Will someone please tell the Editbot...

Jump to Last Post 1-7 of 7 discussions (33 posts)
  1. PegCole17 profile image95
    PegCole17posted 21 months ago

    This seems to be a recurring issue with editorial corrections. The Editbot wants to replace the word "and" with the word "to." This doesn't work in every case. Here's an example.

    Someone commented on my hub about emus, "You gave it a try and learned a lesson." The bot decided to change "and" to the word "to". Now it reads, "You gave it a try to learned a lesson."

    This is obviously incorrect. I went into the hub to take a look at the edits. The change is in the comments section where I can't reject or fix it. Please ask a human to take a look.

    http://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/13362125.jpg

    1. Genna East profile image90
      Genna Eastposted 21 months agoin reply to this

      I've experienced the same problem, Peg.  It's annoying.

    2. Venkatachari M profile image31
      Venkatachari Mposted 21 months agoin reply to this

      Very silly corrections are being done by the editbot on many occasions. Sometimes, I change the entire sentence to give it a sense. But, you can't change the comments that way. The HP staff should look into this defect of their system.

    3. Christy Kirwan profile image96
      Christy Kirwanposted 21 months agoin reply to this

      Hi Peg,

      The notifications that are showing up now are actually for the same corrections that you originally got notified about. The notifications now just indicate that the changes are permanent for the corrections you did not reject during Editbot's original pass. Any corrections that were rejected by you over the last year will not persist.

      1. Marisa Wright profile image98
        Marisa Wrightposted 21 months agoin reply to this

        It would have been nice to have a warning.

      2. PegCole17 profile image95
        PegCole17posted 21 months agoin reply to this

        Hi Christy,
        Thanks for letting me know.

      3. Venkatachari M profile image31
        Venkatachari Mposted 21 months agoin reply to this

        But, the problem is not solved with your reply, Christy. The correction made in the above sentence is totally wrong. It shows the inefficiency of the editbot. That defect should be looked into and got rectified by the technical people of HP. It could have corrected the word "anyhoo" instead.

        1. PegCole17 profile image95
          PegCole17posted 21 months agoin reply to this

          You're right, Venkatachari. I understand the use of anyhoo as a slang term for anyhow (from the comics). But it truly should have addressed that and the misspelled word, ostrich (not ostriche). Instead, it made a good sentence grammatically incorrect.

          That is the real issue, not whether it is too late to fix these editbot changes. We never had the power to edit comments, only to delete them or accept/reject editbot observations.

          1. Jodah profile image89
            Jodahposted 21 months agoin reply to this

            If we can't change anything now why bother to put all those little red exclamation marks all over our hubs so we have to look at them to delete them. It seems a very time consuming activity ( I have at least 100) for no real purpose.

            1. Venkatachari M profile image31
              Venkatachari Mposted 21 months agoin reply to this

              True, John. It is really a time-consuming job, to go through all those hub pro edited hubs. But, they want you to look at those corrections and be careful, whether you are a commenter or an author.

            2. psycheskinner profile image83
              psycheskinnerposted 21 months agoin reply to this

              You can change it, you just have to do it manually by going to edit mode.

              1. Jodah profile image89
                Jodahposted 21 months agoin reply to this

                We can't change it. Read Christy's previous post. These are showing permanent alterations that were done by editbot previously and we accepted. Most are in comments anyway.

                1. Christy Kirwan profile image96
                  Christy Kirwanposted 21 months agoin reply to this

                  psycheskinner is correct, you can still manually edit articles to revert any changes you don't like. It's only the changes in the comments that can no longer be reverted, and the % of errors corrected by Editbot vs. the % it reduced was a very strong net win for HubPages and most individual authors, so it was a risk we accepted.

                  1. Jodah profile image89
                    Jodahposted 21 months agoin reply to this

                    OK thanks, Christy. Almost all the changes on my hubs were in comments. I guess most people just didn't have time to read all the corrections when editbot went through so they are surprised now when brought to their attention.

                  2. Sherry Hewins profile image97
                    Sherry Hewinsposted 21 months agoin reply to this

                    Personally, I am relieved to hear this. I checked all of my editbot corrections when they first happened, so those few errors that it made have already been rejected by me.

                    It would have been nice to have that clarified when the red exclamation marks first started appearing though, or even sooner for those who didn't bother to check the first time.

          2. Venkatachari M profile image31
            Venkatachari Mposted 21 months agoin reply to this

            Peg Cole, I meant the editbot shouldn't make corrections like that in the comments which could not be rectified if the editbot itself is not doing it correctly.
            Even we don't have the option to reject the corrections in such cases.

