Would you accept a free hug? For Castlepaloma and others who get it

1. 0

   PrettyPantherposted 8 years ago

   Castlepaloma, I hope you like this video.  Once you get past the first 1:20 or so, it's pretty wonderful.
   
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1L_UKv19P9E

   replyreport
   1. 76

      Castlepalomaposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Great idea and much fun,  free hugs!!!
      
      Much better than a punch or a spray in the face. lo

      replyreport
2. 0

   ahorsebackposted 8 years ago

   Just what every anti-  Trump protester needs , why go to a rally  to protest and disrupt  another persons right of free speech ?. Or is pepper spray only for the right ?
   
   Try answering that one .
   
   I am stronger than giving in to P.C.

   replyreport
   1. 76

      Castlepalomaposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      I would not vote for anyone,, beside I'm Canadian and not anti anything. I saw protestor at Clinton events and they just laugh them off. Why are Trump supporter so angry and physical.

      replyreport
      1. 0

         ahorsebackposted 8 years agoin reply to this

         Clearly , there is a double standard in America these days created by the new age  left , as always , Free speech being the greatest element of  their message and YET , that same need from the independent voter  is completely ignored and  in fact  stamped out completely .    For that left it's simply who can yell the loudest !   Not who listens the most or  is the most civil.       America's gifted  and entitled left is dominating the press  and entire internet - media for another thing .   So the independent and outside candidates  AND their voting constituency are being walked upon  by the established  right AND left .
         
         Trump is an outsider , like him or not, Sanders is too .  Yet  the establishment dems and repubs;  are waging a war against the greater will of the American voters and the popularity of these two candidates .  Who will win out is the greater question ; the DNC?  , The GOP ?.......or the people.
         I believe this will be a very  hot summer ,as  protesters ,  probably a bloody one too .  America's very future is in the bucket .....or it comes out of established political control !

         replyreport
         1. 78

            colorfuloneposted 8 years agoin reply to this

            Very well said.  Hugs! 
            "Democracy Spring"..mass civil disobedience.

            replyreport
            1. 76

               Castlepalomaposted 8 years agoin reply to this

               I don't like the whole vibe, it's crossroad of two very great evils. No honest President since JFK

               replyreport
               1. 78

                  colorfuloneposted 8 years agoin reply to this

                  Aw, I liked JFK, but the Kennedy family has had its darker side too. 
                  
                  I kind of like these protesters who seem to be on Xanax, they remind me of the hippie-movement-protesters. Not that I completely agreed or disagreed with their agenda or reasoning, but they weren't violent. 
                  
                  A Trump supporter (a teen) recently got his front tooth broke for wearing a Trump t-shirt. He got jumped in a bathroom. The Cruz supporters, black lives matter, Bernie Supporters and liberals all mocked him on Twitter after he posted bloody photos and pic of his tooth.  Cyber-warfare.  It is a bad vibe, I don't like it either.
                  
                  Now we have "Kill Donald Trump" T-Shirts Being Sold Online"
                  Mentally Ill Punks:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QY2AAb1Yx5M
                  They would be arrested if this was about killing Obama or anyone else.

                  replyreport
                  1. 76

                     Castlepalomaposted 8 years agoin reply to this

                     On second thought, Jimmy Carter was most honest and 2nd most efficient president, just he lacked power of the people. He was the best ex President ever.
                     
                     Bill Clinton was honest, most efficient and powerful. Like JFK lacked sexual control, yet impeaching Clinton for a BJ makes US a laughing shock in European eyes and mine.  Half of America men who have affairs would lose their job, if it applied to them. After sex scam Bill, some how got bought off.
                     
                     The rest of them I don't trust them as far as I can throw them. A wild card like Trump I don't trust anywhere near that red button. I can't get a read on Trump, as he is all over the map. Can't get a read on elitists who make the selection, maybe they have not made up their minds. After all, there is hunreds of them who have more finance than Mr T.

                     replyreport
                     1. 78

                        colorfuloneposted 8 years agoin reply to this

                        On second thought, Jimmy Carter was most honest and 2nd most efficient president, just he lacked power of the people. He was the best ex President ever.
                        * http://hubpages.com/forum/post/2805907
                        
                        I think Washington was the only honest president.
                        Carter did good things after he was president. He said his hands were tied when he was in office.   
                        
