Some of my transferred lenses look like crap as a hub, mainly because they have poetry in them, which won't display as neat as I want them to. It will take some time to repair those hubs and I think it would be best to unpublish those hubs and publish them again when fixed.
I think it wouldn't do me any good as a hubber (and I even feel a little ashamed) if visitors should see this mess and each one of those hubs are not fixed in a few hours.
What's your opinion on this?
I have several Hubs that are quite long and take more than one session to edit. What I've done is left them published, but I put a note in at the point where I have stopped editing to letting them know. here's what I've written:
"Please excuse the confusing material that follows. I am in the middle of editing this Hub page that was just transferred from Squidoo. It is a long one and can't be done all at once."
I'd suggest modifying that message. The bulk of your readers won't be from either HubPages or Squidoo and will wonder what on earth you are talking about! Why not something more neutral such as "This article is under construction, please excuse any confusion".
There is one more thing to think about if you decide to unpublish some of your stuff. Some of your ex-lenses may not have been successful in search engines' rankings, but they could be still important for rankings for some of your other lenses, if you interlinked them. Before you unpublish anything, be sure none of your other published articles (on HubPages or wherever) links to this soonto-be unpublished hub and this hub don't link to anything what may be important for you (other hub, post on your blog, ...)
When in doubt - slowly and steadily is probably the best way to go.
Hi Titia I also came over from squidoo and my ex-lenses look awful! I'm in publishing them so I can work through them one by one for the same reasons you said it's definitely worth doing - though a few I have just had to bin (I think I got lazy on squidoo!) I hope this helps
My recommendation is to edit featured Hubs while leaving them published. If you do unpublish while editing, I'd only leave it unpublished for a very short time frame. The longer it's unpublished, the more risk there is to losing the current rankings. Hope that helps.
Thanks for your fast answer Paul. I'll leave them published then, though it will take days before they're finished.
Thank you Paul. When you say a "very short time", how short? A few hours, a day, a week tops?
This is important information for all of us, Paul. Thanks for this input. I'm off to publish some that have been retired awaiting edits.
If you unpublish them for more than a short time, they will lose all their ranking on Google and when you republish, they'll have to start from the bottom again.
That's really the only concern. So if you've got some lenses that didn't get much traffic anyway, you're not going to cause any harm by unpublishing them if you feel happier doing it that way.
Thanks for your thoughts about my question. I've decided to leave them published and will edit those hubs first. I'm very particular on how my poems are displayed, so I will put most of them in jpg. There's enough text in the hubs to compensate the loss of wordcount.
They will make nice pins on Pinterest! I've pinned some of mine that I put inside an image and they are shared frequently on Pinterest, which is good for traffic.
You don't need to be on Pinterest for your images to get pinned on it. Readers who like your work and have Pinterest accounts may share your hubs that way. I didn't even have a Pinterest account (which I have ignored for a long time anyway) until my money rose lens had been pinned by other people on Pinterest close to 100,000 times.
Other people will appreciate the nice formatting on your poems, too, and by making them images people can pin them on Pinterest. Don't worry about your image being on a bunch of peoples' pin boards taking away from the originals' views because the more who do it, the more traffic they'll send your way.
by Lisa Vollrath 4 years ago
Fellow Squid refugees, as many of us come to the end of our first full month on HubPages, I'm wondering how those edits are coming. What's been your process for slogging through the old lenses, to turn them into shiny new hubs?
by Jason Reuter 7 years ago
What's best: Long Hubs or sectioned hubs?Do you think it's best to divide a long hub into 3 or 4 parts that can be published at intervals, or is it better to just cram it all into one BIG hub?
by Susie Lehto 4 years ago
I am being challenged. I have been having a problem getting a new hub to be featured. It has gone through QAP three times already. It is a new day, and I am feeling up to the challenge once again. Rested and refreshed after a good nights sleep, with a hopeful heart. So! Now, the hub will be going...
by Katherine Tyrrell 3 years ago
Squidoo seems to have died twiceThis is an absolutely fascinating hub http://hubpages.com/community/Google-vs-the-Hub-Pages if you have a penchant for analysing numbers. It records the number of hubs and followers on a daily basis since September 9th 2012.In September 2014, the import of Squidoo...
by Tony 4 years ago
There has been a lot of discussion in the last few days about HP changing the rules and people being un-featured or even un-published for spam and over promotional activity. So I just want to add my thoughts......Whether people (writers) like it or not most of their traffic will be coming from...
by EmpressFelicity 9 years ago
I've just joined Squidoo and published my first "lens". My initial impressions of Squidoo are that it's less easy to use than HubPages (from the point of view of actually publishing something rather than just browsing as a reader), and is also slower. I do however like the...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|