need to blame it on anyone, but realise it's the human condition. I study all the political leaders and when they have succeeded and failed all over the globe, leaders of companies etc. I still learn more and more every day. I don't need to get my info from you, believe it or not their authorities higher than you that have done the work to share why the world is a mess. You ever been on CATO. Various sites, books and information out there. If you want to blame it on religion that your own, I do know it is much more than that.
And, that's why you call it mumbo-jumbo, because you studied it. Yeah, right.
Yes, I'm sure the world looks completely different when viewed from within a plastic bubble.
The world is pretty messed up judging by the newspapers and tv news every single day.
Did religion cause that ?............yea right
Just a note in here - yes it does. The cultures of pretty much every place that is at war, suffering really bad social issues etc, are all based in religion. The christian religion only lost its total stranglehold on western societies a few hundred years ago after a thousand years of the dark ages. As one example.
War is about politics ,seldom religion-think about it
War is about power, and religion and politics are the roots.
War has been about realistate forever, now it's about commodities.
Jomine,
Do you truly believe that God and His true religion is the root of wars?
Genesis 9
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?se … ersion=NIV
God’s Covenant with Noah
“1 Then God blessed Noah and his sons, saying to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the earth….
5 And for your lifeblood I will surely demand an accounting. I will demand an accounting from every animal. And from each human being, too, I will demand an accounting for the life of another human being.
6 “Whoever sheds human blood,
by humans shall their blood be shed;
for in the image of God
has God made mankind. “”
You see Jomine, war was never God’s intention. According to the Bible it took hundreds of years, since Noah’s time, before the first innocent people has been slaughter, and it was done by people who ironically call themselves the “God chosen ones”.
Genesis 34
Dinah and the Shechemites
1 Now Dinah, the daughter Leah had borne to Jacob (Israel), went out to visit the women of the land. 2 When Shechem son of Hamor the Hivite, the ruler of that area, saw her, he took her and defiled her.
3 His heart was drawn to Dinah daughter of Jacob; he loved the young woman and spoke tenderly to her. 4 And Shechem said to his father Hamor, “Get me this girl as my wife.”…
…24 All the men who went out of the city gate agreed with Hamor and his son Shechem, and every male in the city was circumcised.
25 Three days later, while all of them were still in pain, two of Jacob’s (Israel’s) sons, Simeon and Levi, Dinah’s brothers, took their swords and attacked the unsuspecting city, killing every male.
26 They put Hamor and his son Shechem to the sword and took Dinah from Shechem’s house and left. 27 The sons of Jacob came upon the dead bodies and looted the city where their sister had been defiled.
28 They seized their flocks and herds and donkeys and everything else of theirs in the city and out in the fields. 29 They carried off all their wealth and all their women and children, taking as plunder everything in the houses. “
There is no god, irrespective of what I believe.
Religion is power and hence one cause of discord, and hence war.
Mankind sins, world is under sin, sin breeds more sin ,hence discord,greed,power war, murder, evil of every kind
Jemine,
4000 years ago two people have been born, although twins, they are Patriarchs of two different nations and two different Religions.
One cares about power and possession, the other about serving others.
One is called Judaism the other Christianity.
One was called Jacob the other Esau.
Jacob was the founder of a nation of Israel.
Esau is ancestor of many Nations also called Gentiles (in NT sometimes - Greeks).
Jacob, the second born, also called Israel, was father of Judah and from his name we have the religion called Judaism.
Esau, the first born, also called Edom, was ancestor of Gentile Nations and founder of religion called today Christianity.
Judaism was always about power and possession while Christians intention was to give and serve others.
The story begins in the Bible - Genesis 25.
http://mobile.biblegateway.com/passage/ … ersion=NIV
Genesis 25
New International Version (NIV)
Jacob and Esau
19 This is the account of the family line of Abraham’s son Isaac.
Abraham became the father of Isaac, 20 and Isaac was forty years old when he married Rebekah daughter of Bethuel the Aramean from Paddan Aram and sister of Laban the Aramean.
21 Isaac prayed to the LORD on behalf of his wife, because she was childless. The LORD answered his prayer, and his wife Rebekah became pregnant.
22 The babies jostled each other within her, and she said,
“Why is this happening to me?” So she went to inquire of the LORD.
23 The LORD said to her,
“Two nations are in your womb,
and two peoples from within you will be separated;
one people will be stronger than the other,
and the older will serve the younger.”
24 When the time came for her to give birth, there were twin boys in her womb.
25 The first to come out was red, and his whole body was like a hairy garment; so they named him Esau.
26 After this, his brother came out, with his hand grasping Esau’s heel; so he was named Jacob.
Isaac was sixty years old when Rebekah gave birth to them.
Evil is the nature of such behaviour. or Satan, call him whatever name you want.
He tells lies because he is the father of lies, that is his true nature.
I totally agree with you Eaglekiwi
John 8
New International Version (NIV)
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?se … ersion=NIV
31 To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said,
“If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples.
32 Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” …
39 “Abraham is our father,” they answered.
“If you were Abraham’s children,” said Jesus, “then you would do what Abraham did.
40 As it is, you are looking for a way to kill me, a man who has told you the truth that I heard from God. Abraham did not do such things.
41 You are doing the works of your own father.”
“We are not illegitimate children,” they protested. “The only Father we have is God himself.”
42 Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love me, for I have come here from God. I have not come on my own; God sent me.
43 Why is my language not clear to you? Because you are unable to hear what I say.
44 You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
45 Yet because I tell the truth, you do not believe me!
46 Can any of you prove me guilty of sin? If I am telling the truth, why don’t you believe me?
47 Whoever belongs to God hears what God says. The reason you do not hear is that you do not belong to God.”
And his father is your god, so he is in fact the father of all lies.
@jomine you are incorrect.
Where does God call Satan his son?
Ha, ha, that's a good question! Who created Satan? No one.
He is the sacrificial lamb on which you and your all powerful god put all your failures, according to bible.
According to reason, just another concept by human beings to put all the blames.
No Satan has never been a sacrificial lamb.Besides a sacrifice was an animal or harvest without blemish.
Later Jesus took the place of produce,animals,lambs etc and was known as the Lamb of God.
jomine ,its ok if you dont agree, some do ,some dont ,but please think before you respond,because sometimes you don't make too much sense
Your Jesus was supposed to be the "lamb". Satan is blamed for all the failures of god and the evil in this world. So his Good name is sacrificed for your God's advantage. To loose the name is same as death.
Now for your information the ot only mention a talking snake, not Satan. Satan is an invention by humans to put the blames on.
A. See all the Good comes from god.
Q. Then why is there evil in this world?
A. Because Satan is creating all these problems.
In every story there needs a hero and villain, to make it attractive. So god, the Good and Satan, the archetypical villain. Good story for kids, but when grown ups think such stories are true, its ridiculous.
Eaglekiwi, do you believe that God demanded sacrifices from His people? There are parts of the Old Testament I find very fascinating. In some accounts, God wants sacrifices. I don't need to provide a verse for that because everyone knows that. However, look at Isaiah 1:11.
"What makes you think I want all your sacrifices?" says the LORD. "I am sick of your burnt offerings of rams and the fat of fattened cattle. I get no pleasure from the blood of bulls and lambs and goats.
Psalm 40:6 "Sacrifice and offering you did not desire, but my ears you have pierced; burnt offerings and sin offerings you did not require."
Jeremiah 6:20 "What do I care about incense from Sheba or sweet calamus from a distant land? Your burnt offerings are not acceptable; your sacrifices do not please me."
It's true, what does God want with sacrifices? How can sacrifices truly be an act of repentance when they get to eat the meat afterwards? This is all pagan stuff!
From the point of view that God created Satan, it was definitely a mega failure! How does one go from being the best friend of God to being the most filthy, evil, etc, entity ever to exist? If I spawned that, I would not dare to judge anyone else.I wish people would realize that Genesis is not from God but from a pagan source, the Sumerian Tablets, which makes an interesting story. The literal translation of Genesis is not what is in the Bible.
Those that control the world are not Christian, Muslim, etc. They are Luciferian. They worship deities like Lillith, Horus, Lucifer, etc. I'm not kidding. That's a fact. In "God We Trust" is not the Christian God. It's Lucifer.
So stop blaming religion now and get to the root of the problem. Religion is a facade for the real problem.
The real problem is human nature, there is only one satan and one god, they exist within the individual. Evil and good are but labels to describe a few human actions, not some omnipotent god or a mundane satan.
So, you read the "Religious" beliefs of folks like Claire and come to the conclusion that the real problem is human nature?
Mischeviousme,
it is not what the Bible tells you; that every human has God and evil in it.
To understand who is who you have to know the Bible.
In the OT - Job 1 : 6, you can read:
Job 1
New International Version (NIV)
http://mobile.biblegateway.com/passage/ … ersion=NIV
Prologue
"6 One day the angels came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan also came with them.
7 The LORD said to Satan, “Where have you come from?”"
So there is the LORD, the Angels who are also called the Sons of God (sometimes council of God), and Satan also known as Accuser or Destroyer, and there is also the Almighty God.
In OT Genesis 6 you can read that the sons of God were able to have children with the mortal women. It happened before the Noah's flood and also after the flood.
New International Version (NIV)
Genesis 6
Wickedness in the World
1 When human beings began to increase in number on the earth and daughters were born to them, 2 the sons of God saw that the daughters of humans were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose.
3 Then the LORD said, “My Spirit will not contend with humans forever, for they are mortal; their days will be a hundred and twenty years.”
4 The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them.
They were the heroes of old, men of renown."
After Noah's flood, God created new and complete human being, but Satan added his own creation.
This story is told in the Bible OT - Genesis 25. It's up to you to find who is who.
Christ was telling about this story in the parable of weeds
Bible NT - Matthew 13:24-29
http://mobile.biblegateway.com/passage/ … ersion=NIV
New International Version (NIV)
The Parable of the Weeds
24 Jesus told them another parable: “The kingdom of heaven is like a man who sowed good seed in his field.
25 But while everyone was sleeping, his enemy came and sowed weeds among the wheat, and went away.
26 When the wheat sprouted and formed heads, then the weeds also appeared.
27 “The owner’s servants came to him and said, ‘Sir, didn’t you sow good seed in your field? Where then did the weeds come from?’
28 “‘An enemy did this,’ he replied.
“The servants asked him, ‘Do you want us to go and pull them up?’
29 “‘No,’ he answered, ‘because while you are pulling the weeds, you may uproot the wheat with them.
30 Let both grow together until the harvest. At that time I will tell the harvesters: First collect the weeds and tie them in bundles to be burned; then gather the wheat and bring it into my barn.’”
Do you think satan made someone steal a car or did they steal it based on desire? I don't fear an authority of a god, so much as that of the cops.
Mischeviousme ,
It's not Satan but the children of Satan who are killing, stealing, lying doing all kind of mischievous things often in the name of their god - the Satan.
Christ told about them in NT John 8
John 8
New International Version (NIV)
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?se … ersion=NIV
31 To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said,
“If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples.
32 Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” …
39 “Abraham is our father,” they answered.
“If you were Abraham’s children,” said Jesus, “then you would do what Abraham did.
40 As it is, you are looking for a way to kill me, a man who has told you the truth that I heard from God. Abraham did not do such things.
41 You are doing the works of your own father.”
“We are not illegitimate children,” they protested. “The only Father we have is God himself.”
42 Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love me, for I have come here from God. I have not come on my own; God sent me.
43 Why is my language not clear to you? Because you are unable to hear what I say.
44 You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
45 Yet because I tell the truth, you do not believe me!
46 Can any of you prove me guilty of sin? If I am telling the truth, why don’t you believe me?
47 Whoever belongs to God hears what God says. The reason you do not hear is that you do not belong to God.”
I belong to and function as part of the greater universe, it does not matter whether I do or do not have a god, it's all one thing.
Mischievoouseme,
" 21 “Submit to God and be at peace with him;
in this way prosperity will come to you.
