UnFeatured Hubs should be able to be excluded from search results

Jump to Last Post 1-5 of 5 discussions (18 posts)
  1. relache profile image86
    relacheposted 3 years ago

    Those of us who are still here and who are trying to help clean up the place are finding it EXTREMELY frustrating and confusing and depressing to be wading through a ton of crap that has already been UnFeatured but which we are unable to see or know when we see this stuff in the searches.

    It's pretty clear our efforts would be radically more efficient if we didn't have UnFeatured Hubs in the internal search. 

    My solution is to suggest you add an option to the internal search so that casual searchers can choose to have UnFeatured Hubs included or removed from their search results.

    1. Millionaire Tips profile image91
      Millionaire Tipsposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      I like the choice of having the option.  Further, the default should be NOT seeing the unfeatured hubs.  New Hubber comes on the site, when they are browsing and looking around, should only be able to see the high quality that is expected, because otherwise, they may think that the lower quality is acceptable.

    2. colorfulone profile image86
      colorfuloneposted 3 years agoin reply to this


    3. Marcy Goodfleisch profile image95
      Marcy Goodfleischposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      I agree that we don't need unfeatured hubs of poor quality to be in the searches. I don't feel they need to be here at all - they should be unpublished, and, as Sue Adams points out, perhaps given a two-week period for cleanup and then nuked.

      As for a feature to allow casual visitors to 'skip' unfeatured hubs - how would they know that's the case?  I see many problems with that idea:

      If there's a button saying "Skip Unfeatured Hubs" many viewers will not know what that means, and some might figure, hey - there's the juicy stuff! 

      Pointing out that there are 'Unfeatured' hubs would be like advertising that there's poor quality writing on the site.

      Hubs that are unfeatured due to low engagement should not be punished - I don't know exactly what those might have in them, but if they're otherwise of good quality, keep them available in some manner.

      Low quality hubs should be GONE.  Period!

      Why does the site expect us to keep our work in a place that isn't purged of junk, copied content, spam and other issues that hurt all of us. 

      This affects our reputations as writers - we need a balanced policy that respects and protects our work and also allows for revenue for the site (and its writers).  But not a policy that focuses on revenue at the expense of those who write high-quality pieces here.

  2. Marisa Wright profile image96
    Marisa Wrightposted 3 years ago


    1. CelebrateUSA profile image78
      CelebrateUSAposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Concur completely!

  3. SANJAY LAKHANPAL profile image81
    SANJAY LAKHANPALposted 3 years ago

    I agree and support this idea.

  4. LeanMan profile image86
    LeanManposted 3 years ago

    I sort of agree; but I would say that I would like those hubs that are unfeatured due to Quality to be excluded rather than those that are excluded due to engagement. There are many hubs that are excellent that are unfeatured due to engagement purely because there are just so few people searching for their subject area.

    In fact I would go one further and say that if a hub is not up to the quality standards then it should be unpublished not just unfeatured. Then it would automatically be removed from the internal search as it would "no longer exist."

    1. relache profile image86
      relacheposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      I suggested an on/off option for this exact reason.  People should be able to filter out all of this stuff, or not.

      Personally, I feel it should either be published or not, and that Featuring itself was a lazy solution to low quality.

      1. TIMETRAVELER2 profile image98
        TIMETRAVELER2posted 3 years agoin reply to this


        1. TIMETRAVELER2 profile image98
          TIMETRAVELER2posted 3 years agoin reply to this

          I don't get this whole thing.  If I write a hub and it is not of good quality, it should simply not be permitted to be published.  Articles that are later discovered to be of poor quality should be dropped.   People can always rewrite and submit work again, so what is the point of the unfeaturing?  Articles that have poor readership can either automatically be dropped by the filters if views stay too low for a specified period of time, or the author can try to revamp them to give them another opportunity for readership or delete them themselves.

          I also think writers who come, produce one article and then disappear should have their work removed after a specified period of time.

          Additionally, keyword stuffed summaries should be part of the evaluation process so that they do not slip through the QAP and damage the site.

          1. profile image0
            calculus-geometryposted 3 years agoin reply to this

            The unfeaturing system is a pointless purgatory.  Hubs that are unfeatured for engagement should be bumped up to featured, and hubs that are unfeatured for quality should be bumped down to unpublished.   Keep it simple.

            1. wilderness profile image97
              wildernessposted 3 years agoin reply to this

              Why is there no engagement?  Because Google (not HP - Google) finds it of low quality?  That is the reason for the system, after all...

              1. profile image0
                calculus-geometryposted 3 years agoin reply to this

                Not necessarily, sometimes hubs getting some search traffic still become unfeatured for engagement.  The system does not work perfectly.

            2. Elsie Hagley profile image72
              Elsie Hagleyposted 3 years agoin reply to this

              Agree 100%. smile

    2. Sue Adams profile image96
      Sue Adamsposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      I agree, keep those and show them in internal searches.

      Yes, I agree to that too. Give an unfeatured for quality hub a, say 2 week grace period in which it can be improved, then give it a final chop.
      Unpublished crap.

      1. aesta1 profile image91
        aesta1posted 3 years agoin reply to this

        The idea of giving them a grace period is good and unpublish it afterwards if it has not reached the quality expected. Hp editors can also give helpful suggestions especially for newbies to improve their hubs during the grace period.

  5. Glenn Stok profile image100
    Glenn Stokposted 3 years ago

    Another reason why hubs become unfeatured is due to keyword spamming, especially in the summary where spammers hide the stuffed keywords.

    In another forum thread we discussed helping clean up spamming by searching for common keyword spamming phrases and reporting them.  When I did this, I found a lot of them. But when I clicked to the profile of the various spammers, I discovered that non of the hubs I found in the search were listed in their profiles. That means that those hubs were already unfeatured.

    So I agree it would be a good idea to offer an option in the search to show only featured hubs, a choice the searcher can make.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)