                        Bill Clinton was honest, most efficient and powerful. Like JFK lacked sexual control, yet impeaching Clinton for a BJ makes US a laughing shock in European eyes and mine.  Half of America men who have affairs would lose their job, if it applied to them. After sex scam Bill, some how got bought off.
                        
                        The women that Bill raped and sexually abused, Hillary targeted psychologically.  Their lives were ruined, suicidal, depressed...all the problems that come with that. Finally, they are safe to speak out and have formed the RAPE-PAC. The website should be live this fall. 
                        *  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7uW0hxokAE
                        
                        The JFK and Merlin Monroe story is a sad one. Poor Jackie. 
                        
                        "A wild card like Trump I don't trust anywhere near that red button. I can't get a read on Trump, as he is all over the map."
                        
                        What do you need help with to get a read?   The media is anti-trump, but I do get insider-info. Its good to listen to videos and get things out of a horses mouth away from the debt stage or liberal-biased interviews.  I would be interested in your read in all fairness for accuracy... Take your time on that .

                        replyreport
                        1. 79

                           Credence2posted 8 years agoin reply to this

                           No, Trump is anti-Trump, his thoughtless statements out of his own mouth are what does him in.
                           
                           Every excuse for a poor showing by anyone is blamed on liberal/media biased interviews. Conservatives make endless excuses to shroud their questionable policy viewpoints.  Breibart is not exactly unbiased. Is that your insider info? Why should I give any more credence to that than the mainstream media? I am certainly not going to take their word as gospel, even though I do read to know what it is they say and balance it against the number and relative impartiality of other sources. You simply choose your biases like one would choose a Baskin Robbins flavor of ice cream.
                           
                           That is my take on fairness for accuracy in the media.....

                           replyreport
                           1. 78

                              colorfuloneposted 8 years agoin reply to this

                              "Breibart is not exactly unbiased. Is that your insider info?"
                              
                              No, that is not my insider info. That's a news-site, Cred.  I posted it so someone like you could Google and read it on a site they prefer better...  Then, it would be stimulating to read their comments being informed, and not playing cat and mouse.  Otherwise, its a waste of time.

                              replyreport
                              1. 79

                                 Credence2posted 8 years agoin reply to this

                                 Did I miss something, where is the 'insider info'?
                                 
                                 Yeah, I know Breibart is a newssite, but a highly biased rightwinged one. I just as well subscribe to the Rush Limbaugh newsletter and expect a fair and balanced story. I do try to read even Breitbart with objectivity, but they are not very objective on his attacks on the President and his administration. IMHO

                                 replyreport
                                 1. 78

                                    colorfuloneposted 8 years agoin reply to this

                                    "Did I miss something, where is the 'insider info'?"
                                    I didn't reveal my source.

                                    replyreport
                                    1. 79

                                       Credence2posted 8 years agoin reply to this

                                       Why should anyone give credibility to a source that you won'treveal in order to verify your claims?
                                       
                                       And no, you are not my secretary but mainstream verifiable evidence is best.  Whenever I check your claims, as you know I will,  I am presume that I will not find  contrary information or perhaps, half of the story.

                                       report
                        2. 76

                           Castlepalomaposted 8 years agoin reply to this

                           Bill Clinton had no convictions. Even Trump apologize to Bill and Hillary for twized doctors Republican did to them.  I would only vote for Ron Paul, the rest of election is like pro wrestler bs. After work alot of them get together in a bar and talk how the public are fools. Have ever notice how after each election we all get deeper in debt, basic cost of living gose way up and on lower wages. It's all fixed until we all get to sick and tired of the great abuse and get mad as hell.  Must say: I'M MADD AS HELL AND NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE. Then call me when the revolution start. Don' t want to be first to get shot.

                           replyreport
   2. 0

      PrettyPantherposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Free speech is for everyone:  Trump and his supporters as well as the protesters. 
      
      Please provide just one example of how free speech "from the independent voter  is completely ignored and  in fact  stamped out completely."  I'll check back periodically for your reply.
      
      "For that left it's simply who can yell the loudest !   Not who listens the most or  is the most civil.  America's gifted  and entitled left is dominating the press  and entire internet - media for another thing ."  This is a hilarious statement, given the amount of free media coverage the delicate and polite Trump gets.

      replyreport
   3. 0

      PrettyPantherposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Free speech is for everyone:  Trump, his supports, his haters, and those who just want a free hug. 
      