22 Accept instruction from his mouth
and lay up his words in your heart.
23 If you return to the Almighty, you will be restored:
If you remove wickedness far from your tent
24 and assign your nuggets to the dust,
your gold of Ophir to the rocks in the ravines,
25 then the Almighty will be your gold,
the choicest silver for you.
26 Surely then you will find delight in the Almighty
and will lift up your face to God.
27 You will pray to him, and he will hear you,
and you will fulfill your vows.
28 What you decide on will be done,
and light will shine on your ways.
29 When people are brought low and you say, ‘Lift them up!’
then he will save the downcast.
30 He will deliver even one who is not innocent,
who will be delivered through the cleanness of your hands.”
Job 22
http://mobile.biblegateway.com/passage/ … ersion=NIV
My God is a perception of my self, as a human I truly only seek to please the one. I can't tell you where my God is, it is my God and mine alone. This world I percieve with my brain, is as natural as looking up. Looking up won't help me find my God, it is everywhere. Good and evil are a result of man and man alone.
Mischievousme,
8 “Ask the former generation
and find out what their ancestors learned,
9 for we were born only yesterday and know nothing,
and our days on earth are but a shadow.
10 Will they not instruct you and tell you?
Will they not bring forth words from their understanding?
11 Can papyrus grow tall where there is no marsh?
Can reeds thrive without water?
12 While still growing and uncut,
they wither more quickly than grass.
13 Such is the destiny of all who forget God;
so perishes the hope of the godless.
14 What they trust in is fragile;
what they rely on is a spider’s web.
15 They lean on the web, but it gives way;
they cling to it, but it does not hold.
16 They are like a well-watered plant in the sunshine,
spreading its shoots over the garden;
17 it entwines its roots around a pile of rocks
and looks for a place among the stones.
18 But when it is torn from its spot,
that place disowns it and says, ‘I never saw you.’
19 Surely its life withers away,
and from the soil other plants grow.
20 “Surely God does not reject one who is blameless
or strengthen the hands of evildoers.
21 He will yet fill your mouth with laughter
and your lips with shouts of joy.
22 Your enemies will be clothed in shame,
and the tents of the wicked will be no more.”
Job 8
http://mobile.biblegateway.com/passage/ … ersion=NIV
If you want more on this topic, go to my forum topic in a few days.
You won't understand, will you?
Those who want power, do not do any worshiping or just worship like anybody else of their tribe. Religion is the easiest tool for it, so they use it, it doesn't mean they are lucipherian, it just mean they understand the populace.
You don't know much about this world, do you? If you go to my forum, prepare to be taught. My ailing computer has started up by some miraculous chance so I will work on your comments until 20:00 when I have to take it in to be serviced.
yes, Claire, religion IS a facade for the real problem.
The REAL problem is that you, and many like you, do not see that, as Mischeviousme pointed out, the god and the satan live inside of us, each individual.
Will you ever get it?
How do you explain why some people are capable of human sacrifices?
They sacrifice to their gods because they believe.
They believe that sacrificing to their gods is a good thing, that it will bring them prosperity and good fortune, or to the extreme, will allow the sun to rise the next day.
Sacrificing humans was all about appeasing gods, Claire.
What made them think sacrifices would appease imaginary beings? What made them thing imaginary beings existed in the first place? Do you think a cave man would ever think up the existence of helicopters? No, because they had no evidence of them. How would people suddenly think up imaginary creatures if there was no evidence of them? We all imagine things based on things that exist already.
Claire, by "...things that exist already...." are you talking about things we can see, hear, touch, taste or smell? By these senses, via the interpretation of the brain, we know that something "exists."
..Then how do you know an atom exists,using those senses? for you can not hear,touch or smell it.
The idea of atoms came from observations:
"Not until around 460 B.C., did a Greek philosopher, Democritus, develop the idea of atoms. He asked this question: If you break a piece of matter in half, and then break it in half again, how many breaks will you have to make before you can break it no further? Democritus thought that it ended at some point, a smallest possible bit of matter. He called these basic matter particles, atoms.
In the 1800's an English chemist, John Dalton performed experiments with various chemicals that showed that matter, indeed, seem to consist of elementary lumpy particles (atoms). Although he did not know about their structure, he knew that the evidence pointed to something fundamental.
n 1897, the English physicist J.J. Thomson discovered the electron and proposed a model for the structure of the atom. Thomson knew that electrons had a negative charge and thought that matter must have a positive charge. His model looked like raisins stuck on the surface of a lump of pudding."
http://nobeliefs.com/atom.htm
Therefore, things that are discovered are the results of observations that allude to its existence. Nobody would have known what gravity was unless things drop to the floor. If it was only out of space and we did not have the technology to go to space, we would be none the wiser.
Therefore, the Holy Spirit cannot be seen, smelled or touched, etc, but people can see the affects of His existence in their lives.
Yes, we can hear, touch, smell and observe atoms with out senses. Everything is made up of atoms.
Haha, no. No no no no no.
You don't have a single sensor in your body that can detect an atom.
You could not see an atom if it were right in front of you.
You could not feel an atom if I hit you in the face with one.
You can not smell an atom. Atoms have no smell. You can only smell certain combinations of molecules.
You could not hear an atom... what makes you think you could?
We can see light that reflects off of large groups of atoms, but we can't actually see the atoms.
We can hear vibrations when large groups of atoms collide, but we can't actually hear the atoms.
We can smell large combinations of atoms, but we can't actually smell atoms.
We can feel certain forces when large combinations of atoms come into near-contact with us, but we can't actually feel atoms.
Then, for what purpose do scientists use Atomic Force Microscopes?
Then, you agree with me.
Not to see things. Atomic force microscopy doesn't look at radiation reflecting off of an object(aka, what we call sight).
No. You say we can know atoms exist through our senses, but we can't. We can't hear, see, feel, smell, or taste an individual atom. None of our senses can detect or describe an atom. We would have no idea of the physical nature of atoms if we relied on our senses.
Ah yes, the ole' "put-words-in-the-mouth-of-others-in-order-to-make-my-point" ploy.
You succeeded. Well done.
Oh yeah, you like totally didn't say that.
Oh wait, you did like totally say that.
I don't want to say you have a reading comprehension problem, so I won't say it.
For most of history, the "atom" was not even considered at all. I believe individuals have actually seen "an atom," but not until recently, and it requires enormously complex and sophisticated equipment.
The concept of the Atom is theoretical. It allows us to have an understanding of what we are made up of. Then when you realise that the atom is only a package of space, infinitely small and unmeasurable, you can get the understanding of our Finite existence.
Those 5 senses mentioned are our immediate, in-the-now connection with the infinite. Our consciousness of the Finite is, if you like, our feedback to the Infinite. If that Infinite is the Creator of us, then Christians might have a point of view worth considering.
Anyway, I beg you to keep your minds open to new possibilities, new understandings, new wonders.
I think it would be great if you took your own advice.
Absolutely, Claire. If I did not I would not even be here.
I think you are more than when I first came across you.
Your senses cannot pick up imaginary entities because they don't exist. There is nothing to compare it with. Therefore the brain cannot interpret it as something that exists.
People say primitive persons were impressed by nature and assumed they were gods but people are just looking at it in retrospect. It is only because we know the concept of God that we assume they thought it was gods.
We know that unicorns are imaginary but we have imagined them because we have seen horses and ponies.
Insanity? Perhaps, the very same kind of insanity that would have one believe most businesses were owned by Satanists, for example?
Hilarious. Leonardo da Vinci not only imagined helicopters, he created a design for one, because he based it on something that already existed. And, that would be what, Claire?
Actually, I can't believe I'm still talking to you after that business/Satanist comment. Truly stunning.
Most major businesses I meant to say.
Answer the question.
Is Leonardo a cave man? Don't you know that Freemasons (the higher level ones) are in possession of ancient secrets that have been passed down for thousands years? One such thing is sacred geometry which can be traced back to Ancient Egypt.
Excerpts from article:
"At the other end of the scientific spectrum of contemporary science an ancient science is being restored. For ages it has been preserved carefully. It is more or less an art form and it is called ‘sacred geometry’. Why sacred, what is so sacred about geometry? In spiritual mystery-schools of the past it was taught that sacred geometry has been used by God to create the universe. We now know that sacred geometry contains many mysterious elements that elegantly describe many phenomena such as the growth of plants, the proportions of the human body, the orbit of the planets, light, the structure of crystals, music. The list goes on and on. We’ll give a few examples in this chapter.
The archaic science of sacred geometry can be traced back to the Egyptian civilization but may well be a heritage from the civilisation of mythological Atlantis and we’ll provide sufficient clues in this book to sustain this claim. Sacred geometry contains elements that are crucial in understanding a new aether physics that will be introduced in the next chapter.
n the ancient teachings of sacred geometry it is believed that the sacredness of everything in the universe can be described in terms of geometrical patterns coming from the hand of God. As unbelievable as that may seem, it can be illustrated with ample examples that indeed many unexpected things have a hidden geometry that is not obvious at first sight.
It is now believed that the Egyptians applied sacred geometry in the construction of the Great Pyramid and many other monuments. The Egyptians had two mystery-schools; one was called the left eye of Horus. This school taught the female principles of creation, about love and compassion. The other school was called the right eye of Horusand taught the intelligent male principles of creation; sacred geometry was a main subject.
Sacred geometry has also left its traces in other cultures such as in the gothic architecture of European churches and cathedrals (Chartres), the Parthenon in Athens, paintings by Leonardo Da Vinci and the Hindu classical dance. Sacred geometry has been preserved in circles of Freemasonry in utmost secrecy."
http://www.soulsofdistortion.nl/SODA_chapter5.html
Let us talk about the golden ratio:
"Ancient Greek mathematicians first studied what we now call the golden ratio because of its frequent appearance in geometry. The division of a line into "extreme and mean ratio" (the golden section) is important in the geometry of regular pentagrams and pentagons. The Greeks usually attributed discovery of this concept to Pythagoras or his followers. The regular pentagram, which has a regular pentagon inscribed within it, was the Pythagoreans' symbol.
If we consult this page and go to the "Vitruvian Man: Leonardo Da Vinci" section, you will find a pentagram, the one used in Satanism, inside a pentagon.
http://www.ancient-wisdom.co.uk/sacredgeometry.htm
And so where is the pentagram used?
"The purpose of this study is to show the curious similarity between the use of the Pentagram by the Masonic lodge, and other occult groups such as Satanists and Witches. There is much more to this symbol than meets the eye. This study will help you to comprehend the deeper meanings of this symbol and the deceptions that are connected to its ritualistic use.
Two witches, Janet and Stewart Farrar, give their definition of a pentagram:
Pentagram: a five-pointed star, one of the main symbols of Witchcraft and occultism in general.#1
Notice the pentagram is used in the center of the Temple by the altar in the Temple of Blue Lodge Masonry (the first three degrees: Entered Apprentice, Fellowcraft, and Master Mason) (See illustration on page 2, #2)
The pentagram is used by Satanists, Witches and Black and White Magicians to invoke and banish demons. The illustration on page 3, #3, is from the book, The Golden Dawn, by Israel Regardie. The Golden Dawn is a secret society that practices ritual magic. It was founded in the nineteenth century by three men; MacGregor Mathers, Wynn Westcott, and Dr. William Robert Woodman. All three of these men were Masons. It should be noted that Westcott and Woodman were eminent and powerful Masons.
Other members of the Golden Dawn were Kenneth MacKenzie, author of The Royal Masonic Enclopaedia - A. E. Waite, the author of, A New Encyclopedia of Freemasonry - and 33rd degree Mason, Aleister Crowley. Crowley's writings have formed the basis of Modern Satanism. Aleister Crowley described his Masonic authority in these words:
...I was now a sort of universal inspector-general of the various rites, charged with the secret mission of reporting on the possibility of reconstructing the entire edifice, which was universally recognized by all its more intelligent members as threatened with the gravest danger. #4
The illustration on page 3, #3, clearly shows how this organization that was founded and guided by Freemasons used the pentagram to invoke and banish demons in their rituals. The following statement is from the same book that the illustration is from.
