Report Confirms 2020 Election Abuses by Democrats

Jump to Last Post 1-21 of 21 discussions (140 posts)
  1. Readmikenow profile image94
    Readmikenowposted 13 months ago

    As I said before, this isn't going away. 

    "Exclusive: Report confirms 2020 abuses and RNC deploys 'year-round' election integrity unit

    “However, Democrats, including some public officials, used the pandemic as a pretense toachieve long-sought policy goals such as expanded mail voting and the elimination of keysafeguards, specifically for absentee voting, such as witness and ID requirements. One of theworst examples is the automatic mailing of ballots to voters who did not request them,including in states such as New Jersey and Nevada that had no tradition of heavy absenteevoting and were unprepared to scale up their processes. Another example was how statecourts ignored laws enacted by their legislatures such as ballot delivery deadlines. Utilizingemergency powers and the courts, the Democrats attempted, with some success, to tear downthese key safeguards that give Americans confidence in our elections.”

    It is also clear that officials watered downverification processes in order to handle the influx of absentee ballots. This includedlowering review standards for counting ballots and insufficient ballot duplication procedures.This easing of standards combined with a lack of observer access to the processing andcounting of absentee ballots could not have coincided at a worse time.The 2020 election also uncovered several festering problems and weaknesses in ourelectoral system that were not specifically attributable to COVID and need to be fixed. Chiefamong these are ongoing failures of states to clean up their voter rolls and securityvulnerabilities in election voting systems and infrastructure. There continue to be ongoing problems with a lack of public access to important election records and data. This isinformation the public deserves and officials have no good reason to withhold

    The issues found in the report, shown below, are technical but amount to improper changes, said the RNC, which provided this list of highlights:
    Democratic leaders leveraged the COVID-19 pandemic as an excuse to water down election integrity safeguards by ramming through last-minute changes to the election process.
    Many changes were enacted by courts that disregarded long-standing laws, by Democratic governors who abused their emergency powers, and by officials such as secretaries of state who ignored state laws duly passed by their legislatures.
    Some public officials used the pandemic as a pretense to expand mail voting and eliminate key absentee voting safeguards such as witness and ID requirements. Policies such as automatically mailing ballots to all voters and waiving ballot delivery deadlines also led to chaos and decreased confidence in our elections.
    The committee also took note of the millions dumped into election coffers by liberals such as Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg.

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wash … grity-unit

    1. Kathryn L Hill profile image75
      Kathryn L Hillposted 13 months agoin reply to this

      Thank You.

      1. Readmikenow profile image94
        Readmikenowposted 13 months agoin reply to this

        It is clear there was sufficient fraud in Georgia and Arizona to change the outcomes of those states in the 2020 election.  There is an effort to have a recount in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.  There is even an effort in Colorado.

        So, just one more state has to be found to have committed a sufficient level of fraud to change the outcome of their 2020 presidential vote, and it is then clear, President Donald Trump should have remained president.

        It makes sense the Democrats will fight this with every resource possible.  Anyone who did what they did and left our country with the senseless babbling idiot of Biden, should not want that revealed.

        1. Ken Burgess profile image84
          Ken Burgessposted 13 months agoin reply to this

          On January 1 2020 Trump was a lock to win re-election in a landslide.

          Even those who truly despised him knew it, the economy was too strong, all was quiet in Foreign Affairs (the only President in decades not to invade/topple another country)... the one negative issue was the Trade war with China, unpopular even if necessary.

          Then the Pandemic, the lockdowns, the Riots over-running many Democrat controlled states, endless negative media attacks, and finally illegal and unconstitutional changes to voting procedures in critical states.

          That's what it took to make a country believe Trump lost to a mentally incapacitated/deranged Joe Biden,

          Not much at all really.

          Scary thing is, three more years of Biden may make Trump the most popular person to the majority of Americans to exist in our lifetimes... America may be begging for him to return to the Presidency by 2024.

          1. Readmikenow profile image94
            Readmikenowposted 13 months agoin reply to this

            You are right.  Even with enough evidence to overturn the election, I know it won't happen.  I do believe it needs to be brought to the attention of the American public exactly how low the Democrat party stooped to steal an election.  That should be the goal.

        2. Ken Burgess profile image84
          Ken Burgessposted 13 months agoin reply to this

          Mike, I suggest this site for info on the 2020 election fraud, this particular individual has gone out of their way to dig up information and detail occurrences of the 2020 election few know about:

          https://www.discoverthenetworks.org/org … ff_id=1262

          1. Valeant profile image88
            Valeantposted 13 months agoin reply to this

            I do enjoy how Levin completely ignores the role of the courts in deciding the constitutionality of laws.  If the courts found that a state's elections laws violate the constitution, pretty sure they have the right to nullify or alter them.  As for changes by elections officials, those too, were upheld in the courts.  What Levin claims as fraud was deemed legal time and time again.

            And the Supreme Court sided with many of these battleground states in noting that the Trump Campaign needed to have filed their challenges before we actually had the election if they had an issue with them.

            It's not fraud to get a legal court ruling about election laws, and then have those rulings upheld at the Supreme Court level.  It's politics, and Trump's Campaign in so many ways got out politicked in 2020 - from Priorities USA to Stacey Abrams out registering the GOP in Georgia.

            1. Ken Burgess profile image84
              Ken Burgessposted 13 months agoin reply to this

              Its good to know that our 2020 Election was decided by those States that made last minute changes to their voting procedures, and the party that lawyered up to attack the court system in support of those changes, before the election even occurred.

              The Party with the most well laid out legal plans, won the election, just goes to show, if you aren't clever enough to manipulate the system, and out maneuver the opponent, you won't win.

              And people say every vote matters..... roll

              1. Valeant profile image88
                Valeantposted 13 months agoin reply to this

                Well, until you can show that a significant number of votes that would have changed the election results were from non-citizens, I would say that the results of those court challenges accomplished the goal of protecting the rights of each and every citizen to vote.  You know, that thing that's in the Constitution.

                1. wilderness profile image94
                  wildernessposted 13 months agoin reply to this

                  How does anyone show that non-citizens are voting when ID's are forbidden, when mass mailings to everyone in the state are done, no checks are ever made to determine eligibility, and no checks are made to determine that the person voting is who they say they are?

                  (PS The constitution does not guarantee that every citizen can vote - there are millions of people, from felons to children that are citizens but cannot vote.)

                  1. Valeant profile image88
                    Valeantposted 13 months agoin reply to this

                    ID's are forbidden?  How do you register to vote then?  I wasn't aware that mass mailings (I assume you meant ballots) were mailed indiscriminately and not just to those registered to vote.  Can you prove that claim?

                    True, I should have added eligible citizens to my sentence.  I will give you that word-game win.

            2. wilderness profile image94
              wildernessposted 13 months agoin reply to this

              Wait.  Courts have determined that changes in election procedures, changes state constitutions limit to actions by state Congress, were legal?