            1. psycheskinner profile image83
              psycheskinnerposted 21 months agoin reply to this

              While I understand the SEO reason for it I don't think we should change comments at all.  Accept or reject, fine.  But editing another person's words is taking a liberty.  We can't know for sure if the change is a simple correction or is distorting and misrepresenting what they intended to say.

            2. PegCole17 profile image95
              PegCole17posted 21 months agoin reply to this

              I understand. I agreed with your earlier observation.

    4. Natalie Frank profile image97
      Natalie Frankposted 21 months agoin reply to this

      I have the same problem along with a problem with the use of the word "or".  The edit bot keeps changing titles and sentences when I am comparing one category with either of two others.  The one I can't seem to prevent from being changed is "Orthorexia: Distinct Disorder or Sub-type of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder or Anorexia" which keeps being changed to "Orthorexia: Distinct Disorder, Sub-type of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder or Anorexia which though perhaps subtle, are still different.

    5. Natalie Frank profile image97
      Natalie Frankposted 21 months agoin reply to this

      Ditto

    6. faith-hope-love profile image72
      faith-hope-loveposted 13 months agoin reply to this

      May be the Humans in charge of Edit Bot should be given some Lessons. As you have pointed out replacing words does in a lot of cases change the intent or it makes in some cases nonsense in reading. Makes no sense. Replacing and with to or to with and should be obvious.

  2. Jodah profile image89
    Jodahposted 21 months ago

    Same thing has happened with a few of mine, Peg. It needs reprogramming.

    1. PegCole17 profile image95
      PegCole17posted 21 months agoin reply to this

      This is creating more work (for us) and not helping improve the grammar.

      1. viryabo profile image87
        viryaboposted 21 months agoin reply to this

        My thoughts exactly!

  3. Stacie L profile image86
    Stacie Lposted 21 months ago

    Wow, I've got to re-check what the robots changed!roll

  4. DzyMsLizzy profile image95
    DzyMsLizzyposted 21 months ago

    Agreed; I've suffered several of the same 'corrections.'  It's both annoying and frustrating.

    1. PegCole17 profile image95
      PegCole17posted 21 months agoin reply to this

      I hope someone reprograms the definition of a conjunction in the bot. And joins two independent thoughts.

  5. DzyMsLizzy profile image95
    DzyMsLizzyposted 21 months ago

    Furthermore, Christy's reply fails to address the problem of 'edits we did not reject.' 
    When the edits are in comments, over which we, as authors, have no control, how are we supposed to reject those???
    Once we've viewed the hub, and seen the correction, or should I say, "so-called correction," when we exit, the changes are made permanent.
    If the bot was changing something in our hub, we could change it back, or fix it in a different way, and that's fine.  But not if it was in a comment, which is where about 90% of these "corrections" seem to be.

    I also noticed that they are failing to leave a space between their corrected word and the word following, thereby creating a new error!
    The bot programmers surely need to look into this issue!

  6. faith-hope-love profile image72
    faith-hope-loveposted 21 months ago

    No one should make corrections to another persons comments. Not even the editors, They may reject a comment that could potentially be a problem, Editors must, as we all do, ask for, and receive clear, clarification on a comment. Unless we know, we know what the other is trying to say we cannot make adjustments to increase understanding;  The faults of "EditBot" are the faults of the programmer and of the assumptions they make. So how about a human who has a command of Language committed to a continuous editing of "EditBot".  Also the person making the comment should have the ability to correct the obvious mistakes of "EditBot."

    1. PegCole17 profile image95
      PegCole17posted 21 months agoin reply to this

      I agree that we should not correct our readers' comments no matter what Google dislikes about them. I've noticed that some of the corrections have to do with the dictionary, for example, the word ashtray or tablecloth or downtown. When I used them in my hub, the dictionary underlined the words in red, so I made them into two words. Now, the editbot marked it for correction.

      Both systems should be in line with one another for best results. Other words like decor or fiance are marked for correction because the accent mark is missing. I'm not even sure how to put an accent mark on these words.

      1. DzyMsLizzy profile image95
        DzyMsLizzyposted 13 months agoin reply to this

        Peg;
        Go to your desktop and look for the character map under the 'accessories' menu.  (If you're on a Mac, I can't help you, though--that is how you find those marks on a PC machine.) wink

        1. PegCole17 profile image95
          PegCole17posted 13 months agoin reply to this

          Thanks, Dzy.

  7. faith-hope-love profile image72
    faith-hope-loveposted 20 months ago

    In modern usage Both forms "Ashtray and Ash Tray" and Both forms of "Tablecloth and Table Cloth" are correct and neither should be edited out.  This happens because we have two opposing views that are not in communication with each other.  There are a few two word phrases in English that have in modern usage become one word.  May be we must send "Editbot" and "Google" back to school..

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)