Who would win in a fight: Bruce Lee or Mohammed Ali?

Jump to Last Post 1-39 of 39 discussions (40 posts)
  1. jreuter profile image88
    jreuterposted 7 years ago

    Who would win in a fight: Bruce Lee or Mohammed Ali?

    And before you give a sarcastic answer, let's assume Bruce Lee is alive, and that they are both in their prime, say about...30 years old.

    https://usercontent1.hubstatic.com/4946800_f260.jpg

  2. independentwriter profile image60
    independentwriterposted 7 years ago

    I would have to say that it would be Bruce Lee!

  3. mcrawford76 profile image82
    mcrawford76posted 7 years ago

    I don't think Ali would have been able to touch him. Bruce Lee would have torn him apart.

  4. Walt Smith profile image57
    Walt Smithposted 7 years ago

    Ali could knock him out w/1 punch, problem is Mr. Lee could have hit him 20 times while waiting for that punch...Lee all the way...W

  5. nightwork4 profile image60
    nightwork4posted 7 years ago

    i think Bruce would win. Ali was an awesome fighter but Bruce used more then fists to fight and he learned from his opponent as he faught him.

  6. Rooskaya profile image47
    Rooskayaposted 7 years ago

    Only Bruce Lee would win.No one can match him.

  7. Dexter Yarbrough profile image81
    Dexter Yarbroughposted 7 years ago

    Bruce Lee would seem to have an advantage, but Ali was a smarter fighter. Ali would have taken the hits and when Lee thought he was winning, Ali would surprise him with a finishing blow. Ali by a small margin.

  8. Ashantina profile image61
    Ashantinaposted 7 years ago

    No doubt Mr Bruce Lee!!!

  9. EltMrx profile image57
    EltMrxposted 7 years ago

    I would love to see this! Hands down Bruce Lee. But I'd like to see this fight a few times. In a UFC cage with a Ref and a no holds barred street fight. I think Ali is stronger but Lee might have a speed advantage...

  10. profile image49
    lightpeakposted 7 years ago

    Bruce Lee for sure ,no two opinions on that.

  11. ianjonas profile image72
    ianjonasposted 7 years ago

    In the field of unarmed combat, the Chinese Kung Fu is still the best weaponless self defense compared to other forms of fighting method ever known to man. It involves speed, strength, stamina, dscipline and technique not found in other art of fighting. It is ridiculously impossible to bring boxing up to the level of Kung Fu. Boxing is way too slow for Kung Fu, boxing is comparable to ballet dancing while Kung Fu is hardcore rock music...besides, boxing is limited only on upper limb defenses and for throwing punches unprepared for foot defense, boxing is like fighting while seated on a wheelchair while Kung Fu is a fighting style involving all four human limbs - punch and kick, now how do you think can a boxer stand a chance against a Kung Fu Master when boxing is two legs short on defense?

    Kung Fu is centuries old fighting style developed in China previously unknown to the western world, thanks to Bruce Lee for his selfless effort in introducing Chinese Kung Fu to the modern world. Despite ignored, turned down and mocked many times, Bruce Lee's endurance, persistence and determination helped paved the way for the global acceptance and recognition of the Chinese culture through his introduction of Chinese martial arts to the rest of the world which easily propelled the career of his two greatest imitators Jacky Chan and Jet Li who both achieved global box office stardom using Bruce Lee's fame as their stepping stone. (btw: to think that Jacky Chan is merely an acrobat and not a professional martial artist, even his role in karate kid is an absolute mockery of the art of Kung Fu for confusing Chinese Kung Fu with Japanese Karate, as implied by the movie title "karate kid"..LOL..).

  12. larry1987 profile image48
    larry1987posted 7 years ago

    Bruce Lee of course, he was an hero in China...

  13. SpikeTheLobster profile image75
    SpikeTheLobsterposted 7 years ago

    Kinda obvious, really. Despite Ali's power and skill, Lee's legs are longer and stronger than his arms. Question of reach. If you've ever seen a boxer in that UFC thing, you'll understand what I mean - a martial art that limits you to only your fists will inevitably fail against one that uses the whole body.

  14. profile image0
    Digsposted 7 years ago

    To be effective in self-defense using hands or feet, it is necessary to close with your opponent albeit briefly.  Assuming Ali blocked such an effort by Bruce Lee then counter punched, I am afraid Mr. Lee would find himself taking a ten count!

    If Ali failed to block effectively then Mr. Lee could seriously injure Ali and close the show shortly thereafter.  While all the flying kicks of the martial arts are popularized in media, an opponent with any skill can use such kicks against his adversary easily.  Ali would only need one good shot, while Mr. Lee would probably need to land a series of solid blows to finish Ali.  My vote goes to Ali!

  15. HealthyPetNetwork profile image60
    HealthyPetNetworkposted 7 years ago

    I seriously doubt Ali would have stood a chance

  16. dosborne08 profile image70
    dosborne08posted 7 years ago

    I love Mohammed but would have to give it to Bruce Lee. His quickness would prevail.

  17. keeponfalling profile image64
    keeponfallingposted 7 years ago

    I vote for Bruce Lee, technical, surprise hit, speed, force and fear Mohammed Ali will be K.O.

  18. HCGexpert profile image55
    HCGexpertposted 7 years ago

    Bruce Lee was probably the greatest single "fighter" master in the last century, so obviously he'd win.

  19. nifty@50 profile image73
    nifty@50posted 7 years ago

    Boxing rules fight goes to Ali and his superior reach, Street rules (no rules) fight easily goes to Bruce Lee and his quickness and ability to get inside.