              Can you point me to such a declaration, wherein changes made by local election officials that were limited to state Congressional actions only, were legal?

              1. Valeant profile image88
                Valeantposted 13 months agoin reply to this

                Sure, search through the 60 court cases the right lost since the election and you'll find plenty that fit my description.

                But here is one right off the bat:  https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- … SKBN2AM1S1

    2. Kathleen Cochran profile image79
      Kathleen Cochranposted 13 months agoin reply to this

      The Washington Examiner? Seriously? Give it a rest.

    3. Miebakagh57 profile image69
      Miebakagh57posted 13 months agoin reply to this

      Thank you. Time for old Joe Biden to pack and go. Re-instal 'Real' Donald Trump for the next four years as President.                                      Seriously, all those who soiled their hands in these cowardly acts should be severely punished. As for Nancy Pelosi, she should be treat like Mao Se Tung of China...her name completely blot out in American history for tearing the state of the nation address.

      1. Ken Burgess profile image84
        Ken Burgessposted 13 months agoin reply to this

        You have to understand, Trump was a "mistake".

        Trump was never expected to win the Republican nomination, he was considered a joke of a candidate no "political expert" or politician took seriously... until it was to late.

        The RNC and its primary supporters spent tens of BILLIONS trying to derail Trump toward the end of the primaries, there were serious considerations to awarding the nomination to Ted Cruz despite Trump having the criteria to receive it... but Ted Cruz himself wasn't a very popular guy within the Republican household, so they finally let Trump have it, figuring Hillary Clinton was a lock anyways.

        Funny thing about Clinton, she wasn't very popular amongst her own Party... the MSM and the DC insiders all carried water for her, but the voters didn't exactly like her... they liked Sanders better, but the DNC ensured Clinton got the nomination anyways.

        THAT 2016 election cycle went a long way to exposing the corruption inherit in the American political system today... for those who wanted to see reality.

        2020 was the Elites retaking control back from the people... no populist was going to threaten the DNC nomination like in 2016... those that controlled the MSM, those in Silicone Valley, the Hollyweird snobs, the Big Foundations, the billionaire class of George Soros, David Rockefeller, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, Michael Bloomberg, Steven Spielberg, Jeff Bezos, all of them were in shock, outraged by the 2016 outcome.

        They were not going to allow that to repeat in 2020.  If they had to burn down the whole country to ensure it didn't happen, they would do so.  They would regain control of DC, put their puppet Biden in the Presidency and pull his strings.

        Day 1 Biden shut down American Oil & Gas operations within America to the best of his ability... we are now reliant on foreign oil once again.

        More importantly, he was doing a great service to Russia, stopping the export of Natural Gas from America to the EU and OKing new pipelines from Russia into the EU... making the EU more reliant on Russia for oil and natural gas than ever before.

        Day 1 - Biden reversed course on all of Trump's efforts at the Border, mandating to Border Patrol agencies that their new mission was to help illegal immigrants to cross the border and enter the country, not deter them and send them back.

        And my favorite when he stood up there with the UAW and Legacy Auto companies and talked about how they might, by 2030, have half the autos they produce be EVs...

        No talk of the effort needed to build the infrastructure across the Nation to support it, no talk of how the batteries can be 95% recycled, making EVs far more 'Carbon friendly" than any other alternative, heck no talk of Tesla... the company whose cars that sell in America are 100% Made in America... the company that leads the way in EV technology and has built its own recharge station infrastructure across the nation.

        And then just a couple weeks after that, the Biden Administration set its Government Agencies out to get Tesla, investigating its 11 car fires... compared to the over 250,000 ICE vehicle fires we have yearly... and its AI Self Driving crashes... that weren't AI or Self Driving at all, making the entire investigation a sham.

        Doing the dirty work for the Legacy Auto and Big Oil companies, trying to slow or stop Tesla from advancing their technologies which all humanity can benefit from... and that is Biden in a nutshell, a corrupt crony that is doing the bidding of the corporations and institutions that don't care one whit about America, or Climate Change, or anything else that supposedly the Democratic Party stands for.

        Any Democrat that voted for Biden... didn't vote out their worst nightmare... they just voted it IN.  As time will prove to us all.

        1. Miebakagh57 profile image69
          Miebakagh57posted 13 months agoin reply to this

          So, what good is the dirty works of old Joe Biden on behave of his masters to America? And how come the "mistake" Trump came to put "America first"?                                   On day one everything began to get dirty, terrific, and awful!                                                  On day two? Trump was no longer liken and minds were made up to throw him out of the white house. God save America!

          1. Ken Burgess profile image84
            Ken Burgessposted 13 months agoin reply to this

            The Biden Administration, based on its actions, is EXACTLY what I said it was going to be long before he was elected... a Puppet Administration for Corporations and International Agencies (WB, UN, WHO) none of which have the best interests of the American people or America in mind.

            He is a shill for Big Oil, Big Pharma, China, the UN, the Legacy (ICE) Auto industry (UAW included)... to name the obvious.

            https://www.thewattcar.com/home/tesla-e … honest-why

            https://www.breitbart.com/border/2021/0 … tion-laws/

            http://here4dbest.com/biden-admin-begs- … with-that/

            https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/26/explosi … firms.html

            Its hard to believe Biden failed at this many serious issues, in less than a year... it usually takes a President between 3-to-7 years to build up a resume that makes Americans dislike them.

            And this is with a MSM that is in full protect and deflect mode for Biden.  Imagine if they were out to make everything seem worse than it is, as they were with Trump.

            1. Kathryn L Hill profile image75
              Kathryn L Hillposted 13 months agoin reply to this

              MSM:
              Main Stream Media

            2. Miebakagh57 profile image69
              Miebakagh57posted 13 months agoin reply to this

              Ken, thanks for the input. It is informing.

  2. IslandBites profile image89
    IslandBitesposted 13 months ago

    "The Republican National Committee report"



    https://hubstatic.com/15685556.jpg

  3. Readmikenow profile image94
    Readmikenowposted 13 months ago

    The Public Interest Foundation has a report that 15 million mail in ballots were unaccounted for during the 2020 election.

    Here is their report with the sources they used at the bottom.


    https://publicinterestlegal.org/wp-cont … 0-1P-1.pdf

  4. Valeant profile image88
    Valeantposted 13 months ago

    What the Republican National Committee report completely ignores is that with nothing to do while working from home, millions of people are going to vote out the person who lied to them about the pandemic.

    And they mention critical states.  But nothing about the other 24 that did the same thing and Trump won.  If you're going to make such a blatantly partisan omission such as that, your report is already dogshit.

    1. wilderness profile image94
      wildernessposted 13 months agoin reply to this

      "What the Republican National Committee report completely ignores is that with nothing to do while working from home, millions of people are going to vote out the person who lied to them about the pandemic."

