|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
What is your definition of bad writing? What are some examples of bad writing you have encounter and why do you feel these writing deserves to be defined as bad? Is there any particular technique or way of writing that you think writers should avoid? At what point is writing beyond the help of constructive criticism?
Anything with lots of errors in grammer, sentence structure and spelling unless this is intended as part of the speech pattern of a character. Even then, the author needs to be careful not to overdo it.
Also stay away from cliches unless the story line really calls for it.
Well, for me it would be wrong English. Any grammatical errors or spelling mistakes is such a NO NO. Bad is a very negative word. I believe such hubs should be called abonimable.
For me I can forgive a bit of bad grammar, spellings and punctuation as long as the piece is understandable and interesting. Obviously the better the work is technically the easier it is to understand but there is a difference between technical skill and creativity/talent.
There are many with perfect english who are very bad at writing~ they use over the top, complicated and obscure words to try and prove their own intelligence rather than because those words are best suited to the point they are trying to make. Then there are those who aren't great at English but have wonderful things to say.
Obviously if the technical skill is very bad it makes it harder to understand, so at least some skill is required. But I believe some people can be a bit hard on others and don't give them a chance to make their point and hence miss out on a potentially interesting, useful or entertaining piece.
I think writing should be 'user friendly' and aware of the audience. Do you want to write something that only those with Masters Degrees in English (or those good at codebreaking) would understand or that almost everyone could?
I know my English isn't perfect but I'm working on it and hope that my readers forgive me the odd spelling mistake or misuse of a comma because they enjoy what I have to say.
Points are all well taken, but if I were writing to an audience of English PhDs, I might need that over the top vocabulary. IMO, there's a place for all voices. The challenge for any writer is to make sure you express that voice in the way in which you want the reader to hear it.
Hmm... I do believe I spent an entire semester discussing the attributes of "Bad Writing" - for me it doesn't come down to bad grammar ( think of character development - how do you depict a Brooklyn Mobster from an East Side Socialite in your story. To me "Bad Writing" is something I cannot connect with. It's Subjective. The over the top vocabulary may be needed in a piece of technical writing I need to present in a company wide forum on Cross Boarder Customs and Logistics. Knowing my audience - keeps the "bad writing" away from an unintentional readers - who would then label me as a "bad writer." Make sense?
It is obvious when a writer does not read very much. Too often, I come across people who have started a novel or short story that looks and sounds too much like a film or TV show they saw. The descriptions cover things in which a director would be interested, but a writer would ignore. The overuse of cliches by the 3rd-person narrator (of all people!) is a no-no. I can tell when someone uses a thesaurus to try to sound intelligent. I take it for granted that a good writer would not have many grammatical errors other than to produce the occasional run-on sentence. A writer who cannot communicate in written form without an editor is like a cowboy who can't saddle his own horse. Obsession with adverbs is common for bad writers. Good writers read all the time. Great writers read all the time and have read lots of European early 20th-Century and latter 19th-Century literature, including poetry, and have made an in-depth study of the subject. On top of that, both good and great writers have had some interesting life experiences and are good observers of people and events.
Well, that second sentence is an example.
It should be "encountered" and either "that writing" or "those writings", though the latter is awkward.
Was that on purpose?
Agree on bad grammar as well as too many words where fewer specific correct ones will do. As general rule I use KISS - Keep It Short & Simple but add humour & emotion whenever possible. Suggest you try the Afrikaans writer Deon Meyer - books now in several other languages - who clearly illustrates my point. Also NO mistakes in the story line & style - keep it moving in strict truth - even in fiction. Regards & Enjoy your last few GREAT reading HoliDays before 2012 starts.........
I wondered that, too, Pcunix. It's hard for me to keep reading an article or take a writer seriously when they have numerous typos or grammatical errors, especially when I first start reading....
You have to wonder if that's why the poster asked the question. Maybe they just really don't know.
I agree with you Victoria. I even edit my forum posts so as to make sure it is written properly.