  20. WindMaestro profile image59
    WindMaestroposted 7 years ago

    Bruce Lee would win no questions asked. For most of his film scenes, the tapes needed to be slowed down to capture the true effectiveness for Bruce Lee's martial arts. Bruce Lee was actually too fast for the naked eye to observe. Also, standing two feet away, Bruce Lee was strong enough and highly trained enough to break an arm bone with one quick punch. Sorry Ali, you were great, but then again, you never faced Bruce Lee, smile

  21. celebritie profile image81
    celebritieposted 7 years ago

    Wow now that is a loaded question, I would have to say that they are in too different leagues of their own and one would not be able to match the other because of the nature of their individual skills.

  22. Ellenzhou profile image56
    Ellenzhouposted 7 years ago

    Of course it is Bruce Lee! He is the greatest one ever!

  23. sylviastone29 profile image56
    sylviastone29posted 7 years ago

    Definitely it is Bruce Lee! He was the master of Kongfu.

  24. edhan profile image62
    edhanposted 7 years ago

    In terms of Kung Fu, Bruce Lee has the advantage over Mohammed Ali.

  25. seoever profile image60
    seoeverposted 7 years ago

    If i'll have some spare time, i can beat both of them. Lol
    Just kidding.

    Bruce Lee for sure.

  26. profile image0
    vinsanityposted 7 years ago

    Bruce Lee would. He is much faster and also quite deadly. Now if Ali got Bruce, then he would for sure defeat him.

  27. profile image0
    Aka Professor Mposted 7 years ago

    The premise is these two individuals are having a UFC style fight! If that is your criteria then Mohammed Ali would be at a severe disadvantage. While having admittedly the longer reach, greater body weight and a distinct height advantage, the style that is  Boxing would only allow upper body defense and attack which the kicking style and power combined with speed would favor Bruce Lee!

    Having done both boxing and MMA I would simply say that the outcome would be defeat for the self proclaimed "Greatest "Ali. Those who realized the power that Bruce Lee generated in his smaller frame would agree that he was formidable and very devastating. Mohammed may have floated like a butterfly and stung like a Bee but he be down and out Cold if he tangled with Bruce Lee!

  28. profile image45
    Jeremymichiganposted 7 years ago

    I am a amature cage fighter and from my experince a boxer does not stand a chance aganist a mixed martial artist " MMA" Bruce lee would smash ali

  29. profile image0
    Lesleysherwoodposted 7 years ago

    Bruce Lee without a doubt.  If you think about it, a boxer takes many rounds before they knock someone out!  Where as Bruce Lee could probably do it much quicker with the skills he had.

  30. nancyme profile image59
    nancymeposted 7 years ago

    Definitely, Bruce Lee. He's quick and more skilled than Mohammed Ali.

  31. profile image0
    James E.posted 7 years ago

    Bruce Lee; he is far more skilled in fighting.  I love Ali, but I would have to give it to Bruce Lee...I mean, Bruce Lee beat Chuck Norris!!! lol

  32. Darknlovely3436 profile image83
    Darknlovely3436posted 7 years ago

    how can you put even think of comparing Bruce Lee and Ali
    two fighters with different skills, I rather stay on outside and throw in the towel, love them both.

  33. wingedcentaur profile image83
    wingedcentaurposted 7 years ago

    I like this question, jreuter. Good move, by the way, in trying to pre-empt sarcastic responses.

    Let me say that for prizefighters. Ali was probably "The Greatest." I don't have any problem with that. If the contest were a straight, Queens-de-Marquis (is that how it's spelled?) boxing match, then the edge would have to go to Ali, for his much greater height, weight, physical strength, and reach.

    If the contest were a no-holds barred contest, in which one is allowed to use other parts of the body as weapons, then the edge would have to go to the great martial arts master, Bruce Lee, obviously. As far as I know, Ali had no experience in that form of fighting.

  34. Porshadoxus profile image72
    Porshadoxusposted 7 years ago

    Bruce Lee was way too fast for Ali. I wouldn't even place a bet on that fight.

  35. Kaddam profile image60
    Kaddamposted 7 years ago

    Bruce Lee hands down wins. Muhammed was clumsy as a boxer and his skills were worked upon to improve because his clumsiness hindered him.

    Bruce Lee had no clumsiness. His skills were never hindered and naturally improved even when he was pushing himself. Bruce Lee's Lifestyle had immensly influenced both the Military & Sports worlds. The training regiments of both wouldn't have changed without the influence prduced by the inspiration Bruce Lee had on several famous individuals and trainers of Marines, Navy Seals and Green Berets-of whom all said that Bruce Lee inspired them.

  36. tobey100 profile image61
    tobey100posted 6 years ago

    Since Bruce is dead and Ali has MS it would be a draw.

    1. jreuter profile image88
      jreuterposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Obviously you failed to read the entire question.

  37. whoisbid profile image72
    whoisbidposted 6 years ago

    There is no doubt that Mohammed Ali would pulverize Bruce Lee. If you have any experience with real fighting you will know why

  38. Rai 18 profile image60
    Rai 18posted 6 years ago

    Bruce Lee, for sure.  He has fantastic skills and is quick.

  39. cjnileski profile image75
    cjnileskiposted 9 months ago

    I'm going with Bruce Lee.  I believe his quickness would work to his advantage.  Although I think Mohammed Ali is great at what he does, still going with Bruce Lee.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)