      Not sure how that makes ignoring election laws legal.  Or how it makes indiscriminate mailing of ballots, without any significant checks, wise.

      1. Readmikenow profile image94
        Readmikenowposted 13 months agoin reply to this

        When you can't rebut an argument, fall back on an old and worn-out talking point.

      2. Valeant profile image88
        Valeantposted 13 months agoin reply to this

        'Not sure how that makes ignoring election laws legal.  Or how it makes indiscriminate mailing of ballots, without any significant checks, wise.'

        Not sure how simply receiving a ballot is fraud either.  The signature checks are done when the votes are actually cast.  Arizona and Georgia both noted that they did not relax signature verification.  In Pennsylvania, allowing voters to come in and verify that it is their signature seems like a significant means of checking when there is a discrepancy.  Of course, that case of fraud in the state where the Republican who voted for Trump using his mother's ballot had some trouble producing her live body.

        https://apnews.com/article/ap-fact-chec … 1e83ab36e0

        https://apnews.com/article/election-202 … 931127caff

        1. wilderness profile image94
          wildernessposted 13 months agoin reply to this

          "Not sure how simply receiving a ballot is fraud either. "

          The comment was: "Or how it makes indiscriminate mailing of ballots, without any significant checks, wise."

          No mention of receiving ballots, not mention of fraud in massive mailings.  Just that such mailings, without checking to see if the person lives at the address AND that they are legal to vote, is not wise.  As you point out, dead people somehow manage to vote under that system - part of the reason it is not wise.

    2. Valeant profile image88
      Valeantposted 13 months ago

      One case of someone caught using a family member's ballot isn't dead people.  It's one case and shows how the system works to catch cheaters in the few instances that it actually happens because there are signature verifications once the vote is actually cast.

      If your argument is that a ballot delivered to an address where someone new lives there will:
      a.) be opened, in violation of federal law of opening another person's mail
      b.) be submitted by a stranger with no clue of what the former occupant's signature looks like and be able to clear the verification standards
      c.) be used by someone not registered to vote while using someone else's identity in violation of the law
      Then I say you're making multiple arguments without the data to back such a claim that it happens on as widespread level.

      1. wilderness profile image94
        wildernessposted 13 months agoin reply to this

        "It's one case and shows how the system works to catch cheaters in the few instances..."

        Apologies; I wrongly assumed that the person in question was dead.  But your assumption that catching one person means we caught them all is, as far as I can tell, without basis, for checking signatures will NOT catch them all.  Nor did all the states use that method - most of them "wrote the book" on mass ballot mailings on the fly and without any experience in the matter, and we KNOW that ballots were sent to addresses where the person had long since departed.  I find it simplistic in the extreme to simply assume that no one else would fill those thousands (millions?) of bad ballots out and return them - whether against the law or not it WILL be done by unscrupulous people determined to get their candidate elected.

        But you're right - I make the claim that is is possible (and therefore happens or could happen) without data to back it.  Just as you make the claim it does not happen...without data to back it.  We have never (as far as I know) actually performed an in depth investigation with all of the voters that returned ballots to see if they actually voted and how.  Democrats simply claim there is no fraud without ever checking, so there is no data either way.

        That's the point - without testing, simply assuming that there is no fraud doesn't cut it.  Not for me, anyway - liberals countrywide are quite happy with the failed logic of the assumption there is no fraud.

        (You arguments that because it is against the law it won't be done don't hold water either; if that were true we wouldn't need police or any other form of law enforcement.)

        1. Valeant profile image88
          Valeantposted 13 months agoin reply to this

          'That's the point - without testing, simply assuming that there is no fraud doesn't cut it.  Not for me, anyway - liberals countrywide are quite happy with the failed logic of the assumption there is no fraud.'

          And yet, by law, most elections do test.  We don't assume fraud as you falsely claim, we assert a lack of fraud based on the audits of ballots after the fact.  Something you seem to be unaware that happens.

          1. wilderness profile image94
            wildernessposted 13 months agoin reply to this

            And how many of the audits consist of contacting those people on the mass mailing list to find out if they voted and if their vote was properly counted?

            Or do we simply gloss over that question, assuming that all of them were valid and proper?  Have we ever even contacted a statistically representative sampling of them or do we ignore it, even knowing that thousands of ballots were mailed to addresses where the people no longer live?  Do we ever verify that each and every mailed ballot (mass mailings, not requests for ballots) is a valid one, received and returned by the person intended?

            I don't think so.  As far as I've heard such testing has never been done.  Am I wrong?  Are those mass mailings ever tested in that manner, verifying that our mailing lists (known to be incorrect and incomplete) was in fact correct?

            1. Valeant profile image88
              Valeantposted 13 months agoin reply to this

              I will concede agreement that a non-partisan commission (assuming one can actually be formed and not corrupted) that checks that ballot result does match the intent of the voter would be a good thing.  But at the same point, you could see bad actors paid to claim that their ballots were accurate and to say that they weren't.  That would hard to prove as false, so that undermines the idea.

    3. Readmikenow profile image94
      Readmikenowposted 13 months ago

      https://hubstatic.com/15689664.jpg

      1. Valeant profile image88
        Valeantposted 13 months agoin reply to this

        The right:
        Businesses should have the right to deny service to whoever they want, especially them gays!

        Also the right:
        Businesses who deny service to us anti-vaxxers are violating our rights!

        Make up your damned minds already.  Geesh.

        1. Readmikenow profile image94
          Readmikenowposted 13 months agoin reply to this

          Good attempt at an analogy...but it does miss the mark.

    4. Readmikenow profile image94
      Readmikenowposted 13 months ago

      How the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump

      A shuffling, peevish and often confused Joe Biden attracted no more than 100 to 200 people to his pre-election rallies where he stumbled through short scripted speeches. His vice-presidential candidate Kamala Harris, selected entirely for being a woman of color (Biden had committed publicly to choosing a woman VP and said he’d prefer one of color), turned out to be so jarringly repellant, even to Democrats, that she dropped out of the presidential race during the primaries, winning zero electoral votes.

      Yet Biden and Harris won the 2020 election – supposedly.

      Most allegations that last November’s election was stolen from Donald Trump center on election fraud and abuse. Indeed, the number of documented “irregularities” is overwhelming: five crucial swing states bizarrely announcing on election eve they were going to stop counting votes for the night when Trump was ahead, only to report the next morning that Joe Biden was in the lead; the clearly unconstitutional last-minute changes in voting regulations in various states, all obviously intended to invite fraud and abuse; Philadelphia election workers refusing to allow Republican observers to witness the vote count and Detroit election personnel likewise plastering cardboard over windows in a vote-counting room to avoid being observed as required by law; the refusal of some states to check voters’ signatures on ballots; the hundreds of affidavits, sworn under penalty of perjury and imprisonment, all testifying to having witnessed overt election fraud; and so on ad infinitum.

