I am really tired of reading forums that have interesting titles but were written some time ago. I posted about this last week, but now have a suggestion that will help people decide whether they want to read and/or respond to such posts: PUT THE DATE BESIDE OR DIRECTLY UNDERNEATH THE POST'S TITLE.
Agreed. Or ANYTHING that will stop people bumping them. It doesn't help that the "related discussions" at the bottom of posts are all years old.
The date is directly underneath the title, beside the author's name, or at least it is on my PC. It could be missing on mobile view, I suppose.
I don't know what you are looking at, but I have none of this on my PC and apparently others don't either...I am not looking via a mobile device. I am talking about the forum topics here. When you click on a forum, titles appear as well as authors' names...but no dates. What are you looking at?
This is what I'm seeing (under the heading Related Discussions):
Phyllis Doyle obviously sees the same as I do
We are talking about two different things. When I click on "Explore" and then "Forums" what comes up is a list of forum titles followed by the name of the author. There is no date, and there is no warning. I guess it depends on how you are accessing the forum topics, but those warnings should be everywhere, otherwise, people will keep responding to the old ones, and this causes confusion.
When I click on Explore then forums, this is what I see:
Discussion Replies Most Recent When
Post-a-factposted by Sed-me in HubPages Tutorials and Community 628 NateB11 43 hours ago
The further down the list you go the older the forum is.
Edit: Well, actually it is how old the latest post - but that gives a pretty good idea of how old the forum thread is.
That's the problem. Since someone recently commented on it, the time looks like it is a recent forum. So you start reading the posts and writing comments only to come to the realization that it is an old thread.
Maybe putting the first post's date as well as the last post's date/time would help.
But when you look at the initial list, there is nothing to indicate the original post date. This is where I think it should be shown, not later.
The date created may not show on the forum main page, but once you open a thread, you can just look at the first post and see if the thread was created 5 years ago or 5 hours ago.
The only people who don't do this are spammers and new users. There's not much excuse for long-time users who reply to years old threads, even if spammers are the culprit for reviving them.
You might be seeing the date on hubs, not on forums and questions.
Look at all the 'Related Discussions' below. On all of them it says "4 years ago" "5 years ago" or other 'years ago' right after the OP's name. By hubber 2 years ago, etc.
I always pay attention to that so I don't go and read old stuff.
I think any forum post that gives the "This Forum Thread is Inactive" warning should not be included in the Related Posts section. It is their appearance there that is causing people to answer them, thereby putting them back to the top of the forum feed.
It already has a warning at the top saying:
The post you are replying to is over two months old. Please DO NOT reply UNLESS you have truly new information to add to this conversation. Consider creating a new forum discussion instead.
Maybe people don't read it?
People obviously don't read it. When I brought this up before I believe it was Matthew who responded saying that the warning should deter people from replying to old threads. I honestly don't see why it's such a big deal to make posts over a year old or so read only. It would keep others able to read older posts and keep the more relevant and timely stuff active. Seems simple and pretty common sense to me.
The "New Feature Discussions Forum" is where they read the threads and the suggestions made Nobody from HQ will be reading this one.
* Instead of starting a thread to discuss this in "freeform discussion" (where every comment is redundant from the perspective of trying to change things)
* it's much better to post such requests for change in the "New Feature Suggestions Discussions" http://hubpages.com/forum/category/6634
* (properly configured as per the notes in "New HubPages Feature Suggestions FAQ - Please read before posting! http://hubpages.com/forum/topic/119282#post2523082 )
If you did start a thread in the appropriate forum you'd see that
1) I've aready started one - the suggestion being "Close threads if no new posts for a specified period" http://hubpages.com/forum/topic/133233 - which means (according to the forum instructions) that you should not start another. Rather it's better to add comments to the existing one
2) However only two people responded to it!
Now if a few more people responded to this thread - http://hubpages.com/forum/topic/133233 - then maybe we might get somewhere........
How about it?
This is a different suggestion - instead of closing the thread, we are asking for the start date to be more prominent. That way, everyone knows they are looking at an old thread before they even open it.
I noticed that it was in the discussions thread instead of new feature suggestions when I first saw it. I figured it was because the OP was making sure it was something people wanted it before suggesting it. I have now reported it as being in the wrong forum, so hopefully the moderator will move it to the new feature forum without having to start all over again.
even so - this suggestions is NEVER going to be looked at simply because it's not been posted in the right section of the forum.
If you've got a good suggestion, make sure you post it in the "New Feature Suggestions Discussions" http://hubpages.com/forum/category/6634
Millionaire Tips: You are correct. This was just meant as a matter for open discussion to see what people think. When I want something specifically addressed, I don't wait for the team to look at the forums...I send them an email.
It's a pretty simple thing, really. There is no reason why Hubbers should have to play guessing games when it comes to seeing the recency of a post.
Thanks for your help on this. Help is always nicer than complaint and criticism.
Sheesh. This post is three days old. Come on people - move on.
I think there were postings on 7 year old threads which is crazy to me. I wouldn't want a thread longer than a year to exist because it's likely not relevant anymore. When I was looking through threads, I read informative postings only to note they didn't make sense because they were outdated.
It reminded me of those old history books that still thought Reagon was the current president. Come on peeps let's get this show on the road.
Some old forum posts are interesting and relevant. I would prefer to allow them to be revived.
The problem is that when they are listed as related forums in current threads, newbies and spammers revive them without good reason. There is plenty of warning for them to not revive them, but they are too easy to pick up since they are in the related threads section. My fix would be to take them out of the related threads section. That way, the only people who are reviving threads are people who are looking for a particular answer. And, of course, put the date of the original post on the listing page (in addition to date/time of the latest post), so that people know how old it is before getting all excited about answering.
by rebekahELLE4 years ago
Whenever I open the forums, I see countless threads by the same people, many of them unanswered or with only a couple of comments. I would love to see a limit on how many threads the same person can open...
by Cagsil7 years ago
Hey Hubbers,I'm quickly approaching 30,000 posts to HubPages' forum thread and if you're really interested, you can help me leave even quicker?That's all you have to do is post to this forum and I'll respond. Once I...
by PrettyPanther8 years ago
I am new here so it's possible this has been suggested before. How about a debate forum, separate from the other forums, where contentious topics can be debated? So, if people wanted to discuss, say, a...
by Dame Scribe8 years ago
Alright, since *S* sells and people insist on this topic, can we have a Adult forum where raging hormones n whatnot gets some sense of release for those in need and maybe keep separate from other forums? I totally...
by Richard Bivins8 years ago
I suggest that HP prevent any registered user from posting a new topic to the forums if they have no hubs. They can comment but not start new threads.Most forums that I use have this restriction in place.
by thisisoli7 years ago
I have noticed that an increasing number of people seem to have joined this site merely to spam religion on the forum. This would be okay if it was not for the fact that this is a forum for writers, not theists.I am all...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.