Yet, if there may arise an absolute necessity for working or conversing with a Spirit of evil nature, and that to retain him before thee without tormenting him, thou hast to employ the Symbol of the Pentagram reversed -. #5
The deception is the fact that some persons using the pentagram think they are invoking good spirits and others think they are invoking bad spirits. It makes no difference what they think ! They are all invoking demons.
The pentagram also is pictured on the cover of A Witches Bible Compleat (Illustration page 5, #6). It is one of the most prominent symbols in Witchcraft and can be seen on the witch's altar. The same type of pentagram is found by the altar in the Temple of the Blue Lodge of Freemasonry (Illustration page 2, #2).
The adepts of Freemasonry are not ignorant of the fact that the symbol of the pentagram with one point down is evil. 33rd degree Mason, Manly P. Hall explains:
When used in black magic the pentagram is called the "sign of the cloven hoof," or the footprint of the Devil. The star with two points upward is also called the "Goat of Mendes," because the inverted star is the same shape as a goat's head. #15"
So, you see, everything is traced back to Satanism. The evidence is irrefutable. And Satan will give you that knowledge if you come to an agreement. Think of what other technology exists that is hidden from the public.
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20 … tagram.htm
Where does the sacred geometry come from?
In MORALS AND DOGMA, 33rd Degree Freemason Albert Pike bestows special honor upon Sirius, a heavenly body that 'still glitters in our Lodges as the Blazing Star' (Pike, 486). Indeed, Sirius represents a foundational axiom of the Masonic Craft. Pike explains that the star is: ''an emblem of the Divine Truth, given by God to the first men, and preserved amid all the vicissitudes of ages in the traditions and teachings of Masonry' (Pike, 136). As Pike continues, he reveals that Sirius has also held numerous other appellations: 'The Blazing Star in our Lodges, we have already said, represent Sirius, Anubis, or Mercury, Guardian and Guide of Souls' (Pike, 506).
Whatever its name, the star represents an entity of great esoteric significance to Freemasonry:
“In the old Lectures they said: 'The Blazing Star or Glory in the centre refers us to that Grand Luminary the Sun, which enlightens the Earth, and by its genial influence dispenses blessings to mankind'.” (Pike, 506)
A little later, Pike reiterates: ''the Blazing Star has been regarded as an emblem of Omniscience, or the All-Seeing Eye , which to the Ancients was the Sun' (Pike, 506).
According to Pike, Sirius was responsible for imparting numerous innovations to mankind:
“He was Sirius or the Dog-Star, the friend and counselor of Osiris , and the inventor of language, grammar, astronomy, surveying, arithmetic, music, and medical science; the first maker of laws; and who taught the worship of the Gods, and the building of temples.” (Pike, 376)
Michael Hoffman further elaborates on the identity of Sirius:
“The mythical Satanic bringer of civilization to earth was supposed to be an alien from the star system Sirius, around whom the Egyptians and all subsequent Hermetic systems constructed their elaborate and obsessive religio-astronomic observances. This star Sirius also served as an astronomic secret code, an allegory of the illusory quality and inherent 'trickiness' of the material world.” (Hoffman, 26-27)
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Ascendancy2.htm
I do believe you have enough brains to put the pieces together.
Yes, it's because in the back of your mind you think I could be right. After all, why bother with a complete loon? If someone had to say they had visions of my little pony I would just ignore them. I assume you have consulted all my material.
There is no less insanity in that statement than the other.
That is the most relevant question you've asked so far. I think your posts have shown well beyond a shadow of a doubt there is no reason to bother any further.
Lol
Considering you haven't done the research, how would you know that isn't true?
Bye Bye!
Because they are relying on their belief systems, just like you are.
Why would they have that belief system? So don't you think it may have someone to do with power? After all, Satan gives power to those who serve him.
Once again, Claire, I don't accept the existence of some kind of metaphysical being called "Satan." You obviously do, along with your belief in a god.
"Good" and "Bad," "right and wrong," "judgment," "punishment," all these things are the domain of humans. The choice whether to be cruel or otherwise to fellow humans is within you and me.
"Satan" and "God" are metaphors, representing inner struggles which you, I and every other thinking human comes up against. One of those Power Struggles is in dealing with inner conflict.
Why is good and evil the domain of humans? Why were we born to do one or the other in a situation and have done both in our lifetimes? When a lioness kills her prey I tell you she has no conscience about it whatsoever.
When a human kills a rat or a chicken, neither he has any!
Means the human being is making a conscious decision.
Humans have an inbuilt conscience that gives us a whole different 'moral code' to work with that animals do not have.
A lion makes a conscious decision to hunt, it communicates with its pride and plan the hunt to single out the target. It kills hyena for fun.
Human does the same thing, only he does it smarter.
There is no moral code, humans in a society behave the same way as a lion in a pride.
That's an absolute truth, though only the few may accept.
That they are different-one is an animal ,the other is a human.
Got it?
Humans are just a species of animals, the only difference is its increased brain capacity and superiority complex.
Then it is a disease. Mind you only the religious got that!
If Jesus is the cure ,then I can live with that
Imaginary beings will only complicate, there is only one cure - reality. If you cannot by yourself reach it, thar are people to help, They are called psychiatrists.
Personal experience perhaps
Thank-you for sharing.
I'll treat, don't worry. And I have assisted in treating a lot many like you, so won't be much of a problem, but I still say you see a qualified psychiatrist, for your problem seems to be gone too far for a GP!
Sorry let me rephrase that " Did you speak from your own psycological experiences?
I don't need treating and thats backed up by real professionals not virtual wanna be's.
I say from experience I had with people like you, who were brought to the psychiatry department by their relatives. You all see imaginary beings, the common thread, and think it is reality.
PS: Homosexuality was once considered a psychiatric disease, but was dropped when they got sufficient numbers. So as long as you can get sufficient people to share your delusion, you are safe, it'll be called a religion.
Drugs you say ,oh my I feel a weight lifted off my shoulders already -
Also thinking this might be a good time to consider a new hobby -like jogging,lol
I thought you were a surgeon?
Tell me does Eaglewiki need surgery in your esteemed opinion?
And if she did, where would she need to travel to?
India?
Bangla Desh?
My guess would be Bangla Desh, yep, that sounds about right.
Yes I'm a surgeon, but before becoming a surgeon I had to pass my undergraduate studies and psychiatry is one topic where we had to study both theory and practical.
What I 've come to know is what you call psychiatry is disturbance in neuron physiology or its interconnections, but it is hardly operatable, as right now we don't have equipment for that, so she'll have to adjust with drugs.
How on earth did you come up with ..more than a complex ,equals a disease lol
Do you just randomly type
Eaglekiwi, are you suggesting that we humans don't have any instincts? Why would we not? We are a species of animal. We have most of the characteristics of all other mammals. All of our physiological processes are very similar.
We are NOT a 'species of animals'
Humans may share some similarities, but we are not animals, we are humans.
We choose to not live as animals, it doesn't mean that we're not a species of animal. We choose to live in houses, yet we still act based on reactionary triggers, it does not make us different, only smarter...
When believers go into denial, is it because they're afraid of reality?
Absolutely... People fear being proven wrong, so they come with all sorts of defensive techniques, like regurgitating something they heard or read.
Could the same not be said of anyone with a minimal education? I spew garbage as much as the next person, at least I'm willing to admit it. So what makes any of us different? Are we all not resorting to such tactics? Have I not tried to be nice? I'm a little frustrated, yes, but why should I be damned for my opinion? Can I not damn the chastizers?
It actually has nothing to do with education. When people don't want to believe something, they will do ANYTHING to try to resort to anything that they feel confirms what they want to believe. It's human. We all have been guilty of that in our lives. All I know is that we have to go where the evidence leads us so that we don't land up deceiving ourselves.
Who is damning you for your opinion?
I don't have to mention names, but if you go through all the threads I've written, you'll see the haters. It's not like we don't all do the same to some extent... For instance, I can't stand stupidity. It's one thing to believe something, it's stupid to defend it. If someone doesn't agree and their as intelligent as they claim, then it shouldn't matter. Can we not have a conversation? Does it have to sink to such a level? Of course I can't point out the faults of others, without first pointing out my own, I too am guilty of such things. The only difference, is that I try to be civil with my stances.
Hate means there is something wrong with a person. I have to admit that I have to exercise great discipline when I write comments because people in denial exasperate me.
We need to correspond without others with respect, and I try to, because we can all learn from one another. Lashing out, unless there is a damn good reason to, and petty insults don't exactly aid us in that endeavour.
Hatred is a common emotion we all share, it is the way we control our hatred that makes all the difference.
You mean, in denial of your irrational beliefs or in denial of reality?
I have no idea what one can learn from such comments as businesses are owned by Satanists, for example, nor can I see how anyone can respect such a comment. Quite the contrary.
Very good!
I like that! << the coveted double laughy award
:lol
:lol
The only difference is that an ATM (the bank variety) only "tell" when asked to, as opposed to the other, which tells irrespective of being asked!
...and often spurges out counterfeit notes as well!
LMAO!
Wish he'd give me cash then all would be forgiven!
I can just picture a murderer in court telling the judge, "I couldn't help it! I'm an animal and was just presenting the body like a gift like my cat does!"
Aquasilver, I 100% disagree. That presumption that we are not animals is, again, an ego-trip. We do this, (all of us, to some extent), to bolster our position in the world, and make ourselves appear more important.
That story of Adam and Eve In The Garden, for me, is metaphorical, giving a picture of how we humans acquired the ability to differentiate between "good" and "evil." It was an enhancement of every animal's ability to make choices.
From that time, i.e., when we learned we could freely choose, our lives have become more complex, full of dilemma, giving us infinite worry and anguish.
It seems that animals other than human do not have such worries. They are very fortunate! And they can be superior to humans in many cases. WE sometimes act worse than the "lower" animals!
We were created higher than the animals (though to our shame(mankind) often one would not think so)
Humans have the power to reason, plan,organise,create. Animals can mimick human behaviour but will always be animals and act instinctively.
You immediately make the presumption that Human Behaviour is seen as the standard, universally?
In my view, it is not appropriate to compare humans with other species. Each species at any given time is adapted ideally to live and breed and thrive in habitat and conditions which prevail at the time. If you look deeply at the peculiar characteristics and skills of each species, they are remarkable and awesome. How do you know that other "lesser" animals are incapable of reasoning? What is the point of comparison?
Study each species for its own sake, respect it, admire it, learn from it.
I am humbled by the beauty and abilities of fast-flying birds. Maybe they look down on us, from a great height and think, "What bungling, incapable idiots those down there are."
I take your point ,and yes ,mankind has pretty much ruined everything he has ever put his hand too, but that doesn't change the fact that He is capable of more..or choosing a higher method of thinking/behaviour,if he so chose too.
So a man and woman are wired for different cognitive and emotional functions. A man from Sweden or a man from Africa are -males that is the species.
The species have many things in common like the power to reason, to analyse, organise, lead,write, read/study,sing, display emotion,articulate needs,create.
Animals -I believe were created for mankind,not the other way around.
That species live within their own species and some others.Not all.They do not domestic humans or organise mankind to become wild like.They don't form committees, preform surgury, or deliver another animals babies.
They survive by instinct and learned behaviour from humans ,not the other way around.
There are any other differences and I am sure someone could explain it so much more intellectually than I just did -but you get the picture
As individuals species we are unique,but that fact does not equate to same, in my humble opinion.
Have you ever had a conversation with a cat? Probably not. Sure we can talk at an animal, but the response is nothing we would understand. Domesticated animals have however, learned to communicate with gesture. For instance, my dogs stare at me until I feed them, then they forget I exist, much like a child with a new toy.