      Even now, Democrats are still desperately trying to discredit and halt the ongoing forensic election audits underway in key battleground states, while accusing states attempting to pass the most reasonable, commonsense Voter ID laws of engaging in white-supremacist “voter suppression.” Biden has ridiculously labeled them “Jim Crow 2.0.”

      But voter fraud is only one element in what was – if one dares speak the forbidden truth out loud – a clearly unfair and rigged election.

      https://www.wnd.com/2021/08/2020-electi … ald-trump/

      1. Kathryn L Hill profile image75
        Kathryn L Hillposted 13 months agoin reply to this

        Redo.

      2. Valeant profile image88
        Valeantposted 13 months agoin reply to this

        How Joe Biden Proved He Was More Fit to Lead the United States

        As a pandemic was raging, Joe Biden campaigned by following the science and CDC guidelines as his opponent displayed a reckless disregard for them to the point where he and many of his staff contracted the deadly virus themselves.

        Kamala Harris was celebrated by the left as adding diversity to a ticket in regard to gender, race, and age.

        The overnight reporting of mail-in ballots added votes to both Biden and Trump - more of which favored Biden due to Trump insisting his followers vote at the polls.  That's not an irregularity at all, it was expected, even by the majority of the GOP.

        The changes to voting regulations, aimed at protecting voters during a pandemic were upheld in the courts, so to call them unconstitutional is to deny reality.  In the one instance of a court win for the Trump campaign, poll watchers were granted the ability to move closer to view the counting.  Many of those sworn affidavits were dismissed by the courts as nothing more than a misunderstanding of the actual processes of the election and lawyers have since been sanctioned for filing frivolous lawsuits with such evidence.

        Even Republicans in Arizona admit the fraudit going on there is flawed beyond the ability to believe any conclusions they report based on many false claims already made and rescinded.  It's clear to all professional elections experts that Cyber Ninjas is a partisan entity hired to announce a pre-determined conclusion.

        https://recorder.maricopa.gov/justthefa … ctionfacts

        1. Readmikenow profile image94
          Readmikenowposted 13 months agoin reply to this

          Only getting the view of Maricopa County and not the Arizona state senate is a bit limited.

          Sorry, but it is painfully obvious to people in the United States and around the world Joe Biden can't do the job as president.  K Harris is dislike by as many Democrats as Republicans.  Between the southern boarder, Afghanistan, and the economy.  His presidency is turning out to be a disaster, and its only been going on for 8 months.

          I could provide many, many links, but it would take too much time and is too easy to Google.

          1. Valeant profile image88
            Valeantposted 13 months agoin reply to this

            The economy?  Unemployment is down.  Stock market near all-time highs, businesses are remaining open now that people are vaccinated. 

            Inflation is from taking a year off where we could not produce goods, or from gas companies not selling gas as no one travelled, so they decided to raise prices to offset those losses now that demand is up.  Also, in 2020, 30% of all US currency in existence was printed by the Fed since our disastrous response to Covid led to the economy closing down. Simple economics to explain inflation and it's cause was long before Biden was elected.

            The border numbers are up with the amount of people that are trying to cross the border a second time (38% now as compared to 7% a year ago at this time) thanks to Trump's Title 42 policy.  Supreme Court just sided with Texas on leaving the remain in Mexico policy, which I think many would agree was actually a good idea and Biden should have left it.

            Afghanistan evacuation is progressing with no loss of American life.  The Afghan government was certain to fall the minute the US did not include them in the negotiations with the Taliban.  Once Biden chose to honor the agreement, that was the foregone conclusion - he just underestimated the resolve of the Afghan government to fight for their own country and the speed with which the Taliban advanced.  America first still, right?  Or do you guys have a new motto we're not aware of? 

            And the Arizona state Senate seems to have as many Republicans who concur that this audit's conclusions are worthless as they have Trump acolytes.  Considering there were only two who were in attendance at the last update that Cyber Ninjas gave to the Senate, before that update was shredded by fact checkers.

            1. Readmikenow profile image94
              Readmikenowposted 13 months agoin reply to this

              Biden inherited an economy that had been shut down because of Covid.  It wouldn't be difficult for anyone to post good economic numbers when businesses start doing business again. 

              I won't even discuss Afghanistan.  Too close to the subject.

              You are wrong about the Arizona state senate Republicans.  The Republicans in Maricopa County this is true.

        2. wilderness profile image94
          wildernessposted 13 months agoin reply to this

          "Kamala Harris was celebrated by the left as adding diversity to a ticket in regard to gender, race, and age."

          With this I would agree.  Harris was put in second spot because of gender, race and age.  Qualifications were strictly secondary - far more important to look good.

          1. Valeant profile image88
            Valeantposted 13 months agoin reply to this

            I would say relatable, or are female Senators no longer qualified to run for the Office of President in your misogynistic view?  Two old white guys did not really appeal to those suburban housewives or black voters all that well in the end, according to the exit polling.

          2. Ken Burgess profile image84
            Ken Burgessposted 13 months agoin reply to this

            That's part of the new agenda... Equity in results.

            Not Equality.

            Not Ability.

            Equity.

            1. Readmikenow profile image94
              Readmikenowposted 13 months agoin reply to this

              Appears to be a case of valuing image over substance. Many people, including Democrats, find her beyond incompetent.

              1. Valeant profile image88
                Valeantposted 13 months agoin reply to this

                I'll concede she won't be my preferred 2024 candidate.

            2. wilderness profile image94
              wildernessposted 13 months agoin reply to this

              You got it.

          3. Miebakagh57 profile image69
            Miebakagh57posted 13 months agoin reply to this

            OMG!

    5. Credence2 profile image77
      Credence2posted 13 months ago

      I guess that the only people in the entire universe who are automatically assumed to be qualified as a default are white males?

      It is just appropriate that the Right clings to a world and values that are decomposing before their very eyes......

      And, yes, I vote..

      1. Readmikenow profile image94
        Readmikenowposted 13 months agoin reply to this

        Are you aware of what is happening with Larry Elder in the California recall election that will take place in September?

        1. Credence2 profile image77
          Credence2posted 13 months agoin reply to this

          Yeah, Mike, I have heard about Larry Elder. He is a long shot as just a Trump clone in blackface. It is also a long shot in a state where Trump is VERY unpopular. The Democrats are never going to let this one slip by to see the light of day.

          But stranger things have happened in California politics, let's hope that the ascendency of Elder is not one them.

          1. Kathryn L Hill profile image75
            Kathryn L Hillposted 13 months agoin reply to this

            There are more conservatives, especially in the Orange County/San Diego area than is revealed. Elder is not "Trump in blackface," which is very rude to Larry as to anybody. How dare you. Those who hear him on the radio understand what he says and they respect him for his political wisdom and passion for independence for ALL.

            1. Credence2 profile image77
              Credence2posted 13 months agoin reply to this

              Yes, I dare.

              He is a Trump supporter and subscriber,  that automatically puts him on my poop list straight away.

