Why Washington is not responding to Russia's questions?

1. 64

   maxoxam41posted 9 years ago

   Some Western states and Kiev rushed to find Russian involvement in the MH17 crash having no evidence to back their claims, Russia’s Deputy Defense Minister told RT. He invited Ukraine to answer 10 questions to prove their commitment to an impartial probe.
   
   Speaking to RT, Russia’s Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov has criticized Western countries for jumping to conclusions just “24 hours after the crash” while there is no evidence.
   
   “They try to show to the whole world that we are responsible for the crash. It is very strange that without any evidence my colleagues from western media would like to find somebody who is responsible for the crash,” Antonov said. “It seems to me that this is part of information warfare which has been started against the Russian Federation and armed forces.”
   
   Instead of using the incident as the pretext for groundlessly blaming one of the sides, the catastrophe over Ukrainian sky should be used as a possibility to restart cooperation to “prevent such tragedies in the future.”
   
   “As for me, I don’t want to use this opportunity to blame anybody. I would just like to raise few questions for my colleagues from the armed forces of Ukraine,” Antonov said. “I hope they try to answer the questions, it will be a good opportunity for us to realize where we are, whether there is a possibility for us to restart cooperation and to find who is really responsible for the tragedy.”
   
   “Answers for these questions could help us find an opportunity to prevent such tragedies in the future,” the Deputy Defense Minister said.
   JPEG - 117.5 kbA picture taken on July 17, 2014 shows the wreckages of the malaysian airliner carrying 295 people from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur after it crashed, near the town of Shaktarsk.
   
   TEN QUESTIONS FOR THE UKRAINIAN AUTHORITIES
   
   1. Immediately after the tragedy, the Ukrainian authorities, naturally, blamed it on the self-defense forces. What are these accusations based on?
   
   2. Can Kiev explain in detail how it uses Buk missile launchers in the conflict zone? And why were these systems deployed there in the first place, seeing as the self-defense forces don’t have any planes?
   
   3. Why are the Ukrainian authorities not doing anything to set up an international commission? When will such a commission begin its work?
   
   4. Would the Ukrainian Armed Forces be willing to let international investigators see the inventory of their air-to-air and surface-to-air missiles, including those used in SAM launchers?
   
   5. Will the international commission have access to tracking data from reliable sources regarding the movements of Ukrainian warplanes on the day of the tragedy?
   
   6. Why did Ukrainian air traffic controllers allow the plane to deviate from the regular route to the north, towards “the anti-terrorist operation zone”?
   
   7. Why was airspace over the warzone not closed for civilian flights, especially since the area was not entirely covered by radar navigation systems?
   
   8. How can official Kiev comment on reports in the social media, allegedly by a Spanish air traffic controller who works in Ukraine, that there were two Ukrainian military planes flying alongside the Boeing 777 over Ukrainian territory?
   
   9. Why did Ukraine’s Security Service start working with the recordings of communications between Ukrainian air traffic controllers and the Boeing crew and with the data storage systems from Ukrainian radars without waiting for international investigators?
   
   10. What lessons has Ukraine learned from a similar incident in 2001, when a Russian Tu-154 crashed into the Black Sea? Back then, the Ukrainian authorities denied any involvement on the part of Ukraine’s Armed Forces until irrefutable evidence proved official Kiev to be guilty.
   
   
   
   
   
     Facebook Twitter Delicious Seenthis Digg RSS
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
    
   
   
   
   Voltaire Network
   
   Voltaire, international edition
   
   
   Focus
   
   
   
   News in Brief
   
   
   
   Controversies
   
   
   
   Diplomatic Wire

   replyreport
   1. 95

      wildernessposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      You're asking why Washington isn't answering the 10 questions addressed to Ukrainian authorities?  I don't understand why you even think they should!

      replyreport
2. 64

   maxoxam41posted 9 years ago

   The innocent will answer. The guilty will shut up. Isn't it what we are doing? Do we want peace or not? Thanks to the Russian aggression prevention act and thanks to our silence our warmongers will strike Russia. How do you think Russia will answer if push to the extreme, do you really think that the coming weekends you will go deer hunting?

   replyreport