<--- coveted double laughie award
Utter nonsense, the common ancestors of dolphins and humans is far removed through time, hence their evolution was very different (land as opposed to water) but dolphins still show incredible feats of intelligence and obviously did not learn that behavior from humans.
How do you know they didn't learn from humans?
Of course I never said ALL behaviour is learned from MAN ,the rest is instinct. OR (and do try to grasp this, ALL living things have a creator-God
For how can one make something from nothing!
I think you need to open your mind and think outside the square ,if you are able to do.
Errr.... is this a serious question? When was a Scuba dive first performed? In terms of evolutionary processes? I don't think humans were very friendly with dolphins deep down in the ocean.
This planet is round, no corners, no where to hide.
I was replying to Cagsill aka Troubled Man.
Generally speaking, I believe we can learn so many things from each other ,including the behaviour of animals. In fact ,its sad to say but most animals behave more humanely than many humans
Yes, the don't make up false statements based on their irrational beliefs. Of course, believers will state that animals learn their behavior from humans. Contradict much?
No, not at all.
Your perception and/or understanding is uniquely your own. Not always correct,but never the less your understanding on any given topic.
Hilarious. You fill your posts with blatant lies about science, which are easily pointed out with understanding from folks who actually did real research, experiments and the rigor. Obviously, the understanding is not uniquely my own, but is published as theory and fact.
While I could care less what you believe about me, Cagsil may not like you telling lies about him.
There is still no evidence of a creator[try to grasp that]
Again you are left with the conundrum of: who created the creator. Apparently you have some advanced information yet to be seen by us.
You make the same mistake many non-believers often make ie, that it our (Christians)responsibility to prove ,show evidence ,convince non-believers about God?
It isnt!
It is yours to seek, accept or reject.
Cant get much simpler than that.
"Why you gotta make it all so complicated"
P.S I don't know who created the Creator-I am ok with that, for there are will always be some things we won't have answers for.
My peace and content comes from the answers I have found that work (for me)
There is no reason to seek any further understanding of your religious beliefs, as they have been thoroughly debunked. Only those who are too stubborn to let go of the LIES told by men(no different than you) will fearfully persist in this delusion...which, unfortunately, make up the majority.
No...actually, that's absurd.
It is the delusion that is complicating the issue. Using straightforward common sense is the best way to arrive at a sensible conclusion. You can't, HONESTLY, say you have been reasonable.
But that contradicts your prior assertions...you must recognize this, or are you unwilling to allow your beliefs to release your critical thinking?
I have no problem with that. I am, however, bound by integrity, to reject your beliefs as delusional nonsense when you assert them as truths.
I present them as my truth,which is why I disagree with you when you assert you don't have a problem with that.
I mean, if the shoe were on the other foot i.e You post in a forum proclaiming ideals I think are absurd, I would have no interest whatsoever debating a set of ideals you clearly support.
If you are deluded(or not) I gain nothing by pointing it out to you and why...because its just my opinion.
I would have to seriously ask myself ,what is my interest,motive, purpose?
Guess I feel strongly when any one person tries to dictate to another what and why they should beleive something.
I will not -unless asked.
Be happy with whatever you chose ,and maybe then you will accept and allow others to choose for themselves too
You are very adept at using your critical thinking skills when appealing for tolerance.
I just wish that you could engage your critical thinking when analyzing your beliefs. But I'm aware of the psychological chaos that would cause.
I understand that you honestly believe that you are telling the truth. I can't blame you. You did not do this to yourself.
If your beliefs calm your anxieties, and takes the edge off, then I say be content in your bliss.
If you don't know the answer, why don't you say so, instead of coming up with ridiculous creation theories?
Castles in the air, that indeed work!
Uh, because dolphins live in the ocean and we don't.
Then, please describe what it is that dolphins have learned from men and distinguish that from instinct because so far I only see you are now back peddling.
Ask your God, that's exactly what he did.
So, I should open my mind in order to believe the nonsense and false statements you produce here?
No, some people don't enjoy killing those animals. I wouldn't unless I really had to.
That is a learned behavior.
Earlier wild animals were called "game", because they were killed for fun.
What happened to...
"O! It amuse me, don't you see that I'm not addressing any of your specific comments, like I used to do?"?
Claire, are you 100% vegetarian? If you find a bug on your lettuce do you kill it? With a clear conscience? Do you use chlorine bleach to kill bacteria? All animals. Each with a right to life, "for as long as it shall live."
The earth is our food, we are food for germs. Then it would be fair to assume, that we too are germs of a sort.
Claire, are you 100% vegetarian? If you find a bug on your lettuce do you kill it? With a clear conscience? Do you use chlorine bleach to kill bacteria? All animals. Each with a right to life, "for as long as it shall live.
Nope, I'm not a vegetarian. There's a difference between enjoying killing and killing for food. If I was REALLY hungry, I'd kill but I would prefer not to!
I think it would be stupid to feel guilty about killing bacteria. Lol. If I found a fly, I'd kill it. If it was a ladybird, no.
It's an interesting topic because I'd feel bad about killing a praying mantis but have no qualms about a fly.
I know this is totally off-topic, but next time a fly is bothering you, try this Buddhist method:
Place a glass jar or tumbler over the fly as it lands on the window pane. You will need to do this quietly, as opposed to frantically trying to swat the fly dead!
Slide a sheet of paper under the rim of the glass as it's held against the window, with the fly inside the jar. Carry the glass and fly outside the house and let it go. That fly has some work to do, cleaning up some dog s..t or some such delicacy.
All in the name of Nature! Your blood pressure will be much better served by this gently, peaceful approach.
I had a buddhist principal in elementary school. One day while I was chewing gum on campus (a no no in school), he made me spit it out. When I went to pick it up, he said "Why pick it up? Why not feed the ants"? I'll never forget the kindness of such words, for it applies even to the fly.
Interesting, but when I'm trying to sleep and it is buzzing in my ear, I don't feel like being that charitable.
Good questions, Claire. I can only suppose that our instinctive, animal characteristics try to push us in one direction, while our sophisticated, human, mind-led motivations pull us in another. This causes conflict, we react in a way which we assume will benefit us. Often this reaction is impulsive, driven sometimes by fear of the unknown.
There is also, sometimes, a human guilt overlay, which confuses the issue even more.
These are only some of my suggestions. Others might have their own diverse opinions.
Why not try to understand human behavior without injecting imaginary beings that make absolutely no sense?
Human behaviour is pretty easy to understand, His(her) natures wants to serve self
But, you and other believers show time and again you have very little understanding of human nature and would much rather believe some ancient mythical book written by morons as opposed to scientific data. Yes, I can see how that would be easy.
Greater is He (Jesus) that is IN YOU, than he (satan) that is IN THE WORLD (Quote,unquote) Bible
Basically I understand that to mean, the more I am transformed(over time)to be more Christ(like) the old nature and all its 'me me me ' desires get starved out.
Hence we are all born sinners.How we chose to live is quite another thing ,and depending on choices we make, death can be another step or ..not.
Yes, and the proof of that is hard and fast as we see babies and toddlers railing at God and committing atrocities of all sorts as they slowly transform into good honest Christians.
the politics of a group come from its own culture, and the current pack of war like nations are steeped and distilled from pure christianity.
I disagree ,war has always been about power and dominance. Many leaders used religion as a mask to indoctrinate the people,but most were not fooled. They just didnt have the power to resist the tyranny or corruption.
Nothing has changed, and it still is not about religion.
If a car slams into a pedestrian killing an innocent person, do we blame the car?, the manufacturer? the cars previous owners ,cars history, pedestrians right to be there.
No, we blame the driver ,he/she is the one to be held accountable, and so it is with every single human being.
We decide who and how we love and we decide who and how we hate.
Choices.
Gotta quit blaming the 'other person' imagined or not. That includes blaming our past, our cultures, our religion,our government.
It's because ATM thrives when putting other people down. Sad but true.
This is the thing, we all take part in this world, we do need to take responsibility for our own actions and behaviors. It is easy to blame others. I agree with you Eagle, doesn't matter who we are, we take part in making this disaster every day in this world, by what we do or don't do individually to make it a better place.
I'm pretty sure that was a pointless barb, but I guess I'm not intelligent enough to grasp it.
Why do you choose to believe these things, Claire? I'm not being mocking or disrespectful, but I am absolutely gobsmacked when I encounter beliefs such as yours. Why do you believe such things?
I've come to assume this has to be an elaborate joke. No one could believe half the stuff that persona has posted within this thread.
I'm not actually disputing the truth of falsity of your claims. While your claims surprise me, I'm prepared to acknowledge that they are true, if I eventually satisfy myself that they are. How did you come to believe these things? That's all that I'm asking.
I'm not actually disputing the truth of falsity of your claims. While your claims surprise me, I'm prepared to acknowledge that they are true, if I eventually satisfy myself that they are. How did you come to believe these things? That's all that I'm asking.
Thank you for the respectful manner in which you have addressed me. One who really seeks the truth starts on neutral grounds, like you, and listens to other people's argument to assess whether they have truth in them or not.
You should go back a few pages and read the correspondences I made with other people for you to get a good idea how I have come to know these things. I iterate, I have had guidance from the Holy Spirit but one can only know how if one knows the opposite entity and that is Satan. You cannot appreciate God's glory unless you know Satan's depravity. I've had experiences with evil that validate what he is like. I've researched quite a bit into the occult over the years and the secret societies of our world leaders. It's indisputable that it is Satanism. Bohemian Grove, for example, is where American leaders perform mock sacrifices of a man to Lillith. I'm not the one who makes these things up. They happen and the symbols of Satanism they associate themselves with needs to be explained.
Both God and Satan are vying for our souls and it is a daily battle. When you realize in retrospect that God was allowing things to happen, or not happen, for our own good. When things appear to be going in the opposite direction but doesn't happen, you realize it is Satan. A person can only know these things over years of experience and has spiritual intuition.
It's a very difficult thing to understand but one realizes the power of the Holy Spirit in that people are drawn to Jesus even in a negative way. How many times are atheists going to try and convince themselves He didn't exist or is not the Holy Spirit? Is it that important? I'm looking for a forum topic where Allah's existence or Mohammed's but have yet to find it. Nobody seems to care.
Hope this makes some sense.
It is important because when ever religions ruled the world, in the name of spirit/god guidance they destroyed civilizations.
because people who come here are mostly Americans and Europeans and the fight against the thing they come against mostly. Besides Muslims in general are more indoctrinated that they won't discuss their faith. Inspite of this there are topics related to that in the forums.
May be to a deluded mind, but it will never make sense or make as much as sense as that of tooth faires or FSM or Dracula/vampires.
And this will be my last reply to you. Unless you can rationally and logically explain what this god/ spirit, this will all be your opinions/subjective hallucinations and though you'll be convinced, nobody is going to care except similarly delude people
So you combat the evils of religion by trying to delude yourself Jesus didn’t exist? So you automatically think because the religion is corrupted that means Jesus couldn’t possibly be the son of God or that He didn’t exist? How about separating the Holy Spirit from the corrupted religion? How about Judaism? Do you ever try and debunk the Genesis story or Moses’ existence?
Fight against Al Qaeda! I saw a Muslim saying Allah was more omnipotent than Jesus! Did you try and debate the Muslim there?
“And this will be my last reply to you. Unless you can rationally and logically explain what this god/ spirit, this will all be your opinions/subjective hallucinations and though you'll be convinced, nobody is going to care except similarly delude people”
I will still address your pigs in the lake, etc, argument. Whether you respond or not is up to you. You say nobody cares? Why have you invested so much time in writing to me? Because you didn’t care a damn? It’s not only Christians who address me, you know.
I wouldn’t brush me off as deluded you know. Truth has a way of coming up from behind you and kicking you in the butt.
One last thing, what would constitute as rational explaining the Holy Spirit?
This is why I say, you don't understand a thing. Jesus don't exist because there is no historical facts to substantiate that claim. In history there some accepted methods to verify the existence of a person or the occurrence of an event, which jesus does not fulfill.