              And Orange County and San Diego counties will not be enough....

              We will see....

          2. Readmikenow profile image94
            Readmikenowposted 13 months agoin reply to this

            I would say that Larry Elder is not a long-shot.  He is leading in the California run-off election.

            "Leading Crowded GOP Field of Recall Candidates, Larry Elder Stumps in San Jose.

            SAN JOSE (KPIX) — Larry Elder, the Republican frontrunner in the California gubernatorial recall election, blasted Gov. Gavin Newsom in a rapid-fire stump speech, going through a laundry list of issues, during an hourlong campaign stop at Calvary Chapel in San Jose Thursday."

            https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2021/ … -san-jose/

            I'm always amazed at the names called black conservatives, but Democrats and especially black Democrats.  Larry Elders grew up in South Central LA.  Because he does not think like Democrats expect him to think, because he has an independent voice, he is set upon.  My favorite comment about him is "Larry Elders is the black face of white supremacy"  That is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever read, but it is one of many things the media has said about him.  I believe Larry Elders has quite a bit of courage to speak his beliefs and not give up his convictions.  It is the way with all black conservatives.

            1. Credence2 profile image77
              Credence2posted 13 months agoin reply to this

              Everyone has their right to beliefs and convictions, not just conservative black politicians, as rarified as they are. I just have my preferences as to who I would support.

              Being called  "the black face of white supremacy" is the most derisive comment that I can make about a black man. While there are probably many black conservatives that qualify, I don't know enough about Elder to label him as such, at this time.

              1. Readmikenow profile image94
                Readmikenowposted 13 months agoin reply to this

                For people focused on race, Larry Elders is more black that Obama or K Harris.  He has two parents of African American decent.  He grew up in South Central Los Angeles.  He knows what it's like to live and grow up in black American society.  I don't know why anyone would say he is not black, as some commentators have stated.

                1. Credence2 profile image77
                  Credence2posted 13 months agoin reply to this

                  It's not about being black, Mike. I would prefer to vote for a lily white man over my own brother if he is a conservative in the Trump mold.

                  It is about policy and ideology, not race.

    6. Readmikenow profile image94
      Readmikenowposted 13 months ago

      Election fraud investigations are now taking place in Arizona, Georgia Wisconsin, Michigan and now Pennsylvania.  As I said before, this isn't going away.

      "Republican lawmakers in Pennsylvania plan to formally launch hearings as part of an investigation into the 2020 vote in the state, the latest GOP-backed effort to revisit an election that former president Donald Trump has falsely claimed was fraudulent.

      “This audit is intended to go much further than previous reviews mandated by state law, which have focused on whether the reported counts are ‘accurate,’ ” Corman wrote. “The goal of the Senate’s investigation will not be to conduct a recount, but to find any flaws in the system that could be exploited by bad actors and take action to correct those flaws through legislative changes to our Election Code.”

      https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics … mp;pc=U531

      1. Valeant profile image88
        Valeantposted 13 months agoin reply to this

        Incorrect, the one in Michigan concluded and the GOP controlled Senate for no fraud and recommended investigating those who pushed false claims of voter fraud.

        1. Readmikenow profile image94
          Readmikenowposted 13 months agoin reply to this

          Ahhh...not so fast.  There is a law that could change things in Michigan.  This was put forth in June of this year.  It will be voted on soon.


          "LANSING, Mich. (WJRT) - A Michigan Republican wants to take a closer look at the state’s November 2020 election results.

          State Rep. Steve Carra of Three Rivers introduced legislation on Tuesday to create a bipartisan audit board to review the election and determine corrective actions to improve the state’s election process.

          “A thorough, bipartisan review will help us identify what works, what doesn’t, and how to make our elections secure and accessible for every Michigan voter,” said Carra. “I know my colleagues on both sides of the aisle care about secure elections that the voters can trust. My plan will help ensure Michigan elections are fair, honest and accurate.”

          House Bill 5091 would create a bipartisan audit board to work with contractors on a forensic audit of the 2020 election. The board would have seven members, including the state auditor general and appointees from both major political parties.

          https://www.abc12.com/2021/06/22/michig … n-results/

          1. Valeant profile image88
            Valeantposted 13 months agoin reply to this

            If you think Whitmer will sign off on that Bill just because Trump supporters distrust elections solely on his word - saying the same things in 2016 before his own people disproved them as lies - then you're a bit naive.

            Just because you believe the propaganda does not mean elections aren't already fair, honest, and trustworthy.

            1. Readmikenow profile image94
              Readmikenowposted 13 months agoin reply to this

              Well, it is all positioning.  Witmer is up for reelection in 2022.  It does NOT look at all good for her.  There is a good chance a Republican will become governor in Michigan named James Craig.  Then, the recount will occur with no problem.

              I would counter with because you refuse and ignore the evidence does not mean it doesn't exist, it means you have chosen to ignore it.  Many local government officials, even media and well-known personalities want a recount in Michigan.

              As I said before, this is not going to go away.

    7. Valeant profile image88
      Valeantposted 13 months ago

      https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-sancti … 08680.html

      The judge had this to say about the lawsuit filed in Michigan by Sidney Powell purporting fraud:
      "This lawsuit represents a historic and profound abuse of the judicial process," Parker said in her decision, adding that the case "was never about fraud - it was about undermining the People's faith in our democracy and debasing the judicial process to do so."

      1. Readmikenow profile image94
        Readmikenowposted 13 months agoin reply to this

        That is one judge's opinion.  Guess the judge's political affiliation?

    8. Readmikenow profile image94
      Readmikenowposted 13 months ago

      Are the Democrats of California getting ready to steal the election from Larry Elder?

      "Torrance police are investigating the discovery of hundreds of recall election ballots in a vehicle where a felon was found passed out with drugs, a loaded firearm and multiple driver’s licenses one week ago, authorities said Monday."

      https://ktla.com/news/local-news/300-re … olice/amp/

      1. Valeant profile image88
        Valeantposted 13 months agoin reply to this

        If he owned a firearm, wouldn't the odds be that he's a Republican?  If there were payments to young women, that'd pretty much confirm it.

        There were ballots from Compton, so if he were a Democrat, he'd be stealing the election from Newsom.

        1. Readmikenow profile image94
          Readmikenowposted 13 months agoin reply to this

          No, only if he legally owned a properly registered firearm, which I doubt. 

          The ballots could have also been used to help Newsom.  I could tell you stories about what I saw when I lived in California when it comes to voting. I don't think that place has had an honest election since the late 1980s.  It's that bad.

      2. Credence2 profile image77
        Credence2posted 13 months agoin reply to this

        Oh no, Mike, please, not again.....

        Has there ever been an Electoral contest where Democrats win that you could had ever admitted was not rigged?

        In California, the natural and expected outcome is for Republicans to lose, nothing conspiratorial about that.

