Trump’s Day One: A Bold Agenda to Reclaim America

1. 87

   My Esotericposted 2 days ago

   Here is some more negative fallout from Trump's Bold Agenda.
   
   "Millions of travelers could skip visiting the US if proposed social media policy is implemented, industry experts warn"
   
   "The potential decline in travelers could cost the US an estimated $15.7 billion in lost visitor spending, according to WTTC. Under one scenario, the US could miss out on as many as 4.7 million international arrivals, which would represent a 23% drop in visitors from ESTA countries in 2026."
   
   Trump is trying to kill our economy yet many of you still support him anyway.
   
   https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/28/travel/s … rld-travel

   replyreport
2. 83

   Ken Burgessposted 32 hours ago

   Trump stirs talk as leaders signal shifting global alliances • FRANCE 24
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4IOOj_92l8
   
   'Europe Needs Urgency Mindset’: Ursula Sends Strong Message On Trump’s Tariffs In Davos Speech * Times of India
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mb85Fk4a_-Q
   
   "Davos In Panic": Cathie Wood Explains Why the EU Model Is Collapsing in 2026
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_X7x_jK1ifA
   
   Can you tell me which one is AI generated?

   replyreport
   1. 85

      Sharlee01posted 29 hours agoin reply to this

      The first has all the earmarks of AI-generated. Although YouTube is supposed to indicate if AI has generated a video. I did not see any mention in any of the clips.

      replyreport
      1. 83

         Ken Burgessposted 29 hours agoin reply to this

         It was the last one.  They aren't always easy to spot, it takes about 30 seconds, sometimes longer, the constant flow of speech without human-like pauses and breaks in the topic, eventually give it away.
         
         There will come a time, when AI is smart enough to insert such human-pauses and shifts into what it is producing, then we will be in trouble.
         
         Thinking back to this:
         https://www.youtube.com/shorts/PcmsiMIaoTU
         
         If not for the sombrero added in, it would have taken more than one viewing to be sure.

         replyreport
         1. 85

            Sharlee01posted 27 hours agoin reply to this

            Laughing so hard!!! That's a good one.  I mean, so realistic, chucks words rang so true, and I would not put them past wearing props to distributen there feed.  So funny...

            replyreport
   2. 86

      peoplepower73posted 25 hours agoin reply to this

      Those are not questions.  That is just looking for information.  I asked AI Why did Trump send Tom Homan to Minneapolis?  Here is the reply I received.  It's objective, not subjective. Your examples are searches.
      
      Trump sent Tom Homan to Minneapolis to take control of ICE and Border Patrol operations after two controversial fatal shootings by federal immigration agents, and to shift the administration’s strategy toward more “targeted” enforcement while negotiating with Minnesota officials amid intense public backlash.
      
      What drove the decision
      
      1. Escalating crisis after two fatal shootings
      
      Federal immigration agents shot and killed Renee Good and Alex Pretti, both U.S. citizens, in Minneapolis.
      
      The incidents triggered public outrage, political pressure, and scrutiny of the administration’s immigration tactics.
      
      2. Loss of confidence in DHS leadership
      
      Conservatives and immigration hardliners were frustrated with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem’s emphasis on high-volume deportations.
      
      Homan represents a more targeted, intelligence-driven enforcement approach, focusing on individuals deemed public‑safety threats.
      
      3. Need for direct federal–state coordination
      
      Trump said Homan would report directly to him and work with Minnesota leaders, including Gov. Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey.
      
      Homan met with state officials to negotiate protocols—especially around jail notifications for individuals considered public‑safety risks.
      
      4. Attempt to calm tensions and reduce federal presence
      
      Homan announced plans to “draw down” federal agents in Minneapolis if cooperation improved.
      
      His mission included stabilizing the situation and preventing further confrontations.
      
      5. Broader political messaging
      
      Trump used Homan’s deployment to reinforce his second‑term immigration agenda and to pressure “sanctuary” jurisdictions.
      
      The move signaled a return to aggressive but targeted enforcement, a hallmark of Homan’s earlier ICE leadership.
      
      If you want, I can break down how Homan’s strategy differs from Noem’s and what it means for Minneapolis going forward.
      
      References (3)
      
      Border Czar Tom Homan says shift in strategy will lead to a drawdown of fed agents in Minneapolis. https://abcnews.go.com/US/border-czar-t … =129667767
      
      Trump sends border czar Homan to Minneapolis, talks with Walz amid shooting scrutiny. https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/2 … s-00746125
      
      What to know about Tom Homan, Trump border czar sent to Minnesota. https://thehill.com/homenews/administra … minnesota/
      
      Do you see the difference?

      replyreport
      1. 85

         Sharlee01posted 25 hours agoin reply to this

         You may have missed it... His question
         
         Can you tell me which one is AI-generated?
         
         His comment was about AI and how it can create videos--- just not about Trump.
         
         Why hijack his comment / Just post one of your own. You are very obsessed with Trump. So add a comment, don't disrupt others' comments. It's rude.

         replyreport
         1. 86

            peoplepower73posted 24 hours agoin reply to this

            Excuse me. Ken's post was about AI knowing who you are. I understood his examples were to show that some things are AI generated which are subjected and some are not. What he was doing is using AI for searches not questions.
            