"To be son of god", there should be a god. No theist, whoever they are, still has to come with a rational theory about god. God is just the imagination of the ill. Same is the case with what ever spirit your are claiming, irrespective of holy or unholy.
Genesis story, its debunked many times. Moses, what is the relevance? [for your information, there is no Egyptian slavery of jews, no moses. But as I already told you the jews won't come to my place to convert or kill, they are a headache only in the middle east.]
I have, and I did. The problems with Muslims are, you rarely get a sane muslim to debate. Debates and discussions occur between sane, intelligent men, who try to understand what each other say, you cannot debate with people who simply repeat what ever they say, irrespective of being shown the irrationality. I don't debate with Dave, Aquasilver and some others in this forum, though sometimes I make fun of them.
.
I didn't know. Till you talk with someone, how do anybody know what whether they talk rationally or not? I start discussions with so many people, but if I find that they are deluded, I leave. I persisted on till you repeated this "spirit" thing, irrespective of so many people pointing to you its just your subjective feeling. Then when some questions are directed at me, in spite of me, sometimes I respond.
Can you say whether it is an object or concept? If it is an object what are it attributes, how it looks like, and how this object can inspire you, though you cannot see it, feel it or touch it?
The Jews don't even deny that such a person lived. They only deny his divine status. So many people mentioned were real people. You are taking a ridiculous stance. Don't quit your day job.
Get yourself educated, and study some history.(A clue, history is not based on democracy)
There is nothing ridiculous in the lack of any proof of the existence of any jesus figure as depicted in the bible.
No jesus is mentioned anywhere except in the bible and there were dozens of 'messiahs' wandering around in that period. There is no mention of any of the events associated with the jesus figure from the myth of the murdered, first-born to the absence of any significant sky darkening 'event' at the time of the supposed crucifixion.
The only mention is in the story book and, whilst he might have been a real person, he could just as easily be a constructed 'hero'.
What most of these stupid discussions fail to address is that the 'reality' of it all is unimportant and focussing on this kind of trivia is just avoiding the message contained in the real or fictional events - and the message has merits. Being rude to Jomine is a sure sign that you are not in tune with the message in any way.
(I iterate, I have had guidance from the Holy Spirit but one can only know how if one knows the opposite entity and that is Satan. You cannot appreciate God's glory unless you know Satan's depravity)
Claire,
The one thing religious people always screw up is the concept of the burden of proof.
The religious person states a proposition for which there is no objective evidence, and then they boast that they are right because they can't be proven wrong.
Have you noticed about yourself how many times you write, How am I wrong, or Show me where I am wrong?
There is no other area of human activity or thought in which this type of "prove me wrong" absurd 'reasoning' is met with anything other than ridicule....yet the believers, who would often scorn similar statements in other areas of human endeavour, see nothing wrong with the argument. When someone asserts a proposition that is contrary to the rules by which the observable universe operates, then the usual requirement is to expect compelling evidence. Extraordinary claims should require extraordinary evidence.
The only reason these "prove me wrong' arguments are not laughed out of existence is due to the privileged position that religion holds in our society and the utter waste of so much effort and human ability sucked so futilely into worship of an entity that, if it existed, is shown biblically to be genocidal, homicidal, racist, sexist, and a sadist.
Claiming an immaterial spirit exists and tells you how to live is irrational, an abandonment of critical thinking and an adoption of blind faith in the infallibility of emotive intuition.
I don't have to prove that wrong - it is self-refuting.
I wasn't referring to Satan and the Holy Spirit's existence. I was referring to the links I posted. Sorry if that wasn't clear.
If you prove me wrong about the links I've posted, the ones that are factual, then I will take into consideration what you write.
The OT god is, yet. But do you know what the OT god is? If I knew God to be like He is in the OT I'll rather go to hell than worship him.
When I talk about God and Satan and the spiritual realm I do not expect people to believe me because I cannot provide evidence for it over the Internet. The evidence of the Holy Spirit that is obvious is exorcism of possessed people which my grandfather had to do to a poor bewitched girl.
(The evidence of the Holy Spirit that is obvious is exorcism of possessed people which my grandfather had to do to a poor bewitched girl.)
Claire,
My grandfather told me tales of the "tail-ee-po", a sasquatch-like creature who would come in the middle of the night to steal sleeping children from their beds.
Fortunately, I outgrew believing my grandfather's tall tales.
So, all I can do in response to your continued belief in the veracity of your grandfather's tales is modify my last statement and say: Claiming an all-good immaterial spirit exists and can force out an all-bad immaterial spirit that has invaded the body of a human is irrational, an abandonment of critical thinking and an adoption of blind faith in the infallibility of emotive intuition.
I don't have to prove that wrong - it is self-refuting
To closed minded individuals who claim 'everything' is a pretense.
And you would be open minded toward a buddhist? I highly doubt it, for your christian attitude is highly evident.
I am very open minded to Buddhists, they are normally fine folk, though like all religions there are bad ones.
I always see Buddhism as Christianity without Christ and some confusion on reincarnation.
That wasn't aimed at you. I was talking to Vector7, he's openly extreme about his stance and seemingly, all are going to hell that have opposing religious views.
One finger pointing forward, three pointing backwards and the thumb holding them there!!!!
Our understanding on the evolution doesn't connect with Jesus. Human understanding has always been limited compared to the things around us, thus, these things are created by the Almighty.
Therefore, God has no limitation and we just a piece of something compared to God. We must respect and praise God always for these wonderful things he has given.
Try to view my simple hub about this.
http://christianajohan.hubpages.com/hub … ose-Part-1
Just because someone decides to blog drunk doesn't mean they represent an entire population of people equal to the entire state population of California....just saying. Stereotypes are SO limiting.
Discussion is the better word with "argument" I should say. We can respect each other's opinion with discussion and not by argument.
Amen Sister,
....and thank you also Jonnycomelately!
John
(We can respect each other's opinion with discussion and not by argument)
christianajohan,
No, we cannot. I can respect the other person's right to hold his ridiculous opinion, but it is the argument for the belief that is either compelling or not compelling. If the argument for the belief is invalid, the belief itself cannot be respected.
I think Mitt Romney is a smart guy. I also happen to believe his Mormon religious beliefs are stupid and based on delusion and nonsense. If Romney wants to discuss religion with me, he had better do better than claim, "it is possible that x,y,z happened, and you can't prove me wrong."
Where that falls on the respect-the-person scale I don't know.
Ha ha well that okay, I don't need to be here, I've got a book to write. lol
Using a statement posted by one atheist to cast aspersions on ALL atheists only illustrates your own intellectual shortcomings. It also evinces the kind of disregard for the truth normally found in the gutter press and in the statements of politicians.
Believers and their personal insults.
They must really, really, really feel intelligent.
No, just humorously conspirational, enjoy the joke, it's directed at ATM whoever that is.... anybody know?
No, they are personal insults an you know it. Of course, with nothing else to say, believers must resort to them.
If you hate being insulted so, then why not refrain from using the laughie face icon?
Because the personal insults are laughable and childish. Who said I hated them, they are simply prohibited on these forums. Are you done focusing on me, yet?
No, because I struggle to understand your motives. I just like to talk and debate, that's my motivation. What's your's?
Maybe you need to check your computer, it seems to have left of most of the question, so in order to help you answer, here it is again...
"No, because I struggle to understand your motives. I just like to talk and debate, that's my motivation. What's your's?"
We'd all like to know that answer!
Yeah what is your point for coming here ATM? All you do is insult people then cry foul when you interpret their rebuttals as an insult. Those that live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones chummy.
You are free to show me where I personally insulted anyone, that is, if you actually understand the difference between personally insulting someone and ridiculing their ideals and beliefs.
Sorry, "A Troubled Man," when I first made that joke of ATM it was not directed at you as an insult. I was just displaying my often-warped sense of humour. Nothing personal against you, but it has been taken up in that way.
Ok, sometimes you do put your point of view in a somewhat aggressive way, and that does tend to raise peoples' ire. However, it is your right to put your opinions here, as for everyone else.
It seems everyone else got the joke.
Don't be too hard on yourself.
Aussies have a way of being able to laugh at themselves, but I guess that's not true of everyone.
That is their problem, not mine.
And, I do understand why their ire's are raised, it is because believers are unable to distinguish their ideals and beliefs from their arms and legs. To them, they are one and the same, but of course, that is an obvious logical fallacy.
If I were to call someone fat, ugly or and idiot, I am insulting them "personally" but if I were to say their beliefs and statements were irrational, dishonest, false or utterly ridiculous, I am criticizing and mocking those beliefs and statements, which have nothing to do with them personally.
I would beg to differ, believers find it highly personally offensive to have their beliefs ridiculed without any other reason than some anonymous forum user taking a dig at them.
But it's a two way street, and what is good for the goose is obviously good for the gander.
Of course nobody can make a personal attack at an avatar with no identity disclosed, for there is no person to attack.
That's not really fair. Now is it? You know there is a person there. Very few people here have pictures of themselves. How do I know that is a picture of you? Many don't reveal their real names. I don't share mine out of deference to my husband's concerns.
Yours is a jab for the sake of the jab. It serves little purpose but to appease your emotional reaction to his posts.
Come on Emile, we've all had the coveted double laughie. You can't blame people for occasionally snapping back. We are all human.
Oh, I know and you are right. Some really push the envelope, but I have a soft spot in my heart for obnoxious butt heads.I guess since I'm one myself.
Obnoxious butt head? No, you are probably one of the more level headed people on this forum.
Exactly. Believers simply cannot defend their irrational beliefs without injecting and invoking magical thinking in the face of reality, so they have nothing else to do but attack the person with personal insults and ridiculous accusations of avatars and userids.
I don't feel the need to attack or defend.
God is God ,He has been taking care of himself long before you or I arrived on the scene.
Its just a great pity that you scoff and mock. Says more about you than me.
Yes, it shows I'm not insane or need to support irrational beliefs with lies.
That's too bad, isn't it? Of course, believers could care less if they tell others they will burn in hell for an eternity, or tell us that having abortions or using contraceptives is blasphemous, or deriding homosexuals... the list goes on and on as to what believers find acceptable, but if anyone criticizes their irrational beliefs that drive them to tell us those things, it's highly offensive.
Hilarious hypocrisy.
Yes, you are free to ridicule any belief I hold, that is, if you can actually find one. But, that would just mean you're ridiculing reality and understanding.
But hey, feel free to do so.
"will burn in hell for an eternity, or tell us that having abortions or using contraceptives is blasphemous, or deriding homosexuals.."
'TM', if I were a believer that told you any of those things, I could half understand why you were so offensive at times.
I'm not.
Whatever deep loss caused your grief, we are not the source of that loss nor hurt that you have obviously experienced.
It's OK be be angry with God, it's OK to rage at the sea like King Canute and demand the tides stop ebbing and flowing, but it's not realistic, your anger and remorse which has turned to spiteful vengeance against faith and believers will do nothing but damage to yourself.
I suspect you started using this covert avatar because your friends or associates told you (correctly} that your antics in the forums could damage your business, that your name was coming up in connection to this 'other' you and looked dubious to those you traded with, because in business anything that looks odd is shunned.
Fact is that you are the flip side to the 'fundy nutter'card that turns up here.
Reviewing some of the staggering number of posts you have made in your short 'TM' life of subterfuge, it's clear to see that you often make intelligent replies that are valid.
Unfortunately you seem unable to restrain yourself from also making inane replies that add nothing to the conversation.
This devalues your (good) replies and in turn diminishes the respect other hubbers would normally pay anybody, when you behave like a school yard bully and bore, the other kids don't want you on their team.
Just try to play nicely with the other kiddies....
From where did you get that nonsense?
More laughable garbage focusing on me, again.
Is that what you're here for, to completely focus on the individuals? Does that make you feel superior some how?
Oh look, the usual Christian love is reeling it's ugly head again.