        Who knows, the ballots could have been stolen to aid Elder, it has not been determined

        1. Readmikenow profile image94
          Readmikenowposted 13 months agoin reply to this

          "Has there ever been an Electoral contest where Democrats win that you could had ever admitted was not rigged?"

          Sure, Obama won the presidency fair and square two time.  No doubt about it.

          You many not believe this, but there was a time not too long ago when California was a majority Republican state.  But, enforcement of voting laws became so lax, you would not believe what I saw happen.

          1. Credence2 profile image77
            Credence2posted 13 months agoin reply to this

            1992 was almost 30 years ago, that is more than "not too long ago".

            I am not going to believe that the political changes in the state starting at that time were due to fraud. Demographics change explains a great deal, as educated people tend to vote Democratic, and we see such a change coming to Texas, sooner rather than later.

    9. Readmikenow profile image94
      Readmikenowposted 13 months ago

      It's about to get real in Arizona.

      "(WASHINGTON EXAMINER) – In a major escalation in the fight over Arizona’s Maricopa County’s refusal to comply with a Senate election audit subpoena, the state attorney general's office ordered the county to give in or lose its state funding, which provides nearly a third of the county’s budget.

      Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich said that the county, America’s fourth largest in population, is violating state law by not complying with the Senate’s request for routers in its 2020 election audit and review of former President Donald Trump’s loss.

      In his ruling shared with Secrets, Brnovich said, “Maricopa County Board of Supervisors is in violation of state law for failing to comply with the Arizona Senate’s legislative subpoena related to the 2020 election audit. If MCBOS does not change course, the AGO will notify the Arizona Treasurer to withhold Maricopa County’s state-shared funds as required under the law.”

      https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wash … syndicated

    10. Readmikenow profile image94
      Readmikenowposted 13 months ago

      https://hubstatic.com/15695923.jpg

      1. Kathryn L Hill profile image75
        Kathryn L Hillposted 13 months agoin reply to this

        We need free and fair elections. No mail-in ballots, except where  absolutely necessary.

        Q. Where and how are they making all these doses?

        They are free to us

        Q. How are they being paid for?

        1. Kathryn L Hill profile image75
          Kathryn L Hillposted 13 months agoin reply to this
          1. Miebakagh57 profile image69
            Miebakagh57posted 13 months agoin reply to this

            Kathryn, thanks for the link. It is interesting and enlightening.

    11. Readmikenow profile image94
      Readmikenowposted 13 months ago

      Petition seeking 'full forensic audit' of election results

      A petition has been launched online seeking to gather hundreds of thousands – even millions – of signatures from people demanding a "full forensic audit" of election results from several states.

      The online Michigan Election Audit effort explains organizers already have been involved with state and federal officials.

      "Once we have hundreds of thousands of petitions signed we are going to our state and federal governments to show them the 'will of the people' and a formal full forensic election audit will begin (at least within our coalition: Michigan, Wisconsin and Minnesota)," they explain.

      The 2020 presidential race results were so unusual that dozens of lawsuits were filed over them. Most judges turned them down without looking at evidence, which came from many witnesses willing to sign sworn statements.

      https://www.wnd.com/2021/08/petition-se … n-results/

      1. Miebakagh57 profile image69
        Miebakagh57posted 13 months agoin reply to this

        Good to note. I like the move.

    12. Readmikenow profile image94
      Readmikenowposted 13 months ago

      It appears that Wisconsin is the one who has recount issues.

      "Wisconsin lost track of more than 82,000 mail-in ballots cast in the state in the November 2020 elections—more than four times the margin of difference separating the two presidential candidates in the state, according to a report by the nonprofit Public Interest Legal Foundation.

      The legal foundation, an election integrity watchdog group, released a research brief Friday looking at one of the most closely contested states in the 2020 presidential election.

      A further breakdown by the legal group shows that 1.4 million ballots were sent by mail. Of those, 6,458 were undeliverable. An additional 2,981 mail-in ballots were rejected. The vast majority, 76,308, met an “unknown” fate.

      “The federal data show the 2020 election had more mail ballots that were never counted than the margin of victory in the presidential election in Wisconsin,” J. Christian Adams, president of the Public Interest Legal Foundation, said in a statement."

      https://www.wnd.com/2021/08/report-wisc … won-20000/

      1. Miebakagh57 profile image69
        Miebakagh57posted 13 months agoin reply to this

        Let the wrong that is done in the November 2020 elections be correct soon.

        1. Readmikenow profile image94
          Readmikenowposted 13 months agoin reply to this

          I agree with you.

          1. Miebakagh57 profile image69
            Miebakagh57posted 13 months agoin reply to this

            Thank you. I am with you in that completely.

          2. Kathryn L Hill profile image75
            Kathryn L Hillposted 13 months agoin reply to this

            Correct the November 2020 election!

            HOW?
            recount or redo?

            Which leader will initiate this necessary correction?

            1. Readmikenow profile image94
              Readmikenowposted 13 months agoin reply to this

              With a Republican controlled congress the necessary investigation can take place.  This should reveal what the Democrats did on a grand scale to get Biden fraudulently elected.  People should go to jail for their participation in such election fraud.  Reforms can be put in place to prevent it from happening again in any election.  Can't change the results.
              Sorry, we are stuck with Biden until the end of his term.

              1. Valeant profile image88
                Valeantposted 13 months agoin reply to this

                What we did on a grand scale was vote.  Sorry you think that voting by Democrats is fraudulent, it's why we will continue to show up at the polls in vast numbers, because that way of thinking - that the exercising of one's constitutional rights - should only be allowed by your own party is the definition of an existential threat to American democracy.

                1. Readmikenow profile image94
                  Readmikenowposted 13 months agoin reply to this

                  In that case, you should support all of the recount efforts because the results would only confirm your statement.

                  1. Valeant profile image88
                    Valeantposted 13 months agoin reply to this

                    I did support the legal recount effort, even the one Trump paid for that helped increase Biden's win total by 87 votes.  Again, just because you guys fail to accept the results of those recounts, and court cases for that matter, doesn't mean anyone should support throwing away our tax dollars in support of the same lie that was already disproven back in 2016 by Trump's own commission.

                    1. Readmikenow profile image94
                      Readmikenowposted 13 months agoin reply to this

                      What recount are you referring to?  NOT the one in Arizona or Georgia.

              2. Miebakagh57 profile image69
                Miebakagh57posted 13 months agoin reply to this

                "we are stuck with Biden until the end of his term." This is very terrific. I opined you mean Biden can't be remove!                                 Why was Richard Nixon impeached? Why was 'real' Donald Trump made to face the music twice, the only America  President that far!? So where does the enlighten founding fathers of the American Constitution says Biden is an holy angel, and the constitutional search light should not be beam on him?                                    There is room to impeach Biden and remove him from power. Biden is not the Queen of England. His position has not be harmonized as such. He's a puppet in the White House.                                      Just list the many bad things he did when he walk into the Oval Office? Regardless of whether he goes to a church, or follow his Vice to a temple.

