Please help us understand this methodology. Is it important to remove RSS feeds? why? How does one split a hub, if the content has already been posted, then won't it be flagged? Any other ideas will be helpful thanks so very much Debby
@Cagsil, how could any of those hubs be useless? The Panda has not yet settled, A lot of changes indeed. Many SEO techniques seem to have been floored by Google new algorithm. But believe me, quality content will always stand after all these dance and worrisome hits. I've also refused to be worried about the Monopoly of Google where the seem to put writers and publishers in the dark. We rather put on the light to see well.
Andrew, there is no need for the "@" when replying to my post. By replying to my post, you are addressing me. Secondly, the hubs that were useless, were non-traffic generating . I would have figured you would have understood that. If there were no traffic before the Panda change, then there was no reason to continue to have faith that anything would change after Panda. There actually isn't any evidence in your statement. White hat, Black hat and Gray hat? Please clarify which you think were floored. Quality content all by itself isn't good enough, and to think it is, is ridiculous. Many people are not in the dark about it and Some are. As for not worrying about the "Monopoly" of Google? Good for you.
Less traffic ought not to make them useless, anyway it's your noble choice to eliminate them. Similar Pandas' have come and gone in years past. We've taken and applied stipulated measures by Google and HubPages Team yet the traffic is about to go up as we all have expected it till now. I'm also pretty sure of HubPages bouncing back to her Super High web traffic status soonest. No one is actually kept in the dark about this, but we have seen so much worries about this usual google panda across the online communities globally. I realy cease to Google panda nor thinker more on my hubs. HaPPy Hubbing!
Since Panda......well, still writing, just only posting humorous hubs instead of the ones I had planned. I mean, if I will not get the traffic I am seeking for the hubs I had planned, I will either hire someone to help me build a website or search until I find a place I can receive the traffic and some income from. I have hubs that do OK here and will continue with those type of hubs and maybe more fun hubs. When I do build a website, there are quite a few hubs I will move there of course.
You don't need to hire someone to make a website for you. Buy hosting from a host that provides one-click install of wordpress and the rest is pretty much like hubbing. And I am personally not in favor of moving hubs, you should write new fresh stuff for your website.
I only mentioned hiring someone so I could get the site up, optimized for SEO and Earnings quicker than going the learn-as-you-go-route. There are a lot of hubs I would not move from here. I enjoy writing here and the people I have gotten to know. Just would place more emphasis on certain niche on a web and only move those Hubs that would fit the web better-money wise.
Done something long overdue - woken up and smelled the coffee about my own personal future as regards earning a living online, and made appropriate plans. I've realised that I don't want to entrust any more of my writing to a third party than I already have done (no offence, HP), and that I'm not cut out to be a stand-alone SEO guru/webmaster. Hence I will be concentrating the bulk of my efforts on earning via sites like Elance.
I don't plan to take down more than a few of my hubs (unless the goalposts get moved yet again in an unpleasant enough way), and I do have a couple of my own sites that I'm developing, but I now realise that my hubs and my own sites together will never do more than earn beer money for me, and act as an online CV.
Empress, you sound like Panda has been good for you, in a crazy kind of way!
I realized long ago that I wasn't comfortable playing all the games required of a SEO guru/webmaster. That's why I went back to the real working world, although I'm still trying to find my niche. Best of luck with your new direction1
Yes, you're so right about Panda having been good for me - although I didn't think so when it first hit LOL.
I totally agree with you about the SEO games. Much as I slagged PCunix off about his "whiter-than-white" attitude to SEO, I do think he had a point about the way in which SEO practices like non-organic backlinking and article spinning lessen the quality of Internet searching for normal users.
When I do an Internet search myself, I can tell straight away whether the keywords I've used are high paying ones in Adsense terms - all you find at the top of the SERPs are dodgy blogs/content farm articles! Of course, the ultimate culprit in this is (whisper it low) Google Adsense itself. People wouldn't attempt to game a system if the system didn't exist in the first place.
With all due respect to PCunix, he was absent from the forums for quite some time, the reason was he was trying to fix his site after the ravages of Panda. I do believe that PCunix practices what he preaches and therefore believe the problems he encountered had nothing to do with linking.
In contrast, I have sites of my own which receive regular links none of them were negatively affected by Panda, in fact some improved significantly.
IMO,Panda has changed nothing as far as backlinking is concerned. What worked before works today. However, the quality of your content and where you place it are more important than ever.
I believe that PC Unix's criticism of dodgy SEO came before the second round of panda, when his personal website was hammered. I wonder if he will be a little more flexible now in his approach? hehe!
To be fair to him, I believe that his main criticism was against out and out black hat SEO techniques, rather than backlink generation which is more grey hat than black hat - although google will ignore artificially generated backlinks if dicoverd, they really pan websites that use underhand technical methods with sanctions.
I think putting new content on sites that have been damaged by Panda might not be the best strategy. Not only will it be difficult to get rankings and traffic, any links from these documents are probably going to be devalued somewhat as well.
You and I obviously think very much alike! I also "had a go" at PCUnix because he was too black-and-white for me, but I also couldn't bring myself to get involved in the backlinking and spinning games, which create so much cr@p on the internet.
I have read many articles on what needs to be done to hubs to respond to Panda, but all of them appear to be very general. Are there any good sources that will give specific pointers on how hubs should be edited to get google rank back up?
Same here. All the stuff about quality matters appears to be nonsense. The hit on hubpages has been universal. There is no signs of recovery. [http://www.quantcast.com/hubpages.com]. I have shifted my focus to my own sites.
Google has completely ravaged my earnings. I was peaking at almost ten dollars a day in revenue on my main writing website and am now down to less than two dollars. Trying my best to recover but sadly, things are looking pretty grim right now.
After the alleged Google alogrithim update probably after 10 December my traffic has fallen drastically from more then 150 views per day to 50. Traffic was steadily rising but after 10 dec it suddenly plunged showing no...
Hey Guys and Gals, Man, I have just about had it with the traffic issues here at the Hubpages. I have published over 100 hubs here in two years. I have won several awards, I have had over 10, 000 views, and I have a...
Google just released what it is calling "Panda4.0", a new addition to its formula for ranking content on webpages. If you have noticed a significant change (up or down) in traffic to your Hubs today,...
Google's latest update was more than just EMD's.Welcome to Panda update 20."Google has confirmed with us that on Thursday, September 27th, they released a Panda algorithm update – this would be the 20th Panda...
I've been on here for a few years, and I guess I never really understood the point of these scores. They don't seem to provide any real value to the user and I can't convince myself that they add value because they...