WHO SHOULD TAKE CUSTODY OF MICHAEL'S KIDS?

1. 59

   AsherKadeposted 14 years ago

   sound off on your opinion on who should get custody of the poor three little kids now facing unspeakable hysteria....

   replyreport
   1. 91

      Rochelle Frankposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      It's not a matter of public opinion or democratic vote. Why should any of us who have no inside information have a valid opinion?
      
      We can only wish them well, and stop speculating. Leave them alone. The ' unspeakeable hysteria' comes from the uninformed speculators with an 'opinion'.

      replyreport
   2. 62

      Lady_Eposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      I personally think the Kids should be asked who they want to stay with.  It's their happiness that counts.

      replyreport
      1. 80

         earnestshubposted 14 years agoin reply to this

         I am 100% behind this suggestion.

         replyreport
      2. 55

         andromidaposted 14 years agoin reply to this

         No doubt.

         replyreport
      3. 59

         AsherKadeposted 14 years agoin reply to this

         I agree with Lade E

         replyreport
   3. 71

      AEvansposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      Simple the Jacksons and I do not take an pity on Debbie Rowe with her it was always about the Benjamins.

      replyreport
2. 88

   Stacie Lposted 14 years ago

   I was surprised that one of his siblings,maybe the older sister,should have been a natural choice. The brothers all have families and children ,so any of them would have been able to also...
   poor kids....

   replyreport
3. 61

   love my yorkiesposted 14 years ago

   who cares!

   replyreport
   1. 62

      Candie Vposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      I agree!  Do we not have more important things to discuss!

      replyreport
4. 59

   AsherKadeposted 14 years ago

   I agree, we shouldn't care, we shouldn't have an opinion, we don't know enough, and maybe in a week we will be so hopelessly over-absorbed by Michael that we will have wished this had just not been such a spectacle. I mean, they are just three kids in a menangerie of children all over the world who aren't wanted and so what could we possibly do for them, right?
   But ask yourselves....do you want them to go to some place where they are exploited and media over saturates us with their odd life like they did to us with Michael? Or should we wish an end to it all by hoping they have a better home life than Michael?!

   replyreport
5. 63

   Mishaposted 14 years ago

   Don't you have anything else to worry about? Something where you can actually make a difference?

   replyreport
   1. 59

      AsherKadeposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      and by the way, I put bad guys in jail everyday, that's the difference I make everyday... so others can have a safe and normal life!

      replyreport
6. 59

   AsherKadeposted 14 years ago

   forgive me for asking. I was merely opening conversation.

   replyreport
7. 66

   darksideposted 14 years ago

   The natural mother.
   
   Though without a doubt it will have to be for the courts to decide.

   replyreport
   1. 79

      Uninvited Writerposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      The one who sold them?
      
      Also, they should not be separated.

      replyreport
8. 70

   Plants and Oilsposted 14 years ago

   I couldn't care less. Next!

   replyreport
9. 62

   lawrettaposted 14 years ago

   i agree, the natural mother is best choice to me. No one can love them as much as Micheal loved them except their natural mum.

   replyreport
10. 60

    Eric Graudinsposted 14 years ago

    Oh for heavens sake.
    This has got to be about the tackiest thread I've seen.

    replyreport
11. 61

    secondreviewposted 14 years ago

    It's MJ's business and that of of his 3 kids.   MJ made his wishes crystal clear and the courts will undoubtedly ask at least the 2 older kids about who they want to be with.   I'm not sure why we're pondering this subject.

    replyreport
12. 0

    sandra rinckposted 14 years ago

    From what I heard, he left them to his mother or Diana Ross..so they should go to his mother and if his mother cannot take care of them then she can chose who can since she would be the sole guardian over the children.
    
    Mr. Jackson was smart enough to understand his mother would be wise enough to make a good decision in this event.

    replyreport
13. 0

    annvansposted 14 years ago

    The real mom should have them providing she is screened and she is capable of taking care of them.  Otherwise, Michaels mom should have them.

    replyreport
14. 78

    Mighty Momposted 14 years ago

    Not so fast... Today's over-the-top, invasive and tasteless media circus includes a potentially new wrinkle. There appears to be some question as to whether MJ was indeed the biological father of his own kids. It's speculated that MJ's dermatologist (a trolly looking man but white, which would help explain why the kids are so snow white) is the real dad.
    
    So if that it the case, who knows what claims may pop up to counter MJ's will...?
    
    BTW, To avoid a cat fight, I suggest the kids go live with the person who is raising Anna Nicole Smith's little girl:-). MM

    replyreport
    1. 59

       AsherKadeposted 14 years agoin reply to this

       LOL atMightyMOm....whoknew that a useless thread would take up so much space?
       I am sick of the Michael attn too, but my heart goes out to the kids.... and by the way, I have wondered why the kids are snow white too!

       replyreport
       1. 0

          annvansposted 14 years agoin reply to this

          Those kids aren't snow white,...???

          replyreport
          1. 71

             AEvansposted 14 years agoin reply to this

             It doesn't matter what color his children are, they are his children.

             replyreport
15. 59

    AsherKadeposted 14 years ago

    i HAVE A HALF BLACK BABY AND THOUGH THEY CAN BE ANY COLOR, THOSE KIDS ARE all VERY LIGHT....

    replyreport
16. 78

    Mighty Momposted 14 years ago

    This is true, AEvans. Presumably if MJ is not the biological father he certainly had legal custody over them.
    I just find it disgusting that anyone would call their paternity into question now. No good can come of that.
    As for the natural mother, I believe she signed away her rights to the kids.
    And Michael's wishes were to have them go to his mother (#1) or Diana Ross (#2).
    No doubt there will be further intrigue.
    
    As another thread topic, we could all place bets on when the final MJ media story will air. I mean, are we talking only a few more days? A week? A month? RIP, I say.

    replyreport