I'm a little, no VERY, concerned that my hub page has been flagged in this manner. I have over 570 words of content and only 5 links off to two other sites.
The entire article has been designed to guide people who are looking for potential cheats and hacks towards a legitimate and valid means to get what they are looking for in a cost effective manner. I hardly consider this to be traffic siphoning.
Furthermore I am highly suspicious of the fact that this article is in competition with some of Maddie Ruud's own articles on hubpages who was just recently installed as head moderator.
Since I am unable to contact a site moderator directly. I am addressing this through the forums. I feel that others should know about the issue and be aware of what might be considered bias by moderators with conflicting hub page interests.
I'd like to see the current flag removed and my hub re-instated with it's previous good ranking immediately.
In addition, the moderators of hub pages need to do a MUCH better job of making if clear what parameters are acceptable for off-site linking and content. My hub page has been live for several months already and only recently flagged as stated above.
Thanks in advance for your prompt attention to this matter.
Five links to two other sites must mean that one has at least 3 of them.
The rules state "You must have no more than 1-2 links to any one domain on a page of original content".
To drag Maddie's reputation into disrepute won't do you any favours.
Last time I checked, a business model which involves the giving away of a service with no way to capture any revenue will see that business buried in the ground.
if you still have questions - http://hubpages.com/email/help/
or email email@example.com
and I don't believe Maddie is biased. More than two links to a single site do violate stated HP policy - and based on your own words you had 3. Fix yourself before trying to fix others.
Obviously I'm frustrated by these rules, or at least the late enforcement. Your response and attitude are very inspirational and comforting. Thanks.
So other than a couple (2) links to any given site or product. You are "encouraging" aka forcing hub posters to use your built-in modules so that you get to capture a large chunk of the revenue.
I appreciate the hub page concept, but you haven't sold me on the business model.
So what you mean is you really like the hub page interface, but you don't think the revenue should be split ? Or a different split perhaps? You might be able to negotiate that if your work is good.
And you would much rather have had this hub flagged six months ago so you didn't make any revenue out of it the last six months? Maddie only just started here and has already posted several times that she is going through a backlog of hubs that needed getting rid of.
As far as I can tell, if you fix the hub to comply with the rules, it will get re-instated. That sounds like just removing one link from what you have said.
Yes I would rather have had the hub flagged six months ago before it started getting significant traffic and making revenue, rather than losing a weeks worth of traffic at this point.
The revenue split is negotiable? Now you've got me interested.
The right way to use Hubpages for Internet Marketing - its not that hard really!
I'd rather worry about adsense ads not appearing at HP site wide
I've addressed the link issue and my hub has been re-instated. Thanks for the help. I'm assuming that my hub score will recover over time as well?
As far as the two other issues. No ill will meant towards Maddie, I know that she has contributed a lot to the hub page community at large. Without being provided adequate explanation as to why my hub page was flagged and immediately unpublished without information on what changes I needed to make, it seemed an odd coincidence on the competitive content side and her recent addition to the team. Sorry for jumping to conclusions.
Secondly, I am also not averse to the idea of revenue sharing, it is a great model in itself, and I understand that it enables hubpages to stay in business, I'm just not overly enamored with the way it's been implemented on hubpages. Correct me if I'm wrong here, but it looks like I get zero revenue on 40% of my page traffic. If all the affiliate purchases came during those 40% of the page visits, I actually see none of it. I realize that the reverse is also true regarding the 60% of page traffic, but I would be much more in favor of a 60-40 split on all revenue generated which shares it more equitably for everyone.
Your analysis of the situation is correct. If all the sales only occur during the 40% of the time when the HubPages' affiliate code is on the page, you get nothing. However this is not a new situation, the site has always been structured that way.
Our system is fair and due the Law of Large Numbers, it works out to a 60-40 revenue split overall.
If you are working with a small traffic base, then the impression share program is just as likely to work more favorably for you as it is against you.
A true revenue split would require centralization of all monies created and payout through HubPages. That's not how we do things.
medialateral - as regards making serious money on HubPages, even the excellent Lissie admits that she "failed to make any significant money" She has 65 published hubs of high score/quality and a large number of fans.
I see your profile is not yet complete - one thing that will immediately improve your general score is a picture and your location. If you don't wish to be specific, have a look and see how other hubber interpret this (actually, my hub with the most comments concerns the topic of profiles).
HubPages is much more about making money - it's an extremely supportive community with a large amount of quality writing and some ingenious software scripts to make those hubs readily accessible. As far as I'm concerned, the owners/staff of HubPages are entitled to the 60% share for making such an elegant and fun interface.
Wishing you a warm welcome to the HP community!
:lol ember PJD I didn't start with lots of sites and fans! I think its important to remember that on HP just like everything on the web the snowball effect occurs - it took me 5 months to get 200 fans - now I have anothe over 50 in a few weeks - the same thing happens with earnings - since Oct my monthly Adsense tracks as : $6.50, $8.40, $12.60. $22.90, $17.30, $24.12
Of all of those about $2 from my own sites. So income is going up consistently - though it doesn't necessarily relate to either the number of hubs you have or the amount of traffic to my hubs - its more about kw, SEO and magic potions as far as I can tell :-)
Maddie is cool, just don't mess with her, cause she don't take crap from nobody.
I thought they said effective April, the owners/staff of HubPages will be entitled to 30% share?
That's only for April. Starting May 1st it goes back to 60/40 split.
The 70/30 split is a bonus from the site due to Adsense being funky and not working right for a bit.
by RockyMountainMom 4 years ago
I'm about to publish a hub. My goal with this hub is to promote the idea of writing for Mesothelioma Awareness day. I took out one link to cancer information already, but am still getting the warning.I think that this hub, without links to the information, would be silly. And I...
by Mark Knowles 11 years ago
At last !One of my hubs has been flagged as overly promotional LOLOr at least :WARNING: This hub is in danger of being flagged as Overly Promotional, for 2+ links to a domain. I feel so proud. Almost like a "real" internet marketer. 2008 Motorcycle Guide
by Tim Mitchell 6 years ago
I have a hub that today has been 'indicated' as being overly promotional. That hub is A Hub Marketing Plan http://tsmog.hubpages.com/hub/A-Hub-Marketing-Plan posted or published on 3/20/12. It has received positive comments and positive accolades. Let me share I am now frustrated with primarily two...
by BenjaminB 8 years ago
I find it hilarious that Hubpages pushes the concept of helping new Hubbers yet my Hub which has had very good reception by the community has been flagged for being both overly promotional and substandard.I had 5 social bookmarking links,and 2 other links to free tools absolutely related to the...
by frogpatch 10 years ago
I am really ticked about this. I posted a hub about a revolutionary new site out there that will change how we social network and I linked to a page, not from that site but an info website of mine so people could get more info and I was flagged for being over promotional! This is news, not...
by Peter V 7 years ago
Do you often flag content on HubPages?I see a few hubs everyday that are in English, but poorly written. I hate to flag a hub if someone is just trying to start on HP, but I don't like reading poorly written hubs! What are your thoughts?
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|