Yes, keep it coming, you're really on a roll here. Hilarious, Mr. Pot. Are you done or are you going to tell us how you really feel?
You can read how I really feel in my hubs, do you know what they are?
Yes, those would be the very poorly written articles filled with irrational beliefs and magical thinking under your userid.
Your hubs and your posts here do not appear to vary in context and validity, and lack thereof.
But at least I actually HAVE SOME, you may not like them, but judging from the comments my 50,000+ readers have made, they do, and it's actually them I write for.
You should try writing one sometime, it's actually not impossible.
The topic is "Is this the level of intelligence of Atheists?"
It seems Atheists display their individual levels of intelligence in different ways!
You are free to write for whomever is entertained by your hubs. What do you want, a medal?
Really? I would have never guessed.
That's just the point, I do write, and people do read, no medal required, just pleased that I reach folk and they approve of what they read.
4,804 posts, in 7 months, which averages 22 comments a day, most of which are just snide digs at what you fail to understand, inane repetition of your set phrases, or silly 'double whatever' emoticons, but no hubs....
A sad situation.
It is interesting that the more deluded the believer, the more they focus on me.
So sorry that you're sad.
I think troubled people gravitate to other troubled people so they can share their problems with one another and take comfort in the fact there is someone else there that understands and is willing to lend an ear.
Oh I'm not sad TM, I am a happy chap, I just think it's sad that your posts are just signs of a wasted life.
Try writing, it's quiet cathartic and would do you good.
These inane one liners with smileys really are pathetic
But TM, you present nothing but you to focus on!
That is precisely why you fall under the third line of that quote. Thanks for admitting that.
Not to take the wind out of your sails (I do enjoy your quick wit) isn't God an idea? Are you saying believers have great minds?
Is that ALL God is to you?
An IDEAD? Not a personal being?
I mean no harm, or disrespect....but, how else can describe it? Can you touch, see, or taste the spirit? Many of you say you've heard it, but is it truly a voice outside of yourself? I doubt that. It's in your head. If you believe, that belief originated because of something you felt in your head and in your heart.
I'm not saying it isn't real to you, but it truly is in your head, so it is an idea. Until such time as it manifests externally for all to see.
Firstly, Emile, let me say, that I didn't see intent of harm, or disrespect in your comment.
Secondly, God is not an idea in "my head". He is actually in my HEART.
I realise not everyone recognises that we have a spirit, but that's another issue.
Ideas didn't transform my life, JESUS, did!
Heart is just an organ to pump blood, its always the head.( heart is a figurative usage now)
Its is not idea, it's people who act on idea that change life. Its not Jesus, but what you interpreted from bible as Jesus teaching that changed your life(on which you acted. Jesus told to sell everything you got and give it to poor but I'm sure you never acted on it and have some rationalization for not doing so).
When I said "heart", I meant the spirit man. The core of my being. The WHO, I am.
Not the pump. I'm not that confused about things!
Jesus changed my "core of being".
You can call it idea all day long, but that's not what happened to me.
I investigated other ideas that had NO effect.
Besides, who gives you, (or anyone else) the right to diagnose what I experienced, who I am and what my "condition" is?
If He was a personal being, you could introduce Him to us.
I'd love to, but you are not a genuine seeker.
WASTE of TIME!
Please don't trouble me with useless posts like this.
I already know they are useless because you can no more show me or anyone else your god than I can show a unicorn or the tooth fairy.
And, you know it. Genuine seeker, indeed.
Hi aka dj, I'm posting this because it says everything that needs to be said to our friend who we both love and respect.
How's what? Your little poster said 'brilliant minds discuss ideas'. What is the concept of God, but an idea? We can't see, touch or feel it. There is nothing concrete. Every word is a discussion of either your ideas or the ideas someone else wrote down before you. It is how we envision the existence or non existence of God. Without proof, what is God but an idea?
We aren't discussing a person; so, by your chart small minds are not at work. (With the exception of the ones who like to talk about you)
We aren't discussing events, so average minds have no place at the table.
So, that leaves only one option. You just called everyone who discusses God brilliant. I know I said believers at first, but that includes you and me too. We post a lot.
Aren't you contradicting believers and those who wrote the Bible, they certainly don't believe God is just an idea?
I wasn't questioning what they believe. I was asking what you think. Is God an idea, or not? In your opinion. And, if not an idea....what?
Oh, I see, this is all about what I believe as opposed to the men who wrote scriptures and what they believed.
You question my beliefs where I have none to question. How is that avoidance?
I didn't question your beliefs. I simply asked that, since there is no evidence that God exists, are we not simply discussing an idea.
Never mind. I've got a pretty good idea what is going on here.
Evidence or not, believers don't believe God is just an idea today or in the past.
Today, we know gods are just myths and superstitions. Even believers in one particular god will admit all the other gods are myths and superstitions.
Does that help?
Did you take tap as a child? Because, no. It doesn't help in the least; since I think you've admitted that God is only an idea. You, I have no doubt, will respond to the contrary.
Congratulations, you have spotted the difference between believers and atheists, now you can stop bothering to push your nonsense on the forums.
Believers = Accept that God is a central point in their lives and that He assists and guides them to make the right life decisions.
Atheists = Do not accept God has any part in their lives and rely upon their own self will to guide them.
Now we can all get on with our own lives, you to yours, we to ours.
Wrong on all points, you may have decided that "gods are just myths and superstitions" but believers (in whichever god they choose to follow) know differently.
I do not say other faiths are following myths, they are just following a different god than Christ, and I only follow Christ because He has demonstrated to me that He does hold ALL power and authority, until the 'task' has been completed and He hands it back to God.
In the spiritual realm, there are many 'gods' but only ONE Supreme God, we just have to decide whether we accept God or choose another minor god, or none at all.
Well, it appears you don't know the difference between believers and atheists, but you'll still push your nonsense on these forums.
Sure, the minute you keep your beliefs behind close doors where they belong and not evangelizing in public. Wow, you sure proved me wrong with all your knowledge of the "spiritual realm".
Thanks TM, I left off all the silly smileys; folk recognise them as stupid emoticons that hide a lack of what to actually say, and I would not want to show you in that light.
Gee, thanks. What a swell guy.
Of course, I was being facetious. You couldn't possibly have any inkling of knowledge about a spiritual realm considering no such thing has ever been shown to exist.
Millions of people watch plenty of garbage on tv and approve of that, too. Your point?
Emile R,
(What is the concept of God, but an idea? We can't see, touch or feel it. There is nothing concrete. Every word is a discussion of either your ideas or the ideas someone else wrote down before you. It is how we envision the existence or non existence of God).
Excellent. You have it. This is the default position of the universe - real or not real, object or concept. Reality is binary - exists/does not exist. The only way mankind can differentiate existence is by definition. God either exists or does not exist, not by the pious pleadings of priests, not by ancient words in a book, not due to the hopes and fears of mankind, not because of how we feel or what we feel - but soley because of how existence is defined.
The inherent attribute of objects is shape - and that is exactly what is lacking in concepts. Can anyone tell me the shape of an idea, a thought?
What is the shape of god? If he has none, he is an idea, not real.
Look up, your redemption is near!
Romans 8:19
For [even the whole] creation (all nature) waits expectantly and longs earnestly for God's sons to be made known [waits for the revealing, the disclosing of their sonship].
God is EVERYWHERE but non believers refuse to actually SEE Him?
Psalm 34:8
O taste and see that the Lord [our God] is good! Blessed (happy, fortunate, to be envied) is the man who trusts and takes refuge in Him.
Yes, that is the epitome of a dishonest and childish believer who must actually draw pictures of old bearded men in order to make their point about God.
Just a little bit of mind-play here, nothing too serious: the Shape of an Idea.
A circle. Of a particular size. You can place 6 more circles, all of the same size, around the first circle. All of the 6 circles touch the 1st central circle AND 2 neighbours.
You now have a compact unit of 7 circles. Each of the 6 circles can be the centre of another unit of 7, except that 3 or this 2nd unit also belong to the first unit. The pattern of 7 can be repeated infinitely, all in communication with each other through a neighbour.
The number 7 is regarded as sacred in many cultures.
If I have up to 6 very close friends in my life, that is just about as much as I can cope with. Any more and I feel exhausted and overwhelmed. In practice I have found that more than 6 internet buddies and it becomes difficult to give due attention to all of them.
The shape of each cell in a bees' hive is 6-sided. 6 other cells packed around it, the most efficient use of space.
"The Shape of an Idea." There you are christians. Who or what "designed" this? Did it just happen to be, in the context of our finite physical world? Or did it have to be "thought" of by the infinite Nothingness?
The only Hubber who talks that way is Mark [the Borg] Knowles. lol. more Hub Persona's than Jethro had daughters.
I realize forums like this are a complete waste of time, because the lines have already been drawn in the sand. But, since I had some time to kill, here goes nothing.
Having said that, I would just like to mention that ignorance makes the impossible...possible. I see Christians here who do not really know why they should be confident and I see atheists here who are confident without reason.
I think Blaise Pascal's "Wager Argument" is the best way to approach this issue. He states that the evidence for a Creator and against one are evenly matched. Therefore, reason cannot be used in this debate.
He simply stated: If one believes there is a Creator and one is right, then eternal life has been won. If one is wrong, however, and there is no Creator, then one has lost nothing.
Conversely, if one believes there is no Creator and one just happens to be right, then one has gained nothing. However, if one is wrong and there is a Creator, then one has lost everything...eternally.
So, according to our good friend, Blaise Pascal, the prudent man (woman) should choose the option which completely covers the bet and makes one happiest...namely, believing in a Creator who made the heavens and the earth and who gave purpose and meaning to life.
Do you think God would consider that a sincere belief?
JaxsonRaine:
To answer your question........yes and no.
The Almighty has deliberately hidden Himself out of the range of the telescope and mircroscope, hence our belief cannot fully rest on reason, logic, or observation, but instead relies mostly on faith with reason and logic playing a smaller part.
You see, without faith one cannot please the Almighty, so discovering Him with a telescope requires no faith at all, hence observation would be a faith killer, so to speak, not to mention counter-productive. For the same reason, one cannot discover "God" through mathematical equations or through humanistic philosophies. He has, therefore, covered His tracks (somewhat), in order for one to use the spirit of truth and eyes of faith to find Him.
The Almighty and His Only Begotten Son, Christ Yeshua, want us to knock, seek, ask, and find Him, but does not want His followers to base their faith and belief in Him on silly superstitions or blind faith - which is faith without reason or faith without authentic authority.
Essentially, blind faith is faith that stands alone, which is not what He wants. The Word of God therefore states, "Blessed is he who believes and hasn't seen", because faith and belief are what He will judge us on and not on our intellect or ability to notice the obvious.
It is also important to note that just believing in a "Creator" is not sufficient for salvation: Knowing who the Creator is thus becomes the obvious second step, while the third step is findiing out what He wants to communicate to us and what He wants from us.
So, basing an initial decision on logic and sound reason, such as in Blaise Pascal's "Wager Argument", can serve a good purpose, but it cannot, on its own, lead one to Paradise; it can only point one in the right direction.
Happy hunting. :0)
Why do you need a telescope to detect god, he is sitting in my basement? There are some aborigines who worship some peculiar stones as god and for them that is god. There are people who think sun and moon are god. So which is your god?
Anyhow since there is no creator, what wager you are taking?
Here, reply to me.
There is a creator.
Your wrong.
Bam. See I can do i too. lol
what is there to create?
What made you assume a beginning for matter?
Is that a joke?
Or are you seriously telling me you think there wasn't a 'beginning' for matter??
The entire human race agrees on that.
Please consider your next statements carefully..
You sound like your on some heavy dosages... of what - I couldn't guess..
I recently was told to 'let the little children come'.
no mention of headstrong......
This adds to some of my studies on logic and full account as well.
you certainly dropped a sledgehammer.
Thank you.
Always good to run into a friend, Vector7, but I am sad to see that one of my paragraphs mysteriously disappeared from the above post.