                1. Readmikenow profile image94
                  Readmikenowposted 13 months agoin reply to this

                  Miebakagh, the impeachment process in the United States is complicated.

                  Simply because a president is impeached, does not mean he will be removed from office.  It simply means the US Congress has determined he has committed "high crimes and misdemeanors."

                  Once the US Congress has written up the accusations, they are then sent to the US Senate.  The president is then put on trial.  Bill Clinton as well as President Donald Trump were impeached, neither was found guilty of the crimes they were accused of in the US Senate.

                  The Democrats currently control the Senate.  The Democrats control the congress.  They will NOT impeach biden under any circumstances.  This may only be possible if the Republicans take control of the US Congress and US Senate in the next election cycle.

                  A US Senate has NEVER removed a sitting president in the entire history of the United States.  Richard Nixon resigned...he was not removed.

                  I'm sure this is confusing to you.  Most people from other countries don't understand it...AND most Americans don't seem to understand it either.

                  1. Miebakagh57 profile image69
                    Miebakagh57posted 13 months agoin reply to this

                    RMN, nothing seem to be confusing to me.                                 Richard Nixon was ask to resign or he be thrown out of office. Bill Clinton beg the American peoples. If Donald Ttrump was found guilty should the Senate if it were Republican control not be removed?                                    Let's say the votes were allow to be recount after the inquiry. And it was found the Domocrates had a heavy hand in cheating  Trump in the election voting process. And also let's say Trump take the matter to court challenging biden's removal. Can that be done? Just curious. Thanks.

                    1. Readmikenow profile image94
                      Readmikenowposted 13 months agoin reply to this

                      Sorry, even if it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Democrats cheated to elect Joe Biden.  Even if the proof was not in question, Joe Biden would stay in office as president.  Would President Donald Trump go to court to change the election results?  Doing this is his right as a US Citizen.  The US Supreme Court is under no obligation to hear the case.  If they DID take the case, the ruling would set a new precedent.  I don't see it happening.  The goal in exposing the fraud is to put laws in place to prevent it from happening again AND to reveal what the Democrats are capable of doing to win a national election.

      2. Valeant profile image88
        Valeantposted 13 months agoin reply to this

        Let's do some math:

        In 2016, 158,846 ballots were mailed and 12,984 were 'lost track' of for 8.2% not-returned.

        In 2020, 1.4 million ballots were mailed and 82,766 were 'lost track' of for a 5.9% not-returned percentage.

        Seems like if anything, the rate actually improved from 2016, according to your own study's findings.  Plus, mail-in ballots were predominantly favoring Biden, so if there were some 'missing', that would have likely just made the difference greater.

        1. Readmikenow profile image94
          Readmikenowposted 13 months agoin reply to this

          I would like to know how many of the ones counted were legitimate.  Wisconsin is one of the states who AG put a law in place, which is against their state constitution, that mail in ballot signatures did not have to be checked for the election.

          There really needs to be a serious recount here.

          1. Valeant profile image88
            Valeantposted 13 months agoin reply to this

            There was a serious recount already:
            https://apnews.com/article/election-202 … f4319591b0

            As for your claim about guidance on ballot signatures:
            “The witness can appear without the voter to add their signature or address,” the memo states. “Please note that the clerk should attempt to resolve any missing witness address information prior to Election Day if possible, and this can be done through reliable information (personal knowledge, voter registration information, through a phone call with the voter or witness). The witness does not need to appear to add a missing address.”

            The commission’s public information officer, Reid Magney, said this guidance has been in place since October 2016 and was brought forward that year by Republicans on the commission. Indeed, an Oct. 18, 2016, memo states that clerks are required to “take corrective actions in an attempt to remedy a witness address error.”

            “The guidance has been in effect for 11 statewide elections, including the 2016 presidential and presidential recount, and no one has objected to it until now,” he said.

            The problem isn't the recounts or the ballot signatures.  The problem is your inability to accept reality.

            1. Readmikenow profile image94
              Readmikenowposted 13 months agoin reply to this

              Article is from November 2020.  Many things have been discovered since then.

              Again, then you should support all recount efforts as this would only prove your point....right?

    13. Valeant profile image88
      Valeantposted 13 months ago

      Even Trump sycophant Ron Johnson understands that Trump lost Wisconsin:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47H26zmt7q0

    14. Miebakagh57 profile image69
      Miebakagh57posted 13 months ago

      What sort of double speak is this? We should not confusf reality with facts.

    15. MG Singh profile image72
      MG Singhposted 13 months ago

      Mike, I quite agree with you but the bigger question now is what next? No way all these reports are going to affect Joe Biden who will continue as president unless some natural calamity takes place to his body. I remember reading that Joseph Stalin had said it does not matter who has voted for who but the man who matters is the person who counts the votes.

      1. Miebakagh57 profile image69
        Miebakagh57posted 13 months agoin reply to this

        I also agree with Mike. What has America got to do with Joseph Stalin? Somethilng matter more than that. Biden should resign. Does that matter? Obvrously.

        1. Readmikenow profile image94
          Readmikenowposted 13 months agoin reply to this

          Miebakagh, I think MG was referring to the fact that Stalin's views of cheating being acceptable during an election is similar to biden's view of cheating during an election.  The similarity is upsetting.

          1. Miebakagh57 profile image69
            Miebakagh57posted 13 months agoin reply to this

            Yes, Mike. But why buy that from a Russian? The bribe has cause America enough trouble.

      2. Readmikenow profile image94
        Readmikenowposted 13 months agoin reply to this

        MG,

        You are absolutely right.

        We have to take one day at a time and deal with it as best we can.  There is nothing else that can be done.  The Republicans should take the Congress and Senate in the next election cycle.  If enough Republicans are voted in and they have a "veto proof" majority, Biden will not be able to stop legislation from being passed.  That is our next best hope of handling this situation with biden.

    16. Readmikenow profile image94
      Readmikenowposted 12 months ago

      The breakdown of the Arizona 2020 election fraud.

      THIS has been the focus of the main stream media.  Over 49,000 questionable votes ignored.

      "Joe Biden was certified as the winner of Arizona’s 11 Electoral College votes over former President Donald Trump by Secretary of State Katie Hobbs (D-AZ) and Gov. Doug Ducey (R-AZ) on November 30, 2020 by a margin of 10,457 votes."

      THIS is the details of the fraudulent voting.

