I propose that duplicate content be banned outright on HubPages. Hub Hopping shows the massive amount of stolen or copied content on HP and denigrates serious writers here.
Others have made the same complaint, but I think HP should seriously consider banning duplicate content outright.
This isn't censorship, either. Duplicate content is often stolen content. If you wrote it elsewhere, write a similar, but different, piece on the subject. Take a different slant.
After all, you are a writer. Right?
No, it should not be banned. Stolen content should be disallowed and dealt with. I have some duplicate content-- two hubs placed on other sites. I know they are rated lower, they are my original work, and I like having them on another site. I don't care.
Rochelle, I agree. I have duplicate content posted, and it's how I want it (for my own reasons other than earnings). Although my own writing on here is mostly hobby writing, there can be a "portfolio aspect" to what any Hubber chooses to include with his own writing (wherever it is).
Keith Tax, yes - we are writers, and that's precisely why the above can apply for a lot of us. Could I write a whole new thing on the same subject? Sure, if I wanted to; but I have some "heavy" stuff I've written (dealing with grief, for example), and I'm done with that subject. For someone who puts a lot into some pieces of work, it can take a lot of "mental energy" that kind of runs its course and doesn't return for that particular subject.
Could we use spinners? Maybe, from what I've seen, if you haven't written the "standard" web article they just make a big mess that's harder to fix than re-writing. On something like a long Hub, intended to be humor, I don't think a spinning works; and, again, writing a similar thing can, at least for me, result in writing a far less effective thing.
I don't think policies should be based on what "crummy" people do. There are ways to deal with the crummy people without. I figure, if I have something I think has some quality to it that makes it worth posting (as duplicate), chances are it does add something to the site in its own way. (I've got stuff that I don't do think does much for the site, but that's not the kind of stuff I post as duplicate.)
yeah, i agree with that. like you, i also have a lot of hubs that are on other sites like my myspace and yahoo pages where I used to write reviews on there since I was a kid.
I'm with Rochelle on this. Saying to rewrite it or word it differently doesn't work when it's poetry you are submitting. The poem is what it is, you can't just change the wording. So I have some poems that are duplicate content and so be it. I know I wrote them and they are original because they are based on my personal experiences, thoughts and feelings.
Why does the rooster never get any credit?
Our rooster was too noisy-- now just have two hens-- and two eggs a day. We got the hens first.
I have no love for plagiarism, but other than that I see no problem with making copies of your own work in different places. Is that not why Gutenberg is revered?
HubPages already does what it can about duplicate content. It's penalized and winds up with little to no traffic.
Now, in regards to plagiarism, the policy is clear that HubPages will take down content provided a complaint is filed by the copyright owner.
If you really want less duplicated content on HubPages, you'll have to go around notifying a lot of people as to the theft of their material so that they can file the appropriate paperwork with admin.
I have two hubs which are duplicate content. They are scoring ok, and hubpages has no problem with them as they are famous poems.
Not all duplicate content is avoidable and hubpages reckon it's OK.
I always assumed one could be tricky and say the egg was reptilian - but in regards to this thread, HP doesnt have the ability to see publish dates on other sites..it never really knows which is chicken and which is egg as far as "duplicate" goes.
HP requests and prefers "unique" content -- doesn't matter which came first if they are both there.
If they are both yours, it is not plagerism or stolen content. It also isn't unique. You have the option of removing one from this or the other site, or letting it stand with a slight penalty.
I hate plagiarism just as much as anybody but there may be good reason from an SEO point of view to publish duplicate content (as long as its yours) on various websites. Duplicate content is filtered so that the most relevant pages populate search results, but what is filtered for one person may not be filtered for another. For example, if you were to post the same article to a site hosted in the UK and another hosted in the US, all things being the same the UK searcher would most likely see the page hosted in the UK and vice versa.
This way content can be localized to show prices in local currencies, phone numbers, addresses, email, spelling differences etc and ensure the reader sees the correct version. (localization in itself helps ensure the correct version is seen)
Duplicate content will usually see one of the sites sent to the supplimentals, regardless of location.
The danger is that as increasing duplicate content appears on Hubpages, this could negatively affect the rest of Hubpages.
I personally would like to see stronger action taken against those users who publish nothing but reams of duplicate content.
