Trump Lawyers - Impeachment v.2

Jump to Last Post 1-8 of 8 discussions (21 posts)
  1. IslandBites profile image88
    IslandBitesposted 2 years ago

    WTF was that?? Worst defense ever.

    But I really enjoyed the part that made Trump furious. big_smile

    Did you watch? What do you think about his defense team.

    1. IslandBites profile image88
      IslandBitesposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      But I really enjoyed the part that made Trump furious. big_smile


      ...the American people just spoke and they just changed administrations... The people are smart enough, in the light most favorable to them, they’re smart enough to pick a new administration if they don’t like the old one and they just did...

      And in fact, this happens all the time when there are changes in administrations from one-term presidents to others...That happens, the people get tired of an administration they don’t want, and they know how to change it. And they just did...

      So it seems pretty evident to me that they do know how. It has worked 100% of the time. 100% of the time in the United States, when the people had been fed up with and had enough of the occupant of The White House, they changed the occupant of the white house.


  2. profile image0
    PrettyPantherposted 2 years ago

    Worst defense ever, and the funniest defense ever. LOL

    Of course, Trump had to take what he could get, given that these were the only lawyers  willing to defend him after his other lawyers  quit.

    Yes, I watched most of yesterday's proceedings. The opening video brought me to tears. The defense brought me nothing but guffaws and snorts. big_smile

    Today has been quite compelling so far.

    1. IslandBites profile image88
      IslandBitesposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Yes. It's been a great presentation by the impeachment managers.

      1. wilderness profile image96
        wildernessposted 2 years agoin reply to this

        I haven't watched the farce; did the "impeachment managers" do anything but play video bites in an effort to raise emotions?  Have they presented any facts at all?

        1. IslandBites profile image88
          IslandBitesposted 2 years agoin reply to this


          1. wilderness profile image96
            wildernessposted 2 years agoin reply to this

            Does that mean I was right not to watch an emotion laden, but fact free, demonstration of party politics?

            1. profile image0
              PrettyPantherposted 2 years agoin reply to this

              Do you even realize how ridiculous you sound?

            2. IslandBites profile image88
              IslandBitesposted 2 years agoin reply to this

              Oh, I'm sorry, no. That meant 'not worth the effort'.

        2. MizBejabbers profile image87
          MizBejabbersposted 2 years agoin reply to this

          Facts, Wilderness? The facts speak for themselves. Cops getting the crap beaten out of them. The Vice President and his family running for their lives; Mitt Romney running toward the mob and being redirected...all the while Trump standing at a podium yelling "Fight! Fight! Fight!
          Gosh, are you blind or have you closed your eyes on purpose? What does it take, anyway?
          Seriously, how would you have felt if the mob had actually killed VP Pence? I don't care for his politics, but I would not have liked it at all. I would have been sad for him and his family and very angry (angrier) at the mob.

          1. wilderness profile image96
            wildernessposted 2 years agoin reply to this

            Good point - you're following exactly that path the Democrats want you to.  Be afraid, cry real tears, and set aside any requirement for real proof of incitement.  Just assume it is true, watch the horror over and over, and you won't need anything more.  You can even change his words as you did (Trump never said "Fight! Fight! Fight!" - that's your own exaggeration) if it helps produce the desired verdict.

            Of course, if you limit yourself to his actual words, without "interpreting" his mysterious code, it doesn't work so well.  If you realize he used the exact same rhetoric politicians have used for centuries it doesn't work so well.  Only after you apply your own interpretation, and assume that the madmen doing the same were right in their interpretation, can you claim there was actually any incitement, intentional or otherwise.

            And that's the difference.  I won't do those things.  I'm not interested in what those charged with rioting have to say in their own defense, I'm not interested in "interpreting" the words to mean other than what they say.  I'm not interested in how scared Pence, Pelosi or others are for it has exactly zero to do with proving incitement.  I choose to read and listen to his words, giving appropriate consideration for political rhetoric and Trumps massive ego (Impossible that Donald Trump lost!).  And when I do I find no incitement to riot (let alone the enforcement of US law that is being called "insurrection").  That a few idiots read into Trumps statements what is not there does not mean Trump incited a riot - they did that all by themselves.

            I'm not even interested in the political aspects of this farce; that Democrats will do anything to prevent facing Trump again in the future only speaks ill of them, not Trump.  That the entire purpose of this trial is to prevent the people from ever again electing Trump only speaks ill of those that will vote their party line, and I trust I am correct when I predict that 100% of Democrats will vote that way.  I have too much concern over the degradation of our law, and our Constitution, to take that road.  Neither are perfect, but both have been trampled very badly, almost exclusively by Democrats trying to remove a political opponent, in the last few years.

  3. LongTimeMother profile image93
    LongTimeMotherposted 2 years ago

    Every American should be watching these proceedings to witness firsthand the evidence presented by both sides and hear their arguments.

    This is not a time to be relying on ‘opinion journalists’ to be telling you what happened. It is impossible to imagine just what is actually being presented if you don’t see it for yourself.

    1. IslandBites profile image88
      IslandBitesposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      I agree.

    2. GA Anderson profile image90
      GA Andersonposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      I agree with your thought if every American also watches the defense presentations.

      As one example; during an Impeachment manager's break a Fox pundit—a Trump administration person, came on making a big deal about them only cherry-picking the most damning soundbites. Portraying a one-sided story.

      Oops . . . after the break the managers did present the "Trump-saving" soundbites.


    3. MizBejabbers profile image87
      MizBejabbersposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Good answer LTM. There's a big difference to being fed opinionated hogwash, and watching the actions for yourself. What I liked was, although I'd seen some of it already, I wasn't sure about what I was seeing until they explained what was going on. The descriptions of the actions were factual, not opinions. It made my skin crawl when I heard the mob yelling to "kill Pence" and see how close they came to capturing him. And I'm not even a Republican.

      I believe that worked up bunch would have taken him out to the noose they put up on the Capitol grounds. I don't think there was anyone, cops or national guard, capable of rescuing him from that mob had they captured him. I believe they actually would have killed him. If I were a stubborn Republican, I certainly wouldn't be sitting around  making light of that.

  4. Benoitsmidget profile image75
    Benoitsmidgetposted 2 years ago

    Kudos, I couldn’t agree more.

  5. IslandBites profile image88
    IslandBitesposted 2 years ago

    So Lindsey Graham, Mike Lee and Ted Cruz had to coach the lawyers. SMH


    Today should be fun. Lets see.

  6. profile image0
    PrettyPantherposted 2 years ago

    I wonder how many Trump apologists will watch the defense after ignoring the prosecution? I am watching both, torturous as it is.

  7. profile image0
    PrettyPantherposted 2 years ago

    Paraphrasing: The house managers made a mistake and fixed it before they showed it to you!


  8. profile image0
    PrettyPantherposted 2 years ago

    Michael Steele, referring to the defense ( paraphrasing because I might not have it exactly right): "amazing display of stupidity. Trump shouldn't pay these lawyers, eiher."

    Also, Trump lawyers lied when they said the defense were not given the video footage. Do ethical lawyers lie in a legal proceeding?


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)