Did they ever actually do one of those jobs, or just teach about them?
Rule out the ones that did not actually work. I believe I was referring to those of action rather than those who simply speak.
Then I choose the businessman. If successful, he has proven he knows how to hire and manage lawyers. You can't be successful in major business these days without that. Lawyers, on the other hand, may have no knowledge or resources to bring to the table for what the businessman knows. Business is all about doing what you know and knowing what you don't know so you can hire it out. How many attorneys do you know who have any idea that there is anything they don't know? Just sayin'.
Also, to be successful a good business makes everyone as happy as possible...employees, customers, vendors and suppliers, etc. This is what it takes to succeed. Lawyers are all about winning for themselves and whoever hired them, regardless of what that does to the other side, because the other side is not their concern. It is by necessity and design, more of a winner take all mindset.
I think someone who has a historian (not Newt) background so we don't continue making the same mistakes in this insane government!
Okay so a pig ballerina historian is the consensus candidate.
Clearly I was mistaken about Maxwell. It looks like this is Napoleon, putting an appropriate modern twist on the old classic, by donning a tutu.
Yikes! You got me. Now I have a little voice on one shoulder telling me there is time to edit, while on the other shoulder I hear "own it". Where are the blushing emoticons when you need them?
If you blush I'll call you on that too. Men don't blush. You should just edit and then call me a loser. I have low self esteem. I'm ok with that.
Now the two voices are yelling at me! What a quandary. I expect to hear from the peanut gallery about referencing the voices now, don't you think? lol, (literally)
People are stopping in the halls and staring at me in my office now because of you. I literally did a spit-take and laughed way harder than I should've at that.
Thanks for brightening my day.
Looking at the last 42 men that have held the office of President of the United States, narrowing it down to just the men that have held the office since the dawn of the 20th century, I don't see a business background as giving the occupant any advantage in doing a better job in the office. Conservatives always say such would be the case, but I am reminded of Ross Perot and Mitt Romney. The characteristics that made the difference between a great president and an mediocre or unsuccessful one are personal traits that do not seem related to their occupation prior to assuming the office.
Those sound like good alternatives, but I gave the two choices: business person or lawyer, because these two occupations seem to breed the most presidential candidates.
I would vote for an architect- if he served in the military.
IMHO it is like asking if you would rather ride a pig or a goat.
This is going south fast. You have conjured up a dancing pig in a tutu for me now, and somehow it is tied to the nutcracker melody....
I'm pretty sure most Americans would vote for a dancing pig in a tutu over a lawyer any day.
Hey, they buy insurance from Maxwell don't they? In fact, I think it might be him in the tutu!
I have no idea who Maxwell is. I like to keep my mind clear of too much info that might cloud my creative skills.
So long as the pig is native-born he can be VP. He would rake in the chauvinists and the bunny huggers. Win/win.
Who said the pig was male? That's what's wrong with America today... always thinking their pigs have to be males.
I am opposed to a dancing pig as president. It would only mean more pork in congressional legislation
An independent businessman, knowledgeable in world trade.
A businessman would be a terrible president. After all, don't businessmen make it their--ahem--business to sell what they own to the highest bidder?
I agree with that one, and I thought that Ross Perot deserved a shot back in the day. Everyone made fun of his ears, his height, his age, and his charts... but you know what? He was the ONLY guy I ever remember running for president who was actually trying to show us Americans what was wrong with government finances and the economy BEFORE winning the presidency... and if you hunt for Ross Perot's videos on Youtube you'll see that the guy had some pretty smart ideas and deserved much more credit than he ever got. I think the worst part about the presidency today is that it may be even more of a beauty contest than voting for a president... and also keep in mind that the smarter people on this planet don't necessarily look like Barbie or Ken dolls...
Perot did have an impact on history as you said, but my overall point was that if Perot was elected president back then, his ideas may have well gotten America back on track and most likely would've been reducing our national debt, versus the other presidents that have purposely digging us deeper election after election.
Perot speaks of a scenario that was not probable. The President is not a CEO, laying down the law from on high. Skills at negotiation and communication, compromise are far more important, Lyndon Johnson comes to mind. If it were not for Vietnam, he certainly would have been considered a better than average president.
Negotiation and communication, compromise, all seem to have died in the last decade. The only thing that matters is pushing your party agenda; compromise is unthinkable any more and there is nothing to negotiate. Either accept MY assessment and proposal or you're wrong and a scumbag to boot.
Maybe we need a King?
Way ahead of you. We pretty much just need to officially change the title at this point.
'Negotiation and communication, compromise, all seem to have died in the last decade. The only thing that matters is pushing your party agenda; compromise is unthinkable any more and there is nothing to negotiate.'
This is true.
I certainly hope that we do not have to resort to tyranny, with the excuse of 'bringing order' as an alternative to a disfunctional legislative body.
I have become very pessimistic as of late.
by Jack Lee 5 years ago
Politics aside, just curious what's your reaction to his speech? Positive, negative or indifferent...
by mj332 2 years ago
what subjects do you need to become a businessman
by JOC 2 years ago
A person answered the question, "Why are people so hostile towards President Donald Trump?".Chris O'Leary:I’ll take a stab at this. Before you pass my answer off as “Another Liberal Snowflake” consider that 1.) I'm an independent centrist who has voted Republican way more often in my life...
by Sychophantastic 5 years ago
Do you care?This would be the first time in modern American history that a candidate for President hasn't released his tax returns. Is this a big deal or not? If it is a big deal, what do you think Donald Trump is afraid the American people will see?
by Demas W Jasper 5 years ago
Will the comparison between the two Vice Presidential candidates make a difference in how you vote?Mr. Trump and Mrs. Clinton need the bodyguards they have due to the hogh number of threats each receives. With their risks so high, not to mention the threats of terrorism, the nominees for the...
by Gary Anderson 5 years ago
I watched him on the golf channel. He is close to being a fraud. He is worth less than a billion dollars. People have lost money in his investments finding out that he doesn't always back them but rather licenses his name. At least that is what I read in the news, although I cannot independently...
Copyright © 2022 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of Maven Coalition, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|