Is it possible to post one of my poems here, which I have already posted in my blog or at some other places???
thisisoli, what are you talking about? Do you have any idea how duplicate content filters work? Duplicate content filters and supplemental listings are two entirely different things. Having two identical pages on different domains will cause neither to go supplemental, having two identical pages on the same domain probably will.
Duplicate content filters are designed to deliver the most relevant content to the searcher, it’s not a penalty. Pages WILL be filtered but Google is smart enough to deliver the UK page hosted in UK to the searcher in the UK and filter the others, especially if some effort has been put into localization and geo targeting inbound links.
A .com hosted in the US will be filtered out if the 'UK only results' option is selected on google.co.uk. The only way round this is to have content on a uk hosted site prefrably a .co.uk. The same problem holds true for most of the regional search engines and not only Google.
If you control the sites or are working for a client that does, it also helps if you get country specific tld's but when not available you can geo target the site using webmasters tools.
The information comes direct from Google and SEOmoz.
I have to finish packing now but will dig out the relevant links when I am finished with this emigration malarky!
Oli, don’t always believe what you read or hear from Google. By way of evidence type Article Spinning Using Synonym Substitution into google.com and also type the same into google.au.com also check out the results with the 'pages from Australia' option selected.
Take a close look at the articles that rank number one, they are duplicates however Google is selecting a US hosted article for the .com search and an Australian hosted article for the au.com search.
Using duplicate content in this way creates an opportunity to engage readers and access markets that were hitherto unreachable.
Hope that makes things a little clearer and I hope the emigration goes well.
Plagarized content hurts everyone. The person that had work stolen, the person who stole the work, the website owners (if different than the theft) where the work is re-pasted, and everyone else who posts on the website.
I read one of the astrology hubs and it was taken word for word right out of Linda Goodman's Sun Signs, a book I read back when I was in High School. I even mentioned in my comment that this hub sounded very much like something I had read back in the 70s just to see how the hubber who posted it would respond.
I still have a copy of that book so I was able to compare. I have no issue with people posting their own original writings on their Facebook or MySpace pages, but for someone to "lift" almost an entire book and then have a really high hubscore and lots of positive comments really stinks.
I was very curious why nobody else had picked up on it.
Recently I read an interesting comment about another hubber that got my curiosity and I checked out several hubs. This hubber takes passages verbatim from multiple online sources and combines them into hubs. The occasional original passages are fairly evident, as this person’s English is pretty good, but stands out because of grammar.
They are a prolific hubber with over 600 hubs. Their 40 or so most recent hubs all have scores in the mid- to high 60s to high 70s. I was pretty surprised that they have not been penalized more by hub scores.
Am I understanding from some of you here that these hubs are penalized in terms of google ranking, thereby impacting traffic and earnings?
by Don 2 months ago
The article in question was "Good Title and Caption Ideas for Content Creators". Here is the link to the unpublished page at least showing the url (https://discover.hubpages.com/technology/Caption-Ideas). I published this article on 2-21-22. There is usually a 1 day wait time for...
by Marlene Bertrand 9 years ago
What is duplicate content?When I get flagged for duplicate content, it kind of breaks my heart, especially when I write something that is totally original - no quotes, no links, etc. I see so many "duplicate" hub oriented hubs and wonder why they exist without being flagged as duplicate...
by HSanAlim 10 years ago
Given all the time spend world wide worrying about Panda and Google's poor quality and duplicate content comments, what the hell does this post from GOOGLE themselves mean. Talk about contradictory!http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot. … apers.html
by lrohner 11 years ago
HubPages has no problem allowing its users to post duplicate content. This dupe content could rightfully belong to the person who posted it, or it could be stolen -- in fact, a lot of it is stolen. I don't know for sure, but I don't think they actually do anything unless a DMCA is filed.In light of...
by canadawest99 11 years ago
People think of duplicate content as a bad thing, but google only defines it as bad if you have duplicate content on a single domain. So now after the google slap, every writing site is trying to make sure they don't have duplicate content (ie. same as another site) when they don't...
by David Muse 9 months ago
I wrote my first hub a few days ago. To my surprise, it was labelled duplicate content. I contacted Team HubPages about the matter because this was my original work. Now it turns out someone actually posted the full content on their Blogger account. I am now following up the issue and considering...
Copyright © 2022 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of Maven Coalition, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|