      Pepper spray?  So far, I'm thinking that belongs to the right.  Haven't yet seen a leftie pepper spray someone.

      replyreport
      1. 0

         ahorsebackposted 8 years agoin reply to this

         No you're right , the leftie protesters are good only at turning the streets into chaos , burning out their neighbors right and left , screaming louder than  the other guy .    Inventing false racism  and reigniting an old war , controlling the Mao-ist media and crying foul at everyone else .

         replyreport
         1. 78

            psycheskinnerposted 8 years agoin reply to this

            That's what I think when I watch Entertainment Tonight: That's just how Mao would want it! Yeah!

            replyreport
   4. 78

      colorfuloneposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      My question is where is the left protesting the right to free speech?  They don't seem to have a problem saying whatever they want, do they?
      
      The fact is the left has been at this for a long time.  Associated Press willingly cooperated to set Hitler in place to help the Nazi, in 1933.  Look it up! 
      
      There's anti-Trump kill Trump allowed but wow, if the right says one little thing...it gets twisted, and made into a mountain by the media.  I don't think everyone here in the forums realizes how bad it is because they feed on liberal media and their Facebook feeds and are not getting the big picture.  Its not there fault.  Do they care to know or to be informed?  IDK -  You are on the right track, and don't you doubt it.
      
      There is censorship going on. And, we are going to be seeing a lot of false-flags in the media going forward. They are going to make it seem like Trump supporters are attacking whomever when its an actor playing a role.  Its going to get deep, get the hip boots on. No sense even mentioning it here when it does happens.  You know how it is.

      replyreport
      1. 65

         PhoenixVposted 8 years agoin reply to this

         One of the comments quickly deleted on MAke América  love was " the only Cure for trump supporters is genocide.." and similar comments. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GepGO6HqL3o

         replyreport
         1. 78

            colorfuloneposted 8 years agoin reply to this

            That's what I'm talking about stuff like that. Its really one-sided.
            
            Here jonnycomelately posted a link to leftist-view of a Trump protester getting mased.
            *  https://youtu.be/1L_UKv19P9E
            
            Here I post a link to the protested punching an old man before she got mased.
            *  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0qg7RY5eZs
            
            There will be a lot more to come.  People won't know what is real if they aren't well informed as to what the truth of the matter is.  If you hate free market but enjoy the fruits of it, everything is ok.  (?)

            replyreport
         2. 65

            PhoenixVposted 8 years agoin reply to this

            Comment is still there I guess. Hugs cant Cure trump supporters but genocide can.  Not much love in Chicago.

            replyreport
            1. 78

               colorfuloneposted 8 years agoin reply to this

               Well, they are not just stealing the election from Trump, they are stealing it from Bernie Sanders, too.  Its one hell of a fight, everyone is saying they have never seen anything like this before. Are we just getting started?  Yep! ... Go Trump!  -  Go Bernie! ...
               
               The Associated Press use to telly the election numbers, but they got in trouble and lost that. Its a felony to interfere with an election, so this is some serious con job happening.
               
               Its the Rothschild and Rockefeller families the The Federal Reserve Cartel that own the media. Puppets!

               replyreport
      2. 79

         Credence2posted 8 years agoin reply to this

         Why is the media considered liberal when those that own the major outlets not anything less than aristocrats, themselves?

         replyreport
         1. 60

            nicompposted 8 years agoin reply to this

            Aristocrats are typically socially liberal. There is no exclusivity between having money/power and favoring big government.

            replyreport
            1. 79

               Credence2posted 8 years agoin reply to this

               Yes, indeed, they "Aristocrats" tend to be socially liberal, much like Donald Trump until he discovered that he needed to win the GOP nomination.
               
               But the bottom line is the bottom line, why advocate anything that you control that could be use to make it more likely that you risk any portion of your wealth by ideologically accomodating the left and its so called 'redistributive agenda'?

               replyreport
               1. 78

                  colorfuloneposted 8 years agoin reply to this

                  In Buenos Aires, Argentina, Obama said, “So often in the past there’s been a sharp division between left and right, between capitalist and communist or socialist. And especially in the Americas, that’s been a big debate, right? Oh, you know, you’re a capitalist Yankee dog, and oh, you know, you’re some crazy communist, you know, that’s going to take away everybody’s property. And I mean, those are interesting intellectual arguments, but I think for your generation, you should be practical and just choose from what works.”
                  