            My reply was to show that if you ask a question that AI response is not subjective it's objective. I use Tom Homan as an example of asking a question to AI instead of a search. I was not trying to hijack his post.

            replyreport
            1. 85

               Sharlee01posted 24 hours agoin reply to this

               No  --Here is his post--- context is clear, he asked a clear question on their videos to see if one could pick which was created by AI. I  played, and I was wrong. He responded to my answer and explained more about how to spot an  AI video. Here is his reply to me.  https://hubpages.com/politics/forum/362 … ost4394246
               
               
               Sharlee01 profile image83Sharlee01posted 5 hours ago
               Ken Burgess wrote:
               Trump stirs talk as leaders signal shifting global alliances • FRANCE 24
               https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4IOOj_92l8
               
               'Europe Needs Urgency Mindset’: Ursula Sends Strong Message On Trump’s Tariffs In Davos Speech * Times of India
               https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mb85Fk4a_-Q
               
               "Davos In Panic": Cathie Wood Explains Why the EU Model Is Collapsing in 2026
               https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_X7x_jK1ifA
               
               Can you tell me which one is AI generated?
               
               
               What baffles me about some on the forum they try to walk back what reads as a clear diversion. Why not let it go?  His post was so clear. You diverted to some Trump rhetoric.   
               
               He just posted a sort of challenge. Nothing more, no Trump, just a sort of fun challenge.
               I had a bit of fun trying to figure out which might have been created by AI.  Lighten up..  .

               replyreport
               1. 83

                  Ken Burgessposted 22 hours agoin reply to this

                  
                  
                  
                  
                  Yeah... like wow....

                  replyreport
                  1. 85

                     Sharlee01posted 21 hours agoin reply to this

                     So very tired of those who can't take the time to perhaps read a post before commenting, or diverting instead of just creating a separate conversation.  I  guess one has got to laugh...

                     replyreport
                     1. 83

                        Ken Burgessposted 21 hours agoin reply to this

                        I've read that reply several times... with the "Excuse me."
                        
                        
                        .... Wha?
                        
                        That's all I can say... maybe ... WTF?
                        
                        Your reply to it was classic.

                        replyreport
                        1. 85

                           Sharlee01posted 21 hours agoin reply to this

                           I’ll say your challenge was not only tough but also a bit fun. The clips were really informative too, giving plenty of food for thought. But, of course, heaven forbid anyone bring in something that actually makes us use our brain cells!

                           replyreport
                           1. 83

                              Ken Burgessposted 4 hours agoin reply to this

                              That's true... critical thinking is frowned upon on the Progressive Left, facts are optional, and questioning the narrative is downright verboten.

                              replyreport
                              1. 85

                                 Sharlee01posted 3 hours agoin reply to this

                                 100% agree.

                                 replyreport
               2. 86

                  peoplepower73posted 21 hours agoin reply to this

                  Here is what I was replying to about Ken's post. It was posted out of order.  I don't know if it was my fault or HPs fault.  But you should lighten up. I used Tom Homan as an example to prove the difference between searches and objective questions on AI. If one does a search, it may give you replies that are based on what it knows about your geopolitical interest. If one asks question like I did with Tom Homan.  AI gave me an objective answer. This is what I was I replying to that Ken posted.
                  
                  The funny thing about AI... and most people don't know this... they adapt to the person using them.
                  
                  If you were to ask AI who was the greatest QB or who was the greatest President, AI will draw information based on your region, your previous site visits, and what data it has collected on you... and will formulate an answer catered to you... not necessarily factual.
                  
                  Anyone that has spent a few hours ever working with these AIs... be it ChatGPT or Grok or whatever else, knows they essentially compile information that you can filter, or unknowingly gear towards your biases.
                  
                  So... any AI that I were to use, for instance, would reject almost all the sites that Eso considers gospel, as an example... it would reject ANY and ALL sources of information from sites like CNN or MSNBC for instance, as I know information CNN presents is fabricated, biased, and garbage opinion most of the time, so I would direct AI searches to ignore CNN and MSNBC from all searches and compilations.
                  
                  This post was followed by Ken's post with his video examples that were inadvertently posted to Ken's next post about AI videos. You are too quick to accuse me of being rude and high jacking Ken's post when you didn't have the evidence.  I want to thank you Trumper's for insulting me. That's very typical of Trumper's

                  replyreport
3. 78

   Readmikenowposted 25 hours ago

   

   replyreport
   1. 85

      Sharlee01posted 25 hours agoin reply to this

      These sentiments have become very evident, and strangely, some people seem to enjoy belonging to this niche. I think it’s only a minority, but yes, some truly operate with this kind of mindset. I’m not even sure they realize it; they latch onto a word and run with it, almost like it’s a well-trained habit.

      replyreport
   2. 86

      peoplepower73posted 25 hours agoin reply to this

      Interesting, that sounds exactly like Trump and Kristi Noem when they said, immediately Pretti's killing to claim he was a domestic terrorist and was sent to massacre ICE. They said it immediately without any evidence or proof.

      replyreport