You are right in your observation: "let the little children come to me...." is important to remember because the Lord said His kingdom belonged to such as these.
I believe, therefore, that the wealthy and intellectually affluent will have a difficult time impressing the Almighty on Judgement Day, because one relies on their money to save them, while the other relies solely on reason to guide them through life. Unfortunately, the Almighty owns everything so the rich man cannot impress God with his wealth and since the Almighty is the author of truth, the intellectual's grasp on knowledge is relegated to that of foolishness.
Yes, those who imagine gods and demons swirling round their heads within the thin air considers others who understand the world around them as fools.
How else to better serve their superiority and defend their irrational beliefs?
Should I collect the objective lacking insults just from this thread alone and see just how big the post is when I'm done?
You could do that, if you had enough time to waste, and wanted to fill a whole forum with inane comments, but don't copy and paste any hubs, or they would end up being downed for duplication.... oh hang on, that would be no problem, there are no hubs....
Actually for the most part what you copied from the forum posts would be duplication anyway.
Of course, magical thinking makes anything possible within ones imagination, but not beyond it.
A tired, old argument long refuted with very simple arguments.
It makes about as much sense as selling one's soul to sky faries and believing one's free will is under the control of demons. It's actually almost laughable, if that level of insanity wasn't scary.
A Troubled Mind:
I have read your simplistic arguments and I am both unimpressed and bored. I heard the same old drivel back in junior high school. Do you have anything else to offer?
Your master, Earnest, was my whipping post and could not defend himself either. As I have said before: "Ignorance makes the impossible...possible" and your lack of understanding allows for many possibilities to exist that shouldn't.
They say that ignorance is bliss, is that the reason behind your laughing emoticon? In my mind, I do not find this a laughing matter and I certainly don't see where you have much to be happy about.
Earnest could have taken two Ex-Lax and cr*pped a better argument than you've ever spewed in your attempts at rationalizing the existence of your invisible, imaginary, boogeyman.
And many of us are extremely happy not to have your mindset!
Earnest coulda, woulda, shoulda, but didn't. Yeah, and I once saw Earnest fry a pack of dingos by shooting lightning bolts out of his eyes.
I realize he was a hero in certain circles, but he has now gone off to his eternal reward, and left a legacy of religious intolerance and vitriol in his wake. He was a smug, hateful little man, who only cared about those who agreed with him.
As I said before, some of you think you have something intelligent to say and you revel in your rhetoric, but it only serves to drive the nails deeper into your own coffins.
I have read the arguments, I have seen enough mud-slinging, but I still have not seen any proof that God doesn't exist.
Are you the one, Randy Godwin, who can lead the slaves out of captivity and to the promised land of a purposeless and meaningless existence, where we can worship the god of chance or the god within?
Please, I beg you, shake my faith in the Almighty through your vast intellect, wisdom and army of laughing emoticons. I fear, however, that all you will deliver is yet another sophomoric response, with little or no substance. Earnest couldn't deliver..........can you?
No one is enslaved but you and your fellow fundies. End of story.
Jesus Christ disagrees.
John 8:34
You are enslaved to sin, and have no way free but through Christ.
Yet, you want come to Him that He might heal you and open your eyes.
John 5:40
And yet if you didn't think you knew everything God would open your eyes but you're too busy telling everybody you can see.
John 9:41
Therefore you will remain a slave to your sins out of stubborness.
Such a perfect example as well: Dictator Godwin believes he says when the story ends.
I, and all servants of the Lord Christ Jesus, are free.
(Jesus Christ disagrees.)
vector7,
Let's be accurate - unknown author claims to know what was said 60+ years before he wrote it down, and he didn't personally hear it: John 8:34
Me, I prefer to know my authors: Joseph Heller, Catch 22
"There was no telling what people might find out once they felt free to ask whatever questions they wanted to. "
You mean guilty before proven innocent?
Thought the way the court seen it was the right way?
Innocent until proven guilty.
Yeah, that's the problem.
You distrust first, because your kind is distrustful.
Your too used to everyone lying so everything must be a lie.
Politicians, Presidents, Drama Shows.
Who DOESN'T lie right?
God.
You pick it apart before you ever understand it, because you treat everything as lie lie lie.
So how then can you ever distinguish what is true? You haven't got anything to analyze but the amazing facts of the story that you 'just can't believe' and you think YOUR verdict is right?
Play chess against a super computer. You will lose.
Why? Because it will take into account every move. Full account.
And will conclude correctly on it's choice on that basis alone against you, and will provide you with the conclusion your choices were incorrect.
Why? Because your account was Partial and not a Full Account. Therefore your analysis incomplete. As well, your Conclusion.
Incomplete Conclusions are Conclusions lacking Details. Details which alter the Relative Information you do have.
But you can't see the Relative Connections because you don't even have all of the Details...
You didn't obtain a full account, you lost the chess game, and you are blind to the fact that you are blind.
Why ask any questions? If it doesn't fit 'seeable' or 'touchable' it's already a lie.
And therefore you will dismiss it and continue to build your 'empty' account of 'nothing' that you built out of 'some' of the details....
Whatever Winston.
You must be joking me...
No. I think I know exactly why you deny it.
(Your too used to everyone lying so everything must be a lie)
vector7,
You know, when you are fearful of admitting the truthfulness of facts, it makes you look like you are afraid of them, like you have something to hide.
It is fact that the authors of the four gospels are unknown, that there were no stenographers following Jesus around taking down his exact words, and all that remains of the gospels to indicate what he might have said are copies of copies of copies of copies, all of which are nothing more than the records of the oral legends from which they are based. If there really were apostles, they were illiterate fisherman who spoke aramaic, while the gospels were written in Greek, and they were written 35-95 years after Jesus lived.
One cannot whisper a secret in a circle of 20 and have the original words come back to the start inviolate - and yet you suggest that these are the words spoken in a different language decades before, passed along by mouth perfectly, perfectly translated to another language, and then written down without error, and these perfect words lasted from Constantine until now with no further changes or errors, even with further translations?
Good luck selling that story.
That you need to hold out faith that these stories somehow are the inerrant word of your god is your personal problem, but your psychological need for an authority to rule your life does not mean others are telling lies when they point out the factual inconsistencies of your belief.
Get over it.
Wow! For once, Vector7 was almost speechless!
LOL
No. I have plenty..
But the horse is dead and my arm is tired of beating.
(Please.... )
Vector7,
That's the best argument you have made yet.
Don't worry about him
He will NEVER "get it right".
I don't bother with this one any more!
You and Agua KILLED me laughing with your posts......
Thx.. Was awesome. lol
dj
I held your feet to the fire, and brought you into the depths of your delusion. You became fearful and eventually angry.
Your attitude is indicative of the unnecessary trauma that the mind will put itself through to support a delusion...a delusion that is OBVIOUSLY not validated by common sense.
You went completely to pieces, with no rational explanations for any of your assertions about your God. Your only "defense" was attacking me, personally, with irrelevant childish nonsense.
You are adept at the ego defense mechanism called "Projection"
Though the primitive beliefs you espouse show mind-numbing stupidity, you somehow project this stupidity away from your beliefs, and onto the person espousing reason and common sense.
All I asked of you was to introduce me to your God. And you told me to get on my knees, clasp my hands together, and talk to the ceiling. What could be more childish and foolish than that?
And to this date you still have not introduced me to your God...and you know you couldn't even do it if your very life depended on it. This proves the inherent dishonesty of your psychotic beliefs.
Luke 18;17I tell you the truth, anyone who will not receive the kingdom of God like a little child will never enter it.”
(Luke 18;17)
aka-dj,
Why is it that the gospel of Luke and the gospel of Matthew disagree on the circumstances surrounding the birth of Jesus? One of them must be wrong. So, you are telling me I should believe Luke, therefore implying that anything found in Matthew must be invalid?
At least that makes some kind of sense. Just don't qo quoting Matthew at me in the future as a justification, O.K.?
The same can be said for both sides of these types of debates.
Exactly, my point, Double Scorpion. The lines have already been drawn in the sand and I would wager that not one in a thousand (in this forum) is open to change.
I, therefore, will find something better to do with my time seeing that no one has the mental capacity to convert me to an atheistic viewpoint, and the likelihood of me converting them to a better way of life is remote.
A wise man knows when to hold 'em and knows when to fold 'em. So, I will fold, knowing that spiritual conversions are a personal matter and not something that will ever happen on a public forum.
Peace and goodwill to all - C.J. Sledgehammer
I hope you choose NOT to leave!
I was just getting into your style and wit.
Not to mention the power of what you say.
I for one thoroughly enjoyed it.
Having said that, I thoroughly understand what you mean. I've had my own thoughts along those lines.
My early, initial intention was to help people come to the knowledge of Him, but pretty soon found out there is a totally different tone here.
Me too CJ, just ignore the trolls and only comment where there are signs of intelligence, except when you want to wind up a troll!
I hardly think it is fair to take one quotation from an atheist and say it is indicative of all atheists- I could give you some ridiculous quotations from religious people too but then I wouldn't fall prey to such flawed logic and sweeping generalizations.
Yet they get angry when those same generalizations are aimed at them. They also call it false logic and craziness. But who's crazier, us or them?
You are right, Meg Moon, when you stated, "I hardly think it is fair to take one quotation from an atheist and say it is indicative of all atheists."
The fact is, and I wish my brothers and sisters in Christ knew this, but there are at least a dozen "types" of atheists, who differ as much in their views as Christian denominations do.
Until you surrender your rebellion and meet with Him.
Correction, Until yo surrender reason and logic and trust some ancient charlatans.
You just said in an above post "What made you assume a beginning for matter?"
::ahem:: - Correction: lol
No one agrees with you, and they all think it's 'illogical' that matter has no beginning.
Big Bang - Creation = Either way you go you're screwed. lol
There IS a beginning. And you didn't use 'reason' or 'logic' to conclude otherwise.
Humanity is against you friend. Give up.
I know you are deluded and cannot think anything by yourself. Know this, nobody has ever demonstrated "nothing" suddenly getting width, length and height to become "something" or the converse. "Beginning" is a concept, which based on another concept "time" whose basis is our memory and motion of objects.
lol
Let me help..
Time: is a tool - A 'measuring' tool.
'Measurements' have: a Beginning and an End.
There. Confusing made simple.
Very good, you are picking up fast. Now find out what does it measure.
oh dear- lol
Events.......
Don't worry, it gets even deeper than that. Want the sub-categories??
You going to act like you were aware of that now?
You give ME the sub-categories! LOL [they aren't on wiki either]
I like how you act like you're teaching me something..
You're alright Jomine. A little nutty, but I can deal.
You crack me up....
You are not ok vector, you act like a psychotic. Time is a measurement. It is what we define it to be. It never start or end, for it measure not a thing, but change of locations.
However "back you go in time" you'll never see the things existing today vanish into nothing, but only changing its location to each other.
No 2 positions are exactly the same, they are relative to eachother. Just as time is an effect on one or both positions, you can see the effect only truly by percieving a change. It's a change relative to the observer.
Exactly, its change and time is measurement of change, and how do we know change? By remembering the previous location.
The mind is fixed, not the natural world it percieves. If we stood still for hours on end, we would still percieve a change in position. It's the mind which makes things appear to be fixed and unchanging. But as we know, change is the only constant...
Ok dj... I understand...
I GIVE..
Have fun teaching everyone time travel.
It's called Relativity buddy..... I'm sry, i should have quit sooner... oh dear.. dying...... LOL
God's blessings Jomine. You've made my morning.
Have a good one.
You really lack comprehension vector. Neither you understand straight language nor analogues. I've nothing to do with relativity nonsense. There is no time, only change of location, no beginning or end. Without beginning there is no creation.
Of course, you are deluded and see gods in air, what sense can you have?
(You really lack comprehension vector)
jomine,
Actually, what vector is is an authoritarian/individualist. I recently came across an interesting survey done by PEW research on just this thing, and the found the startling conclusion that is personality type only hardens with increased education - there is no reasoning available that will dissuade them of their narrative belief system.