                  Can you believe this guy...comes right out of the closet. 
                  And, Obama grabs up more land for the federal government, and people are forced out of their homes ... Agenda 21.

                  replyreport
                  1. 79

                     Credence2posted 8 years agoin reply to this

                     Yeah, but you also know that GHW Bush was the signatory to this Agenda 21 at the Earth Summit back in 1992. So, now,  why is it all Obama's fault?

                     replyreport
                     1. 60

                        nicompposted 8 years agoin reply to this

                        Agenda 21 was non-binding and voluntary.

                        replyreport
               2. 65

                  PhoenixVposted 8 years agoin reply to this

                  Of one understands that socialism is not a share-the-wealth program, but is in reality a method to consolidate and control the wealth, then the seeming paradox of super-rich men promoting socialism becomes no paradox at all. Instead it becomes the logical, even the perfect tool of power-seeking megalomaniacs. Communism, or more accurately, socialism, is not a movement of the downtrodden masses, but of the economic elite. The plan of the conspirator Insiders then is to socialize the United States, not to Communize it http://modernhistoryproject.org/mhp?Art … &C=2.0

                  replyreport
                  1. 79

                     Credence2posted 8 years agoin reply to this

                     Very interesting points and perspective, thanks. I am not a concerned about introducing socialism as much as I am in reining in Capitalism's abuses and excesses.

                     replyreport
                     1. 65

                        PhoenixVposted 8 years agoin reply to this

                        I'm on my phone so is difficult writing. Introducing socialism is the goal of the abusive capitalist elite. Instead of being against it , one aids it.  It's just the way to control and consolodate . It is not aiding the poor by creating a larger monste.  Controlled by a few. Would you trade freedom for food? And when control of the masses and wealth is not enough any more for them what is next?

                        replyreport
                        1. 79

                           Credence2posted 8 years agoin reply to this

                           So how do we stop the 'abusive capitalist' elite that we know needs to be stopped?
                           
                           How do we get their tentacles out of influence peddling in government operations through bribes and privilege?
                           
                           How do we keep the pressure on Wall Street without more stringent regulations to prevent a repeat of the disaster to the economy back  in 2008?
                           
                           The risk of a plutocracy and feudalism society must be avoided, I don't necessarily see Socialism as the solution.
                           
                           Aiding the poor would be assisted by people electing representatives that represent rather than succumb to those that want to 'buy'  unjustified and inordinate influence, consolidating a Government that works to their advantage and to the detriment of everybody else. How do I promote the destruction of that power?
                           
                           The answer is not coming from conservatives that only want to give the plutocrat class even more. if the system worked properly, I should not have to choose between food and freedom.
                           
                           Campaign finance reform and reversal of 'Citizen United' ruling breaking their power and influence seems to be a prerequisite.

                           replyreport
                     2. 78

                        colorfuloneposted 8 years agoin reply to this

                        TPP is a big scam, it will be a disaster waiting to happen..
                        The US trade deficit with China is not rolling on our favor.
                        https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/ba … .html#2015
                        
                        Communism / socialism = capitalism, rich and powerful, control, dominance. Not smart free market.  We've been feed so much propaganda from the the rules to the politicians and media for centuries.  If a mainstream media journalist bravely reports real truth they find themselves threatened or out on the streets.

                        replyreport
                        1. 79

                           Credence2posted 8 years agoin reply to this

                           I can't argue with that...

                           replyreport
                           1. 78

                              colorfuloneposted 8 years agoin reply to this

                              I just got the revelation that “Democracy Spring” is actually against Hillary and is all for Sanders.  It is starting out in Philadelphia, Penn. today and they are marching to DC.  Too bad its raining there and might turn into snow by tomorrow.  -  Funded by George Soros though. 
                              
                              I was worried of another "Arab Spring".

                              replyreport
                           2. 76

                              Castlepalomaposted 8 years agoin reply to this

                              Something in between can, just not Government's or Kings.

                              replyreport
                              1. 76

                                 Castlepalomaposted 8 years agoin reply to this

                                 Small Government at local levels is goood, just not feberal God who focus on stealing and killing.

                                 replyreport
                     3. 65

                        PhoenixVposted 8 years agoin reply to this

                        Is like gin rummy. Socialism is a free card you receive before a better player gins on ya.

                        replyreport