Change Width Of Our Hubs

Jump to Last Post 1-7 of 7 discussions (22 posts)
  1. LisaMarie724 profile image76
    LisaMarie724posted 5 years ago

    I may be the only person that feels this way but I really don't like the look of our hubs.  I think they would look more professional if they were wider.  They remind me of blog posts.

    1. Kangaroo_Jase profile image79
      Kangaroo_Jaseposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Not everyone has a wide screen used for laptops, tablets, desktop PCs and importantly, mobile devices.

    2. Greensleeves Hubs profile image94
      Greensleeves Hubsposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      I very much agree LisaMarie - it would be more attractive particularly to visitors from off HubPages if the text of the hub could cover a little more of the screen without the blank margin down either side. More like a page of information and less like a blog (although the current format of the pages is certainly much better than it was before last year's revamp).

      As far as Kangaroo_Jase's reply is concerned, I have an old 4x3 (non widescreen) PC monitor as this is the screen format I prefer, and even on this, I feel that Hubs could be wider. However, I'm sure the point about mobile devices is very valid - I guess much of the text would disappear off the sides of the screen of such devices if the hub was any wider!

      There is always the option of hitting the zoom button to expand the page to the edges of the screen, though this of course also makes the text much bigger, and perhaps too big to make it attractive to read.

      1. LisaMarie724 profile image76
        LisaMarie724posted 5 years agoin reply to this

        I really think that it looks more like a blog as well.  My concern is that our hubs may not look as professional as some other sites, so they will look towards those sites for their information.

    3. cascoly profile image59
      cascolyposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      a major propblem is that google judges quality by the % of qualioty -- ie, non-ad info in the first screen page, so HP is eliminating about 40% of our content by what their designers may consider a prettier presentation - yet another example of vomiting out changes without any consideration of real world effects

  2. paradigmsearch profile image89
    paradigmsearchposted 5 years ago

    My sincere concern is that the font is too small. Consciously or unconsciously, visitors will spend less time on a page that causes eye strain. Not kidding here. smile

    1. Barbara Kay profile image91
      Barbara Kayposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      I agree. Some people don't have 20/20 vision.

    2. The Examiner-1 profile image71
      The Examiner-1posted 4 years agoin reply to this

      para,
      Go to font when in edit and change the font size.

  3. mistyhorizon2003 profile image91
    mistyhorizon2003posted 5 years ago

    I guess if the hubs were wider on screen, they would be shorter in vertical length, therefore we might lose some of our adverts on the right (which is important if you plan on earning from your writing).

    1. cascoly profile image59
      cascolyposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      right now, ads take up about half the available space, so with  margins google 'sees' only about 25% of the first page as worthwhile info; meaning placement in searches is going to be reduced

      you can't get traffic & clicks if no one can find your page

      1. mistyhorizon2003 profile image91
        mistyhorizon2003posted 5 years agoin reply to this

        You may well be making a valid point here, to be honest I am not sure as I have not really looked that far into what percentage of the page Google are judging the quality of content on. That said I do pretty well on traffic and earnings, so am guessing that many of my hubs must feature fairly highly in the SERPS. I always try to make sure the first few sentences of my hubs contain keywords  and phrases relevant to the article, which if your assumption on rating by Google is correct might well help to ensure a good position in the SERPS even with the current narrow layout.

  4. wilderness profile image99
    wildernessposted 5 years ago

    No thank you, unless you can make new hubs one size and older ones a different width.

    Most people go to considerable effort to make an attractive package, integrating the different kinds of capsules and floating many of them to the right of pertinent text.  Making that text wider will make it shorter as well, and nothing will fit any longer.

    1. Howard S. profile image91
      Howard S.posted 5 years agoin reply to this

      They already made changes about a week ago that affect column alignment. Text capsules and photo capsules placed in left and right columns previously did not align horizontally. They fixed that. It looks better now, but, as you pointed out, you may need to go back and check the alignment of some hubs. If you typically use many short capsules, you've got less worry than if you tend to use fewer long capsules.

      It is also more obvious now that the title of ad capsules (if you title them) does not align with the title of right-floated text or photo capsules. Furthermore, since it's off by only a few pixels, it is more obviously a design error than a feature spec.

      1. wilderness profile image99
        wildernessposted 5 years agoin reply to this

        I saw that thread, yes.  Changing the height a few pixels (which should help everyone) is a far cry from reducing the length by a third or some other huge amount though.  I've often had trouble fitting all the photos, Amazon, extra text, etc. capsules next to a long text capsule; reduce the length of that long capsule and I'm going to have a huge white space at the bottom of it.  Ugly in the extreme.

    2. Marisa Wright profile image96
      Marisa Wrightposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      I know this is an old thread, but it's an interesting point.  As Wilderness says, most of us have gone to some trouble to use different kinds of capsules with right-floated highlights, photos, etc etc.  That was a good reason for not changing the width of Hubs.

      Now that's all in the toilet, because most of our readers are viewing our Hubs on mobiles and tablets which mucks up our layout anyway.   So I think it's high time HubPages looked at a more responsive layout which can take advantage of the wide screen when it's available.

      1. relache profile image85
        relacheposted 4 years agoin reply to this

        If Hubpages never ever responded to all the pleas to make the layout more responsive before the site was predominated by mobile viewers, I feel they sure as heck aren't gonna do it now.  It's clear they are redesigning the entire site for what could be best-described as "phone view" to the exclusion of everything else.

        Given the past precedent for Hubpages "all-in" history, and the recent rededication to not listening to user/members that the HubPro rollout demonstrated, the most likely scenario would be that the entire site is fully converted to some design that plays best to phone-equipped visitors, and then after a year something major changes in the greater scheme of the web and that makes the single, locked-in decision now seem bad, so the entire site has to change again.  Like converting the entire site to subdomains only to then turn around and start moving content back to the main domain that's happening now.

        1. TIMETRAVELER2 profile image98
          TIMETRAVELER2posted 4 years agoin reply to this

          Relache:

          I was unaware that the team is moving hubs back to their subdomain.  When did that happen and does it affect everybody?

          I must have missed something.

          1. psycheskinner profile image83
            psycheskinnerposted 4 years agoin reply to this

            I assume this refers to "Editors Choice".

  5. psycheskinner profile image83
    psycheskinnerposted 5 years ago

    I agree that they look old-fashioned in being so narrow.  Like an old fixed-width blog.

  6. jacharless profile image80
    jacharlessposted 5 years ago

    TMK, Hubs were redesigned to "fit" for most mobile platforms/devices with a max-width of 728 inner pixel container -which houses all hub elements. viewing hub on Anroid or iPhone is actually quite nice. For desktop/wide tablets, it does look "smaller" but centered. Howeaver, seven ads on Hubs carrying less than 3000 words does look a bit heavy -four above the fold alone- not including amazon/ebay capsules...

    James.

  7. lobobrandon profile image89
    lobobrandonposted 4 years ago

    As PD says the text could be a bit larger say 120% of what it currently is.

    Regarding the width, it sure is narrow on a laptop. But, if it's spread out too much I would find it a bore to read as I'd feel it's never ending - maybe there are many others like me out there? Younger readers that is.

    10% on each side would be ideal in my opinion. But if they do happen to make any changes, I'm sure the team would go through a series of tests to find the optimum solution.

    1. Solaras profile image96
      Solarasposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Making the font larger while increasing the width at the same time could allow you to maintain the same proportions with regards to image/capsule placements.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)