Need a better vetting system

Jump to Last Post 1-11 of 11 discussions (17 posts)
  1. Terri Paajanen profile image73
    Terri Paajanenposted 11 years ago

    I don't know if "vetting" is even the right word here, but I think we need some sort of approval process for new hubbers. Though I've only been here a few months, it feels like there has been a real increase in empty, self-promoting, spam hubs. People join, and post a big ad about themselves or their services... that sort of thing. Or people who don't understand the point and post 3 sentences about what they did today.

    There are a lot of great informative hubs in here, but a casual visitor is going to be turned off when they see some of the nonsense being published. This goes for hubs as well as requests.

    The flagging idea works, provided enough people are using it (I flag bad hubs as I see them, anyone else?). Perhaps new hubbers should have their first 3 or 4 hubs approved by an editor before posting. That might help eliminate people who don't actually have anything to say.

    Just a thought.

    1. darkside profile image80
      darksideposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      I so hate that.

      There's place for that sort of thing. Like their own blog, forums or they can just annoy their closest friends by emailing them.

      1. gamergirl profile image60
        gamergirlposted 11 years agoin reply to this

        I agree with you, darkside.  HubPages strikes me more as a place to share what you know or can do and teach with the world, not as a place to leave a journal.

        I believe there should be a requirement before you are able to post a request, specifically regarding a possible approval process over requests.  I pull a number of ideas from the requests option, but often I see requests which are poorly thought out or poorly worded, and have to pass over them to find viable requests.

  2. Lissie profile image73
    Lissieposted 11 years ago

    I agree, I have the same feeling too of an increase in spam .  I denied one comment that I thought was spam and then got a thumbs down on the hub - gee  I wonder who that was from!
    How do you report a suspect?

  3. Marisa Wright profile image96
    Marisa Wrightposted 11 years ago

    I think you may have a point.  I'm sure HP don't want to turn into the thought police, but there are several writing sites which do already insist you go through a vetting process before you get started.

    It's absolutely vital that HP keeps up the quality, if it's going to preserve its reputation.  I haven't come across too many awful Hubs, but some of the Requests are truly ridiculous and simply invite people to post something sub-standard. 

    Personally, I'm not quite sure what flagging is all about.  I've had one "thumbs down" for one hub and I don't know why.  Is flagging different from thumbs?  Does anything happen if you flag?

    1. Terri Paajanen profile image73
      Terri Paajanenposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      Flagging is a specific way to let the admin folks know there is a bad hub out there. When you click the "flag this hub" link (next to the thumbs up/down buttons, I think) you are given a choice of what the problem is with the hub so that it can be reviewed.

  4. Patty Inglish, MS profile image92
    Patty Inglish, MSposted 11 years ago

    If you Flag, then administration lopks closely at the Hub to see what is worng with it. It may be removed, or not.

  5. Marisa Wright profile image96
    Marisa Wrightposted 11 years ago

    Another measure that would help is to have a minimum word count for Hubs.  That would prevent people posting short answers.

  6. Paul Edmondson profile imageSTAFF
    Paul Edmondsonposted 11 years ago

    It's enormously helpful if people flag hubs.  They will get reviewed by one of us.

    1. Terri Paajanen profile image73
      Terri Paajanenposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      Are hubs reviewed with even just a single flag?  Or do they need to be flagged a certain number of times to trigger a review?

      I flag lots !  Hopefully, I'm helping and not annoying.....  :-D

  7. Lissie profile image73
    Lissieposted 11 years ago

    In this case the spammer doesnt have any hubs - all hes done is become fans of lots of people and posted comments.

  8. Paraglider profile image86
    Paragliderposted 11 years ago

    I agree that there does seem to be more junk requests and junk answers than previously, but maybe that's just because there's more of everything - the price of expansion.

    I worry a bit about the thumbs down option. A hub that is controversial or challenging will sometimes attract an anonymous thumbs down from someone who doesn't even comment. I don't see how that benefits anyone.

    1. Patty Inglish, MS profile image92
      Patty Inglish, MSposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      I agree. Commenting or flagging would be better than the thumbs down, imo.

  9. Marisa Wright profile image96
    Marisa Wrightposted 11 years ago

    Thanks for the clarification about thumbs down vs flagging.  I thought they had to be different.  I got a thumbs down for one of my hubs, and I didn't get any messages from HP or have any action taken. 

    Actually I feel it was a good thing, because it made me have a look at the hub and realise I hadn't done a thorough job.  I've revised it now - just wish there was a way to get whoever "thumbed" it to look at it again and (hopefully) change their mind!

    Maybe the "flagging" option needs to be a bit more obvious, then more people would use it?

    1. Terri Paajanen profile image73
      Terri Paajanenposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      Not sure if that's a good idea or not. It might be better than only a few "serious" hubbers really know what it's for, or it could be misused and become useless.

      I run a large social network, and there is a little icon to flag something as inappropriate (for photos, blogs, messages). Well, people are constantly using it, likely thinking that it's like a bookmark or something. I get flag reports every day with dozens of perfectly fine entries. People even flag their own posts. I can see that kind of problem happening here too.

      Just a thought.

  10. retireyoung profile image59
    retireyoungposted 11 years ago

    Aside from straight out spam and duplicate content how can you judge quality?  Everyone is going to have a different opinion on what makes a good hub.  Word count wouldn't work either because a good hub could just have videos and/or pictures. 

    I think HP already has a pretty good algorithm with quality hubs having a higher score and rising above average hubs.

  11. profile image0
    daflaposted 11 years ago

    The problem with flagging as opposed to vetting is that the content is already there, and being read, before it is removed.  In the case of sexually explicit material, that isn't good.  Children can be reading this. 

    I suggest either a filtering system or vetting of some kind before a hub can even hit the site.  I know that would involve a lot of work, but there has to be something that can be done.  I had to flag several sexually explicit hubs today, but they are still there for all to see.  The flagging process just takes too long to be effective.  And these spammers are smart.  They post at the heaviest traffic times to get the most exposure.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)