      "Here is a breakdown of those 49,718 questionable votes:

      23,344 mail-in ballots were counted from individuals who no longer lived at the address to which the mail-in ballot was sent. The audit called these “mail-in ballots voted from prior address” in the voter history phase. (critical impact)
      9,041 more ballots returned by voters than received in the voter history phase. (high impact)
      5,295 voters that potentially voted in multiple counties in the certified results phase.  (high impact)
      3,432 more ballots cast than the list of people who show as having cast a vote. The audit called this group of ballots “official results does not match who voted,” in the certified results phase. (medium impact)
      2,592 more duplicates than original ballots in the ballot phase. (medium impact)
      2,382 in person voters who had moved out of Maricopa County in the certified results phase. (medium impact)
      2,081 voters moved out of state during 29 day preceding election in the voter history phase. (medium impact)
      1,551 votes counted in excess of voters who voted in the certified results phase. (medium impact)"

      A separate report, Pattern Recognition of Early Voting Ballot (EVP) Return Envelope Images for Signature Presence Detection, was prepared by EchoMail, and presented to the panel by its lead investigator, Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai. The findings of that report included the following:

      Maricopa County allowed 9,589 more Early Vote Ballot return envelopes (EVBs) to move forward to the signature verification process than the audit determined were eligible.
      Maricopa County counted 1,917,008 EVBs as eligible to move on to the signature verification process. The audit determined that only 1,907,419 EVBs should have been eligible to move on to the signature verification process. (Early voting ballots were contained within EVB return envelopes, which required a signature of the voter on the outside envelope prior to moving it forward to the signature verification process).
      34,448 Early Vote Ballot return envelopes (EVBs) were duplicates, submitted by 17,126 individual voters, most of whom submitted two ballots, but some of whom submitted either three or four.
      A third report on cybersecurity from a firm called CyFir, Digital Findings, was delivered by Ben Cotton. Key findings of that report included:

      "Maricopa County failed to perform basic OS Patch Management;
      Maricopa County failed to update antivirus definitions;
      Maricopa County failed to preserve security logs;
      Maricopa County failed to establish and monitor host baseline; and,
      Maricopa County failed to establish and monitor network communications baseline."

      Official Report
      https://cdn.nucleusfiles.com/fe/fe2178f … 714c8cb8b9


      Report on Pattern Recognition
      https://c692f527-da75-4c86-b5d1-8b3d5d4 … 53459b.pdf

      Two things are clear.

      1. It has now been established there was fraud committed in the Arizona election.  A correction in any one of the voting irregularities would have given the election to President Donald Trump.

      2. The main stream media does not present the news, but manipulates information in favor of the Democrats.

    17. Valeant profile image88
      Valeantposted 12 months ago

      Maricopa County:
      CLAIM: 23,344 mail-in ballots voted from a prior address.

      BOTTOM LINE: Cyber Ninjas still don’t understand this is legal under federal election law. To label it a “critical” concern is either intentionally misleading or staggeringly ignorant. AZ senators should know this too.

      CLAIM: 9,041 more ballots returned by voters than received

      BOTTOM LINE: This suggests a lack of understanding about how EV 33 files work.  It’s not unusual for more ballots to be returned by voters than received.

      I could go on, but Mike is much like Cyber Ninjas and clearly doesn't understand how elections work, just how to copy and paste useless information.

      1. Miebakagh57 profile image69
        Miebakagh57posted 12 months agoin reply to this

        That now may seem obvious. Then an official statement from the election body after all votes has been tally, taking into account the differences in voters fraud. Next, the electoral body should then declare again who is the actual winner on the basis of those glaring fraudulent facts. Though  Trump may not be reinstate as president.                                       Biden, then should be told in clear terms by both Congress and the Senate to RESIGN or be thrown out of the Oval Office window!

        1. Valeant profile image88
          Valeantposted 12 months agoin reply to this

          Not fraud.  Just a company that has no understanding that the things they cited were not examples of fraud.  So while people like you and Mike continue to misunderstand these claims, Biden will continue on as the LEGALLY elected President.

          1. Miebakagh57 profile image69
            Miebakagh57posted 12 months agoin reply to this

            Valeant, Biden legally elected president? Really? Sure, he's messing up America, and you're there praising a puppet China has installed in the Oval Office.                                      A person with common sense like you like that? Shame!

        2. Readmikenow profile image94
          Readmikenowposted 12 months agoin reply to this

          Miebakagh,

          No matter how they try to rationalize it, justify it, this was blatant fraud that was committed.

          We must work to put safeguards in place so the Democrats no longer win fraudulent elections.  This is the reason we are working hard to expose all of the fraud committed.  Changes must be put in place.

          1. Credence2 profile image77
            Credence2posted 12 months agoin reply to this

            You GOP want to build guardrails so that no democrat can legitimacy win any election. But, I am committed to fight the right-winger - tooth and nail and will do whatever it taken to destroy what influence they have.

            Conservatives and I, on the basis of principles, are not friends.

            1. Readmikenow profile image94
              Readmikenowposted 12 months agoin reply to this

              "build guardrails so that no democrat can legitimacy win"

              I have no idea what you're talking about.

              Could you please be more specific?

              Backing up allegations with proof is always appreciated.

          2. gmwilliams profile image84
            gmwilliamsposted 12 months agoin reply to this

            +10000000000000000000000

      2. Readmikenow profile image94
        Readmikenowposted 12 months agoin reply to this

        To say the least you are a bit confused as usual.

        It's not worth the time.

    18. Credence2 profile image77
      Credence2posted 12 months ago

      Mike and Miebakagh,

      Why do you continue to beat a dead horse? Your Trump has lost and there is not any PRoof to indicate otherwise. No where near enough for anybody, anywhere to take any action on your accusations.

      You've lost, it is time to admit it to yourselves and end all the futile drama.

      1. Miebakagh57 profile image69
        Miebakagh57posted 12 months agoin reply to this

        Credence, if Trump has lost, he has lost. But that's really the fault of those Americans like you, who does not meant well for the country.                                               That said, continue to glorified your puppet. When your eyes pop open, continue to praise Biden.

        1. Credence2 profile image77
          Credence2posted 12 months agoin reply to this

          No, it is to the credit of Americans like me that Trump lost. You know as much about American politics as I do about the dark side of the moon.

      2. Readmikenow profile image94
        Readmikenowposted 12 months agoin reply to this

        I guess you've not read the report.  I suggest it.

        This was fraud.  No matter how you rationalize it, attempt to justify it, this was fraud on a large scale.

        Discovering and showing this fraud is essential for election integrity.  Changes must be made to prevent this sort of thing from happening again.  I've said before, Biden won't be removed from office for voter fraud, but I believe he should.

        This is just one state, the fraud committed by the Democrat machine occurred in other key states.

        It is important for everyone in the country to realize what the Democrat party is capable of doing to win an election and put safeguard in place so it doesn't happen again.

        Discovering this fraud and exposing it is essential for future election integrity.  That is why the MUST continue in other states as well.

        A separate report is being put together showing how poll workers intentionally changed ballots and more.  The Fraud is massive.

        1. Credence2 profile image77
          Credence2posted 12 months agoin reply to this

          Ok, but any attempts as GOP disenfranchisement tricks will be dealt with massive response and most severely.

    Closed to reply
     
    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)