http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government … owd-Column
I have been pointing out things like this from the Democratic Party for some time now. This is not surprising.
This is from Politifact.com and clearly states that Obama is neither anti Israle nor anti semetic,
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter … ael-issue/
Dirty smears like the one you are touting here make me sick, no matter what side of the aisle you're on.
I have said this time and again...if you don't like someone, fine. But STOP SPREADING LIES!!
"Published on Friday, March 14th, 2008"
Not exactly relevant to current events!
This is a new low JSC, an article that was misrepresented, was not endorsed by Obama at all and which never says anything at all about Jewish people...
From a terrible source, thinking people write off the Huffington post and Breitbart from the get go.
Oh my - more propaganda insinuation. What did she say exactly, 'cause I am not going look up this nonsense?
I read the link and failed to find 1) what the column is exactly so I can decide if *I* think it is anti-semitic, or 2) when/how Obama endorsed any or all of it.
Again, criticizing the government of Israel is not in itself anti-semitic. Her use of the term snakes does not mean she is using anti-semitic language just because others have used it to insult Jewish people. I think it's reaching. Much like when people bend over backwards to say racist terms are not racist because they are old and not one knows what they mean any more.
And... I didn't see anything either that showed Obama was supporting what she said.
That site is not really known for their veracity
For the record if the left continues to use Huffington Post and Wikipedia I will continue to use Brietbart.
None of these are reliable sources, no matter who you are.
I doubt anyone uses those as reliable sources alone. Factcheck.org is becoming very popular with anyone who wants to know the truth.
Had this been posted about Romney no one here would be questioning the source.
There would be cheers and little "He's done!" blurbs and talk about oh how evil and stupid he is.
What's the difference?
Did you read the Maureen Dowd column or simply the breitbart.com interpretation?
For the benefit of those readers who do, as a matter of course, like to "consider the source," here is a link to the actual article.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/16/opini … .html?_r=0
Having read the source article, might I point out the following:
1. Nowhere, not in one sentence, does Ms. Dowd reference Israelis or Jews as "snakes."
2. The subject of the verb "slither" in her title is not Israelis or Jews. It is "neocons." Specifically, Dan Senor and his ilk, who influenced Middle East policy for the Bush/Cheney administration.
3. If we're going to focus exclusively on snake imagery, note that there is a second reference in the article. "Paul Wolfowitz, an Iraq war architect, weighed in on Fox News, slimily asserting that President Obama should not be allowed to “slither through” without a clear position on Libya."
Is Ms. Dowd calling Mr. Wolfowitz a snake? Snakes are not slimy.
But, clearly, Mr. Wolfowitz is comparing President Obama to a snake.
By your logic, that comment makes HIM anti-Semitic!
But that site will never post anything negative about Romney.
Romney is a Mormon billionaire blessed in God's riches. Obama is CIA blessed in the powers that be. What's the difference?
by ahorseback 16 months ago
Jees ,........ This Trump obstructionism from the left couldn't show more ignorance of origin than the naked moral corruption OF the actual investigators ? From Mueller to his hired , high payed minions of Clinton ,Obama donors to Comey himself. Time for...
by ahorseback 19 months ago
After the election ! Pres. Obama may have ordered surveillance of the Trump Administration ! At least some whistleblower[s] are saying - alleging Trump was possible bugged by the Obama administration . This is aside of the whole Russian ...
by Scott S Bateman 20 months ago
One of the most widely folllowed political polls just issued the results of a new survey on Trump and found that:1. Trump's disapproval rating dropped again -- to 38%.2. 63% said he is not level headed.3. Voters disapprove 61 - 35 percent of the way Trump talks about the media.4. 52% of voters...
by Jack Lee 5 months ago
The latest revelations has demonstrated where the problem originated. It started with Obama and his appointments of Comey as FBI director and Loretta Lynch as Attorney General. All the subsequent events, starting with the Hillary email server, and ending with the Trump election...All points to...
by Susan Reid 6 years ago
I am sorry for his family.Will not miss his voice or his toxic brand of journalism (if you can call it that) for one second.
by SparklingJewel 6 years ago
you gotta wonder....it's all a little too coincidental some are saying...see the video down the column in the articlehttp://www.wnd.com/2012/03/breitbarts-l … ion-obama/
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|