For me bad writing is incorrect use of tenses, parts of speech and contractions.
" your very smart" instead of "you're very smart"
"There clothes are all wet" instead of "Their clothes are all wet"
"I here someone calling" instead of "I hear someone calling"
These are just some examples. I see it often on HP and I noticed that particular hubbers make the same mistakes over and over in almost all there....sorry....their hubs. So I assume they don't remember or don't know.
Cardisa, your second example is kind of funny because if you put a comma after the word There, the sentence would read differently but be correct.
(I really hate and am embarrassed when I do make those kinds of mistakes. I think my fingers think faster than my brain. Fortunately, there's an edit feature).
Oh, I hate it the most when I find a stupid typo, repeated or left out word or some other error in my opening paragraph.
Screwing up lower down bothers me, but not as much as leading with a gaffe!
Pc, I feel the same way. I keep going through my hubs and re-reading them to make sure and when I see a typo I feel so embarrassed!
Oh, I am not embarrassed - I'm ticked off!
I'm angry at the typist - that would be me, of course. I dress myself down thoroughly and cancel planned days off. I've even threatened to fire myself but I have been told by my wife that only she has that authority.
Yep, repeated words. I hate that, it's my worst thing. A typo is what it is, and Word catches most of them, but to use the same word in sentence after sentence is just plain embarassing.
I tend to write in Word, review, build Hub, review, publish Hub, review, and I still pick them up - sometimes months later.
You can tell when someone is forced to write. Its just not in them to do. I think its bad when there is no passion in the topic that is being written about and the writer still expects for there to be a continued following.
If you want to see bad writing check out my dont you just hate hubs lol its bad but funny at same time :-)
For example, I am one of those who's English is not-native, but I do pay a lot attention - and it bothers me a lot - when someone do not apply and obey the "rules" of punctuation. Take a look at my hubs, and You'll see how someone - that's not from English language region, speaks, writes, and reads English just "well".
I think bad writing is anything that interferes with the intended goal of the writing. So it is a bit relative.
There's no such thing like bad writing. There's just grammar-Nazi approved content or grammar-Nazi ignored content, oh and let's not forget Machine generated content.
The question is, "Does the piece do its job?"
If the answer is yes, then it's good writing.
If no, then it's not.
An instruction manual needs to be clear. A humorous story needs to be entertaining and funny. A news article needs to be informative and true. An op-ed needs to be persuasive. You can depart from the rules of grammar and spelling in a humorous story, but not in an instruction manual.
I agree with you Jeff - "Does the piece do its job?" is the crux of the matter.
When I read an article, I expect to be either entertained or educated, and if it's both, then it's hit the jackpot.
I am put off by mystifying grammar and syntax but, if the meaning is clear and interesting, I can be quite forgiving - although I sometimes send a little note to the writer, with some apologetic but helpful editorial comments to encourage them to make their good article even better. I have had grateful replies, and never a rude response, so I must have hit the right note!.....oh dear, I've used the word "hit" twice within 2 sentences
Well put Jeff & Diana! - you & several others have clearly summed up this NB topic . Writing is much like talking. Suggest a body who needs positive help to join your own local Toastmasters(TM) club & practicepractise under positive evaluations from members. So many TM clubs in most countries. No, sorry ;-) I'm really not advertising for them - have left our club in June11. Bless you all! Stan.
But your comment 'did the job'. So is it bad or good writing even with the dual 'hit's.
Writing that is bad in my estimation has syntax poor, embellishment a plenty, for example, like the time that Aunt Lulu (you know her; she rode around with her husband in that lime green Hyundai that he painted with house paint) made those awful pies that tasted of creosote and lime!
Voice that is passive in the method of the bombastic babelizer of the propensity of those who never learned the voice of an active nature.
Writing of the spelling instant results translator Babelfish from lenguages plural and foreign. They are been who writing our manuals instructing.
Writing that is of not a broken nature so as to make the reading a purely wondrous and joyful exprience. Then, ov curse, there are the worse spelling and grammer errors like reigning in, irregardless, and mute point that send me spiraling down into a great depressive episode and speaking of depressive episodes, there are none worse than being confronted by a huge, solid, impenetrale chunk of wordage that never seemst to ens, to have been writ wit a spel chkr and that is blinding to the first, second AND third eye.
Thank you for allowing me to rant about bad riting.
You've been reading way too much Neil Gaiman.
It's a great rant about syntax : and also proves the point of this entire post - duhhh - "irregardless" doesn't exist. So your point is really not mute - but is certainly moot. Have to wonder if you made all of these intentional mistakes to mock the people in this forum
According to me, bad writing includes
- Bad grammar: The writer need not be a master in English, but should take sufficient time to do spell check. Certain free software help in doing spell check. Small grammatical mistakes can be forgiven.
- Redundant and repeating sentences: Increasing the word count just for the sake of it is not good. It must contain quality content. Using too many redundant lines and unnecessarily repeating the same idea starts boring the reader.
I love the way the arrow is pointing to all the repliers. That wasn't planned!
according to me anything which have wrong way of presentation or having grammatical mistakes includes in bad writing......
Let me give an example: The Twilight Saga
Too much 'purple prose' and Edward is too creepy.
Plus, there is a lot of plot holes and it is anti-feminist.
Bad writing is not doing your homework first, expecting others to do the work for you - having to read through what you've plonked down via the keyboard - and I have to admit I've done it myself. Mostly, though, I try to make sure I've got some sort of direction in what I've set down and got at least most of my facts right!
I get nagging doubts sometimes and go back to what I've already put down.
Unlike the laws Moses found on Mount Sinai, nothing's set down in stone!
(You know the joke, "Moses fell ill on his way up the mountain and was told when he got up there, 'Keep taking the tablets'")
I agree with many of you on this thread that some aspects of "bad" versus "good" writing are subjective. There are other objective criteria, though: Sentence structure, knowing when to use apostrophes, knowing how to transition to a new paragraph (to name a few).
If you want to know what "bad writing" is, put a questionable Hub side by side with a post on the same topic but on a strictly professional site (online newspapers and magazines). Truth is, the greenest young reporter fresh out of school is held to a much higher standard of writing at one of these publications than is a HubPages writer.
I say this not to hurt any feelings but in the hope that all HubPages writers will take the nuts and bolts of writing more seriously. If you're happy living in the HubPages world only, then just write to the best of your ability and enjoy. If you'd like to bring in followers from the Interwebs at large, please work on your technical proficiency. We'll be a better community for it!
I absolutely detest 'text talk' in what is supposed to be an intelligent, informative or creative piece of writing. If you are not a 13yr old girl/boy then you should not be 'LOL' -ing or 'BRB' - ing or 'WTF' - ing! It's lazy and ineloquent and will be the death of our beautiful langauge.
P.S. I may just be an old fart!
by Chris Mills3 years ago
Good writing won't save a bad story. Bad writing won't necessarily kill a good story. Thoughts?I read something along these lines recently and I can't remember who wrote it. King? ...
by Ryan Buda12 months ago
Is beginning a sentence with a preposition considered bad writing?In college, I have been given conflicting information regarding this topic. I personally love to begin sentences with words like and, but, or...I...
by Sohel Ahmed4 weeks ago
hey, I made the change to this content. Could you check and say any changes do I need?https://hubpages.com/travel/15-Best-Saf … or-Seniors
by Dana Strang6 years ago
How often do you leave constructive critiscism in your comments?Besides telling an author how much you like their hub, and maybe sharing a story or info of your own, do you offer constructuve criticsim? Do you tell them...
by Don Bobbitt6 years ago
Why am I seeing SO MANY Hubs with obvious GRAMMATICAL ERRORS in the TITLE?I mean, People? The Title is your HOOK!
by Kara Skinner3 years ago
Do people really say "Double Crap?"I'm reading a book where the protagonist, who is an adult and not adverse to swearing , says "Double crap!" This has also shown up in another book I've read before....
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.