Others, egalitarian/collectivists, on the other hand are keen to use critical thinking and reasoning and their beliefs are data driven.
Waste of time to explain anything to an authoritarian who believes in he knows the truth as revealed by a higher intelligence.
I'm the new subject again.
Jomine denies Einstein's work as stupidity and I'M the waste of time?
Jomine denies the existence of Time? Wanna jump in with him?
It exists.. It's a SYSTEM.. A measurement system which he admitted we use and now says 'no such'?
And he has no IDEA what he thinks. Two posts ago there was 'no beginning' and now he's trying to tell ME there 'HAS' to be a beginning?
Read the previous posts and then tell me your writing about the one lacking clear thoughts... lol
I'm done here.. Anyone reading this should DIE laughing.
Why should I make anything up about atheists?
They have the above posts that say it all...
Peace people... Enjoy your slandering attempts lol
And read carefully, you imbecile, beginning is your claim.
Oh, Dear! After 1300+ posts to this Hub, is this as good as it gets?
"Is this the level of intelligence of Atheists?" I declare the Atheist IQ superior to the Theists. On what grounds? Logic!
Admittedly we do have a little bit of faith missing from somewhere below the Medula Oblongata, but no doubt we can manage without it.
....and a couple of posts earlier:
Obviously he is correct, after all an idiot would be personal insult, whereas imbecile could not be considered insulting.... or could it?
OH!, forgot that you also consider any believer to be 'brain dead' well you are the eminent surgeon, so I would imagine you know brain dead when you see it, and hopefully you don't see it too often in your patients.
Thanks for being the focus of our entertainment, Vector. You make for a good laugh, likewise Claire Evans. It would be funny if it was not so seriously deficient in good sound logic.
The 'enemy' that they refuse to believe exists, but who 'jerks their chains'
The gullible people who misread ancient text to make up imaginary enemies are probably the ones jerking the chain. No one really cares if you've got an imaginary adversary. It does get a little irritating when some hysterically dash about the forums foolishly insisting they are real.
Emily, why do we bother replying to each other?
We seldom agree and never change our opinions, so what's the point?
Ah, the point. I would think the point is that we disagree. I give you credit for being an intelligent person, so I'm surprised when you make what I perceive to be unintelligent statements. Therefore, I post a reply. Should I think less of you?
Emile, you can conclude what you may about my intelligence, what I write defines what I believe and if we disagree on points, perhaps you should ask whether my 'intelligence' is just defective on those issues, or more informed?
My positions have been reached over many years of thought, discussion and study, and derive from the dissection of my old life with serious (and private) prayer added, seeking divine guidance and understanding.
I seldom 'shoot from the hip' and rarely enter a discussion that I have not previously engaged in elsewhere.
Considering claims you have made, I doubt any would classify some of your stands as informed.
But, when I run across a post where someone is giving another person a virtual 'high five' for opinions that demean other belief structures, or they choose to do it first, I'll usually comment. I believe, by Hub Pages policy, I have that right.
Please feel free to develop your own website with a forum section devoted only to those who enjoy ignoring reality and marginalizing others. At that time, you would be well within your rights to censure my comments and prohibit my participation.
Yes, it's all about magical super beings pulling our strings like we're marionettes.
No TM, not magical, just spiritual, but apart from that you were on target, just blinded by your preconceptions.
The spiritual and the magical are one and the same, neither have ever been shown to exist. Blinded, indeed.
Neither has human intelligence (or lack of) ever been shown to exist.
This forum thread has proven that it does. (Or has it?)
<<-----Me just laughing!
It's very sad believers must resort to false statements in order to defend their beliefs. Either that or they simply have no intelligence and couldn't recognize it if it hit them in the face.
Show me proof that intelligence exists.
Otherwise, zip it!
dj, "intelligence" is a function, or a quality, e.g., "He researched the idea with intelligence..." A quality does not exist of itself....it needs to be attached to, ascribing to, something.
You would not "define it" as an object, therefore you cannot describe it as "existing."
"Intelligence" requires an observer to perceive something as being intelligent. Without the observer there will be no perception.
A useful analogy is the mirror - without someone (the observer) looking into the mirror, there is no image to be seen (observed). Even the image does not "exist." Therefore it cannot be considered "real."
I am sure your intelligence will allow you to see this....
Certainly, I can't use any of your posts as an example of intelligence existing.
What's truly and remarkably stunning is the fact you're asking for proof that intelligence exists. It's like you're actually waging war on reality.
It has been shown through scientific research that those who are proficient in one mental ability tend to be proficient in others, while those who do poorly in one area tend to do poorly in others. Factor analysis shows a single general intelligence quotient for everything and are measured with IQ tests, which reflects an individuals ability to deal with cognitive complexities.
There are over 28,000 papers on John B Carroll alone and his work on human cognitive abilities and over 2400 articles on elementary cognitive tasks on Arthur Jensen's work correlating with the "G Factor", the model used to measure commonality between cognitive ability test factors.
Recognition of visual patterns using Raven's Progressive Matrices with individual results correlate to IQ tests.
Scientific studies have also shown intelligence is genetic with almost half of all preschoolers and growing significantly to 4 out of 5 individuals later in life.
All of these studies are able to predict educational achievement and performance in jobs, lower IQ individuals are much harder to train and don't learn as well. They usually earn less and commit more crimes. Those with IQ's less than 75 are very hard to teach and train while those with IQ's around 125 learn quickly and can usually train themselves.
No one with an IQ of 75 will ever be a theoretical physicist just as a man with no limbs will ever win a marathon.
How quaint. Yes, I understand there are those who are in complete denial of these facts, but that just shows where those who do and where they reside in the Bell Curve of intelligence.
That's wonderful!
Thank you.
This was the first post I respect from you.
But, I now fall back to atheist definition of EXIST.
If it's not three dimensional, it doesn't exist!
It's only a concept!
Based on that, your reply is mere rhetoric!
Send me a picture! Thanks.
Wow! a thinking theist!! I thought such types existed only in films!!
Now since you figured out that much, let me ask you one question, is time an object or concept?
Curiosity...
1. I would like to know whether you accepted that version just to win the argument with ATM.
2. If you really think like that, I'm more curious to know how a rational person can become a theist.
1. Not a bad attempt to win one every now and then. All I did was turn their own argument against them.
2. Contrary to all the stupid ideas on these threads, you don't have to check your brain at the Church door, when you enter.
Unfortunately for you, you cannot differentiate between object and concept then. And that argument will not go with ATM, as he is just as religious as you are, regarding relativity.
That is fortunate(for the believers), for if having a brain (Human brain, that is, that extra part which we use to do analytical and critical thinking) is a must to enter church, those who go there won't be able to enter it and those who can enter it, won't go there.
Thanks for taking a light comment seriously.
More power to ya! Glad to see you have a one track mind yourself.
I was barely trying, and you took "hook, line and sinker"!
Glad to see you admit you don't know the rules of the "game".
Plain and simple!
Is this how you understand the rules of the game?
More empty judgmental gibberish?
It seems we have a pointless verbal ping-pong game going.
I suggest you find a more challenging adversary, on another thread.
You contribute next to nothing here!
I suggest you do the same!
If you want an intelligent discussion State something other than your opinions.
Amen AKA, but God still loves him and it looks like he is drawn like a fly to flypaper, so watch and see what God does with this character, the fish wriggles as they are pulled from the water.
I suggest it can be both or either, depending on the point of view of the observer.
Sorry, but I don't have access to a MRI. Not only that, but we would need to watch a video of how the brain works from one moment to the next as opposed to a static picture. But, that can be accomplished with a MRI.
Anything else? Or, are you still going to remain in denial?
(It's called Relativity buddy..... )
vector7,
It really is interesting to watch your responses from a dispassionate perspective, as you exemplify perfectly the authoritarian/individualistic belief system, meaning you show a belief in the heirarchial system of knowledge and intellect where all you have to do is believe someone whom you think is your superior and then match any contrary argument against your memorized belief system - that way you don't have to critically analyze the new argument..
All in all quite an impressive demonstration of a personality type.
From this observation, I would also guess that your news source is Fox News, that you support Rick Santorum for president, and you are a global warming denier.
3 out of 3?
(Jomine denies the existence of Time? Wanna jump in with him?)
Sure. It is apparent that you do not grasp that before there can be a discussion of existence, this critical word (exist) must be defined. (And, no, a critical definition is not the same definition as the one used in everyday speech, so no laughy icon button or appeal to common understanding will win the debate.)
There are only two possibilities, as reality is binary, something exists or it does not exist, no maybe involved. Existence is an issue of shape versus no shape - objects versus concepts. All objects have intrinsic shape. What is the shape of time?
If time has no shape, then it is a concept. Concepts rely upon a brain for their definition. Ergo, time is conceptual. It is only a reality within the confines of the brain.
If you don't believe this, perhaps you could mail me a piece of time?
P.S. Einstein was a smart guy, but he was talking about relationships (concepts) - which is why it is called relativity instead of objectivity.
Have you done any ACTUAL work involving time.
I think I'm done teaching, you can begin your research from the terms I provided jomine.
Peace Winston.
I don't argue with 'double meaning' definers..
Oh, the Hypocricy of Christians is astounding! Thanks vector7!
Oh, the Hypocricy of Christians is astounding! Thanks vector7!
Oh, the Hypocricy of Christians is astounding! Thanks vector7!
I'm just a human buddy. That's your excuse?
The standard is Jesus Christ. Not me.
You people crack me up.. I could die laughing at your high school postings....
Reminds me of the kid that said 'well jimmy done it first!'...
No.. That's called an excuse. I'm sure YOUR perfect though right?
And yes, my name is vector7.
Three clone posts.. what a waste of thread space..
No, I get agitated.. Anyone see why? Ohh looky.. Useless finger pointers without a neuron of perspective on the OP.. lol
Peace blackart.
Jesus was a poor standard, a Plagiarized Savior.
As far as the 3 posts at once, I have no idea why that happened, I only posted that once.
So your interpretation of that was the joke.
Just because one atheist doesn't have a solid argument nor does he have the slightest comprehension of his beliefs that doesn't necessarily mean all atheists are unintelligent.
Hi there.
It is people like you that I was hoping to attract to this thread.
Please tell us why we should become atheists.
Or, present arguments that actually give us content, value and meaningful discussion, instead of the likes of the OP.
(Sincere request )
dj, "Please tell us why we should become atheists."..... It is never my intention that you or anyone else should be atheist. It is my choice for myself to be atheist. Your choice is your choice.
Contrast my approach to the subject with the approach of christians who, in most cases want me to become christian.
by Cecilia 14 years ago
Can you be an Creationist Atheist or a Religious Scientist? Is it possible or are you either one or the other?
by Sherlock221b 11 years ago
Since joining HubPages, I have read the many evolution versus creationism and atheism versus religion debates. As an atheistic evolutionist, I have read what I considered to be the strange views of a religious minority, including beliefs in intelligent design and other forms of...
by Will Apse 9 years ago
Quote:Humans suppress areas of the brain used for analytical thinking and engage the parts responsible for empathy in order to believe in god, research suggests.They do the opposite when thinking about the physical world, according to the study." from what we understand about the...
by Asa Schneidermann 10 years ago
How Does Creationism Prohibit Scientific Progress?"Atheists" are always claiming that Creationism or Creationists prohibit scientific progress, yet fail to give any concrete examples or reasons. Your thoughts?
by Horvath György 12 years ago
The theory of evolution is in an immense danger to be discarded by everyone, whether doing science or not. What is the next paradigm to solve the mystery of the origin of man?http://home.wxs.nl/~gkorthof/kortho18.htm
by Claire Evans 12 years ago
Atheists often ask for proof of Jesus being the son of God. If Jesus came to earth and everyone realized He is the son of God, would you still reject Him as your saviour?
Copyright © 2025 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2025 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |